Power, Politics, and Influence

This chapter describes how power and politics influence the roles of leaders and managers and how leaders and managers use power and politics to be influential. Contemporary concepts of power, empowerment, types of power exercised by nurses, key factors in developing a powerful image, personal and organizational strategies for exercising power, and the power of nurses to shape health policy by taking action in the arena of legislative politics are explored. Engaging in the politics of the workplace is critical for effective nursing leadership and management.
• Explore the concepts of professional and legislative politics related to nursing.
• Value the concept of power as it relates to leadership and management in nursing.
• Use different types of power in the exercise of nursing leadership.
• Develop a power image for effective nursing leadership.
• Choose appropriate strategies for exercising power to influence the politics of the work setting, professional organizations, legislators, and the development of health policy.
Introduction
The profession of nursing developed in the United States at a time when women had limited legal rights (e.g., most were prohibited from voting, and many could not own property). Women were viewed as neither powerful nor political; in the late nineteenth century, feminine and powerful were practically contradictory terms. During the twentieth century, as the status and role of women changed, so did the status and role of nurses. As the economic and social power of women evolved, so did the power of nurses. This is significant because nursing historically has been and continues to be a discipline comprising primarily women.
Now in the twenty-first century, nurses must exercise their power to create a strong voice for nursing in shaping an evolving healthcare environment. This is an era of rapid and often unplanned change with a dramatic nursing shortage like none before. Nurses must use their collective power and flex their political muscles to create a preferred future for the healthcare system, healthcare consumers, and the profession of nursing.
History
The word power comes from the Latin word potere, meaning “to be able.” Simply defined, power is the ability to influence others in an effort to achieve goals. Power was once considered almost a taboo in nursing. In nursing’s formative years, the exercise of power was considered inappropriate, unladylike, and unprofessional. During nursing’s earliest decades in America, many decisions about nursing education and practice were made by persons outside of nursing (Ashley, 1976). Nurses began to exercise their collective power with the rise of early nursing leaders such as Lillian Wald, Isabel Stewart, Annie Goodrich, Lavinia Dock, M. Adelaide Nutting, Mary Eliza Mahoney, and Isabel Hampton Robb and the development of organizations that evolved into the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the National League for Nursing (NLN).
Sadly, the media, politicians, organized medicine, some healthcare executives, and some nurses have traditionally viewed nurses and nursing as powerless. That view began to change dramatically in the 1990s as nurses began to appear more often on local and national news and on talk shows as experts on health care, the changes occurring in the healthcare system, and the effect of these changes on the public. Nurses have become increasingly visible in political campaigns on the local, state, and national levels, both as candidates and as political influentials. For example, Congresswoman Lois Capps, MA, BSN, RN, represents a California congressional district; she assumed the office held by her husband upon his death. A former school nurse, Congresswoman Capps has since been re-elected by her constituents to the House seat. Nurses and nursing have gained new respect in the political arena in recent years. Sheila Burke, MPA, RN, FAAN, served as Chief of Staff for Senator Robert Dole while he was Senate Majority Leader in the United States Congress, making her one of the most powerful congressional staff people in Washington. During the Clinton administration, nurse leaders were prominent: two former ANA presidents, Virginia Trotter Betts, MSN, JD, RN, FAAN, and Beverly Malone, PhD, RN, FAAN, served in roles that helped shape health policy for the nation. Diana J. Mason, PhD, RN, FAAN, editor emerita of the American Journal of Nursing, has long hosted a radio talk show in New York City on healthcare issues. Mary Wakefield, PhD, RN, FAAN, serves as the administrator of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) under President Barack Obama. She served in the 1990s as chief of staff to North Dakota senators Kent Conrad and Quentin Burdick.
As we experience a new and different era of nursing shortage, there are still some nurses who see themselves as powerless and oppressed, demonstrating aspects of oppressed group behavior. Roberts (1983) addressed the historical evidence of oppressed group behavior among nurses, based on models developed from the study of politically and economically oppressed populations. Oppressed group behavior is apparent when a population is dominated by another group. This subordinate or oppressed group begins to take on the characteristics of the dominant group and reject the characteristics of their own group, although this behavior fails to create a balance of power with the dominant group (Roberts 1983). Matheson and Bobay (2007) conducted a review of the literature to validate oppressed group behavior in nursing. They noted that nurses continue to demonstrate some of the behaviors characteristic of oppressed groups, but they could not validate that these behaviors occur directly as a result of oppression by outside groups. Among nurses, oppressed group behavior is manifested in low self-esteem (e.g., “I’m just a nurse”), passive aggressiveness (e.g., nurse-on-nurse bullying), distancing oneself from other nurses (e.g., the failure of nurses to join professional organizations), and engaging in intragroup conflicts (e.g., “infighting” or horizontal violence) (Matheson & Bobay, 2007; Roberts, 1983).
Some nurses are still uncomfortable with politics and the use of power, treating “politics” as if it were a dirty word. Historically, politics has been viewed with some disdain. Writer Robert Louis Stevenson noted, “Politics is perhaps the only profession for which no preparation is thought necessary.” But contemporary nursing’s need to thrive within a healthcare system demands that nursing education prepare nurses to engage in professional, workplace, and legislative politics.
Politics can be defined in many ways. One simple definition of politics that this author uses when teaching health policy and politics in nursing is “a process of human interaction within organizations.” Politics permeates all organizations, including workplaces, legislatures, professions, and even families. Young children often learn that one parent is more likely to readily give permission for special activities or more likely to buy toys and other desired items. They quickly learn to ask permission or ask for a desired item from that parent before asking the other. This is an unwritten political rule in many families. Political activism should be an unwritten rule in nursing (see the Literature Perspective at right).
The model of political activism, noted below, is based on elements from models of political activism (Leavitt, Chaffee, & Vance, 2007). This model can be applied to the political development and activism of individual nurses related to both professional and legislative political arenas (Kelly, 2007):
1. Apathy: no membership in professional organizations; little or no interest in legislative politics as they relate to nursing and health care
2. Buy-in: recognition of the importance of activism within professional organizations (without active participation) and legislative politics related to critical nursing issues
3. Self-interest: involvement in professional organizations to further one’s own career; the development and use of political expertise to further the profession’s self-interests
4. Political sophistication: high level of professional organization activism (e.g., holding office at the local and state level) moving beyond self-interests; recognition of the need for activism on behalf of the public and the profession
5. Leading the way: serving in elected or appointed positions in professional organizations at the state and national levels; providing true leadership on broad healthcare interests within legislative politics, including seeking appointment to policy-making bodies and election to political positions
Focus on Power
Some nurses, including both new graduates and seasoned veterans, have too often viewed power as if it were something immoral, corrupting, and totally contradictory to the caring nature of nursing. However, the definition on p. 176 (the ability to influence others in an effort to achieve goals) demonstrates the essential nature of power to nursing. Nurses routinely influence patients to improve their health status, an essential element of nursing practice. When nurses provide health teaching to patients and their families, the goal is to change patient/family behavior to promote optimal health. That is an exercise of power in nursing practice. Changing the behavior of one’s colleagues by instructing them about a new policy being implemented on the nursing unit is another example of how nurses exercise power. Coaching nurses to improve their performances is an exercise of power. Serving as the chief nursing officer of a hospital, managing a multimillion-dollar budget, demonstrates another exercise of power.
Social scientists have studied the use and abuse of power in human organizations. They have analyzed and categorized the sources and applications of power in human experience. Hersey, Blanchard, and Natemeyer (1979) offer a classic formulation on the basis of social power. Sullivan (2004, p. 33) offers a revised view of types of power that readily apply to the efforts of nurses in the workplace, in professional organizations, and in politics (see the Theory Box on p. 180). These types of power are not mutually exclusive. They are often used in concert to exert influence on individuals or groups.
