Integrative care

CHAPTER 35


Integrative care


Laura Cox Dzurec and Rothlyn P. Zahourek




image


Visit the Evolve website for a pretest on the content in this chapter: http://evolve.elsevier.com/Varcarolis


image


This chapter considers integrative care as part of a holistic nursing philosophy. Integrative care is often referred to as integrative medicine or as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Since these terms are widely accepted, they are used interchangeably throughout this chapter.


Integrative care places the patient at the center of care, focuses on prevention and wellness, and attends to the patient’s physical, mental, and spiritual needs (Institute of Medicine, 2009). Many of the philosophical underpinnings for the approaches presented in this chapter are derived from non-Western cultural traditions or from quantum physics and studies in the nature of energy and reality.


The trend toward adoption and use of integrative care modalities in Western health care is fairly recent and, over time, has been influenced by changes in dominant scientific theory and belief (Weldon, 2011). Across its individual therapies, integrative care is directed at healing, and its practitioners consider the whole person (mind, body, and spirit), along with the lifestyle of the person in their choice of treatment options. Establishing a therapeutic nurse/patient relationship is integral to integrative care, which includes both conventional and alternative therapies as required by the individual patient or client. Clinicians may choose to use integrative care as a substitute for, or combined with, conventional therapies or treatments.




Integrative Care In The United States


The conventional health care system (also referred to as allopathic, mainstream, or orthodox medicine; regular medicine; and biomedicine) in the United States is based largely on highly controlled and federally regulated scientific research. One of the essential differences between conventional and integrative health care is that conventional medicine focuses on what is done to the patient whereas integrative practices are patient-centered, meaning that the patient participates with the provider to heal the body and mind.


Due to the growing interest in and use of CAM in the United States, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) established the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) in 1998, making it one of 27 institutes and centers of the NIH. The NCCAM supports fair, evidence-based, scientific evaluation of integrative therapies and the dissemination of information to assist health care providers in making relatively informed choices regarding the safety and appropriateness of CAM. Since 2000, NCCAM has been awarded $2 billion for research, and as of 2011, NCCAM’s annual budget was $134 million.


In 2011, NCCAM released a set of goals and objectives intended to benchmark its research priorities through 2015 in a document called Exploring the Science of Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Third Strategic Plan 2011–2015. Through this plan, NCCAM describes how it proposes to direct funding for research in complementary and alternative medicine for the next 5 years. The document addresses the conduct of research and the strengths and limitations of the scientific method for determining how CAM is used.


Study at this level—that is, study that questions research practices as well as the findings that those practices generate—is essential to optimal understanding of CAM modalities. Over the years since its establishment, NCCAM has been the subject of debate as questions of the efficacy of alternative therapies, and the appropriateness of allocating public funds for their study, continue to surface. The results of empirical studies have not convincingly established the efficacy of CAM modalities for improving the health of patients, nor have they ruled out the possibility of their worth.


What is clear in regard to CAM is that it is being used. The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) National Health Interview Survey included 31,000 people. They were surveyed regarding their use of 26 complementary and alternative treatments (Barnes et al., 2008). Below is a summary of the survey”s findings:



Despite debates surrounding its efficacy, CAM has been steadily integrated into Western health care practice since 2002. This increased use may be due to a greater availability of CAM-prepared practitioners and practice facilities, along with more public exposure to CAM through the media. Box 35-1 lists the types of CAM included in the 2007 National Health Interview Survey, and Figure 35-1 is a graph comparing the 10 most commonly used therapies among adults surveyed.




The children of parents who use natural supplements, not surprisingly, were more likely to use them as well. The profile for a child who uses supplements is one who is white, non-Hispanic, adolescent, insured, lives in the western portion of the country, and has educated parents. Another factor that related to use of supplements was the presence of health conditions and frequent visits to the primary care provider.


In 2011, the AARP (formerly the American Association of Retired Persons) and the National Institutes of Public Health worked together to study conversations between people 50 and older and their health care providers regarding their use of CAM. They found that half of the people they surveyed used dietary supplements or herbal products and over 75% took one or more prescription medications. Study authors expressed concern that a significant number of respondents did not discuss their use of supplements and herbal products with their health care providers. Providers may not have a full picture of the ways people ages 50 and over seek to improve their health or of the implications of integration of CAM into traditional health care practices (AARP/NIH, 2011).



Research


As noted, although research on the efficacy of CAM is increasing, studies in the field are minimal and often controversial when compared to those of conventional medicine. At issue is not only the comparison of traditional and alternative therapies but also the question of what actually counts as evidence to support their use (Walach, 2009). Numerous explanations contribute to the current complexity of CAM research and knowledge, including (1) the relatively recent use of some of these therapies in the United States, (2) lack of financial incentive to support the research, (3) difficulties encountered by researchers when studying these modalities (Box 35-2), (4) the evolution of complementary science in the Western world (Weldon, 2011), and (5) the eagerness with which the public has begun to embrace these modalities.



Incorporation of CAM into Western health care practice has required a significant change in the way providers and researchers think about CAM. There has been a paradigm shift, or a major change, in the way that people think about things. This paradigm shift has instigated dramatic change in regard to perceptions of the legitimacy of nontraditional approaches to health care (van der Riet, 2011). CAM is being explored for such diverse and serious problems as neurocognitive disorders, substance abuse treatment, depression, traumatic life events, negative affect, trauma, pain, cancer, and diabetes (Edwards, 2012; Denneson, 2011). Reflexology, body work, prayer, visualization, breathing meditation, chiropractic, diet and/or megavitamin therapy, relaxation, massage, and poetry are among the CAM methods that are widely used.


Issues of finance also influence the use of integrative therapies. If a pharmaceutical company studies and patents a drug, it can reap considerable financial return; however, an herb cannot be patented and exclusively marketed, so there is little incentive to invest in researching its uses and effects. Governmental sources of funding such as the NCCAM and NIH, as well as nonprofit groups, are continuing to sponsor research that should contribute to further understanding of CAM. Nursing groups such as Healing Touch International and the American Holistic Nurses Association (AHNA) are emphasizing research and are beginning to catalogue findings and new interventions on their websites.


CAM is controversial, complex, and challenging. Full knowledge of integrative therapies of their effects, side effects, and interactions with dominant treatment modalities have yet to be determined. Both provider and consumer response to them continues to shift in response to available knowledge and understanding.



Consumers and integrative care


Consumers are attracted to integrative care for a variety of reasons, including the following:



Because the demand for alternative medications is growing, the promise of financial gain is growing as well, and product marketing has become an industry. One marketer opens his website with the following comment: “FDA guidelines on supplement marketing have tightened in recent years. Supplement marketers now need more substantiation than ever” (Dougherty, 2011). Those companies selling supplements need to appeal to an increasingly well-informed audience. As a consequence, their marketing efforts need to reflect not only efforts to meet a growing public demand for CAM therapies and modalities, but also efforts to convince people of the legitimacy of the science surrounding their use and perceived efficacy.


Strong claims often are made on behalf of CAM therapies and modalities. One of the most common marketing angles is to use the term “natural” (Chiappedi, 2010). “Natural” emphasizes the notion that the chemicals in these medications are present in nature. Through its simplicity, the notion of “naturalness” suggests that alternative medications are harmless. However, even if they are naturally occurring, the chemicals contained in alternative medicines remain chemicals. The body does not distinguish between naturally occurring chemicals and those synthesized in a laboratory. Some natural substances are just not safe. Consider arsenic, for example, which is abundant in nature.


Knowledgeable consumers, relying on health information available through public libraries, popular bookstores, and the Internet, may question providers about aspects of conventional health care. Nurses’ knowledge about CAM modalities and their commitment to ongoing evaluation of related evidence regarding the effectiveness of these modalities will provide information to patients and support general awareness of the efficacy of CAM in health care practice. For example, consumers are using herbal remedies to treat a variety of psychiatric conditions, including depression, which is among the most common complaints of all patients seeking medical treatment (Blues Busters, 2011). The wide range of herbs used without the guidance of a knowledgeable practitioner can result in serious side effects through their direct influence on the body and through interactions with other herbs and drugs.


Nurses’ roles in collecting good assessment data about the integrative therapies their patients are using cannot be overemphasized; further, helping consumers actively evaluate the quality of information available to them is important. Information broadly available to consumers through sources such as the Internet and other readily accessible sources may not be especially useful or accurate (Evans et al., 2011).



Safety and efficacy


As noted, people who use CAM therapies often do so without informing their conventional health care providers, which poses some risk. In the United States, there are no standards or regulations that guarantee the safety or efficacy of herbal products. Herbs and other food supplements do not have to undergo the same safety review as over-the-counter and prescription medications. Some consumers may believe that if they purchase a natural substance at a health food store, it must be safe and effective; however, as noted, “natural” does not mean “harmless.” Herbal products and supplements may contain powerful active ingredients that can cause damage if taken inappropriately; furthermore, a consumer cannot be sure that the amount of the herb or other active ingredient listed on the label is actually the amount in the product. Consumers may waste a great deal of money and risk their health on unproven, fraudulently marketed, useless, or harmful products and treatments.


Another concern regarding CAM therapies is that diagnosis and treatment may be delayed while patients try alternative interventions, which is common with mental health symptoms such as major depression and anxiety. On the other hand, many CAM practitioners can recount stories of patients who have been injured by a noncaring conventional medical system or who have suffered terrible consequences from the use of conventional pharmaceuticals.





Placebo effect


Some people make the claim that integrative therapies work through a mechanism known as the placebo effect. In fact, research indicates little difference between CAM to placebos. This lack of difference has fueled the debate about the efficacy of CAM modalities and spurred questions regarding the continuation of NCCAM funding. The placebo effect refers to a treatment that actually does nothing, even though the condition for which it is used improves in response to its use. Researchers and practitioners argue that improvements noted in response to placebo come about based on the power of suggestion and a belief that the treatment works. Research continues and is necessary to refute or support this claim; however, structuring research so that its outcomes accurately describe or predict reality is challenging.


The successes of integrative care may rely to a great degree on optimism. A positive approach and the use of positive suggestions, no matter what treatment modality is being implemented, typically yield a greater chance of success than do negative approaches and suggestions. The placebo effect can be most powerful when the need is greatest and a trusting relationship has been established between patient and caregiver. Saying “This will hurt” (more negative) may result in a negative placebo effect whereas saying “This may cause some brief discomfort, but I know it can make you better” (more positive) may result in a positive placebo effect. As a consequence of the complexities of the patient/caregiver relationship, the readiness of the patient to experience a positive result from CAM, and the actual efficacy of a given CAM intervention in itself, study of the effects of those modalities is challenged. The interrelationships of these factors make teasing out actual cause and effect difficult. A major report on the mechanism and value of the placebo as a mind-body response can be found in the CAM at the NIH newsletter (NCCAM, 2007b). It falls to the practitioner, and to the student learning about CAM, to determine whether or not use of CAM is optimal for a given patient.



Integrative nursing care


The American Nurses Association (ANA) recognizes holistic nursing as a specialty, publishing Holistic Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice in 2007. Holistic nursing is defined as “all nursing that has healing the whole person as its goal” (AHNA, 1998). Holism is described as involving (1) the identification of the interrelationships of the bio-psycho-social-spiritual dimensions of the person, recognizing that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts, and (2) understanding of the individual as a unitary whole in mutual process with the environment (AHNA, 2004). Holistic nursing accepts both views and believes that the goals of nursing can be achieved within either framework.


Nurses in any setting should have a basic knowledge of treatments used in integrative care for several reasons. One is that they care for patients who increasingly are using a variety of unconventional modalities to meet their health needs. To fully understand the needs of patients, it is essential that nurses ask questions about the use of CAM as part of a holistic assessment. This practice is encouraged by NCCAM (2008f) and is emphasized in newer, published standards of nursing practice. Nursing education programs are including basic integrative modalities such as relaxation and imagery in nursing curricula, and some may include energy-based approaches such as therapeutic touch.


Holistic assessments include the traditional areas of inquiry such as history, present illness, family medical history, and history of surgeries as well as medications taken and response to these medications; however, the holistic-integrative assessment also includes areas such as the quality of social relationships, the meaning of work, the impact of major stressors in the person’s life, strategies used to cope with stress (including relaxation, meditation, deep breathing, etc.), and the importance of spirituality and religion and cultural values in the person’s life. Patients also are asked what they really love, how this is manifested in their lives, what their strengths are, and to identify the personal gifts they bring to the world (Maizes et al., 2003).



Credentials in integrative care


Graduate programs in the United States that prepare nurses with a specialty in holistic nursing are increasing in number. Doctor of nursing practice (DNP) programs with an emphasis in integrative health have been developed. Numerous post-master’s certificate programs exist for advanced practice registered nurses.


The American Holistic Nurses” Credentialing Corporation (AHNCC) offers two levels of certification for registered nurses: the holistic nurse, board certified (HN-BC) for diploma or associate degree-prepared nurses, and the holistic baccalaureate nurse, board certified (HNB-BC) for baccalaureate-prepared nurses. AHNCC also offers two certificates for advanced practice nurses. Credentialing procedures are in place for many of the non-nursing modalities, such as acupuncture, chiropractic medicine, naturopathy, and massage therapy. Efforts are underway to regulate integrative care through credentialing of integrative physicians and non-physician practitioners, including nurses.


Integrative care is classified according to a general approach to care and is separated into these domains: (1) natural products, (2) mind and body approaches, (3) manipulative practices, (4) body-based practices, and (5) other CAM therapies (NCCAM, 2011). Some CAM therapies may fit into more than one domain.



Natural products


Natural products include herbal medicine (botanicals) and also vitamins, minerals, and other “natural” products. With the proliferation of literature on herbal remedies and the accessibility of the products, increasing numbers of consumers are using these products to manage symptoms. Purchasing over-the-counter medications allows people to bypass a visit to a health care provider, thereby eliminating the cost and inconvenience of a visit as well as the real or perceived stigma on the part of the health care provider and others of a psychiatric label. As noted previously, however, use of these therapies may compromise treatment and/or health if they interact inappropriately or interfere with patient use of mainstream treatment approaches.



Diet and nutrition

Because psychiatric illness affects the whole person, it is not surprising that patients with mental illnesses frequently have nutritional disturbances. Often their diets are deficient in the proper nutrients, or they may eat too much or too little. Obesity and diabetes coexist at a greater than average rate in persons with psychiatric disorders. Nutritional states may also cause psychiatric disturbances. Anemia, a common deficiency disease, is often accompanied by depression.


There is a good deal of study of the influence of diet and nutrition on health (Simpson et al., 2011). It is important that clinicians assess for patients’ use of nutrients such as vitamins, protein supplements, herbal preparations, enzymes, and hormones that are considered dietary supplements. These dietary supplements are sold without the premarketing safety evaluations required of new food ingredients. Dietary supplements can be labeled with certain health claims if they meet published requirements of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). They also may be labeled with a disclaimer saying that the supplement has not been evaluated by the FDA and is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Clinicians and consumers both should know, however, that the FDA does not regulate supplements and that claims offered on supplement labels may or may not be accurate.


Some nutritional supplements interact with medications. There are well-known interactions between prescription drugs and vitamins (e.g., vitamin E and anticoagulants), but drug interactions with other supplements are not so easily recognized or well understood. Nurses should specifically ask about patients’ use of supplements during the assessment and should not expect patients to share this information without being asked. Nurses can review the use of the supplements and the potential interactions with foods, drugs, and other supplements to reduce risks. As an example, a serious hypertensive reaction can occur when a patient who is taking a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) for depression ingests a food that contains tyramine, such as aged cheese, pickled or smoked fish, or red wine.


Megavitamin therapy, also called orthomolecular therapy, is a nutritional therapy that involves taking large amounts of vitamins, minerals, and amino acids. The theory is that the inability to absorb nutrients from a proper diet alone may lead to the development of illnesses. The earliest use of megavitamin therapy was for the treatment of schizophrenia, for which niacin was recommended.


Avoiding artificial food coloring became popular in the 1970s for treating children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and other developmental disorders. The Food and Drug Administration long ago determined that there is no definitive link between these disorders and food dyes; however, some clinicians and parents believe that children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder are vulnerable to synthetic color additives (Food and Drug Administration, 2011).


Nutritional therapies are used to treat a variety of disorders, including depression, anxiety, ADHD, menopausal symptoms, dementia, and addictions. For instance, lower rates of anxiety and depression are reported among vegetarians than among non vegetarians. An analysis of the vegetarian diet found a higher antioxidant level compared with the non vegetarian diet, which suggests that antioxidants may play a role in the prevention of depression.


The efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids continues to be studied in the treatment of depression and bipolar depression. In a meta-analysis of studies of omega-3 supplements, Eisenberg and colleagues (2006) concluded that they could recommend them as adjuncts to standard treatment for depression and bipolar disorder. Chiu and colleagues (2008) reviewed epidemiological evidence, preclinical trials, and case-controlled studies on the use of omega-3 fatty acids and recommend that patients with depression and bipolar depression follow the same guidelines as for the American Heart Association. These stipulate that adults eat fish at least twice a week. Some authors (Chiu et al., 2008) argue that patients with mood disorders, impulse-control disorders, and psychotic disorders should consume 1 gram of omega-3 fatty acids a day.


Certain nutritional supplements, including S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe) and the B vitamins (especially vitamin B6 and folic acid), also appear to improve depression (Lakhan & Vieira, 2008). Currently, B vitamins and folic acid are also being seen more favorably for the management of bipolar illness and schizophrenia. According to Lake (2006), these vitamins often augment conventional care with antipsychotic, antidepressant, and antimanic medications. The researchers recommend that combining such approaches with exercise and meditative practices such as yoga is helpful. In a recent random, controlled trial investigating vitamins B12 and B6 and folic acid for the onset of depressive symptoms in older men (Ford et al., 2008), the vitamin supplements were found to be no more effective than placebo.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Feb 3, 2017 | Posted by in NURSING | Comments Off on Integrative care

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access