Nursing’s pathway to professionalism



Nursing’s pathway to professionalism



imageTo enhance your understanding of this chapter, try the Student Exercises on the Evolve site at http://evolve. elsevier.com/Black/professional.


The word “professional” shows up in everyday conversation and in the media. A professional athlete is one who is paid and no longer has the distinction of being an amateur. A professional stunt driver is one whose dangerous activities should not be “tried at home”—according to warning messages at the bottom of your television screen. Job-seekers are encouraged to “look professional” when applying for a position. Domestic services such as dry cleaning, lawn care, and plumbing are often referred to as “professional” when they are rendered by someone with specific expertise or tools of their trade.


Chapter opening photo from Photos.com.


Historically, physic (medicine), law, and divinity (clergy) were considered “learned professions.” Over time, however, the meaning of “profession” has expanded to include other domains of work and career, including nursing. You will learn in this chapter various characteristics of a profession and how nursing fits those characteristics. Furthermore, you will learn what professionalism means generally, and what contributes to professionalism in nursing specifically.




Characteristics of a profession


For nearly a century, scholars have grappled with the meaning of profession.They have generally agreed that a profession is an occupational group with a set of attitudes or behaviors, or both.


In the early 1900s, the Carnegie Foundation issued a series of papers about professional schools. In 1910, Flexner, a sociologist, published what became groundbreaking work for reform in medical education, calling on medical schools to implement high standards for admission and graduation, and to follow long-accepted tenets of science in teaching and research. A century later, the Flexner Report still has repercussions in medical education.


Five years after his initial report, Flexner published a list of criteria that he believed were characteristic of all true professions (Flexner, 1915). These criteria stipulate that a profession:



Since the 1910 report was published, Flexner’s criteria have been widely used as the benchmark for determining the professional status of various occupations and have had a profound influence on professional education in several disciplines, including nursing. In 1968, Hall, a sociologist, published his work on professionalism. Similar to Flexner’s criteria, Hall (1968) described a professional model with five attributes of professions:



Hall recommended that each profession needed to develop its own methods of measuring professionalism that recognize the uniqueness of that discipline.


In recent years, individuals and groups have continued to identify what professionals believe, think, and do. In the 1990s, a pharmacy profession task force spent 5 years studying and promoting pharmacy student professionalism (Task Force on Professionalism, 2000). This task force, in examining the history of professional development in a broad sense, reviewed the work of numerous scholars. From this review they found that members of a profession share the following 10 characteristics in common:



Although scholars have not always agreed on the number of criteria and the types of behaviors and characteristics of professions, three criteria consistently appear: service/altruism, specialized knowledge, and autonomy/ethics (Flexner, 1915; Hall, 1968, 1982; Carr-Saunders and Wilson, 1933; Huber, 2000).



From occupation to profession


The distinction between an occupation and profession is not always clear. The term “occupation” is often used interchangeably with “profession,” but their definitions differ. Collins English Dictionary (2009) defines “occupation” as “a person’s regular work or profession; job or principal activity.” In this discussion, Huber’s (2000) definition of “profession” is used to make the distinction between an occupation and a profession: “a calling, vocation, or form of employment that provides a needed service to society and possesses characteristics of expertise, autonomy, long academic preparation, commitment, and responsibility” (p. 34).


Professions usually evolved from occupations that originally consisted of tasks but developed more specialized educational pathways and publicly legitimized status. The earliest recognized “learned” professions (law, medicine, and divinity) generally followed a sequential development. First, practitioners of these professions performed full-time work in the discipline. They then determined work standards, identified a body of knowledge, and established educational programs in institutions of higher learning. Next, they promoted organization into effective occupational associations, and then worked to establish legal protection that limited practice of their unique skills by outsiders. Finally they established codes of ethics (Carr-Saunders and Wilson, 1933). This is the process known as “professionalization.”


The evolution from occupation to profession was further analyzed by Houle (1980), who identified a number of characteristics that indicate that an occupational group is moving along the continuum toward professional status. Defining the group’s mission and foundations of practice is the first step, followed by the mastery of theoretical knowledge, development of the capacity to solve problems, use of practical knowledge, and self-enhancement (continued learning and development). Finally, Houle described the necessity of the development of a collective identity as an occupation evolves into a profession. Signs of a developing collective identity, and hence a profession, include: formal training, credentialing, creation of a subculture, legal right to practice, public acceptance, ethical practice, discipline of incompetent/unethical practitioners, relationship to other practitioners, and formalization of the relationship of practitioners of the profession to users of the practitioners’ services.



Professional preparation


A profession is different from an occupation in at least two major ways—preparation and commitment. Professional preparation, typically taking place in a college or university, requires instruction in the specialized body of knowledge and techniques of the profession. In addition to knowledge and skills, professional preparation includes orientation to the beliefs, values, and attitudes expected of the members of the profession, as well as the standards of practice and ethical considerations. These components of professional education are part of the process of socialization into a profession and are discussed in more detail in Chapter 6. This intense preparation enables professional practitioners to act in a logical, rational manner using a scientific knowledge and prescribed ways of thinking through problems rather than relying on simple problem solving, custom, intuition, or trial and error. The nursing process, described in detail in Chapter 8, is an example of how the profession of nursing uses scientific knowledge and prescribed ways of thinking through patient problems amenable to nursing care.



Professional commitment


Professionals are usually very committed to their work, deriving much of their personal identification from it, and consider it an integral part of their lives; some people even refer to their profession as their “calling.” Historically, professionals’ commitment to their profession has transcended their expectation of material reward. The strong identity that professionals develop means that it is less common for them to change careers, as compared with persons involved in occupations, which may not involve such a strong commitment and identity. Several critical differences between occupations and professions are summarized in (Table 3-1).




Interprofessionality


Educators across health care professions have recognized the importance of the development of core competencies for their students (and future practitioners) in response to initiatives calling for more teamwork across disciplines and team-based care. This is known as “interprofessionality” (D’Amour and Oandasan, 2005). Specifically, interprofessionality is a “process by which professionals reflect on and develop ways of practicing that provides an integrated and cohesive answer to the needs of the client/family/population . . . [involving] continuous interaction and knowledge sharing between professionals” (p. 9). In 2010, the World Health Organization (WHO) noted that in the current global climate, “it is no longer enough for health workers to be professional . . . [they] also need to be interprofessional” (p. 36).


The Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel Report (2011) identified four domains of interprofessional collaborative practice competency:



Nursing educators are responding to the challenges of interprofessionalism through careful examination of essential elements of nursing education at all levels. More details are included in Chapter 8.



Nursing’s pathway to professionalism


The question of whether nursing is a profession has been debated for decades. In the mid-twentieth century, Roy Bixler and Genevieve Bixler examined nursing’s status as a profession. Bixler and Bixler, neither of whom were nurses but were advocates and supporters of nursing, used seven criteria that are similar to those listed earlier in this chapter. In 1959, they reappraised nursing, noting progress in nursing’s professional development (Bixler and Bixler, 1959). More recently, nurse leaders have explored the professionalization of nursing.



Kelly’s criteria


Lucie Kelly, RN, PhD, FAAN, is an outstanding nurse writer, teacher, and influential leader. Now retired from Columbia University, Kelly was editor of the journal Nursing Outlook and president of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, among many career highlights. Dr. Kelly has spent much of her nursing career exploring the dimensions of professional nursing. Although she compiled the following set of eight characteristics of a profession many years ago, contemporary nursing still embodies these characteristics (Kelly, 1981, p. 157):





“There is a special body of knowledge that is continually enlarged through research.”

Nursing has an increasingly well-developed body of knowledge. Nursing now has its own PhD (doctor of philosophy), a research degree earned by nurses at the highest levels of education. Through research, the specialized body of knowledge for nursing is developed. In the past, nurse researchers often had doctorates from other academic disciplines, and nursing science was based on principles borrowed from the physical and social sciences. Nursing is no longer based on simple problem solving but increasingly relies on theory and research as a basis for practice. One of the key principles of evidence-based practice is the use of research evidence. You will learn more about theory, research, and evidence-based practice in later chapters.



“The services involve intellectual activities; individual responsibility (accountability) is a strong feature.”

Nursing is a cognitive (mental) activity that requires both critical and creative thinking and serves as the basis for providing nursing care. Nursing developed and refined its own unique approach to practice, called the nursing process. (You will learn more about the nursing process in Chapter 8.)


Individual accountability in nursing has become a hallmark of practice. Accountability, according to the American Nurses Association’s (ANA) Code of Ethics for Nurses (2001), is being answerable to someone for something one has done. Provision 4 of the Code states, “The nurse is responsible and accountable for individual nursing practice and determines the appropriate delegation of tasks consistent with the nurse’s obligation to provide optimum patient care” (p. 5). Furthermore, responsibility and accountability are firmly rooted in the ethical principles of “fidelity (faithfulness), and respect for the dignity, worth, and self-determination of patients.”



“Practitioners are educated in institutions of higher learning.”

The first university-based nursing program began in 1909 at the University of Minnesota. Three decades later, Esther Lucille Brown (1948) wrote Nursing for the Future, calling for nursing education to be based in universities and colleges. Then in 1965, the ANA published a significant position paper, taking the official position that all nursing education should take place in institutions of higher education.


The debate about entry level into practice still continues. Despite the ANA’s long-held position, associate degree nursing (ADN) programs remain the major source of entry-level registered nurses (RNs) entering the workforce today; however, the number of bachelor of science in nursing (BSN) programs in colleges and universities has greatly increased in the past 30 years. In addition, the number of master’s and doctoral programs continues to increase, although the number of nurses with master’s and doctoral degrees is small when compared with other health professions.



“Practitioners are relatively independent and control their own policies and activities (autonomy).”

Licensure by state boards of nursing means that nurses are autonomous practitioners who are responsible for their own practice. “Autonomy” mean that one has control over one’s practice. Although nursing actions are independent, most RNs are employed in settings in which nurse practice is interdependent, especially with regard to carrying out orders written by physicians, nurse practitioners, or physician assistants. Nurse practice acts in many states establish and acknowledge nurses’ independent practice, yet nurses face constraints on practice in settings in which their scope of practice can be narrowed by their employer or a supervising physician.


Three groups have historically attempted to control nursing practice: organized nursing, organized medicine, and health service administration. “Organized” in this context refers to the collective professional bodies that are the voice speaking for the interests of their respective professions, specifically the ANA and the American Medical Association, although other organizations have vested interests in these professions too. The interests of these groups are often expressed through lobbying efforts at the state and federal levels to influence legislative decisions that benefit their constituencies. Organizations such as National Nurses United (NNU) and its affiliates use collective bargaining and other strategies to protect the interests of nurses and patients. Although the discussion of nursing unionization is beyond the scope of this chapter, you will find the NNU website (www.nationalnursesunited.org) to be very informative regarding organized nursing’s efforts to keep the best interests of nursing, and therefore patients, front and center in the current health care debate and efforts to transform care in the United States today.


Both the medical profession and health service administration have attempted to limit the autonomy of nursing in order to hinder financial competition for patients by nurses in independent practice. Medicine and health service administration are well organized and well funded with powerful lobbies at state and national levels. This is a major challenge to full autonomy for nurses. Conversely, organized nursing does not yet have available economic resources to compete effectively against these influential forces seeking to neutralize nursing autonomy.


The Magnet Recognition® Program, an initiative of the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), was established to recognize hospitals that attract and retain nurses, acknowledging that this achieves better patient outcomes. Nursing autonomy and control over practice were identified in 1983 as crucial characteristics of these hospitals. By early 2012, 391 hospitals had achieved Magnet designation, most in the United States and a few internationally (ANCC, 2012). In the 2010 National Survey of Registered Nurses, nurses in Magnet hospitals rated their workplace organization and participation in shared governance higher than did nurses in non-Magnet hospitals; however, there were no differences between Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals with respect to influence on decisions related to patient care, and only 37% of Magnet nurses rated their opportunities to participate in shared governance as very good or excellent (Hess, DesRoches, Donelan, et al, 2011). This implies that nursing still has a significant ways to go to become autonomous and to incorporate this value into the culture of nursing.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 21, 2017 | Posted by in NURSING | Comments Off on Nursing’s pathway to professionalism

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access