Pain



Pain


Lindsay L. Kindler and Rosemary C. Polomano





Reviewed by Judith A. Paice, RN, PhD, Director, Cancer Pain Program, Division Hematology-Oncology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Debra B. Gordon, RN-BC, DNP, ACNS-BC, FAAN, Teaching Associate, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Jo Ann Baker, RN, MSN, FNP-C, Department Chair, Nursing, Delaware Technical and Community College, Terry Campus, Dover, Delaware; Susan Turner, RN, MSN, FNP, Professor of Nursing, Gavilan College, Gilroy, California; and Linda Wilson, RN, PhD, CPAN, CAPA, BC, CNE, Assistant Dean for Special Projects, Simulation and CNE Accreditation, Drexel University, College of Nursing and Health Professions, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.


Pain is a complex, multidimensional experience that can cause suffering and decreased quality of life. Pain is one of the major reasons that people seek health care. To effectively assess and manage patients with pain, you need to understand the physiologic and psychosocial dimensions of pain. This chapter presents evidence-based information to help you assess and manage pain successfully in collaboration with other health care providers.



Magnitude of Pain Problem


Every year, millions of people suffer from pain. Annually in the United States, at least 25 million people experience acute pain as a result of injury or surgery.1 Common chronic pain conditions such as arthritis, migraine headache, and back pain affect approximately 116 million American adults.2 Seventy percent of all cancer patients experience significant pain during their illness.3 The financial impact of pain is staggering. In the United States, unrelieved pain and inadequate management of pain costs an estimated $560 billion to $635 billion each year in direct medical treatment costs and lost work productivity.2


Despite the high prevalence and costs of acute and chronic pain, inadequate pain management occurs. For example, approximately a third of patients enrolled in hospice reported pain at their last hospice visit.4 Cancer pain is often undertreated.5


Consequences of untreated pain include unnecessary suffering, physical and psychosocial dysfunction, immunosuppression, and sleep disturbances2 (Table 9-1). The varied reasons for the undertreatment of pain are discussed in this chapter.




Definitions and Dimensions of Pain


In 1968 Margo McCaffery, a nurse and pioneer in pain management, defined pain as “whatever the person experiencing the pain says it is, existing whenever the person says it does.”6 The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) defines pain as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage.”2


Note that these definitions emphasize the subjective nature of pain, in which the patient’s self-report is the most valid means of assessment. Although understanding the patient’s experience and relying on his or her self-report is essential, this view is problematic for many patients. For example, patients who are comatose or who suffer from dementia, patients who are mentally disabled, and patients with expressive aphasia possess varying abilities to report pain. In these instances, you must incorporate nonverbal information such as behaviors into your pain assessment.


With pain defined as a human experience, successful pain assessment and treatment must incorporate multiple dimensions.7 The biopsychosocial model of pain includes the physiologic, affective, cognitive, behavioral, and sociocultural dimensions of pain (Table 9-2).



The emotional distress of pain can cause suffering, which is the state of distress associated with loss. Suffering can result in a profound sense of insecurity and lack of control. When suffering occurs, people can experience spiritual distress. Achieving pain relief is an essential step in relieving suffering. In addition, the assessment of ways in which a person’s spirituality influences and is influenced by pain is important.8


The meaning of the pain can be critical. For example, a woman in labor may experience severe pain but can manage it without analgesics because for her it is associated with a joyful event. Moreover, she may feel control over her pain because of the training she received in prenatal classes and the knowledge that the pain is time-limited. In contrast, a woman with chronic, undefined musculoskeletal pain may be plagued by thoughts that her pain is “not real,” is uncontrollable, or is caused by her own actions. These perceptions will influence the ways in which a person responds to pain and must be incorporated into a comprehensive treatment plan.



Some people cope with pain by distracting themselves, whereas others convince themselves that the pain is permanent, untreatable, and overwhelming. People who believe that their pain is uncontrollable and overwhelming are more likely to have poor outcomes.9


Families and caregivers influence the patient’s response to pain through their beliefs and behaviors. For example, families may discourage the patient from taking opioids because they fear the patient will become addicted.



Pain Mechanisms


Nociception is the physiologic process by which information about tissue damage is communicated to the central nervous system (CNS). It involves four processes: (1) transduction, (2) transmission, (3) perception, and (4) modulation (Fig. 9-1).




