Reimbursement Procedures
Getting Paid
Chapter objectives
After completion of this chapter, the student should be able to:
1. List and explain the various types of reimbursement.
2. Discuss the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) and how it works.
4. Summarize the transition of Medicare to RBRVS.
6. Discuss responsibilities of peer review organizations as they relate to PPS.
7. Identify the various functions that most patient accounting software systems can perform.
Chapter terms
accounts receivable aging report
activities of daily living (ADLs)
ambulatory payment classifications (APCs)
average length of stay (ALOS)
balance billing
business associate
capitation
case-mix adjustment
comorbidity
contractual write-off
cost outliers
covered entity
diagnosis-related group (DRG)
discounted fee-for-service
disproportionate share
DRG grouper
fee-for-service
geographic practice cost index (GPCI)
home health prospective payment system
inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system (IRF PPS)
labor component
long-term care hospital prospective payment system (LTCH PPS)
managed care organizations (MCOs)
nonlabor component
peer review organization (PRO)
per diem rates
principal diagnosis
prospective payment system (PPS)
reimbursement
relative value scale (RVS)
residential healthcare facility
resource utilization groups (RUGs)
resource-based relative value scale (RBRVS)
short-stay outlier
skilled nursing facility (SNF)
standardized amount
Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA)
usual, customary, and reasonable (UCR)
Understanding reimbursement systems
To understand fully the entire health insurance picture and how fees are established, the health insurance professional should be aware of the various reimbursement systems, their structure, and how they affect health insurance in general. Understanding reimbursement systems is important in making the most of payment opportunities. Current reimbursement systems are based on five elements that impact the dollar amount paid:
Because reimbursement systems can be challenging, every healthcare facility ideally should assign someone the responsibility of being the “reimbursement expert.” The health insurance professional might fit this role best, and he or she should be prepared to take on this responsibility. The rules are constantly changing with the frequent introduction of new payment formulas, and it takes diligence and dedication to keep current with these changes. Small adjustments in the payment rates can make a big difference in practice income. The following sections describe the various types of reimbursement and their fee structures.
Types of Reimbursement
From an insurance standpoint, the term reimbursement means payment to the insured for a covered expense or loss experienced by or on behalf of the insured. More specifically in health insurance, reimbursement is a payment made to a provider or to a patient in exchange for the performance of healthcare services. There are several different types of reimbursement in the healthcare office. Table 17-1 lists common types of reimbursement.
Table 17-1
Comparison of Reimbursement Methods
Reimbursement Type | Explanation |
Fee-for-service | Services or procedures are paid as charged from physician’s fee schedule |
Discounted fee-for-service | Services or procedures are paid at insurers’ contracted rates |
PPS | Flat-rate reimbursement based on predetermined factors such as diagnoses, procedures, or a combination of both |
Capitation | Payment is based on a fixed, per capita amount for each person served without regard to the actual number or nature of services provided |
Fee-for-Service
As we learned in Chapter 4, fee-for-service is a system of payment for healthcare services whereby the provider charges a specific fee (typically the usual, customary, and reasonable [UCR] fee) for each service rendered and is paid that fee by the patient or by the patient’s insurance carrier. UCR is a fee amount an insurance carrier will accept based on the prevailing charges made by physicians in a similar specialty for a particular service or procedure within a specific community or geographic area.
Discounted Fee-for-Service
When a healthcare provider offers services at rates that are lower than UCR fees, that arrangement is called discounted fee-for-service. A typical example of discounted fee-for-service is when a healthcare provider is a participating provider with a preferred provider organization (PPO) and charges patients enrolled in the PPO lower rates in return for certain amenities from the PPO. (See Chapter 7 for details about PPOs.)
Prospective Payment System
A third type of reimbursement is the prospective payment system (PPS). With a PPS, reimbursement is made to the healthcare provider on the basis of predetermined factors (e.g., patient category or type of facility) and not on individual services. PPS is Medicare’s system for reimbursing Part A inpatient hospital costs. The amount of payment is determined by the assigned diagnosis-related group (DRG). PPS rates are set at a level intended to cover operating costs for treating a typical inpatient in a given DRG. DRGs are discussed in more detail later in this chapter.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) uses a separate PPS for reimbursement to acute inpatient hospitals, home health agencies, hospice, hospital outpatient care, inpatient psychiatric facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, long-term care hospitals (LTCH), and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). Payments for each hospital are adjusted for differences in area wages, teaching activity, care to the poor, and other factors. PPS and DRGs are discussed in more detail later. To see related links for more detailed information about each specific PPS, visit the Evolve site.
Relative Value Units
Many insurance companies reimburse on a fee schedule that is based on relative value units (RVUs). More and more practices are also converting to a provider fee schedule that is based on RVUs. With the use of computers for medical billing, attaching RVUs to each procedure in the system provides the advantage of having a logical explanation for patients who inquire about the cost of their procedure (e.g., “the procedure is valued at 10 RVUs, and our conversion factor is $70 per RVU”). Patients tend to understand and accept this more readily than explaining what a UCR fee is (e.g., “$700 is what the average charge is for physicians in the same specialty in our area”). Additionally, when procedure codes are attached to an RVU, when the practice finds it necessary to increase its charges, the practice merely increases the conversion factor, rather than go into each procedure in the computer system and reset the charge amount. RVUs are discussed in more detail later in the chapter.
Managed Care Organizations
Managed care organizations (MCOs) vary greatly in their policies and procedures for reimbursement, and laws vary significantly from state to state. Individual MCO contracts have specific restrictions and requirements, and contracts may have rate reductions and discounts of certain types of care (e.g., telephone consultations). Referral processes typically require prior authorization, and billing procedures with MCOs are often complex.
Capitation
Capitation is a method of payment for healthcare services in which a provider or healthcare facility is paid a fixed, per capita amount for each individual to whom services are provided without regard to the actual number or nature of the services provided to each individual patient. Capitation is a common method of paying physicians in health maintenance organizations (HMOs).
Medicare and reimbursement
The Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) enacted by Congress in 1982 provided for limits on Medicare reimbursement that applied to stays in long-term acute care hospitals. After TEFRA was passed, the fee-for-service–based payment system was replaced with a PPS.
Initially, only Medicare patients were included in the PPS. Later, Medicaid patients were added on a state-by-state basis. As mentioned, with the PPS, a predetermined payment level is established primarily on the basis of a patient’s diagnoses and services performed, and the hospital receives a set payment. If money spent to care for a patient is less than the PPS payment, the healthcare facility is allowed to keep the extra money and makes a profit on the care provided. However, if the money spent to care for a patient is more than the PPS payment, the healthcare organization loses money in caring for the patient.
Medicare presently has three primary reimbursement systems:
Medicare Prospective Payment System
Congress adopted the PPS to regulate the amount of resources the federal government spends on medical care for elderly and disabled individuals. The Social Security Amendments of 1983 mandated the PPS for acute hospital care for Medicare patients. The system was intended to encourage hospitals to modify the way they deliver services. Congress had the following four chief objectives in creating the PPS:
Congress gave primary authority for implementing the PPS to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). As a federal entity, CMS sets guidelines and rules that impact the entire insurance industry, and everyone must follow these guidelines and rules. Congress also assigned responsibilities to outside, independent organizations to ensure that the medical profession, hospital industry, and Medicare beneficiaries had the opportunity to provide input on the creation and implementation of the system.
Under the Medicare PPS, hospitals are paid a set fee for treating patients in a single DRG category, regardless of the actual cost of care for the individual. The DRG system is an inpatient classification structure based on several factors including principal diagnosis, additional diagnosis, surgical factors, age, sex, and discharge status. DRGs are discussed in more detail later.
In addition to payment adjustments for differences in area wages, teaching activity, care to the poor, and other factors, hospitals may receive additional payments to cover extra costs associated with atypical patients—patients whose stays are either considerably shorter or considerably longer than average (referred to as cost outliers) in each DRG.
How the Medicare Prospective Payment System Works
In a PPS, payment levels are set ahead of time, or prospectively, and are intended to pay the healthcare provider for a particular group of services. The established payment rate for all services that a patient in an acute care hospital receives during an entire stay is based on a predetermined payment level that is selected on the basis of averages. This means that some providers’ actual costs would be above the average payment and some would be below. Whatever the case, the provider receives only the preset amount, regardless of whether actual costs are more or less.
CMS has developed several variations of payment systems from the initial PPS currently being used by Medicare and other third-party payers in the United States. Following are brief definitions of these various CMS PPS structures.
Acute Inpatient Prospective Payment System
The inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) is the Medicare PPS used for acute care hospital inpatient stays. Under IPPS, each case is categorized into a DRG with a payment weight assigned to it based on the average resources used to treat patients in that particular DRG. Medicare publishes a final rule with revisions to IPPS every year for the upcoming fiscal year, which goes into effect on October 1—the beginning of the federal government’s fiscal year.
Outpatient Prospective Payment System
The outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) is the Medicare PPS used for hospital-based outpatient services and procedures. Under OPPS, payment is based on the assignment of ambulatory payment classifications (APCs) and reimburses a predetermined amount by procedures performed. Medicare publishes revisions to OPPS annually for the upcoming fiscal year that go into effect on January 1 of the following year.
Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System
The skilled nursing facility prospective payment system (SNF PPS) is a per diem reimbursement system for all costs (routine, ancillary, and capital) associated with covered SNF services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries. Per diem rates are a hospital’s all-inclusive daily rates as calculated by department.
Home Health Prospective Payment System
The home health PPS is the reimbursement system developed by CMS to cover home health services provided to Medicare beneficiaries. Medicare pays home health agencies a predetermined base payment. The payment is adjusted for the health condition and care needs of the beneficiary and for the geographic differences in wages for home health agencies across the United States. The adjustment for the health condition, or clinical characteristics, and service needs of the beneficiary is referred to as the case-mix adjustment.
Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System
The inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) PPS is the reimbursement system developed by CMS to cover inpatient rehabilitation services provided to Medicare beneficiaries. The IRF PPS uses the patient assessment instrument to assign patients to case-mix groups according to their clinical status and resource requirements.
Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Prospective Payment System
The inpatient psychiatric facility PPS is a per diem PPS based on 15 DRGs.
Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System
The PPS for LTCHs classifies patients into diagnostic groups based on clinical characteristics and expected resource needs of inpatient stays in LTCHs (defined as hospitals with an average length of stay greater than 25 days). The patient classification groupings are called LTC-DRGs—they are the same DRGs used under the hospital inpatient PPS.
Medicare Advantage Program (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hierarchical Condition Category)
The Medicare Advantage program employs a CMS hierarchical condition category (HCC) risk assessment payment model. This capitation payment model is used to provide payment to managed care organizations (e.g., HMOs and PPOs) on behalf of Medicare beneficiaries. The CMS HCC risk assessment adjusts per-beneficiary capitation payments with a risk adjustment methodology using diagnoses to measure relative risk owing to health status. Select diagnostic codes are used to define disease groups, referred to as hierarchical condition categories, or HCCs.
CMS also develops fee schedules for specific providers and services such as physicians, ambulance services, clinical laboratory services, durable medical equipment, and supplies. You can read more about them on the CMS website at http://www.cms.gov/.
Other systems for determining reimbursement
Until the latter part of the 20th century, fee-for-service was the usual method of determining reimbursement in the United States. As the nation faced an increase in the elderly population and access to healthcare improved, the government enacted legislation to control the increasing cost of healthcare associated with these factors. Out of these federal laws, several new systems of reimbursement appeared (Table 17-2).
Table 17-2
Prospective Payment Systems Comparison
Type of System | Applicable Setting | Reimbursement Based on |
DRG | Acute care | Diagnosis and procedures |
APC | Ambulatory care | Procedures, using diagnoses to verify medical necessity |
RUG | Skilled nursing facilities | Minimum data set including activities of daily living index |
HH PPS | Home health care | Outcome and assessment information set |
IRF PPS | Inpatient rehabilitation facilities | Length of hospital stay and function-related group classification |
Relative Value Scale
The relative value scale (RVS), first developed by the California Medical Association in the 1950s, is a method of determining reimbursement for healthcare services based on establishing a standard unit value for medical and surgical procedures. RVS compares and rates each individual service according to the relative value of each unit and converts this unit value to a dollar value. RVS units are based on average charges for a same or similar procedure of all healthcare providers during the time in which the RVS was established and published. The total relative value unit (RVU) consists of the following three components: