investigations

Chapter 33 Antenatal investigations





Introduction


The field of antenatal investigations has grown greatly in the past few years. Tests are being offered today – and decisions from women are becoming necessary – that would have been unthinkable previously. Although NICE (2008) guidelines for antenatal care recommend a schedule of antenatal tests, there is still a wide variation in what tests are considered ‘routine’ in various parts of the UK. The increase in use of information technology has meant that women and their partners often have accessed much specialized information themselves, and this may shape their questions.


Therefore, midwives need to have a better-than-ever knowledge of what tests are being offered, in order that they can ensure women are making their choices based on up-to-date and comprehensive information. They also need to be effective counsellors as it is acknowledged that the skills and attitudes of midwives influence the uptake of screening tests (Heyman & Henriksen 2001, van den Berg et al 2007). The midwife should also appreciate that the complete clinical antenatal examination is one of the most effective and efficient screening and diagnostic tools, if undertaken systematically and skilfully.



Screening and diagnosis


Although the meanings of screening and diagnosis are very different, they are often confused, and the midwife must ensure that the woman fully understands the difference.


Screening can be defined as determining the risk or likelihood of a condition, whereas a diagnostic test will give a definite answer. Sometimes, action will be taken following the results of a screening test. For example, a low haemoglobin (Hb) result in pregnancy may be assumed to be caused by pregnancy-induced anaemia and iron tablets will probably be given without further investigation, although in a few rare cases the anaemia may be caused by uncommon conditions, such as chronic renal infection, which would need further investigations to obtain a diagnosis. However, it would not be cost-effective to do an infinite range of investigations for every woman who presented with a positive screening test where the usual cause can be easily treated.


Some screening tests will produce results which mean an invasive test will be necessary to obtain a diagnosis. This needs to be made clear to the woman by the midwife providing counselling – should a woman be undertaking a serum screening for Down syndrome test if she would not undergo amniocentesis in the case of a ‘high risk’ result? Some tests, such as ultrasound, can be both screening and diagnostic (see Table 33.1) – for instance, a scan can diagnose a missing limb or neural tube defect, but can also discover anomalies (for example, ‘soft markers’) which would need further investigations to determine a diagnosis. (See the NHS screening website for the timeline for antenatal tests.)


Table 33.1 Common procedures used for fetal assessment































Test   Time
Nuchal translucency (screening) Chromosomal abnormality 10–14 weeks
Chorionic villus sampling (diagnostic) Chromosomal abnormality
Genetic disease
Metabolic disorders
Haemoglobinopathies
Infection
>10 weeks
Amniocentesis (diagnostic) Chromosomal abnormality
Genetic disease
Metabolic disorders
Haemoglobinopathies
Infection
10–14 weeks (early)
15–18 weeks
Ultrasound (screening and diagnostic) Assess fetus (dates/growth/viability/number)
Diagnosis of some abnormalities (e.g. structural)
Screening for abnormalities (e.g. soft markers)
Assessment of placental site
Liquor volume
All gestations
Cordocentesis (diagnostic) Obtain fetal blood sample 2nd/3rd trimester
Doppler (screening) Assess fetal/placental/uterine blood flow 2nd/3rd trimester

It is obviously not enough just to have the tests explained by the midwife – the implications of both positive and negative results also need to be explored before a woman can be said to be making an informed choice. As tests become more varied and complex and midwives’ time more limited, ensuring properly informed choice is becoming a greater challenge for midwives.



Blood tests


Blood is taken from a woman during pregnancy to detect conditions which may influence her wellbeing and that of the developing fetus.



Blood tests for assessment of maternal wellbeing


See Table 33.2 for normal blood laboratory values.


Table 33.2 Normal blood levels and specific diagnostic tests















































































  Non-pregnant Pregnant
General screening assays
Haemoglobin 12–16 g/dL 11–13 g/dL
Packed cell volume (PCV) 37–45% 33–39%
Red blood cell count (RBC) 4.2–5.4 million/mm3 3.8–4.4 million/mm3
Mean corpuscular volume (MCV) 80–100 fL 70–90 fL
Mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH) 27–34 fL 23–31 fL
Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC) 32–35 fL 32–35 fL
Reticulocyte count 0.5–1% 1–2%
White blood cells (WBC) 4–11 × 109/L 6–16 × 109/L
Platelets 150–400 × 109/L 150–400 × 109/L
C-reactive protein (CRP) 0–7 g/L 0–7 g/L
Specific diagnostic tests
Serum iron 50–100 mg/dL 30–100 mg/dL
Unsaturated iron binding capacity 250–300 mg/dL 280–400 mg/dL
Transferrin saturation 25–35% 15–30%
Iron stores (bone marrow) Adequate ferritin Unchanged
Serum folate 6–16 mg/mL 4–10 mg/mL
Serum vitamin B12 70–85 ng/dL 70–500 ng/dL
Serum ferritin 15–300 pg/L Unchanged




Full blood count


Full blood counts are taken routinely at booking and intervals during pregnancy, to detect a pathological fall in haemoglobin (Hb) which may indicate an iron deficiency anaemia. No woman should reach term with a potentially dangerous anaemia because this exposes her to the risk of excessive blood loss at delivery. It must be remembered, however, that other rare conditions may be discovered ‘accidentally’; for example, a low white cell count may lead to a diagnosis of leukaemia. It is important therefore that no abnormal result ever be disregarded.







Haemoglobinopathies


Haemoglobinopathies are a diverse group of inherited single-gene disorders involving abnormal haemoglobin patterns which constitute two major conditions: thalassaemia (minor or major) and sickle cell disorders: sickle cell trait (SCT or HbAS); sickle cell haemoglobin C disease (HbSC); and sickle cell disease/anaemia (HbSS).


Both sickle cell disease and thalassaemia are recessive conditions (see Ch. 26), therefore only those inheriting an affected gene from each parent will have the disease. If a woman is found to be carrying either the HbS gene or the thalassaemia trait (thalassaemia minor), it is necessary to test her partner before a prediction about the baby’s condition can be made. If both parents carry the gene, prenatal diagnosis can be made by chorionic villus sampling (CVS), amniocentesis or, more rarely, cordocentesis.


Currently, in high-prevalence areas, booking bloods for all women are automatically screened by hospital laboratories. In areas considered low prevalence, the Family Origin Questionnaire (DH 2007) should be used by midwives to identify who to test (see website).



Maternal infection screening



Rubella


This common viral infection is a significant condition in pregnancy because of the teratogenic effect on the developing fetus caused by transplacental transmission of the virus. Detection of rubella antibodies is carried out by serological testing to identify immunity (IgM and IgG antibodies).


The majority of women in the UK are immune as a result of routine vaccination against rubella at 11–14 years of age. However, since 1988, vaccination is now by measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine, usually administered before 15 months to male and female infants. It was hoped that with a universal take-up, rubella would be eradicated altogether. However, controversies over routine vaccination for infants reported in the media may compromise this.


All pregnant women are tested for rubella immunity at antenatal booking. Some women who have previously tested as immune have been known to become infected or test as susceptible, therefore testing in the preconception period is to be advised.


If a woman is not immune and comes into contact with rubella, she may develop the disease. Rubella can cause the loss of the pregnancy or the birth of a rubella-infected baby with various physical and mental anomalies. The fetus is most vulnerable up until 16 weeks, but the infection can cross the placenta at any gestation. To avoid the danger of rubella in future pregnancies, the non-immune woman is offered vaccination in the puerperium, together with contraceptive advice for a period of 3 months.


Jun 18, 2016 | Posted by in MIDWIFERY | Comments Off on investigations

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access