Reducing the Risk: Primary Care Initiatives



This means that bystander and community-based CPR plays a significant role in return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest. However, audits of out of hospital cardiac arrest still show the frequency of BCPR remains poor, with less than one-third of cardiac arrest victims benefiting from BCPR before emergency services arrive (Eisenburger and Safar, 1999). The importance of BCPR is evidenced in one UK study by Dowie et al. (2003). Their work with the London Ambulance Service showed that BCPR increased the chance of survival by 10% over a monitored period of time. However, this study demonstrated a high percentage of BCPR (44%) in progress when the ambulance arrived.


Early Defibrillation


In the past few decades, the advent of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in public places has meant that early access to defibrillation has become much more common. Advances in manufacturing and technology mean these simple and accurate AEDs can be used safely in workplaces, public places and even in the home (Jorgensen et al., 2003). Evidence is undisputed regarding the significance of early defibrillation. When the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) published its guidelines for CPR and emergency cardiac care in 2000, it stated:


With reported survival rates of up to 49%, PAD (public access defibrillation) has the potential to be the single greatest advance in the treatment of prehospital sudden cardiac death since the invention of CPR.


Yet appropriate placement of AEDs is still contested. Handley et al. (2005) reflect the most common opinion that defibrillators should be sited in places where large numbers of the public gather or pass though (railway stations, airports, shopping centres etc) and where cardiac arrests occur once every two years or more. Similarly, remote areas where ambulance response times are likely to be extended also influence where AEDs and community based programmes should be sited. This is supported by most national defibrillation programme planners and ILCOR (2000) suggest that PAD programmes prove to be cost effective when measured against years of added life. However, Handley et al (2005) remind us that up to 80% of cardiac arrests occur in residential or private settings. This then needs to be addressed through emergency dispatch systems to enable rapid responses with a defibrillator to residential settings as well as public places. Community first responders must therefore arrive on scene within five minutes – before emergency medical services – to be a truly effective resource, although their target response time is eight minutes.


The European Resuscitation Council and the European Society of Cardiology recognised the significance of community-based defibrillation and in 2004 produced policy statements making recommendations surrounding the use of AEDs in Europe. These included guidance for:



  • legislation
  • training and updating lay and co-responders
  • access to and via emergency service call systems
  • audit of AED use
  • needs analyses
  • cost benefits to public health.

First Responders


The UK has seen rapid development of first and community first responder schemes in the last decade. Community first responders are:


…volunteers who respond to emergency calls within their local community. They are generally lay people who have received basic medical training from their ambulance service. They respond, when available, to immediately life-threatening calls, usually in a rural area or one that is difficult for ambulances to reach within the current time target of eight minutes. They are not a substitute for professional paramedics and technicians, but they augment the ambulance service’s response.


(Healthcare Commission, 2007)


First responders come from a variety of backgrounds – from co-responders in other emergency services (police, fire, coastguard), staff in public places providing a localised emergency response (e.g. shopping centres, railway stations and airports), first aid organisation partners or volunteers from military backgrounds, to the general public keen to support emergency response systems in their local communities. They are not employees of ambulance services, but when called out by the ambulance services act as agents for them as part of the emergency response (Healthcare Commission 2007). Many nurses and healthcare practitioners are taking up this voluntary role.


First responder groups are set up in areas of identified need – now mostly influenced and defined by local ambulance service audit data in order to be sure of a co-ordinated response backed up by technicians/paramedics. The Healthcare Commission (2007) indicated that ambulance services see benefits in community first responder schemes, which have already had a positive impact on response times.


Colquhoun et al. (2008) show that although community first responders attending home and community-based cardiac arrests is a relatively new concept in the UK, and cost benefits have not yet been evaluated, they are worthy of support and continued funding to prove their value in time. They showed that these responders are achieving comparable results to the ambulance services. The key to ongoing work is that any public access and community response defibrillation programme must be aligned to the ambulance services based on data about incidence of sudden cardiac arrest and response times (Priori et al., 2004).


Summary


Coronary heart disease continues to exert a huge burden on patients, families, health services and society. Chest pain and sudden death form major parts of that burden. Implementation of the NSF has been associated with many improvements in care, including faster access to care and uptake of evidence-based treatments in both primary and secondary care settings. Preventative strategies have continued to have a high national profile. As the NHS undergoes significant reorganisation and care becomes more community focused, cardiac nurses will need to continue to develop their skills and expertise towards working in these challenging times, in order to contribute to reducing the cardiac risk.


References


Boyle R (2004) Meeting the challenge of cardiovascular care in the new National Health Service. Heart 90 (suppl. IV): iv3–iv5.


British Heart Foundation (BHF) (2009) Coronary heart disease statistics database. www.heartstats.org


Capps N (2004) Quality and outcomes framework of the new general medical services contract. Guest editorial. National Electronic Library for Health. Cardio­vascular Diseases Specialist Library. www.library.nhs.uk/CARDIOVASCULAR/Page.aspx?pagename=GUESTARC


Collins GS and Altman DG (2009) An independent external validation and evaluation of QRISK cardiovascular risk prediction: a prospective open cohort study. British Medical Journal 339: b2584. www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/339/jul07_2/b2584


Colquhoun MC, Chamberlain DA, Newcombe RG et al. (2008) A national scheme for public access defibrillation in England and Wales: early results. Resuscitation 78: 275–80.


Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection (Healthcare Commission) (2007) The Role and Management of Community First Responders. Findings from a national survey of NHS ambulance services in England. London, Healthcare Commission.


Department of Health (2009a) The Coronary Heart Disease National Service Framework: Building on Excellence, Maintaining Progress; progress report for 2008. London, Department of Health.


Department of Health (2009b) Developing the Quality and Outcomes Framework: Proposals for a New, Independent Process; consultation response and analysis. London, Department of Health.


Department of Health (2008) High Quality Care For All: NHS Next Stage Review final report. London, Department of Health.


Department of Health (2005a) Arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease. London, The Stationery Office.


Department of Health (2005b) Creating a Patient-led NHS: Delivering the NHS Improvement Plan. London, Department of Health.


Department of Health (2005c) Leading the Way: the Coronary Heart Disease National Service Framework; progress report. London, The Stationery Office.


Department of Health (2004) National Standards, Local Action: Health and Social Care Standards and Planning Framework 2005/06–2007/08. London, Department of Health.


Department of Health (2000a) National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease. London, The Stationery Office.


Department of Health (2000b) The NHS Plan. London, The Stationery Office.


Department of Health (1999) Saving Lives: Our Healthier Nation. London, The Stationery Office.


Despres J-P, Lemieux I and Prud’homme D (2001) Treatment of obesity: need to focus on high risk abdominally obese patients. British Medical Journal 322: 716.


Dowie R, Campbell H, Donohoe R and Clarke P (2003) “Event tree” analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest data: confirming the importance of bystander CPR. Resuscitation 56: 173–81.


Eisenburger P and Safar P (1999) Life supporting first aid training of the public – review and recommendations. Resuscitation 41: 3–18.


General Practice Extraction Service (GPES) (2009) NHS Information Centre. www.ic.nhs.uk/services/in-development/general-practice-extraction-service


Goodacre S, Cross E, Arnold J, Angelini K, Capewell S and Nicholl J (2005) The health care burden of acute chest pain. Heart 91: 229–30.


Grundy S, Cleeman J, Bairey Merz C et al. (2001) Implications of recent clinical trials for the national cholesterol education program adult treatment panel III guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 44(3): 720–32.


Handley AJ, Koster R, Monsieurs K, Perkins GD, Davies S and Bossaert L (2005) European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005. Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators. Resuscitation 67(S1): S7–S23.


Healthcare Commission (2005) Getting To the Heart of It. Coronary Heart Disease in England: a review of progress towards national standards. London, Healthcare Commission. Available at: www.healthcarecommission.org.uk


International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (2000) Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. International consensus on science. Supplement to Circulation 102(8): I4–I5.


Jackson R, Marshall R, Kerr A, Riddell T and Wells S (2009) QRISK or Framingham for predicting cardiovascular risk? British Medical Journal 339: b2673. www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/339/jul07_2/b2673#REF12#REF12


Jorgenson DB, Skarr T, Russell JK, Snyder DE and Uhrbrock K (2003) AED use in businesses, public facilities and homes by minimally trained first responders. Resuscitation 59: 225–33.


Kelly MP and Capewell S (2004) Relative Contributions of Changes in Risk Factors and Treatment to the Reduction in Coronary Heart Disease Mortality. NHS, Health Development Agency. Available at: www.nice.org.uk/niceMedia/documents/CHD_Briefing_nov_04.pdf


Mueller D, Agrawal R and Arntz H-R (2006) How sudden is sudden cardiac death? Resuscitation 69(1): 42.


Priori SG, Bossaert LL, Chamberlain DA et al. (2004) Policy statement ESC-ERC recommendations for the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in Europe. Resuscitation 60: 245–52.


Quinn T (2007) Coronary heart disease, healthcare policy and evolution of chest pain assessment and management in the UK. In: Albarran J and Tagney J Chest Pain. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing.


Secretary of State for Health (2006) Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: A New Direction for Community Services. Command Paper 6737. London, The Stationery Office.


Sekhri N, Feder GS, Junghans C, Hemingway H and Timmis AD (2006) Rapid access chest pain clinics and the traditional cardiology outpatient clinic. Quarterly Journal of Medicine 99(3): 135–41.


Smallwood A (2009) Cardiac assessment teams: a focused ethnography of nurses’ roles. British Journal of Cardiac Nursing 4(3): 132–9.


Stewart S, Murphy N and Walker A (2003) The current cost of angina pectoris to the National Health Service in the UK. Heart 89: 848–53.


Strong M, Maheswaran R and Radford J (2006) Socioeconomic deprivation, coronary heart disease prevalence and quality of care: a practice-level analysis in Rotherham using data from the new UK general practitioner Quality and Outcomes Framework. Journal of Public Health 28(1): 39–42.


Taylor G, Murphy NF, Berry C et al. (2008) Long-term outcome of low-risk patients attending a rapid-assessment chest pain clinic. Heart 94: 628–32


Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ôunpuu S et al. (2004) Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet 364(9438): 937–52.


Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 3, 2016 | Posted by in NURSING | Comments Off on Reducing the Risk: Primary Care Initiatives

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access