Antipsychotic agents and their use in schizophrenia

CHAPTER 31


Antipsychotic agents and their use in schizophrenia


The antipsychotic agents are a chemically diverse group of compounds used for a broad spectrum of psychotic disorders. Specific indications include schizophrenia, delusional disorders, bipolar disorder, depressive psychoses, and drug-induced psychoses. In addition to their psychiatric applications, the antipsychotics are used to suppress emesis and to treat Tourette’s syndrome and Huntington’s chorea. As a rule, antipsychotics should not be used to treat dementia-related psychosis in the elderly, owing to a risk of increased mortality.


Since their introduction in the early 1950s, the antipsychotic agents have catalyzed revolutionary change in the management of psychotic illnesses. Before these drugs were available, psychoses were largely untreatable and patients were fated to a life of institutionalization. With the advent of antipsychotic medications, many patients with schizophrenia and other severe psychotic disorders have been able to leave psychiatric hospitals and return to the community. Others have been spared hospitalization entirely. For those who must be institutionalized, antipsychotic drugs have at least reduced suffering.


The antipsychotic drugs fall into two major groups: (1) first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs), also known as conventional antipsychotics, and (2) second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), also known as atypical antipsychotics. Both groups are equally effective. All of the FGAs produce strong blockade of dopamine in the central nervous system (CNS). As a result, they all can cause serious movement disorders, known as extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). The SGAs produce moderate blockade of receptors for dopamine and much stronger blockade of receptors for serotonin. Because dopamine receptor blockade is only moderate, the risk of EPS is lower than with the FGAs. However, although the SGAs carry a reduced risk of EPS, they carry a significant risk of metabolic effects—weight gain, diabetes, and dyslipidemia—that can cause cardiovascular events and early death.


In 2009, antipsychotic drugs were the top-selling medications in the United States, with total sales of $14.6 billion, up from $9.6 billion in 2004. Of note, the SGAs outsold the FGAs by a factor of 10. Why? Good question, given that the SGAs are no more effective than the FGAs, and carry significant risks that the FGAs don’t have. Then why are SGAs so widely prescribed? The main reason is inappropriate off-label use, such as controlling agitation in nursing home residents. In addition, aggressive marketing has created the perception of clinical superiority, even though the FGAs are just as good.



Schizophrenia: clinical presentation and etiology




Clinical presentation


Schizophrenia is a chronic psychotic illness characterized by disordered thinking and a reduced ability to comprehend reality. Symptoms usually emerge during adolescence or early adulthood. In the United States, about 3.2 million people are affected. Diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia are presented in Table 31–1.



TABLE 31–1 


DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Schizophrenia








A. Characteristic Symptoms



B. Social/Occupational Dysfunction



C. Duration



D. Schizoaffective and Mood Disorder Exclusion



E. Substance/General Medical Condition Exclusion



F. Relationship to a Pervasive Developmental Disorder




image


Modified from the proposed diagnostic criteria for Schizophrenia, to be published in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. Expected publication date: May 2013. Copyright © American Psychiatric Association. The proposed criteria are from the DSM-5 web site—–www.DSM5.org–—accessed on June 20, 2011.



Three types of symptoms

Symptoms of schizophrenia can be divided into three groups: positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and cognitive symptoms. Positive and negative symptoms are summarized in Table 31–2.










First-generation (conventional) antipsychotics


The FGAs have been in use for over 50 years, and their pharmacology is well understood. Accordingly, it seems appropriate to begin with these drugs, even though their use has greatly declined. Besides, since the pharmacology of the FGAs and SGAs is very similar, once you understand the FGAs, you will know a great deal about the SGAs as well.



Group properties


In this section we discuss pharmacologic properties shared by all FGAs. Much of our attention focuses on adverse effects. Of these, extrapyramidal side effects are of particular concern. Because of these neurologic side effects, the FGAs are also known as neuroleptics.



Classification


The FGAs can be classified by potency or chemical structure. From a clinical viewpoint, classification by potency is more helpful.



Classification by potency

First-generation antipsychotics can be classified as low potency, medium potency, or high potency (Table 31–3). The low-potency drugs, represented by chlorpromazine, and the high-potency drugs, represented by haloperidol, are of particular interest.