Nurses commonly use all of these types of power while implementing a wide range of nursing activities. Nurses who teach patients use expert and information power by virtue of the information they share with patients; they also exercise position power because they are registered nurses and therefore are accorded a certain status by society. Members of a state nurses’ association who lobby members of the state legislature use expert, perceived, personal, and position power when trying to gain legislators’ support for healthcare legislation. New graduates, employed on probationary status until they demonstrate the initial clinical competencies of a position, may view the nurse manager as exercising both position and expert power related to their evaluation for continued employment. Nursing faculty and skilled clinicians exercise expert and perceived power as students emulate their behavior. Connection power is evident at any social gathering in the workplace. People of high status (e.g., vice presidents, directors, deans) within an organization may be sought out for conversation by those who want to move up the organizational hierarchy.
Having a high-status position in an organization immediately provides stature, but power depends on the ability to accomplish goals from that position. Although some may think that “knowledge is power,” acting on that knowledge is where the real power lies. Sharing knowledge expands one’s power and, in turn, empowers others, including colleagues and patients, by giving them information or skills that they need to take action in a situation.
Nursing’s early history in the United States was marked by powerlessness (Ashley, 1976). Nurses were absent from the decision-making processes about their education, practice, and employment. As the social, political, and economic status of women and nurses changed, so did the exercise of power by nursing as a profession and nurses as individuals. Powerlessness, a behavior still exhibited by some nurses, results in negative emotions such as apathy and anger. This can result in a workplace culture that is marked by conflict, anger, and other dysfunctional behaviors. Sharing power and facilitating the empowerment of colleagues so that they exercise their power are strong forces in creating vibrant workplace cultures.
Empowerment
Empowerment is a term that has come into common usage in nursing in recent years. It has been used extensively in the nursing literature related to administration and management; it is also highly relevant to the domain of clinical practice. Empowerment is the process of exercising one’s own power. It is also the process by which we facilitate the participation of others in decision making and taking action so they are free to exercise power (Ozimek, 2007). Empowerment is consistent with the contemporary view of leadership, a paradigm that is exemplified by behaviors characteristic of all nurse leaders: facilitator, coach, teacher, and collaborator. Nursing leaders, whether in their employment settings or in professional organizations, exercise power in making professional judgments in their daily work.
Empowerment is the process by which power is shared with colleagues and patients as part of the nurse’s exercise of power. This is in sharp contrast to traditional conceptualizations of power, a patriarchal model of power that relies on coercion, hierarchy, authority, control, and force. Viewed with a feminist perspective, empowerment is supported through collaboration, not competition and power plays (Sullivan, 2004).
• Nurses who view power as finite will avoid cooperation with their colleagues and refuse to share their expertise.
• Nurses who view power as infinite are strong collaborators who gain satisfaction by helping their colleagues expand their expertise and their power base.
Empowered nurses make professional practice possible, the kind of professional practice that is satisfying to all nurses. Empowered clinicians are essential for effective nursing management, just as empowered managers set the stage for excellence in clinical practice. Encouraging a reticent colleague to be an active participant in committee meetings serves to empower that nurse and to shape practice policy with the institution. Guiding a novice nurse in exercising professional judgment empowers both the senior nurse and the novice clinician. Coaching a patient on how to be more assertive with a physician who is reluctant to answer the patient’s questions is another form of empowerment.
Strategies for Developing a Powerful Image
Consider the words of Lady Margaret Thatcher, former prime minister of Great Britain: “Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren’t.” You don’t have to wear a sign around your neck to show that you are powerful!
The most basic power strategy is the development of a powerful image. If nurses think they are powerful, others will view them as powerful (perceived power); if they view themselves as powerless, so will others. A sense of self-confidence is a strong foundation in developing one’s “power image,” and it is essential for successful political efforts in the workplace, within the profession, and within the public policy arena. Several key factors contribute to one’s power image:
• Self-image: thinking of oneself as powerful and effective
• Grooming and dress: ensuring that clothing, hair, and general appearance are neat, clean, and appropriate to the situation
• Good manners: treating people with courtesy and respect
• Body language: maintaining good posture, using gestures that avoid too much drama, maintaining good eye contact, and being confident in movement
• Speech: using a firm, confident voice; good grammar and diction; an appropriate vocabulary; and strong communication skills.


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

