Claim Submission Methods
Chapter objectives
After completion of this chapter, the student should be able to:
1. Explain how HIPAA’s technology standards influence electronic claims
2. Explain how technology influenced electronic claims
3. Discuss the impact of HIPAA on claims submission
4. Determine the rationale for the new HIPAA 5010 Standards
5. Outline the electronic billing process and list the information necessary for the process
6. Identify the advantages of electronic claims submission
7. Compare and contrast the use of a clearinghouse versus direct claims submission
Chapter terms
ASCII (American Standard Code for Information Interchange)
assign(s) benefits
beneficiary
claim attachments
claims clearinghouse
clean claims
CMS-1500 form
demographic information
dial-up(s)
direct claim submission
electronic protected health information (e-PHI)
employer identification number (EIN)
encounter form
guarantor
HIPAA-covered entity
insurance billing cycle
medical necessity
mono-spaced fonts
national provider identifier (NPI)
OCR scannable
optical character recognition (OCR)
patient ledger card
practice management software
protected health information (PHI)
release of information
small (entity) provider
third-party payer
waiver
Overview of the health insurance claims process
The health insurance claims process is an interaction between the healthcare provider and an insurance company (third-party payer). Sometimes referred to as the insurance billing cycle, this interaction can take anywhere from several days to several months to complete, depending on the number of exchanges in communication required. The cycle begins when a patient visits a healthcare provider, where a medical record is created or an existing one is updated. This record contains demographic information including, but not limited to, the patient’s name, address, Social Security number, date of birth, sex, telephone number(s), and insurance identification number(s). Also included in the record are examination details, medication prescribed, diagnoses, and suggested treatment. If the patient is a minor, information of the guarantor (a parent or an adult related to, or legally responsible for the patient) is recorded. The medical record can be paper, electronic, or a combination of both. It is a legal document and the information it contains is protected by privacy laws.
Once the patient visit is over, the health insurance professional (or medical biller) transmits information from the record to the insurance company in the form of a claim. Historically, claims were submitted using a paper form—the CMS-1500 form—named for its originator, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) (see later). After federal legislation was passed in 1996 (Health Insurance Privacy and Portability Act [HIPAA]), CMS directed providers who submitted claims to Medicare to do so electronically, with few exceptions. However, some providers, for example, dentists and small, rural practices, may still be using the paper form.
After the insurance company receives the claim, it is reviewed, evaluated for validity—patient eligibility, provider credentials, and medical necessity—and processed. (To meet the medical necessity criteria, services or supplies must be appropriate and necessary for the symptoms, diagnosis, and/or treatment of the medical condition and they meet the standards of good medical practice.) Approved claims are reimbursed according to pre-negotiated rates between the provider and the insurance contract. Failed claims are rejected, and notice is sent to both the provider and the patient. An explanation of benefits (EOB) or a remittance advice (RA) is generated for both approved and rejected claims. EOBs and RAs are discussed in a later chapter.
Two Basic Claims Submission Methods
In this chapter, we will talk about the two basic methods of submitting health insurance claims, electronic and paper. Submission of claims has gone through a metamorphosis just as health insurance itself has. Prior to the electronic age, providers submitted claims on paper through the mail. Every insurance carrier had its own specialized type of paperwork for submitting claims. Imagine the frustration a health insurance professional must have felt trying to figure out how to complete all these different forms properly. Then, in the mid-1970s, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA, pronounced “hick-fa”) created a new form for Medicare claims, called the HCFA-1500. The form was approved by the American Medical Association Council on Medical Services and was subsequently adopted by all government healthcare programs. Although the HCFA-1500 originally was developed for submitting Medicare claims, it eventually was accepted by most commercial/private insurance carriers to assist the standardization of the claims process. Because HCFA is now called the CMS, the form is called the CMS-1500; however, it is basically the same document as the original. The CMS-1500 has gone through several updates, the most recent being CMS-1500 (08-05).
Because many medical offices currently submit claims electronically, we will discuss the electronic claims submission process first; because some providers still use the paper claim form, submission of claims using the CMS-1500 is also discussed. The information needed for claims processing, however, is the same whether it is a paper or electronic claim.