Table 31–3 


Antipsychotic Drugs: Relative Potency and Incidence of Selected Side Effects




































































































































































































































































      Incidence of Side Effects
Drug Trade Name Equivalent Oral Dose (mg)* Extrapyramidal Effects Sedation Orthostatic Hypotension Anticholinergic Effects Metabolic Effects: Weight Gain, Diabetes Risk, Dyslipidemia Significant QT Prolongation Prolactin Elevation Metabolized by CYP3A4
FIRST-GENERATION (CONVENTIONAL) ANTIPSYCHOTICS
Low Potency
Chlorpromazine generic only 100 Moderate High High Moderate Moderate Yes Low
Thioridazine generic only 100 Low High High High Moderate Yes Low
Medium Potency
Loxapine Loxitane 13 Moderate Moderate Low Low Low No Moderate
Perphenazine generic only 8 Moderate Moderate Low Low No Low
High Potency
Fluphenazine generic only 1 Very high Low Low Low No Moderate
Haloperidol Haldol 2 Very high Low Low Low Moderate Yes Moderate
Pimozide Orap 1 High Moderate Low Moderate Yes Moderate
Thiothixene Navane 2 High Low Moderate Low Moderate No Moderate
Trifluoperazine generic only 1 High Low Low Low No Moderate
SECOND-GENERATION (ATYPICAL) ANTIPSYCHOTICS
Aripiprazole Abilify 2 Very low Low Low None None/low No Low Yes
Asenapine Saphris 4 Moderate Moderate Moderate Low Low Yes Low Slightly
Clozapine Clozaril, FazaClo 75 Very low High Moderate High High No Low Yes
Iloperidone Fanapt 4 Very low Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Yes Low Yes
Lurasidone Latuda 10 Moderate Moderate Low None None/low No Low Yes
Olanzapine Zyprexa 3 Low Moderate Moderate Moderate High No Low No
Paliperidone Invega 2 Moderate Low Low None Moderate Yes High Slightly
Quetiapine Seroquel 95 Very low Moderate Moderate None Moderate/high Yes Low Yes
Risperidone Risperdal 1 Moderate Low Low None Moderate No High No
Ziprasidone Geodon, Zeldox 20 Low Moderate Moderate None None/low Yes Low Yes


image


*Doses listed are the therapeutic equivalent of 100 mg of oral chlorpromazine.


Incidence here refers to early extrapyramidal reactions (acute dystonia, parkinsonism, akathisia). The incidence of late reactions (tardive dyskinesia) is the same for all traditional antipsychotics.


It is important to note that, although the FGAs differ from one another in potency, they all have the same ability to relieve symptoms of psychosis. Recall that the term potency refers only to the size of the dose needed to elicit a given response; potency implies nothing about the maximal effect a drug can produce. Hence, when we say that haloperidol is more potent than chlorpromazine, we only mean that the dose of haloperidol required to relieve psychotic symptoms is smaller than the required dose of chlorpromazine. We do not mean that haloperidol can produce greater effects. When administered in therapeutically equivalent doses, both drugs elicit an equivalent antipsychotic response.


If low-potency and high-potency neuroleptics are equally effective, why distinguish between them? The answer is that, although these agents produce identical antipsychotic effects, they differ significantly in side effects. Hence, by knowing the potency category to which a particular neuroleptic belongs, we can better predict its undesired responses. This knowledge is useful in drug selection and providing patient care and education.



Chemical classification

The FGAs fall into five major chemical categories (Table 31–4). One of these categories, the phenothiazines, has three subgroups. Drugs in all groups are equivalent with respect to antipsychotic actions, and hence chemical classification is not emphasized in this chapter.



Two chemical categories—phenothiazines and butyrophenones—deserve attention. The phenothiazines were the first modern antipsychotic agents. Chlorpromazine, our prototype of the low-potency neuroleptics, belongs to this family. The butyrophenones stand out because they are the family to which haloperidol belongs. Haloperidol is the prototype of the high-potency FGAs.



Mechanism of action


The FGAs block a variety of receptors within and outside the CNS. To varying degrees, they block receptors for dopamine, acetylcholine, histamine, and norepinephrine. There is little question that blockade at these receptors is responsible for the major adverse effects of the antipsychotics. However, since the etiology of psychotic illness is unclear, the relationship of receptor blockade to therapeutic effects can only be guessed. The current dominant theory suggests that FGA drugs suppress symptoms of psychosis by blocking dopamine2 (D2) receptors in the mesolimbic area of the brain. In support of this theory is the observation that all of the FGAs produce D2 receptor blockade. Furthermore, there is a close correlation between the clinical potency of these drugs and their potency as D2 receptor antagonists.



Therapeutic uses




Schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia is the primary indication for antipsychotic drugs. These agents effectively suppress symptoms during acute psychotic episodes and, when taken chronically, can greatly reduce the risk of relapse. Initial effects may be seen in 1 to 2 days, but substantial improvement usually takes 2 to 4 weeks, and full effects may not develop for several months. Positive symptoms (eg, delusions, hallucinations) may respond somewhat better than negative symptoms (eg, social and emotional withdrawal, blunted affect, poverty of speech) or cognitive dysfunction (eg, disordered thinking, learning and memory difficulties). All of the FGA agents are equally effective, although individual patients may respond better to one FGA than to another. Consequently, selection among these drugs is based primarily on their side effect profiles, rather than on therapeutic effects. It must be noted that antipsychotic drugs do not alter the underlying pathology of schizophrenia. Hence, treatment is not curative—it offers only symptomatic relief. Management of schizophrenia is discussed in depth later in the chapter.













Adverse effects


The antipsychotic drugs block several kinds of receptors, and hence produce an array of side effects. Side effects associated with blockade of specific receptors are summarized in Table 31–5.



Although antipsychotic agents produce a variety of undesired effects, these drugs are, on the whole, very safe; death from overdose is practically unheard of. Among the many side effects FGAs can produce, the most troubling are the extrapyramidal reactions—especially tardive dyskinesia (TD).



Extrapyramidal symptoms

Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) are movement disorders resulting from effects of antipsychotic drugs on the extrapyramidal motor system. The extrapyramidal system is the same neuronal network whose malfunction is responsible for the movement disorders of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Although the exact cause of EPS is unclear, blockade of D2 receptors is strongly suspected.


Four types of EPS occur. They differ with respect to time of onset and management. Three of these reactions—acute dystonia, parkinsonism, and akathisia—occur early in therapy and can be managed with a variety of drugs. The fourth reaction—tardive dyskinesia—occurs late in therapy and has no satisfactory treatment. Characteristics of EPS are summarized in Table 31–6.



The early reactions occur less frequently with low-potency agents (eg, chlorpromazine) than with high-potency agents (eg, haloperidol). In contrast, the risk of TD is equal with all FGAs.



Acute dystonia.

Acute dystonia can be both disturbing and dangerous. The reaction develops within the first few days of therapy, and frequently within hours of the first dose. Typically, the patient develops severe spasm of the muscles of the tongue, face, neck, or back. Oculogyric crisis (involuntary upward deviation of the eyes) and opisthotonus (tetanic spasm of the back muscles causing the trunk to arch forward, while the head and lower limbs are thrust backward) may also occur. Severe cramping can cause joint dislocation. Laryngeal dystonia can impair respiration.


Intense dystonia is a crisis that requires rapid intervention. Initial treatment consists of an anticholinergic medication (eg, benztropine, diphenhydramine) administered IM or IV. As a rule, symptoms resolve within 5 minutes of IV dosing and within 15 to 20 minutes of IM dosing.


It is important to differentiate between acute dystonia and psychotic hysteria. Why? Because misdiagnosis of acute dystonia as hysteria could result in giving bigger antipsychotic doses, thereby causing the acute dystonia to become even worse.



Parkinsonism.

Antipsychotic-induced parkinsonism is characterized by bradykinesia, mask-like facies, drooling, tremor, rigidity, shuffling gait, cogwheeling, and stooped posture. Symptoms develop within the first month of therapy and are indistinguishable from those of idiopathic PD.


Neuroleptics cause parkinsonism by blocking dopamine receptors in the striatum. Since idiopathic PD is also due to reduced activation of striatal dopamine receptors (see Chapter 21), it is no wonder that PD and neuroleptic-induced parkinsonism share the same symptoms.