Transduction.


Transduction involves the conversion of a noxious mechanical, thermal, or chemical stimulus into an electrical signal called an action potential. Noxious (tissue-damaging) stimuli, including thermal (e.g., sunburn), mechanical (e.g., surgical incision), or chemical (e.g., toxic substances) stimuli, cause the release of numerous chemicals such as hydrogen ions, substance P, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) into the damaged tissues. Other chemicals are released from mast cells (e.g., serotonin, histamine, bradykinin, prostaglandins) and macrophages (e.g., interleukins, tumor necrosis factor [TNF]). These chemicals activate nociceptors, which are specialized receptors, or free nerve endings, that respond to painful stimuli. Activation of nociceptors results in an action potential that is carried from the nociceptors to the spinal cord primarily via small, rapidly conducting, myelinated A-delta fibers and slowly conducting unmyelinated C fibers.


In addition to stimulating nociceptors to fire, inflammation and the subsequent release of chemical mediators lower nociceptor thresholds. As a result, nociceptors may fire in response to stimuli that previously were insufficient to elicit a response. They may also fire in response to non-noxious stimuli, such as light touch. This increased susceptibility to nociceptor activation is called peripheral sensitization. Leukotrienes, prostaglandins, cytokines, and substance P are involved in peripheral sensitization. Cyclooxygenase (COX), an enzyme produced in the inflammatory response, also plays an important role in peripheral sensitization. A clinical example of this process is sunburn. This thermal injury causes inflammation that results in a sensation of pain when the affected skin is lightly touched. Peripheral sensitization also amplifies signal transmission, which in turn contributes to central sensitization (discussed under Dorsal Horn Processing). The pain produced from activation of peripheral nociceptors is called nociceptive pain (described later in the chapter on p. 119).


Therapies that alter either the local environment or sensitivity of the peripheral nociceptors can prevent transduction and initiation of an action potential. Decreasing the effects of chemicals released at the periphery is the basis of several drug approaches to pain relief. For example, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) and naproxen (Naprosyn, Aleve), and corticosteroids, such as dexamethasone (Decadron), exert their analgesic effects by blocking pain-sensitizing chemicals. NSAIDs block the action of COX, thereby interfering with the production of prostaglandins. Corticosteroids reduce the production of both prostaglandins and leukotrienes (see Fig. 12-2).


Drugs that stabilize the neuronal membrane and inactivate peripheral sodium channels inhibit production of the nerve impulse. These medications include local anesthetics (e.g., injectable or topical lidocaine, bupivacaine [Sensorcaine], and ropivacaine [Naropin]) and antiseizure drugs (e.g., carbamazepine [Tegretol] and lamotrigine [Lamictal]).



Transmission.


Transmission is the process by which pain signals are relayed from the periphery to the spinal cord and then to the brain. The nerves that carry pain impulses from the periphery to the spinal cord are called primary afferent fibers. These include A-delta and C fibers, each of which is responsible for a different pain sensation. As previously mentioned, A-delta fibers are small, myelinated fibers that conduct pain rapidly and are responsible for the initial, sharp pain that accompanies tissue injury. C fibers are small, unmyelinated fibers that transmit painful stimuli more slowly and produce pain that is typically aching or throbbing in quality. Primary afferent fibers terminate in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. Activity in the dorsal horn integrates and modulates pain inputs from the periphery.


The propagation of pain impulses from the site of transduction to the brain is shown in Fig. 9-1. Three segments are involved in nociceptive signal transmission: (1) transmission along the peripheral nerve fibers to the spinal cord, (2) dorsal horn processing, and (3) transmission to the thalamus and the cerebral cortex.



Transmission to Spinal Cord.

The first-order neuron extends the entire distance from the periphery to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord with no synapses. For example, an afferent fiber from the great toe travels from the toe through the fifth lumbar nerve root into the spinal cord; it is one cell. Once generated, an action potential travels all the way to the spinal cord unless it is blocked by a sodium channel inhibitor (e.g., local anesthetic) or disrupted by a lesion such as a dorsal root entry zone lesion.