Proposed Revisions to the CMS-1500 (08-05) Form
The National Uniform Claims Committee (NUCC) is proposing certain data reporting revisions in the Version 005010 837 professional electronic claim transaction. As of this writing, immediate changes are not anticipated to the paper CMS-1500 form; however, after considering several options for revising the form, the NUCC decided to proceed with making “minor changes” to the existing form. Also, a revised NUCC 1500 Health Insurance Claim Form Reference Instruction Manual is available as of July 2011. For a list of the proposed changes and to view a mock-up of the “cleaned” form, log on to the NUCC website at http://www.nucc.org/. The health insurance professionals should keep up to date with these potential changes to the 1500 form by periodically logging on to the NUCC website.
Electronic claims
With the development and growth of computer technology, specifically medical practice management software (a type of software that deals with the day-to-day operations of a medical practice), the way claims are generated and processed has changed. Practice management software allows users to enter patient demographic information, schedule appointments, maintain lists of insurance payers, perform billing tasks, and generate reports. Also known as health information systems, this category of software has made it possible to manage large numbers of insurance claims with various payers accurately and efficiently. Currently, many companies offer such software programs. Computer technology has also made claims submission faster and more accurate at a cost savings to the practice using it.
Although new technologies improved some facets in the administration of healthcare, others made it more complex. Just as in dealing with the many types of paper insurance claim forms and specific standards for completing each, payers once more developed individualized methods for providers to submit claims electronically. The result was added administrative costs for providers and the necessity for their staffs to learn various, often complicated, computer programs.
Health insurance portability and accountability act
A very significant change that impacted medical billing was the legislation passed by Congress in 1996—the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). HIPAA initiated changes to promote uniformity in healthcare claim submission by adopting standards for electronic health information transactions. This adoption eliminated most of the unique forms used by individual health insurance carriers and the different requirements for processing claims. By October 2003, every HIPAA-covered entity (healthcare plans, healthcare providers, and healthcare clearinghouses) was asked to begin using these standard formats for processing claims and payments as well as for the maintenance and transmission of electronic healthcare information and data. Prior to HIPAA, there were over 400 different ways to submit a claim. With HIPAA there are only two—submitting them electronically using the new standard transaction formats or (if the provider meets certain criteria) using the universal CMS-1500 paper form (discussed later in this chapter). This standardization of submitting claims and simplifying the processes involved makes getting paid quicker, easier, and less costly. The HIPAA mandates also help providers take advantage of new technologies, ultimately improving their overall business practices.
As a result of HIPAA, CMS directed all healthcare providers to submit Medicare claims electronically in a HIPAA-compliant format beginning in October 2003. Recognizing that this ruling could generate some challenging situations, the Administrative Simplification Compliance Act (ASCA) of 2001 identified limited exceptions to this requirement, which include:
• Roster billing of Medicare-covered vaccinations
• Claims in which there are two or more primary plans and Medicare is secondary
Also qualifying for exemption are small entities, or small providers—those with 25 or fewer full-time employees (FTEs)—and physicians, practitioners, and suppliers with 10 or fewer FTEs. This small entity exemption applies only to billing Medicare electronically, not to implementing HIPAA transactions and code sets.
The intent of HIPAA’s Administrative Simplification law was to provide consumers with greater access to healthcare insurance, to protect the privacy of healthcare data, and to promote more standardization and efficiency in the healthcare industry. Although HIPAA covers a number of important healthcare issues, this chapter focuses on the Administrative Simplification portion of the law—specifically HIPAA’s Electronic Transactions and Code Sets requirements. There are four parts to HIPAA’s Administrative Simplification:
Following is a brief summary of each of these four parts. For more detailed information on HIPAA’s Administrative Simplification Act, visit the Evolve site.
Electronic Transactions and Code Set Requirements
HIPAA requires every provider who conducts business electronically to use the same healthcare transactions, code sets, and identifiers. HIPAA has identified 10 standard transactions for Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) for the transmission of healthcare data. Claims and encounter information, payment and remittance advice, and claims status and inquiry are some of these standard transactions that affect medical billing and claim submission. The Current Procedural Terminology, 4th Edition (CPT-4) and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes (see Chapters 12 and 13) are examples of code sets for procedure and diagnosis coding, respectively. Other code sets adopted under the Administrative Simplification provisions of HIPAA include those used for claims involving medical supplies, dental services, and drugs.
Privacy Requirements
The Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information (Privacy Rule) establishes a set of national standards for the protection of certain health information. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued the Privacy Rule to implement one of the HIPAA main requirements. These standards address the use and disclosure of an individual’s health information—referred to as protected health information (PHI)—as well as standards for an individual’s privacy rights to understand and control how his or her health information is used. Within HHS, the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is responsible for implementing and enforcing the Privacy Rule in regard to voluntary compliance procedures and civil penalties.
A major goal of the Privacy Rule is to ensure that individuals’ health information is properly protected while allowing the flow of health information needed to provide and promote high-quality healthcare and to protect the public’s health and well-being. The objective is to strike a balance between the uses of information and protecting a patient’s privacy.
Security Requirements
The Security Standards for the Protection of Electronic Protected Health Information (Security Rule) established a national set of security standards for protecting certain health information that is held or transferred in electronic form. This rule addresses the technical and non-technical safeguards that covered entities must put in place to secure individuals’ electronic protected health information (e-PHI). As with the Privacy Rule, the OCR is responsible for enforcing the Security Rules.
A major goal of the Security Rule is to protect the privacy of individuals’ health information while allowing covered entities to adopt new technologies to improve the quality and efficiency of patient care.
National Identifier Requirements
HIPAA requires the adoption of a standard unique identifier for every healthcare provider, health plan, and employer that identifies the entity on standard transactions. The Final Rule, issued in January 2004, adopted the national provider identifier (NPI) as this standard. The NPI is a 10-digit intelligence free number, meaning the number does not carry any information about the provider, such as the state in which he or she practices or the type of specialization. The NPI replaced healthcare identifiers used prior to the onset of this rule, which included Medicare legacy IDs (unique identifiers specific to Medicare), unique provider identification numbers (UPINs), provider identification numbers (PINs), and National Supplier Clearinghouse (NSC) identifiers. NPIs remain with the provider and do not change even if he or she changes locations or specialties.
The NPI should not be confused with the employer identification number (EIN), which is a unique, 9-digit number issued to businesses for use by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in the administration of tax laws. Both the NPI and the EIN are used in claims submission.
The new hipaa 5010 standards
Up until January 2012, HIPAA required the use of Standard X12 transactions to report and inquire about healthcare services. Providers who submitted claims electronically used the 4010/4010A1 version of HIPAA transactions, which are nearly a decade old. A new transaction standard–Version 5010–will be implemented in 2012, and the old Version 4010A1 will no longer be valid. Currently, the date for all entities to be in full compliance with Version 5010 is June 30, 2012; however, it is important that the health insurance professional check the CMS site periodically to see if the compliance date has changed. This new version addresses many of the deficiencies in the former version and accommodates the reporting of NPIs and the new ICD-10 codes (see Chapter 12). The following entities are affected by the switch to Version 5010:
The following transactions are included in the 5010 Final Rule:
• Healthcare claims for professional, institutional and dental services
• Eligibility for a health plan (inquiry and response)
• Referral certification and authorization
• Healthcare claim status (inquiry and response)
• Enrollment and disenrollment in a health plan
• Healthcare payment and remittance advice
Providers who submit claims electronically must use Version 5010 unless they qualify for Exceptions to Electronic Claim Submission Requirements (Box 5-1). Non-compliant transactions received after the compliance deadline, will be rejected as directed by CMS.
Although HIPAA does not require healthcare providers to use electronic transactions, ASCA does impose such a requirement for those who bill Medicare. ASCA requires that all claims submitted to the Medicare program be submitted in electronic form, with limited exceptions. The implication of this requirement is that because the claims are submitted electronically, they are also required to comply with HIPAA. Physicians who qualify for exemption under the small provider exemption may continue sending paper claims. A small provider or supplier is defined as a provider of services with fewer than 25 full-time equivalent employees or a physician, practitioner, facility, or supplier (other than a provider of services) with fewer than 10 full-time equivalent employees (see Box 5-1).
For more detailed information about 5010, visit the Evolve site to find the link to a CMS article in MLN Matters, entitled “An Introductory Overview of the HIPAA 5010.”
The electronic insurance claims process
Regardless of how claims are submitted, the insurance claims process begins when the patient arrives at the medical facility, at which time he or she is given various forms to read and fill out. The front office staff then enters the information into the medical facility’s computer using the practice management software that meets electronic filing requirements as established by the HIPAA claim standards. It is from this information that the claim is generated through the internal functioning of the software.
Essential Information for Claims Processing
The following sections discuss the various forms and documents from which necessary data for generating claims are gathered along with illustrations showing sample data entry screens.
Patient Information Form
A patient information form, sometimes referred to as a patient registration form, is a document (typically one page) that patients are asked to complete for the following reasons: