1. Discuss the context of family interventions, including the family movement, cultural competence, professional training, and a framework for working with families. 2. Analyze family assessment and planning, intervention, and outcomes. 3. Examine the research evidence for family interventions. • Family advocacy is a model of working with parents and family members to help them act as advocates with and on behalf of their family member with a disability. • Family-oriented practice refers to specific family interventions and to a broader conceptual framework for intervention that includes family-centered treatment. • Family intervention science is a well-defined area of research in changing behavior in families. Family advocacy groups can be effective in raising awareness among service providers, legislators, and the public for improved services and opportunities for family members with psychiatric illness. Family members are strong partners in the new recovery movement. Box 32-1 illustrates the power of consumer grassroots activity. Patient- and family-centered care is defined as an approach to the planning, delivery, and evaluation of health care that is grounded in mutually beneficial partnerships among health care providers, patients, and families. Four core concepts underlie patient- and family-centered care: dignity and respect, information sharing, participation, and collaboration. Box 32-2 describes activities for promoting dialogue and partnerships with patients and families. These activities are consistent with the tradition, roles, and practice of psychiatric nurses (see Box 32-2). Specific multicultural contexts include immigration status, economics, education, ethnicity, religion, gender, age, role, minority-majority status, and geography. Nurses need to examine their own sociocultural contexts, recognize similarities and differences with those of patients and families, assess the sociocultural context of the patient and family, and include sociocultural considerations in the assessment and planning of care for the family (Chapter 7). The Office of Minority Health National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Standards of Care case-based nursing curriculum modules and guidelines developed for youth with emotional, behavioral, and mental disorders and their families also can be used as guides to ensure cultural competence in the delivery of mental health services to families (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2007a,b). Theoretical approaches to intervention include cognitive behavioral, experiential, integrative, brief, systemic, narrative, psychodynamic, psychoanalytical, solution-focused, strategic, structural, and transgenerational approaches (Sadock and Sadock, 2007). Many of these family theories and interventional approaches overlap, and some have clinical evidence of effectiveness but not research evidence. During past decades, there has been a shift toward integrative family therapy. The risk and protective factors framework has been widely used in the family movement and in mental health prevention. These factors can include individual aspects of biology, behavior, personality, psychiatric, family, and environmental studies (O’Connell et al, 2009). Box 32-3 lists family risk and protective factors impacting children and adolescents. Examples of family risk factors include a sibling’s drug use or a lack of consistent discipline by parents. Family protective factors can include parental supervision, family cohesion, and attachment and bonding between parents and children. The risk and protective factors model is consistent with predisposing factors, precipitating stressors, and appraisal of stressors in the Stuart Stress Adaptation Model (see Chapter 3). Family theories provide a way to examine family processes, such as hierarchy (who is in charge), boundaries (closeness without too much closeness or enmeshment and distance or estrangement), and organization (how tasks are structured). It is important for the family therapist and psychiatric nurse to differentiate between adaptive and maladaptive family functioning in order to appropriately identify target symptoms for interventions. Characteristics of functional families are described in Chapter 10. • The acting-out adolescent who is a symptom bearer and whose symptoms bring the family to treatment • The overprotective mother and distant father (distant through work, alcohol, or physical absence) • The overfunctioning “superwife” or “superhusband” and the underfunctioning passive, dependent, and compliant spouse • The spouse who maintains peace at any price and denies difficulties in the marriage but suddenly feels wronged and self-righteous when the mate is discovered to be in legal trouble or having an affair • The child who exhibits evidence of poor peer relationships at school while attempting to parent younger siblings to compensate for ineffective or emotionally overwhelmed parents • The overly close three generations of grandparent, parent, and grandchild in which lines of authority and generational identity are poorly defined and the child acts out because of a lack of effective limit setting by an agreed-on parental figure • The family with a substance-abusing member • The family subjected to physical, emotional, or sexual abuse by one of its members • The child who is scapegoated by the family to diffuse marital conflict The goals of a family assessment and subsequent intervention are as follows:
Family Interventions
The Context of Family Interventions
The Family Movement
Cultural Competence
Framework for Family Work
Assessment and Planning
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree