Pain

2 Pain





Nursing diagnoses:




Chronic pain


related to disease process, injury, or surgical procedure


Desired Outcome: Patient’s subjective report of pain using a pain scale, family’s report, and behavioral and/or physiologic indicators reflect that pain is either reduced or at an acceptable level within 1-2 hr.











































ASSESSMENT/INTERVENTIONS RATIONALES
Obtain history about ongoing/previous pain experiences and previously used methods of pain control. Elicit what was/was not effective. Consider whether pain is acute, chronic, or acute with an underlying chronic component. A pain history enables development of a systematic approach to pain management for each patient, using information gathered from pain history and the hierarchy of pain measurement (self-report, pathologic conditions or procedures that usually cause pain, behavioral indicators, report of family, and physiologic indicators). Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) and American Pain Society (APS) state self-report of pain is the single most reliable indicator of pain.
Use a formal patient-specific method of assessing self-reported pain when possible, including description, location, intensity, and aggravating/alleviating factors.


Assess for behavioral and physiologic indicators of pain at frequent intervals (e.g., during scheduled vital signs [VS] assessments). Document responses.


  Physiologic responses: Examples include diaphoresis, vasoconstriction, increased or decreased blood pressure (15% or more from baseline), increased pulse rate (15% or more from baseline), pupillary dilation, change in respiratory rate (RR) (usually increased to greater than 20 breaths/min), muscle tension or spasm, and decreased intestinal motility (evidenced by nausea, vomiting). Physiologic indicators may reflect pain as a result of autonomic stimulation of the sympathetic and parasympathetic responses.
Teach patients that pain assessment and management are not only a part of their treatment but also their right. Patients have the right to appropriate assessment and management of their pain (TJC, 2003).
Evaluate patient’s health history for alcohol and drug (prescribed and nonprescribed) use, which could affect effective doses of analgesics (i.e., patient may require more or less). Ensure that surgeon, anesthesiologist, and other health care providers are aware of any significant findings. Consult a pain management team if available. Other drug use could alter effective doses of analgesics or lead to undertreatment. All care providers must be consistent in setting limits while providing effective pain control through pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic methods. Psychiatric or clinical pharmacology consultation may be necessary.
Develop a systematic and collaborative approach to pain management for each patient, using information gathered from pain history and the hierarchy of pain measurement. American Society for Pain Management and American Nurses Association (2005) identifies importance of involvement of patient, family, and other health care providers in data collection, formulation of outcomes, and development of the pain management plan. The AHCPR and APS state self-report of pain is the single most reliable indicator of pain.
Use at least two identifiers (e.g., patient’s name, medical record number) before administering medications. Using two or more identifiers improves accuracy of patient identification in keeping with The Joint Commision (TJC) National Patient Safety Goals promoting the right patient receiving the right medication.
Use a preventive approach: administer prn pain medications before pain becomes severe as well as before painful procedures, ambulation, and bedtime. Prolonged stimulation of pain receptors results in increased sensitivity to painful stimuli and the need to increase the amount of drug required to relieve pain.
Administer analgesics according to the World Health Organization (WHO, 1996) three-step analgesic ladder. The WHO analgesic ladder focuses on selecting analgesics and adjuvants based on pain intensity. The WHO analgesic ladder has been endorsed by the AHCPR Guidelines (1994) and the APS (2003). Note: Not all patients start with the first step; the process is determined by the etiology and severity of the pain. The three steps include:


Recognize that choice of analgesic agent is based on three general considerations: therapeutic goal, patient’s medical condition, and drug cost. Individualized therapeutic goal and the stage of illness/disease process are important factors in agent selection to maximize pain relief and minimize potential of adverse side effects. The difference in cost of different drugs used to accomplish the same goal may be large. Where there is no proven or expected benefit of using one drug in preference to another to accomplish a desired goal, the less costly drug should be considered. The right drug is the one that works with the fewest side effects.
Also consider convenience, anticipated analgesic requirements, side effects, and patient’s previous experience with a specific agent or patient’s recall of side effects experienced with a specific agent, including route. The preferred route is the one that is least invasive while achieving adequate relief. Aversion to painful routes of delivery (e.g., subcutaneous, intramuscular [IM]) may lead to underreporting of pain by patients and to undermedication by nurses.
< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 18, 2016 | Posted by in NURSING | Comments Off on Pain

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access