Crisis and disaster

CHAPTER 26


Crisis and disaster


Halter Margaret Jordan and Graor Christine Heifner




image


Visit the Evolve website for a pretest on the content in this chapter: http://evolve.elsevier.com/Varcarolis


image


The Homeland Security Department raises the terror alert to high and warns American citizens to be watchful for any suspicious behavior. A tornado touches down in a small town, levels an entire neighborhood, and leaves 10 residents dead and many more homeless. A hurricane rips into a coastline, levees fail, 80% of a major city floods, and nearly 2,000 die. A teenage boy armed with automatic weapons enters a crowded movie theater and shoots everyone he can. A young nursing student discovers she is pregnant, and the father of the baby abandons her. What do these situations have in common? Each of these situations could be the precipitant of a crisis—leaving individuals, families, and whole communities struggling to cope with the impact of the event.


Crisis is not defined by the experience itself. Crisis is defined by the struggle for equilibrium and adaptation in its aftermath. Roberts (2005) defines a crisis as a profound disruption of a person’s normal psychological homeostasis. Normal coping mechanisms fail to deal with this distress, resulting in an inability to function as usual. The primary cause of crisis is the actual traumatic event, but two other conditions are also involved:



Crisis threatens personality organization, but it also presents an opportunity for personal growth and development. Successful crisis resolution results from the development of adaptive coping mechanisms, reflects ego development, and suggests the employment of physiological, psychological, and social resources.


Crises are acute and time-limited, usually lasting 4 to 6 weeks. They are associated with events that are experienced with overwhelming emotions of increased tension, helplessness, and disorganization.


As shown in Figure 26-1 (Aguilera, 1998), the outcome of crisis depends on (a) the realistic perception of the event, (b) adequate situational supports, and (c) adequate coping mechanisms.


image
FIG 26-1  Paradigm: The effect of balancing factors in a stressful event. (From Aguilera, D.C. [1998]. Crisis intervention: Theory and methodology [8th ed.]. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.)


• Perception of the event: People vary in the way they absorb, process, and use information from the environment. Some people may respond to a minor event as if it were life threatening. Conversely, others may assess a life-threatening event and carefully consider options.


• Situational supports: Situational supports include nurses and other health professionals who use crisis intervention to assist those in crisis. Crisis intervention is “a short-term therapeutic process that focuses on the rapid resolution of an immediate crisis or emergency using available personnel, family, and/or environmental resources” (American Psychiatric Nurses Association [APNA], 2007, p. 65).


• Coping mechanisms: Coping mechanisms and skills are acquired through a variety of sources, such as cultural responses, the modeling behaviors of others, and life opportunities that broaden experience and promote the adaptive development of new coping responses (Aguilera, 1998). Many factors compromise a person’s ability to cope with a crisis event. These may include the number of other stressful life events with which the person is currently coping, other unresolved losses, concurrent psychiatric disorders, concurrent medical problems, excessive fatigue or pain, and the quality and quantity of a person’s usual coping skills.




Crisis theory


An early crisis theorist, Erich Lindemann, conducted a classic study in the 1940s on the grief reactions of close relatives of the 492 victims who died in the Cocoanut Grove nightclub fire in Boston. This tragedy was due, in part, to exits being blocked to prevent customers from leaving without paying and inward swinging exit doors that trapped crowds as they desperately tried to escape; laws requiring outward swinging exit doors were enacted as a result of this fire.


This study formed the foundation of crisis theory and clinical intervention. Lindemann was convinced that even though acute grief is a normal reaction to a distressing situation, preventive interventions could eliminate or decrease potential serious personality disorganization and the devastating psychological consequences of the sustained effects of severe anxiety. He believed that the same interventions that were helpful in bereavement would prove just as helpful in dealing with other types of stressful events; therefore, he proposed a crisis intervention model as a major element of preventive psychiatry in the community.


In the early 1960s, Gerald Caplan (1964) advanced crisis theory and outlined crisis intervention strategies. Since that time, our understanding of crisis and effective intervention has continued to be refined and enhanced by numerous contemporary clinicians and theorists (Behrman & Reid, 2002; Roberts, 2005). The 1961 report of the Joint Commission on Mental Illness and Health addressed the need for community mental health centers throughout the country. This report stimulated the establishment of crisis services, which are now an important part of mental health programs in hospitals and communities.


Donna Aguilera and Janice Mesnick (1970) provided a framework for nurses for crisis assessment and intervention, which has grown in scope and practice. Aguilera continues to set a standard in the practice of crisis assessment and intervention.


Albert R. Roberts’s seven-stage model of crisis interventions (Figure 26-2) (Roberts, 2005; Roberts & Ottens, 2005) is a model that is useful in helping individuals who have suffered from an acute situational crisis as well as people who are diagnosed with acute stress disorder.


image
FIG 26-2  Roberts’s seven-stage model of crisis intervention. (From Roberts, A. R., & Ottens, A. J. [2005]. The seven-stage crisis intervention model: A road map to goal attainment, problem solving, and crisis resolution. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 5, 329–339.)

In an effort to establish consensus on mass trauma intervention principles, Hobfoll and colleagues (2007) identified five essential, empirically supported elements of mass trauma interventions that promote: (1) a sense of safety, (2) calming, (3) a sense of self-efficacy and collective efficacy, (4) connectedness, and (5) hope.


The effects of disasters such as the 9/11 World Trade Center terrorist attack, the earthquake in Haiti in 2010, and a dozen billion-dollar weather disasters in the United States in 2011 have emphasized the need for crisis assessment and intervention by community and general mental health providers. Regardless of the type of crisis and whether traumatized individuals are victims, families, rescue workers, or observers, those with access to crisis assessment and intervention are more likely to feel safe, supported, and empowered. Individuals are also better able to make sense of their response to the disaster, compared to those without access to supportive care providers (Phoenix, 2007).


Components of crisis assessment are derived from established crisis theory and constitute a sound knowledge base for the application of the nursing process to treatment of a patient in crisis. An understanding of the types of crises and phases of crises lays the groundwork for the application of the nursing process.



Types of crisis


There are three basic types of crisis situations: (1) maturational (or developmental) crises, (2) situational crises, and (3) adventitious crises. Identifying which type of crisis the individual is experiencing or has experienced helps in the development of a patient-centered plan of care.



Maturational crisis


A process of maturation occurs across the life cycle. Erik Erikson (1902-1994) conceptualized the process by identifying eight stages of ego growth and development (see Table 2-2 in Chapter 2). Each stage represents a time when physical, cognitive, instinctual, and sexual changes prompt an internal conflict or crisis, which results in either psychosocial growth or regression. Therefore, each developmental stage represents a maturational crisis that is a critical period of increased vulnerability and, at the same time, heightened potential.


When a person arrives at a new stage, formerly used coping styles are no longer effective, and new coping mechanisms have yet to be developed. Thus, for a time the person is without effective defenses. This often leads to increased tension and anxiety, which may manifest as variations in the person’s normal behavior. Examples of events that can precipitate a maturational crisis include leaving home during late adolescence, marriage, birth of a child, retirement, and the death of a parent. Successful resolution of these maturational tasks leads to development of basic human qualities.


Erikson believed that the way these crises are resolved at one stage affects the ability to pass through subsequent stages because each crisis provides the starting point for movement toward the next stage. If a person lacks support systems and adequate role models, successful resolution may be difficult or may not occur. Unresolved problems in the past and inadequate coping mechanisms then adversely affect what is learned in each developmental stage. When a person experiences severe difficulty during a maturational crisis, professional intervention may be indicated.


Factors may disrupt individuals’ progression through the maturational stages. For example, alcohol and drug addiction disrupts progression through the maturational stages. Unfortunately, this interruption occurs too often among individuals during their adolescent years. When the addictive behavior is controlled (e.g., by the late teens or mid-20s), the young person’s growth and development resume at the point of interruption. For example, a young person whose addiction is arrested at 22 years of age may have the psychosocial and problem-solving skills of a 14-year-old. Often these teenagers do not receive treatment, and their adult coping skills are diminished or absent.



Situational crisis


A situational crisis arises from events that are extraordinary, external rather than internal, and often unanticipated (Roberts, 2005). Examples of events that can precipitate a situational crisis include the loss or change of a job, the death of a loved one, an abortion, a change in financial status, divorce, and severe physical or mental illness. Whether or not these events precipitate a crisis depends on factors such as the degree of support available from caring friends, family members, and others; general emotional and physical status; and the ability to understand and cope with the meaning of the stressful event. As in all crises or potential crisis situations, the stressful event involves loss or change that threatens a person’s self-concept and self-esteem. To varying degrees, successful resolution of a crisis depends on resolution of the grief associated with the loss.



Adventitious crisis


An adventitious crisis is not a part of everyday life; it results from events that are unplanned and that may be accidental, caused by nature, or human-made. This type of crisis results from (1) a natural disaster (e.g., flood, fire, earthquake), (2) a national disaster (e.g., acts of terrorism, war, riots, airplane crashes), or (3) a crime of violence (e.g., rape, assault, or murder in the workplace or school; bombing in crowded areas; spousal or child abuse).


Commonly experienced, posttrauma phenomena include acute stress disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, and depression; therefore, the need for psychological first aid (crisis intervention) and debriefing after any crisis situation for all age groups cannot be overstressed.


It is also possible to experience more than one type of crisis situation simultaneously, and as expected, the presence of more than one crisis further taxes individual coping skills. Consider a 51-year-old woman who may be going through menopause (maturational) when her husband dies suddenly of cancer (situational). Think about the victims of Hurricane Katrina, many of whom were members of vulnerable groups—racially, socially, and financially—and may have been experiencing maturational or situational crises prior to the hurricane. They were then confronted with the devastation of the hurricane and the simultaneous onset of multiple losses. Many of them lost family members and friends, homes and belongings, employment, community supports, and even personal identification.



Phases of crisis


Through extensive study of individuals experiencing crisis, Caplan (1964) identified behaviors that followed a fairly distinct path. These behaviors were categorized in four distinct phases of crisis.







Application of the nursing process


Nurses, perhaps more than any other group of health professionals, deal with people who are experiencing disruption in their lives. Because people typically experience increased stress and anxiety in medical, surgical, and psychiatric hospital settings, as well as in community settings, nurses are often positioned and primed to initiate and participate in crisis intervention. Crisis theory defines aspects of crisis that are basic to crisis intervention and relevant for nurses (Box 26-1).





Assessment



General assessment

As shown in Figure 26-1, a person’s equilibrium may be adversely affected by one or more of the following: (1) an unrealistic perception of the precipitating event, (2) inadequate situational supports, and (3) inadequate coping mechanisms (Aguilera, 1998). It is crucial to assess these factors when a crisis situation is evaluated because data gained from the assessment guide both the nurse and the patient in setting realistic and meaningful goals and in planning possible solutions to the problem situation.


The nurse’s initial task is to promote a sense of safety by assessing the patient’s potential for suicide or homicide. If the patient is suicidal, homicidal, or unable to take care of personal needs, hospitalization should be considered (Aguilera, 1998). Sample questions to ask include the following:



After establishing that the patient poses no danger to self or others, the nurse assesses three main areas: (1) the patient’s perception of the precipitating event, (2) the patient’s situational supports, and (3) the patient’s personal coping skills.





Assessing perception of precipitating event

The nurse’s task is now to assess the individual or family and the problem. The more clearly the problem can be defined, the more likely effective solutions will be identified. Sample questions that may facilitate assessment include the following:





Next the nurse determines available resources by assessing the patient’s support systems. Family and friends are often involved to aid the patient by offering material or emotional support. If these resources are unavailable, the nurse or counselor acts as a temporary support system while relationships with individuals or groups in the community are established. Sample questions include the following:






Assessing personal coping skills

Finally, the nurse assesses the patient’s personal coping skills by evaluating the patient’s anxiety level and identifying the patient’s established patterns of coping. Common coping mechanisms may be overeating, drinking, smoking, withdrawing, seeking out someone to talk to, yelling, fighting, or engaging in other physical activity. Sample questions to ask include the following:






Self-assessment

Nurses need to constantly monitor and acknowledge personal feelings and thoughts when dealing with a patient in crisis. It is important to recognize your own level of anxiety to prevent the patient from closing off his or her expression of painful feelings to you. Self-awareness of your negative feelings and reactions can prevent unconscious suppression of the patient’s personal distress in an effort to manage your own discomfort.


There may be times when, perhaps for personal reasons, you feel you cannot deal effectively with a patient’s situation. If this happens, ask another colleague to work with the individual. Consulting a more experienced colleague or mentor or seeking supervision will help you separate the patient’s needs from your own and identify how to work through uncomfortable or painful personal issues or bias to better care for those in crisis.


New nurses working in crisis intervention often face common problems that must be dealt with before they can become comfortable and competent in the role of a crisis counselor. Four of the more common problems include the following:



Table 26-1 gives examples, results, appropriate interventions, and desired outcomes of common problems in the nurse-patient relationship faced by beginning nurses. It is crucial that expert supervision be available as an integral part of the crisis-intervention training process.



TABLE 26-1   


COMMON PROBLEMS IN THE NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP






































EXAMPLE RESULT INTERVENTION OUTCOME
Problem 1: Nurse Needs to Feel Needed
Nurse:
Allows excessive phone calls between sessions.
Gives direct advice without sufficient knowledge of patient’s situation.
Attempts to influence patient’s lifestyle on a judgmental basis.
Patient becomes dependent on nurse and relies less on own abilities.
Nurse reacts to patient’s not getting “cured” by projecting feelings of frustration and anger onto patient.
Nurse:
Evaluates personal needs versus patient’s needs with an experienced professional.
Discourages patient’s dependency.
Encourages goal setting and problem solving by patient.
Takes control only if patient is suicidal or homicidal.
Patient is free to grow and problem-solve own life crises.
Nurse’s skills and effectiveness grow as comfort with role increases and own goals are clarified.
Problem 2: Nurse Sets Unrealistic Goals for Patients
Nurse:
Expects physically abused woman to leave battering partner.
Expects man who abuses alcohol to stop drinking when loss of family or job is imminent.
Nurse feels anxious and responsible when expectations are not met; anxiety resulting from feelings of inadequacy are projected onto the patient in the form of frustration and anger. Nurse:
Examines realistic expectations of self and patient with an experienced professional.
Reevaluates patient’s level of functioning and works with patient on his level.
Encourages setting of goals by patient.
Patient feels less alienated, and a working relationship can ensue.
Nurse’s ability to assess and problem solve increases as anger and frustration decrease.
Problem 3: Nurse Has Difficulty Dealing with a Suicidal Patient
Nurse is selectively inattentive by:
Denying possible clues.
Neglecting to follow up on verbal suicide clues.
Changing topic to less threatening subject when self-destructive themes come up.
Patient is robbed of opportunity to share feelings and find alternatives to intolerable situation.
Patient remains suicidal.
Nurse’s crisis intervention ceases to be effective.
Nurse:
Assesses own feelings and anxieties with help of an experienced professional.
Evaluates all clues or slight suspicions and acts on them (e.g., “Are you thinking of killing yourself?”—if yes, nurse assesses suicide potential and need for hospitalization).
Patient experiences relief in sharing feelings and evaluating alternatives.
Suicide potential can be minimized.
Nurse becomes more adept at picking up clues and minimizing suicide potential.
Problem 4: Nurse has Difficulty Terminating after Crisis Has Resolved
Nurse is tempted to work on other problems in patient’s life to prolong contact with patient. Nurse steps into territory of traditional therapy without proper training or experience. Nurse works with an experienced professional to:
Explore own feelings about separations and termination.
Reinforce crisis model; crisis intervention is a preventive tool, not psychotherapy.
Nurse becomes better able to help patient with his/her feelings when nurse’s own feelings are recognized.
Patient is free to go back to his or her life situation or request appropriate referral to work on other issues of importance to patient.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Feb 3, 2017 | Posted by in NURSING | Comments Off on Crisis and disaster

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access