10 Diane M. Billings, EdD, RN, FAAN Designing or redesigning courses for effective learning is an important aspect of the faculty role. Learner-centered courses are first and foremost designed based on a clear understanding of the students and their needs (Chapter 2). Thoughtful course design brings specificity to the school’s mission and philosophy (Chapter 7) and program outcomes and curriculum design (Chapters 8 and 9), and sets the stage for choosing learning activities (Chapters 11 and 15) and assessment and evaluation strategies (Chapters 16 and 25). This chapter discusses a process that can be used to design learner-centered courses and explains how to develop a syllabus to communicate course expectations. Course design follows a sequential process, starting with the broad program outcomes and ending with specific lesson plans (Candela, Dalley, & Benzel-Lindley, 2006; Diamond, 2008; Haas, Sheehan, Stone, & Hammer-Beem, 2009; Wiggins & McTighe, 2005). Although a sequential process is described here, the process is, in fact, iterative as the course design or redesign unfolds. Courses may be designed by a faculty team or an individual with subject matter expertise. Instructional designers, a resource often available at teaching resource centers at many colleges, are an asset to the course development process. Course objectives, outcomes, and competencies are derived from end-of-program (terminal) and program-level (year or semester) outcomes and indicate what students should know, be able to do, and value at the end of the course, and how they will be evaluated and graded. Although faculty use terms in different ways, Wittman-Price & Fasolka (2010) suggest that the term learning outcome (as opposed to the term objective) is less restrictive and more appropriate in a learner-centered environment. Regardless of the term used, these “behavioral indicators” activate the curriculum, direct the choice of learning materials, guide the development of learning activities, and communicate to students what they are expected to learn and how they will be evaluated. Course learning objectives, outcomes, and competencies therefore must be written at appropriate levels of learning domains, for relevance to clinical practice, to be easily understood by students, and to guide evaluation of attainment. To prevent having a course burdened by content, Candela et al. (2006) recommend developing a process for making decisions about which content to retain and suggest including only content that is essential to meet program and course outcomes, that is required for safe practice, that needs to be reinforced and practiced, that is included in curriculum recommendations from professional nursing organizations, and that cannot be accessed easily when needed. Others (Davis, 2010; Diamond, 2008) recommend distinguishing between essential and optional material, considering core concepts versus details, and including only those topics relevant to practice or common existing problems. If the course is a part of a concept-based curriculum, the course designer must thread concepts and other broad outcomes and competencies, such as patient safety, communication, health information technology, or collaboration and teamwork, into the course (Giddens & Brady, 2007). By organizing the course into smaller units of study (modules, units, lessons), faculty provide additional direction for learning. For each unit or lesson, faculty should state the purpose, outcomes, assignments, learning activities, and evaluation strategies; this level of detail is particularly helpful for online or hybrid courses to provide necessary boundaries for unit or lesson activities (Chapter 23). Time limits must be considered when determining units of study; the time spent should be in proportion to the relative significance of the concepts and content and the students’ ability to learn the material. Learning activities are selected to assist students in acquiring course learning outcomes (Chapter 11). They should be selected to provide opportunity for developing higher-order thinking and clinical decision-making skills (Benner, Sutphen, Leonard, & Day, 2010). Learning activities help students to synthesize content and concepts in context and connect the classroom to clinical practice (Benner et al., 2010). Learning activities should build from course to course, level to level, and be threaded throughout the course as they fit with the level and program outcomes. Learning activities can be designed to be completed as required assignments or as optional, supplemental, or remedial activities and can take place in class or be assigned as class preparation. Faculty should indicate how the learning activities will be used in the syllabus and provide information about how students will be given feedback or evaluated and graded. In many courses textbooks and other reading materials are the primary source of information. Beeson and Aucoin (2005) recommend that faculty focus on assigning essential content and focused reading assignments and building on the information from these readings during class. Most textbook publishers offer ancillary study resources and web links, often at an additional cost. In one small study, researchers found that electronic textbook companion resources were not well used and that if faculty required students to purchase them, they should orient students to the materials available and integrate them into course learning activities (Missildine, Fountain, & Summers, 2009). The final step of course design is to determine how student learning will be evaluated and how grades will be calculated and assigned (Chapters 16 and 25). Where possible, students should be able to choose among several options with regards to how their work will be evaluated and graded. The evaluation plan should be included in the syllabus to inform students of when and how evaluation will take place. The syllabus communicates information about the course and specifies the responsibilities of both students and faculty (Clark, 2009; Davis & Schrader, 2009; Iwasiw, Goldenberg, & Andrusyszyn, 2009; O’Brien, Millis, & Cohen, 2008). A well-developed syllabus serves as a student guide to attaining course learning outcomes and explains how learning will be assessed, evaluated, and graded. Equally important, the syllabus sets the tone for the course by introducing the faculty and the faculty’s philosophy, university, school, and course policies and norms for behavior to be demonstrated during the course; as such, it should be written in a welcoming style. The syllabus for a learner-centered course also explains the roles of the faculty and students in the teaching–learning process and conveys the attitudes and behaviors that will promote active and effective learning. A full course syllabus includes information about course implementation, university and school policies, and norms for behavior. The full course syllabus is described below. (See Boxes 10-1 and 10-2, and Box 14-2 in Chapter 14, for examples of course syllabi.)
Developing learner-centered courses
Course design process
Course objectives, outcomes, and competencies
Course concepts and content
Units and lessons
Learning activities
Textbooks and other learning resources
Evaluation and grading plan
Course syllabus