Neuroleptic-induced parkinsonism is treated with some of the drugs used for idiopathic PD. Specifically, centrally acting anticholinergic drugs (eg, benztropine, diphenhydramine) and amantadine [Symmetrel] may be employed. Levodopa and direct dopamine agonists (eg, bromocriptine) should be avoided. Why? Because these drugs activate dopamine receptors, and might thereby counteract the beneficial effects of antipsychotic treatment.


Use of antiparkinsonism drugs should not continue indefinitely. Antipsychotic-induced parkinsonism tends to resolve spontaneously, usually within months of its onset. Accordingly, antiparkinsonism drugs should be withdrawn after a few months to determine if they are still needed.


If parkinsonism is severe, switching to an SGA is likely to help. As discussed below, the risk of parkinsonism with the SGAs is much lower than with FGAs.



Akathisia.

Akathisia is characterized by pacing and squirming brought on by an uncontrollable need to be in motion. This profound sense of restlessness can be very disturbing. The syndrome usually develops within the first 2 months of treatment. Like other early EPS, akathisia occurs most frequently with high-potency FGAs.


Three types of drugs have been used to suppress symptoms: beta blockers, benzodiazepines, and anticholinergic drugs. Although these drugs can help, reducing antipsychotic dosage or switching to a low-potency FGA may be more effective.


It is important to differentiate between akathisia and exacerbation of psychosis. If akathisia were to be confused with anxiety or psychotic agitation, it is likely that antipsychotic dosage would be increased, thereby making akathisia more intense.



Tardive dyskinesia.

Tardive dyskinesia, the most troubling EPS, develops in 15% to 20% of patients during long-term therapy with FGAs. The risk is related to duration of treatment and dosage size. For many patients, symptoms are irreversible.


Tardive dyskinesia is characterized by involuntary choreoathetoid (twisting, writhing, worm-like) movements of the tongue and face. Patients may also present with lip-smacking movements, and their tongues may flick out in a “fly-catching” motion. One of the earliest manifestations of TD is slow, worm-like movement of the tongue. Involuntary movements that involve the tongue and mouth can interfere with chewing, swallowing, and speaking. Eating difficulties can result in malnutrition and weight loss. Over time, TD produces involuntary movements of the limbs, toes, fingers, and trunk. For some patients, symptoms decline following a dosage reduction or drug withdrawal. For others, TD is irreversible.


The cause of TD is complex and incompletely understood. One theory suggests that symptoms result from excessive activation of dopamine receptors. It is postulated that, in response to chronic receptor blockade, dopamine receptors of the extrapyramidal system undergo a functional change such that their sensitivity to activation is increased. Stimulation of these “supersensitive” receptors produces an imbalance in favor of dopamine, and thereby produces abnormal movement. In support of this theory is the observation that symptoms of TD can be reduced (temporarily) by increasing antipsychotic dosage, which increases dopamine receptor blockade. (Since symptoms eventually return even though antipsychotic dosage is kept high, dosage elevation cannot be used to treat TD.)


There is no reliable management for TD. Measures that may be tried include gradually withdrawing anticholinergic drugs, giving benzodiazepines, and reducing the dosage of the offending FGA. For patients with severe TD, switching to an SGA agent may help. Why? Because SGAs are less likely to promote TD.


Since TD has no reliable means of treatment, prevention is the best approach. Antipsychotic drugs should be used in the lowest effective dosage for the shortest time required. After 12 months, the need for continued therapy should be assessed. If drug use must continue, a neurologic evaluation should be done at least every 3 months to detect early signs of TD. For patients with chronic schizophrenia, dosage should be tapered periodically (at least annually) to determine the need for continued treatment.



Other adverse effects


Neuroleptic malignant syndrome.

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare but serious reaction that carries a 4% risk of mortality—down from 30% in the past, thanks to early diagnosis and intervention. Primary symptoms are “lead pipe” rigidity, sudden high fever (temperature may exceed 41°C), sweating, and autonomic instability, manifested as dysrhythmias and fluctuations in blood pressure. Level of consciousness may rise and fall, the patient may appear confused or mute, and seizures or coma may develop. Death can result from respiratory failure, cardiovascular collapse, dysrhythmias, and other causes. NMS is more likely with high-potency FGAs than with low-potency FGAs.


Treatment consists of supportive measures, drug therapy, and immediate withdrawal of antipsychotic medication. Hyperthermia should be controlled with cooling blankets and antipyretics (eg, aspirin, acetaminophen). Hydration should be maintained with fluids. Benzodiazepines may relieve anxiety and help reduce blood pressure and tachycardia. Two drugs—dantrolene and bromocriptine—may be especially helpful. Dantrolene is a direct-acting muscle relaxant (see Chapter 25). In patients with NMS, this drug reduces rigidity and hyperthermia. Bromocriptine is a dopamine receptor agonist (see Chapter 21) that may relieve CNS toxicity.


Resumption of antipsychotic therapy carries a small risk of NMS recurrence. The risk can be minimized by (1) waiting at least 2 weeks before resuming antipsychotic treatment, (2) using the lowest effective dosage, and (3) avoiding high-potency agents. If a second episode occurs, switching to an SGA may help.



Anticholinergic effects.

First-generation agents produce varying degrees of muscarinic cholinergic blockade (see Table 31–3), and can elicit the full spectrum of anticholinergic responses (dry mouth, blurred vision, photophobia, urinary hesitancy, constipation, tachycardia). Patients should be informed about these responses and taught how to minimize danger and discomfort. As indicated in Table 31–3, anticholinergic effects are more likely with low-potency FGAs than with high-potency FGAs. Anticholinergic effects and their management are discussed in detail in Chapter 14.



Orthostatic hypotension.

Antipsychotic drugs promote orthostatic hypotension by blocking alpha1-adrenergic receptors on blood vessels. Alpha-adrenergic blockade prevents compensatory vasoconstriction when the patient stands, thereby causing blood pressure to fall. Patients should be informed about signs of hypotension (lightheadedness, dizziness) and advised to sit or lie down if these occur. In addition, patients should be informed that hypotension can be minimized by moving slowly when assuming an erect posture. With hospitalized patients, blood pressure and pulses should be checked before dosing and 1 hour after. Measurements should be made while the patient is lying down and again after the patient has been sitting or standing for 1 to 2 minutes. If blood pressure is low, or if pulse rate is high, the dose should be withheld and the prescriber consulted. Hypotension is more likely with low-potency FGAs than with the high-potency FGAs (see Table 31–3). Tolerance to hypotension develops in 2 to 3 months.








Severe dysrhythmias.

Four FGAs—chlorpromazine, haloperidol, thioridazine, and pimozide—pose a risk of fatal cardiac dysrhythmias. The mechanism is prolongation of the QT interval, an index of cardiac function that can be measured with an electrocardiogram (ECG). As discussed in Chapter 7 (Adverse Drug Reactions and Medication Errors), drugs that prolong the QT interval increase the risk of torsades de pointes, a dysrhythmia than can progress to fatal ventricular fibrillation. To reduce the risk of dysrhythmias, patients should undergo an ECG and serum potassium determination prior to treatment and periodically thereafter. In addition, they should avoid other drugs that cause QT prolongation (see Chapter 7, Table 7–2), as well as drugs that can increase levels of the drugs under consideration.




Signs of withdrawal and extrapyramidal symptoms in neonates.

In 2011, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) notified healthcare professionals that neonates exposed to antipsychotic drugs (first or second generation) during the third trimester of pregnancy may experience EPS and/or signs of withdrawal. Symptoms include tremor, agitation, sleepiness, difficulty feeding, severe breathing difficulty, and altered muscle tone (increased or decreased). Fortunately, the risk appears low: As of October 29, 2008, only 69 cases of neonatal EPS or withdrawal had been reported to the Adverse Event Reporting System. Neonates who present with EPS or signs of withdrawal should be monitored. Some will recover within hours or days, but others may require prolonged hospitalization. Despite the risk to the infant, women who become pregnant should not discontinue their medication without consulting the prescriber.


Jul 24, 2016 | Posted by in NURSING | Comments Off on Antipsychotic agents and their use in schizophrenia

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access