The manner in which nerve fibers enter the spinal cord is central to the notion of spinal dermatomes. Dermatomes are areas on the skin that are innervated primarily by a single spinal cord segment. The distinctive pattern of the rash caused by herpes zoster (shingles) across the back and trunk is determined by dermatomes (see Fig. 24-7). Different dermatomes and their innervations are illustrated in eFig. 9-1 (available on the website for this chapter) and Fig. 56-6.



Dorsal Horn Processing.

Once a nociceptive signal arrives in the spinal cord, it is processed within the dorsal horn. Neurotransmitters released from the afferent fiber bind to receptors on nearby cell bodies and dendrites of cells. Some of these neurotransmitters (e.g., glutamate, aspartate, substance P) produce activation, whereas others (e.g., γ-aminobutyric acid [GABA], serotonin, norepinephrine) inhibit activation of nearby cells. In this area, exogenous and endogenous opioids also play an important role by binding to opioid receptors and blocking the release of neurotransmitters, particularly substance P. Endogenous opioids include enkephalin and β-endorphin. They are capable of producing analgesic effects similar to those of exogenous opioids such as morphine.


Increased sensitivity and hyperexcitability of neurons in the CNS is called central sensitization. Peripheral tissue damage or nerve injury can cause central sensitization, and continued nociceptive input from the periphery is necessary to maintain it. As a result of the increased excitability of neurons within the CNS, normal sensory inputs cause abnormal sensing and responses to painful and other stimuli. This explains why some people experience significant pain from touch or tactile stimulation in and around the areas of tissue or nerve injury. This is called allodynia. With central sensitization, the central processing circuits are altered. In some cases, central sensitization can be long-lasting due to changes in the synapse.10


With ongoing stimulation of slowly conducting unmyelinated C-fiber nociceptors, firing of specialized dorsal horn neurons gradually increases. These inputs create many problems, including the sprouting of wide dynamic range (WDR) neurons and induction of glutamate-dependent N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. WDR neurons respond to both nociceptive and non-nociceptive inputs that are of varying levels of stimulus intensity. When these neuron dendrites sprout, they grow into areas where pain-receiving nerve cell bodies are located. This results in the capacity to transmit a broader range of stimuli-producing signals, which are then passed up the spinal cord and brain. This process is known as windup and depends on the activation of NMDA receptors. NMDA receptor antagonists, such as ketamine (Ketalar), potentially interrupt or block mechanisms that lead to or sustain central sensitization. Windup, like central sensitization and hyperalgesia (increased pain responses to noxious stimuli), is induced by C-fiber inputs. Windup is different, however, in that it can be short lasting, whereas central sensitization and hyperalgesia persist over time.11


It is important for you to understand that acute, unrelieved pain leads to chronic pain through the process of central sensitization. Acute tissue injury produces a cascade of events that involve the release of certain excitatory neurotransmitters (e.g., glutamate) and neuropsychologic responses. Even brief intervals of acute pain are capable of inducing long-term neuronal remodeling and sensitization (plasticity), chronic pain, and lasting psychologic distress.


Neuroplasticity refers to processes that allow neurons in the brain to compensate for injury and adjust their responses to new situations or changes in their environment.12 Neuroplasticity contributes to adaptive mechanisms for reducing pain but also can result in maladaptive mechanisms that enhance pain. Genetic variability among individuals may have an important effect on the plasticity of the CNS.12 Understanding this phenomenon helps explain individual differences in response to pain and why some patients develop chronic pain conditions whereas others do not. Clinically, central sensitization of the dorsal horn results in (1) hyperalgesia, (2) painful responses to normally innocuous stimuli (allodynia), (3) prolonged pain after the original noxious stimulus ends (called persistent pain), and (4) the extension of tenderness or increased pain sensitivity outside of an area of injury to include uninjured tissue (i.e., expansion of nociceptive receptive fields, or secondary hyperalgesia).13


Referred pain must be considered when interpreting the location of pain reported by the person with an injury or a disease involving visceral organs. The location of a stimulus may be distant from the pain location reported by the patient (Fig. 9-2). For example, pain from liver disease is frequently located in the right upper abdominal quadrant, but can also be referred to the anterior and posterior neck region and to a posterior flank area. If referred pain is not considered when evaluating a pain location report, diagnostic tests and therapy could be misdirected.




Transmission to Thalamus and Cortex.

From the dorsal horn, nociceptive stimuli are communicated to the third-order neuron, primarily in the thalamus, and several other areas of the brain. Fibers of dorsal horn projection cells enter the brain through several pathways, including the spinothalamic tract and spinoreticular tract. Distinct thalamic nuclei receive nociceptive input from the spinal cord and have projections to several regions in the cerebral cortex, where the perception of pain is presumed to occur.


Therapeutic approaches that target pain transmission include opioid analgesics that bind to opioid receptors on primary afferent and dorsal horn neurons. These agents mimic the inhibitory effects of endogenous opioids. Another medication, baclofen (Lioresal), inhibits transmission by binding to GABA receptors, thus mimicking the inhibitory effects of GABA.



Perception.


Perception occurs when pain is recognized, defined, and assigned meaning by the individual experiencing the pain. In the brain, nociceptive input is perceived as pain. There is no single, precise location where pain perception occurs. Instead, pain perception involves several brain structures. For example, it is believed that the reticular activating system (RAS) is responsible for warning the individual to attend to the pain stimulus; the somatosensory system is responsible for localization and characterization of pain; and the limbic system is responsible for the emotional and behavioral responses to pain. Cortical structures also are crucial to constructing the meaning of the pain.


Therefore behavioral strategies such as distraction and relaxation are effective pain-reducing therapies for many people. By directing attention away from the pain sensation, patients can reduce the sensory and affective components of pain. Opioids and other classes of analgesics such as some types of antiseizure drugs and antidepressants modify pain perception.



Modulation.


Modulation involves the activation of descending pathways that exert inhibitory or facilitatory effects on the transmission of pain (see Fig. 9-1). Depending on the type and degree of modulation, nociceptive stimuli may or may not be perceived as pain. Modulation of pain signals can occur at the level of the periphery, spinal cord, brainstem, and cerebral cortex. Descending modulatory fibers release chemicals such as serotonin, norepinephrine, GABA, and endogenous opioids that can inhibit pain transmission.


Several antidepressants exert their effects through the modulatory systems. For example, tricyclic antidepressants (e.g., amitriptyline [Elavil]) and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) (e.g., venlafaxine [Effexor] and duloxetine [Cymbalta]) are used in the management of chronic nonmalignant and cancer pain. These agents interfere with the reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine, thereby increasing their availability to inhibit noxious stimuli.



Classification of Pain


Pain can be categorized in several ways. Most commonly, pain is categorized as nociceptive or neuropathic based on underlying pathology (Table 9-3). Another useful scheme is to classify pain as acute or chronic (Table 9-4).



TABLE 9-3


COMPARISON OF NOCICEPTIVE AND NEUROPATHIC PAIN





















  Nociceptive Pain Neuropathic Pain*
Definition Normal processing of stimulus that damages normal tissue or has the potential to do so if prolonged. Abnormal processing of sensory input by the peripheral or central nervous system.
Treatment Usually responsive to nonopioid and/or opioid drugs. Treatment usually includes adjuvant analgesics.
Types



image


Adapted from National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke: Complex regional pain syndrome fact sheet. Retrieved from www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/reflex_sympathetic_dystrophy/detail_reflex_sympathetic_dystrophy.htm.


CNS, Central nervous system; GI, gastrointestinal.


*Note: Some types of neuropathic pain (e.g., postherpetic neuralgia) are caused by more than one neuropathologic mechanism.




Nociceptive Pain


Nociceptive pain is caused by damage to somatic or visceral tissue. Somatic pain often is further categorized as superficial or deep. Superficial pain arises from skin, mucous membranes, and subcutaneous tissues. It is often described as sharp, burning, or prickly. Deep pain is often characterized as deep, aching, or throbbing and originates in bone, joint, muscle, skin, or connective tissue.


Visceral pain comes from the activation of nociceptors in the internal organs and lining of the body cavities such as the thoracic and abdominal cavities. Visceral nociceptors respond to inflammation, stretching, and ischemia. Stretching of hollow viscera in the intestines and bladder that occurs from tumor involvement or obstruction can produce distention and intense cramping pain. Examples of visceral nociceptive pain include pain from a surgical incision, pancreatitis, and inflammatory bowel disease.



Neuropathic Pain


Neuropathic pain is caused by damage to peripheral nerves or structures in the CNS.14 Typically described as numbing, hot, burning, shooting, stabbing, sharp, or electric shock–like, neuropathic pain can be sudden, intense, short lived, or lingering. Paroxysmal firing of injured nerves is responsible for shooting and electric shock–like sensations. Common causes of neuropathic pain include trauma, inflammation (e.g., secondary to a herniated disc inflaming the adjacent nerve and dorsal root ganglion), metabolic diseases (e.g., diabetes mellitus), alcoholism, infections of the nervous system (e.g., herpes zoster, human immunodeficiency virus), tumors, toxins, and neurologic diseases (e.g., multiple sclerosis).


Deafferentation pain results from loss of afferent input secondary to either peripheral nerve injury (e.g., amputation) or CNS damage, including a spinal cord injury. Sympathetically maintained pain is associated with dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system, and central pain is caused by CNS lesions or dysfunction. Painful peripheral polyneuropathies (pain felt along the distribution of multiple peripheral nerves) and painful mononeuropathies (pain felt along the distribution of a damaged nerve) arise from damage to peripheral nerves and generate pain that may be described as burning, paroxysmal, or shock-like. The patient may have associated positive or negative motor and sensory signs, including numbness, allodynia, or change in reflexes and motor strength. No single quality descriptor or sign or symptom is diagnostic for neuropathic pain. Examples of neuropathic pain include postherpetic neuralgia, phantom limb pain, diabetic neuropathies, and trigeminal neuralgia.


One particularly debilitating type of neuropathic pain is complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Typical features include dramatic changes in the color and temperature of the skin over the affected limb or body part, accompanied by intense burning pain, skin sensitivity, sweating, and swelling. CRPS type I is frequently triggered by tissue injury, surgery, or a vascular event such as stroke.14 CRPS type II includes all these features in addition to a peripheral nerve lesion.


Neuropathic pain often is not well controlled by opioid analgesics alone. Treatment frequently necessitates a multimodal approach combining various adjuvant analgesics, including tricyclic antidepressants (e.g., nortriptyline [Pamelor], desipramine [Norpramin]), SNRIs (e.g., venlafaxine, duloxetine, bupropion [Wellbutrin, Zyban]), antiseizure drugs (e.g., gabapentin [Neurontin], pregabalin [Lyrica]), transdermal lidocaine, and α2-adrenergic agonists (e.g., clonidine [Catapres]). NMDA receptor antagonists such as ketamine have shown promise in alleviating neuropathic pain refractory to other drugs.14



Acute and Chronic Pain


Acute pain and chronic pain differ in their cause, course, manifestations, and treatment (see Table 9-4). Examples of acute pain include postoperative pain, labor pain, pain from trauma (e.g., lacerations, fractures, sprains), pain from infection (e.g., dysuria from cystitis), and pain from acute ischemia. For acute pain, treatment includes analgesics for symptom control and treatment of the underlying cause (e.g., splinting for a fracture, antibiotic therapy for an infection). Normally, acute pain diminishes over time as healing occurs. However, acute pain that persists can ultimately lead to disabling chronic pain states. For example, pain associated with herpes zoster (shingles) subsides as the acute infection resolves, usually within a month. However, sometimes the pain persists and develops into a chronic pain state called postherpetic neuralgia.


Chronic pain, or persistent pain, lasts for longer periods, often defined as longer than 3 months or past the time when an expected acute pain or acute injury should subside. The severity and functional impact of chronic pain often are disproportionate to objective findings because of changes in the nervous system not detectable with standard tests. Whereas acute pain functions as a signal, warning the person of potential or actual tissue damage, chronic pain does not appear to have an adaptive role. Chronic pain can be disabling and often is accompanied by anxiety and depression. As previously discussed, untreated acute pain leads to chronic pain through central sensitization and neuroplasticity. Consequently, it is imperative to treat acute pain aggressively and effectively to help prevent chronic pain.



Pain Assessment


Assessment is an essential, though often overlooked, step in pain management. Regularly screen all patients for pain and, when present, perform a more thorough pain assessment. The key to accurate and effective pain assessment is to consider the core principles of pain assessment (Table 9-5).



TABLE 9-5


CORE PRINCIPLES OF PAIN ASSESSMENT



































Principles Nursing Implications
1. Patients have the right to appropriate assessment and management of pain.
2. Pain is always subjective.
3. Physiologic and behavioral signs of pain (e.g., tachycardia, grimacing) are not reliable or specific for pain.
4. Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience.
5. Assessment approaches, including tools, must be appropriate for the patient population.
6. Pain can exist even when no physical cause can be found.
7. Different patients experience different levels of pain in response to comparable stimuli.
8. Patients with chronic pain may be more sensitive to pain and other stimuli.
9. Unrelieved pain has adverse consequences. Acute pain that is not adequately controlled can result in physiologic changes that increase the likelihood of developing persistent pain.


image


The goals of a nursing pain assessment are to (1) describe the patient’s pain experience in order to identify and implement appropriate pain management techniques and (2) identify the patient’s goal for therapy and resources for self-management.



Elements of a Pain Assessment


Most components of a pain assessment involve direct interview or observation of the patient. Diagnostic studies and physical examination findings complete the initial assessment. Although the assessment differs according to the clinical setting, patient population, and point of care (i.e., whether the assessment is part of an initial workup or a reassessment of pain following therapy), the evaluation of pain should always be multidimensional (Table 9-6).



Before beginning any assessment, recognize that patients may use words other than “pain.” For example, older adults may deny that they have pain but respond positively when asked if they have soreness or aching. Document the specific words that the patient uses to describe pain. Then consistently ask the patient about pain using those words.



Pain Pattern.


Assessing pain onset involves determining when the pain started. Patients with acute pain resulting from injury, acute illness, or treatment (e.g., surgery) typically know exactly when their pain began. Those with chronic pain may be less able to identify when the pain started. Establish the duration of the pain (how long it has lasted). This information helps to determine whether the pain is acute or chronic and assists in identifying the cause of the pain. For example, a patient with advanced cancer who also has chronic low back pain from spinal stenosis reports a sudden, severe pain in the back that began 2 days ago. Knowing the onset and duration can lead to a diagnostic workup that may reveal new metastatic disease in the spine.


Pain pattern also provides clues about the cause of the pain and directs its treatment. Many types of chronic pain (e.g., arthritis pain) increase and decrease over time. A patient may have pain all the time (constant, around-the-clock pain), as well as discrete periods of intermittent pain.


Breakthrough pain (BTP) is transient, moderate to severe pain that occurs in patients whose baseline persistent pain is otherwise mild to moderate and fairly well controlled. The average peak of BTP can be 3 to 5 minutes, and can last up to 30 minutes or even longer. BTP can either be predictable or unpredictable, and patients can have one to many episodes per day. Several transmucosal fentanyl products are specifically used to treat BTP.


End-of-dose failure is pain that occurs before the expected duration of a specific analgesic. It should not be confused with BTP. Pain that occurs at the end of the duration of an analgesic often leads to a prolonged increase in the baseline persistent pain. For example, in a patient on transdermal fentanyl (Duragesic patches) the typical duration of action is 72 hours. An increase in pain after 48 hours on the drug would be characterized as end-of-dose failure. End-of-dose failure signals the need for changes in the dose or scheduling of the analgesic. Episodic, procedural, or incident pain is a transient increase in pain that is caused by a specific activity or event that precipitates pain. Examples include dressing changes, movement, position changes, and procedures such as catheterization.



Location.


Determining the location of pain assists in identifying possible causes and treatment. Some patients may be able to specify the precise location(s) of their pain, whereas others may describe general areas or comment that they “hurt all over.” The location of the pain may also be referred from its origin to another site (see Fig. 9-2). For example, myocardial infarction can result in pain in the left shoulder. Pain may also radiate from its origin to another site. For example, angina pectoris can radiate from the chest to the jaw or down the left arm. This is referred to as radiating pain. Sciatica is pain that follows the course of the sciatic nerve. It may originate from joints or muscles around the back or from compression or damage to the sciatic nerve. The pain is projected along the course of the peripheral nerve, causing painful shooting sensations down the back of the thigh and inside of the leg to the foot.


Obtain information about the location of pain by asking the patient to (1) describe the site(s) of pain, (2) point to painful areas on the body, or (3) mark painful areas on a pain map (see eFig. 9-2, available on the website for this chapter). Because many patients have more than one site of pain, make certain that the patient describes every location.



Intensity.


Assessing the severity, or intensity, of pain provides a reliable measure to determine the type of treatment and its effectiveness. Pain scales help the patient communicate pain intensity. Choice of a scale to use should be based on the patient’s developmental needs and cognitive status. Most adults can rate the intensity of their pain using numeric scales (e.g., 0 = no pain, 10 = the worst pain) or verbal descriptor scales (e.g., none, a little, moderate, severe). These tools are sometimes easier for patients to use if they are oriented vertically or include a visual component. The Pain Thermometer Scale is an example of this type of scale15 (Fig. 9-3). Other visual pain measures or scales include the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (see eFig. 9-3 on the website for this chapter) and the FACES Pain Scale–Revised (see eFig. 9-4 on the website for this chapter). These and other pain scales may be useful for patients with cognitive or language barriers to describe their pain.16 Pain assessment measures for cognitively impaired adults and nonverbal adults are addressed later in this chapter.



Although intensity is an important factor in determining analgesic approaches, do not dose patients with opioids solely based on reported pain scores.17 Opioid “dosing by numbers” without taking into account a patient’s sedation level and respiratory status can lead to unsafe practices and serious adverse events. Safer analgesic administration can be achieved by balancing an amount of pain relief with analgesic side effects. Adjustments in therapy can be made to promote better pain control and minimize adverse outcomes.










Pain Treatment


Basic Principles


All pain treatment plans are based on the following 10 principles and practice standards:



1.Follow the principles of pain assessment (see Table 9-5). Remember that pain is a subjective experience. The patient is not only the best judge of his or her own pain, but also the expert on the effectiveness of each pain treatment.


2. Use a holistic approach to pain management. The experience of pain affects all aspects of a person’s life. Thus a holistic approach to assessment, treatment, and evaluation is required.18


3. Every patient deserves adequate pain management. Many patient populations, including ethnic minorities, older adults, and people with past or current substance abuse, are at risk for inadequate pain management. Be aware of your own biases and ensure that all patients are treated respectfully.


4. Base the treatment plan on the patient’s goals. Discuss with the patient realistic goals for pain relief during the initial pain assessment. Although goals can be described in terms of pain intensity (e.g., the desire for average pain to decrease from “8/10” to “3/10”), with chronic pain conditions functional goal setting should be encouraged (e.g., a goal of performing certain daily activities, such as socializing and hobbies). Over the course of prolonged therapy, reassess these goals and progress made toward meeting them. The patient, in collaboration with the health care team, determines new goals. If the patient has unrealistic goals for therapy, such as wanting to be completely rid of all chronic arthritis pain, work with the patient to establish a more realistic goal.


5. Use both drug and nondrug therapies. Although drugs are often considered the mainstay of therapy, incorporate self-care activities and nondrug therapies to increase the overall effectiveness of therapy and to allow for the reduction of drug dosages to minimize adverse drug effects.19


6. When appropriate, use a multimodal approach to analgesic therapy. Multimodal analgesia is the use of two or more classes of analgesic medications to take advantage of the various mechanisms of action. This approach achieves superior pain relief, enhances patient satisfaction, and decreases adverse effects of individual drugs.20


7. Address pain using an interdisciplinary approach. The expertise and perspectives of an interdisciplinary team are often necessary to provide effective evaluation and therapies for patients with pain, especially chronic pain. Interdisciplinary teams frequently include psychology, physical and occupational therapy, pharmacy, spiritual care, and multiple medical specialties (e.g., neurology, palliative care, oncology, surgery, anesthesiology). Some pain teams also include massage therapists, music therapists, acupuncturists, and art therapists.


8. Evaluate the effectiveness of all therapies to ensure that they are meeting the patient’s goals. Achievement of an effective treatment plan often requires trial and error. Adjustments in drug, dosage, or route are common to achieve maximal benefit while minimizing adverse effects. This trial-and-error process can become frustrating for the patient and caregivers. Reassure them that pain relief, if not pain cessation, is possible and that the health care team will continue to work with them to achieve adequate pain relief.


9. Prevent and/or manage medication side effects. Side effects are a major reason for treatment failure and nonadherence. Side effects are managed in one of several ways, as described in Table 9-7. You play a key role in monitoring for and treating side effects, and in teaching patients and caregivers how to minimize these effects.



TABLE 9-7


DRUG THERAPY Managing Side Effects of Pain Medications






Side effects can be managed in one or more of the following methods.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 17, 2016 | Posted by in NURSING | Comments Off on Pain

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access