Antidysrhythmic drugs

CHAPTER 49


Antidysrhythmic drugs


A dysrhythmia is defined as an abnormality in the rhythm of the heartbeat. In their mildest forms, dysrhythmias have only modest effects on cardiac output. However, in their most severe forms, dysrhythmias can so disable the heart that no blood is pumped at all. Because of their ability to compromise cardiac function, dysrhythmias are associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality.


There are two basic types of dysrhythmias: tachydysrhythmias (dysrhythmias in which heart rate is increased) and bradydysrhythmias (dysrhythmias in which heart rate is slowed). In this chapter, we only consider the tachydysrhythmias. This is by far the largest group of dysrhythmias and the group that responds best to drugs. We do not discuss the bradydysrhythmias because they are few in number and are commonly treated with electronic pacing. When drugs are indicated, atropine (see Chapter 14) and isoproterenol (see Chapter 17) are usually the agents of choice.


It is important to appreciate that virtually all of the drugs used to treat dysrhythmias can also cause dysrhythmias. These drugs can create new dysrhythmias and worsen existing ones. Because of these prodysrhythmic actions, antidysrhythmic drugs should be employed only when the benefits of treatment clearly outweigh the risks.


For two reasons, use of antidysrhythmic drugs is declining. First, research has shown that some of these agents actually increase the risk of death. Second, nonpharmacologic therapies—especially implantable defibrillators and radiofrequency ablation—have begun to replace drugs as the preferred treatment for many dysrhythmia types.


A note on terminology: Dysrhythmias are also known as arrhythmias. Since the term arrhythmia denotes an absence of cardiac rhythm, whereas dysrhythmia denotes an abnormal rhythm, dysrhythmia would seem the more appropriate term.



Introduction to cardiac electrophysiology, dysrhythmias, and the antidysrhythmic drugs


In this section we discuss background information that will help you understand the actions and uses of antidysrhythmic drugs. We begin by reviewing the electrical properties of the heart and the electrocardiogram. Next, we discuss how dysrhythmias are generated. After that, we discuss classification of the antidysrhythmic drugs as well as the ability of these drugs to cause dysrhythmias. We conclude by discussing the major dysrhythmias and the basic principles that guide antidysrhythmic therapy.



Electrical properties of the heart


Dysrhythmias result from alteration of the electrical impulses that regulate cardiac rhythm—and antidysrhythmic drugs control rhythm by correcting or compensating for these alterations. Accordingly, in order to understand both the generation and treatment of dysrhythmias, we must first understand the electrical properties of the heart. Therefore, we begin the chapter by reviewing (1) pathways and timing of impulse conduction, (2) cardiac action potentials, and (3) basic elements of the electrocardiogram (ECG).



Impulse conduction: pathways and timing


For the heart to pump effectively, contraction of the atria and ventricles must be coordinated. Coordination is achieved through precise timing and routing of impulse conduction. In the healthy heart, impulses originate in the sinoatrial (SA) node, spread rapidly through the atria, pass slowly through the atrioventricular (AV) node, and then spread rapidly through the ventricles via the His-Purkinje system (Fig. 49–1).








Cardiac action potentials


Cardiac cells can initiate and conduct action potentials, consisting of self-propagating waves of depolarization followed by repolarization. As in neurons, cardiac action potentials are generated by the movement of ions into and out of cells. These ion fluxes take place by way of specific channels in the cell membrane. In the resting cardiac cell, negatively charged ions cover the inner surface of the cell membrane while positively charged ions cover the external surface. Because of this separation of charge, the cell membrane is said to be polarized. Under proper conditions, channels in the cell membrane open, allowing positively charged ions to rush in. This influx eliminates the charge difference across the cell membrane, and hence the cell is said to depolarize. Following depolarization, positively charged ions are extruded from the cell, causing the cell to return to its original polarized state.


In the heart, two kinds of action potentials occur: fast potentials and slow potentials. These potentials differ with respect to the mechanisms by which they are generated, the kinds of cells in which they occur, and the drugs to which they respond.


Profiles of fast and slow potentials are depicted in Figure 49–2. Please note that action potentials in this figure represent the electrical activity of single cardiac cells. Such single-cell recordings, which are made using experimental preparations, should not be confused with the ECG, which is made using surface electrodes, and hence reflects the electrical activity of the entire heart.




Fast potentials

Fast potentials occur in fibers of the His-Purkinje system and in atrial and ventricular muscle. These responses serve to conduct electrical impulses rapidly throughout the heart.


As indicated in panel A of Figure 49–2, fast potentials have five distinct phases, labeled 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4. As we discuss each phase, we focus on its ionic basis and its relationship to the actions of antidysrhythmic drugs.







Phase 4.

During phase 4, two types of electrical activity are possible: (1) the membrane potential may remain stable (solid line in Fig. 49–2A), or (2) the membrane may undergo spontaneous depolarization (dashed line). In cells undergoing spontaneous depolarization, the membrane potential gradually rises until a threshold potential is reached. At this point, rapid phase 0 depolarization takes place, setting off a new action potential. Hence, it is phase 4 depolarization that gives cardiac cells automaticity (ie, the ability to initiate an action potential through self-excitation). The capacity for self-excitation makes potential pacemakers of all cells that have it.


Under normal conditions, His-Purkinje cells undergo very slow spontaneous depolarization, and myocardial cells do not undergo any. However, under pathologic conditions, significant phase 4 depolarization may occur in all of these cells, and especially in Purkinje fibers. When this happens, a dysrhythmia can result.



Slow potentials

Slow potentials occur in cells of the SA node and AV node. The profile of a slow potential is depicted in Figure 49–2B. Like fast potentials, slow potentials are generated by ion fluxes. However, the specific ions involved are not the same for every phase.


From a physiologic and pharmacologic perspective, slow potentials have three features of special significance: (1) phase 0 depolarization is slow and mediated by calcium influx, (2) these potentials conduct slowly, and (3) spontaneous phase 4 depolarization in the SA node normally determines heart rate.



Phase 0.

Phase 0 (depolarization phase) of slow potentials differs significantly from phase 0 of fast potentials. As we can see from Figure 49–2, whereas phase 0 of fast potentials is caused by a rapid influx of sodium, phase 0 of slow potentials is caused by slow influx of calcium. Because calcium influx is slow, the rate of depolarization is slow; and because depolarization is slow, these potentials conduct slowly. This explains why impulse conduction through the AV node is delayed. Phase 0 of the slow potential is of therapeutic significance in that drugs that suppress calcium influx during phase 0 can slow (or stop) AV conduction.



Phases 1, 2, and 3.

Slow potentials lack a phase 1 (see Fig. 49–2B). Phases 2 and 3 of the slow potential are not significant with respect to the actions of antidysrhythmic drugs.




The electrocardiogram


The ECG provides a graphic representation of cardiac electrical activity. The ECG can be used to identify dysrhythmias and monitor responses to therapy. (Note: In referring to the electrocardiogram, two abbreviations may be used: EKG and ECG. Some people prefer EKG over ECG. Why? Because ECG sounds much like EEG [electroencephalogram] when spoken aloud, whereas EKG does not.)


The major components of an ECG are illustrated in Figure 49–3. As we can see, three features are especially prominent: the P wave, the QRS complex, and the T wave. The P wave is caused by depolarization in the atria. Hence, the P wave corresponds to atrial contraction. The QRS complex is caused by depolarization of the ventricles. Hence, the QRS complex corresponds to ventricular contraction. If conduction through the ventricles is slowed, the QRS complex will widen. The T wave is caused by repolarization of the ventricles. Hence, this wave is not associated with overt physical activity of the heart.


image
Figure 49–3  The electrocardiogram.

In addition to the features just described, the ECG has three other components of interest: the PR interval, the QT interval, and the ST segment. The PR interval is defined as the time between the onset of the P wave and the onset of the QRS complex. Lengthening of this interval indicates a delay in conduction through the AV node. Several drugs increase the PR interval. The QT interval is defined as the time between the onset of the QRS complex and completion of the T wave. This interval is prolonged by drugs that delay ventricular repolarization. The ST segment is the portion of the ECG that lies between the end of the QRS complex and the beginning of the T wave. Digoxin depresses the ST segment.



Generation of dysrhythmias


Dysrhythmias arise from two fundamental causes: disturbances of impulse formation (automaticity) and disturbances of impulse conduction. One or both of these disturbances underlie all dysrhythmias. Factors that may alter automaticity or conduction include hypoxia, electrolyte imbalance, cardiac surgery, reduced coronary blood flow, myocardial infarction, and antidysrhythmic drugs.



Disturbances of automaticity


Disturbances of automaticity can occur in any part of the heart. Cells normally capable of automaticity (cells of the SA node, AV node, and His-Purkinje system) can produce dysrhythmias if their normal rate of discharge changes. In addition, dysrhythmias may be produced if tissues that do not normally express automaticity (atrial and ventricular muscle) develop spontaneous phase 4 depolarization.


Altered automaticity in the SA node can produce tachycardia or bradycardia. Excessive discharge of sympathetic neurons that innervate the SA node can augment automaticity to such a degree that sinus tachycardia results. Excessive vagal (parasympathetic) discharge can suppress automaticity to such a degree that sinus bradycardia results.


Increased automaticity of Purkinje fibers is a common cause of dysrhythmias. The increase can be brought on by injury and by excessive stimulation of Purkinje fibers by the sympathetic nervous system. If Purkinje fibers begin to discharge faster than the SA node, they will escape control by the SA node; potentially serious dysrhythmias can result.


Under special conditions, automaticity may develop in cells of atrial and ventricular muscle. If these cells fire faster than the SA node, dysrhythmias will result.



Disturbances of conduction





Reentry (recirculating activation).

Reentry, also referred to as recirculating activation, is a generalized mechanism by which dysrhythmias can be produced. Reentry causes dysrhythmias by establishing a localized, self-sustaining circuit capable of repetitive cardiac stimulation. Reentry results from a unique form of conduction disturbance. The mechanism of reentrant activation and the effects of drugs on this process are described below.



The mechanism for establishing a reentrant circuit is depicted in Figure 49–4, panels A and B. In the figure, the inverted Y-shaped structure represents a branched Purkinje fiber terminating on a strip of ventricular muscle, which appears as a horizontal bar. Normal impulse conduction is shown in Figure 49–4A. As indicated by the arrows, impulses travel down both branches of the Purkinje fiber to cause excitation of the muscle at two locations. Impulses created within the muscle travel in both directions (to the right and left) away from their sites of origin. Those impulses that are moving toward each other meet midway between the two branches of the Purkinje fiber. Since in the wake of both impulses the muscle is in a refractory state, neither impulse can proceed further, and hence both impulses stop.



Figure 49–4B depicts a reentrant circuit. The shaded area in branch 1 of the Purkinje fiber represents a region of one-way conduction block. This region prevents conduction of impulses downward (toward the muscle) but does not prevent impulses from traveling upward. (Impulses can travel back up the block because impulses in muscle are very strong, and hence are able to pass the block, whereas impulses in the Purkinje fiber are weaker, and hence are unable to pass.) A region of one-way block is essential for reentrant activation.


How does one-way block lead to reentrant activation? As an impulse travels down the Purkinje fiber, it is stopped in branch 1 but continues unimpeded in branch 2. Upon reaching the tip of branch 2, the impulse stimulates the muscle. As described above, the impulse in the muscle travels to the right and to the left away from its site of origin. However, in this new situation, as the impulse travels toward the impaired branch of the Purkinje fiber, it meets no impulse coming from the other direction, and hence continues on, resulting in stimulation of the terminal end of branch 1. This stimulation causes an impulse to travel backward up the Purkinje fiber. Since blockade of conduction is unidirectional, the impulse passes through the region of block and then back down into branch 2, causing reentrant activation of this branch. Under proper conditions, the impulse will continue to cycle indefinitely, resulting in repetitive ectopic beats.


There are two mechanisms by which drugs can abolish a reentrant dysrhythmia. First, drugs can improve conduction in the sick branch of the Purkinje fiber, and can thereby eliminate the one-way block (Fig. 49–4C). Alternatively, drugs can suppress conduction in the sick branch, thereby converting one-way block into two-way block (Fig. 49–4D).




Classification of antidysrhythmic drugs


According to the Vaughan Williams classification scheme, the antidysrhythmic drugs fall into five groups (Table 49–1). As the table shows, there are four major classes of antidysrhythmic drugs (classes I, II, III, and IV) and a fifth group that includes adenosine and digoxin. Membership in classes I through IV is determined by effects on ion movements during slow and fast potentials (see Fig. 49–2).





Class I: sodium channel blockers

Class I drugs block cardiac sodium channels (see Fig. 49–2A). By doing so, these drugs slow impulse conduction in the atria, ventricles, and His-Purkinje system. Class I constitutes the largest group of antidysrhythmic drugs.




Class III: potassium channel blockers (drugs that delay repolarization)

Class III drugs block potassium channels (Fig. 49–2A), and thereby delay repolarization of fast potentials. By delaying repolarization, these drugs prolong both the action potential duration and the effective refractory period.



Class IV: calcium channel blockers

Only two calcium channel blockers—verapamil and diltiazem—are employed as antidysrhythmics. As indicated in Figure 49–2, calcium channel blockade has the same impact on cardiac action potentials as does beta blockade. Accordingly, verapamil, diltiazem, and beta blockers have nearly identical effects on cardiac function—namely, reduction of automaticity in the SA node, delay of conduction through the AV node, and reduction of myocardial contractility. Antidysrhythmic benefits derive from suppressing AV nodal conduction.




Prodysrhythmic effects of antidysrhythmic drugs


Virtually all of the drugs used to treat dysrhythmias have prodysrhythmic (proarrhythmic) effects. That is, all of these drugs can worsen existing dysrhythmias and generate new ones. This ability was documented dramatically in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST), in which use of class IC drugs (encainide and flecainide) to prevent dysrhythmias after myocardial infarction actually doubled the rate of mortality. Because of their prodysrhythmic actions, antidysrhythmic drugs should be used only when dysrhythmias are symptomatically significant, and only when the potential benefits clearly outweigh the risks. Applying this guideline, it would be inappropriate to give antidysrhythmic drugs to a patient with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, since this dysrhythmia does not significantly reduce cardiac output. Conversely, when a patient is facing death from ventricular fibrillation, any therapy that might work must be tried. In this case, the risk of prodysrhythmic effects is clearly outweighed by the potential benefits of stopping the fibrillation. Regardless of the particular circumstances of drug use, all patients must be followed closely.


Of the mechanisms by which drugs can cause dysrhythmias, one deserves special mention: prolongation of the QT interval. As discussed in Chapter 7, drugs that prolong the QT interval increase the risk of torsades de pointes, a dysrhythmia that can progress to fatal ventricular fibrillation. All class IA and class III agents cause QT prolongation, and hence must be used with special caution.



Overview of common dysrhythmias and their treatment


The common dysrhythmias can be divided into two major groups: supraventricular dysrhythmias and ventricular dysrhythmias. In general, ventricular dysrhythmias are more dangerous than supraventricular dysrhythmias. With either type, intervention is required only if the dysrhythmia interferes with effective ventricular pumping. Treatment often proceeds in two phases: (1) termination of the dysrhythmia (with electrical countershock, drugs, or both), followed by (2) long-term suppression with drugs. Dysrhythmias can also be treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or by destroying small areas of cardiac tissue using radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation.


It is important to appreciate that drug therapy of dysrhythmias is highly empiric (ie, based largely on the response of the patient and not on scientific principles). In practice, this means that, even after a dysrhythmia has been identified, we cannot predict with certainty just which drugs will be effective. Frequently, trials with several drugs are required before control of rhythm is achieved. In the discussion below, only first-choice drugs are considered.



Supraventricular dysrhythmias


Supraventricular dysrhythmias are dysrhythmias that arise in areas of the heart above the ventricles (atria, SA node, AV node). Supraventricular dysrhythmias per se are not especially harmful. Why? Because dysrhythmic activity within the atria does not significantly reduce cardiac output (except in patients with valvular disorders and heart failure). Supraventricular tachydysrhythmias can be dangerous, however, in that atrial impulses are likely to traverse the AV node, resulting in excitation of the ventricles. If the atria drive the ventricles at an excessive rate, diastolic filling will be incomplete and cardiac output will decline. Hence, when treating supraventricular tachydysrhythmias, the objective is frequently one of slowing ventricular rate (by blocking impulse conduction through the AV node) and not elimination of the dysrhythmia itself. Of course, if treatment did abolish the dysrhythmia, this outcome would not be unwelcome. Acute treatment of supraventricular dysrhythmias is accomplished with vagotonic maneuvers, direct-current (DC) cardioversion, and certain drugs: class II agents, class IV agents, adenosine, and digoxin.




Atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained dysrhythmia, affecting about 2.2 million people in the United States. The disorder is caused by multiple atrial ectopic foci firing randomly; each focus stimulates a small area of atrial muscle. This chaotic excitation produces a highly irregular atrial rhythm. Depending upon the extent of impulse transmission through the AV node, ventricular rate may be very rapid or nearly normal.


In addition to compromising cardiac performance, atrial fibrillation carries a high risk of stroke. Why? Because in patients with atrial fibrillation, some blood can become trapped in the atria (rather than flowing straight through to the ventricles), thereby permitting formation of a clot. When normal sinus rhythm is restored, the clot may become dislodged, and then may travel to the brain to cause stroke.


Treatment of atrial fibrillation has two goals: improvement of ventricular pumping and prevention of stroke. Pumping can be improved by either (1) restoring normal sinus rhythm or (2) slowing ventricular rate. The preferred method is to slow ventricular rate. How? By long-term therapy with a beta blocker (atenolol or metoprolol) or a cardioselective calcium channel blocker (diltiazem or verapamil), both of which impede conduction through the AV node. If episodes of atrial fibrillation are infrequent (eg, less than 12 a year), they can be managed with PRN flecainide or propafenone. This so-called pill-in-the-pocket approach is analogous to treating infrequent attacks of angina with sublingual nitroglycerin. For patients who elect to restore normal rhythm, options are DC cardioversion, short-term treatment with drugs (eg, amiodarone, sotalol), or RF ablation of the dysrhythmia source.


To prevent stroke, most patients are treated with warfarin. For those undergoing treatment to restore normal sinus rhythm, warfarin should be taken for 3 to 4 weeks prior to the procedure and for several weeks after. For those taking an antidysrhythmic drug long term to control ventricular rate, warfarin must be taken long term too. Alternatives to warfarin include two new oral anticoagulants—dabigatran [Pradaxa] and rivaroxaban [Xarelto]—and antiplatelet drugs (either aspirin alone or aspirin plus clopidogrel).



Atrial flutter.

Atrial flutter is caused by an ectopic atrial focus discharging at a rate of 250 to 350 times a minute. Ventricular rate is considerably slower, however, because the AV node is unable to transmit impulses at this high rate. Typically, one atrial impulse out of two reaches the ventricles. The treatment of choice is DC cardioversion, which almost always converts atrial flutter to normal sinus rhythm. Cardioversion may also be achieved with IV ibutilide. To prevent the dysrhythmia from recurring, patients may need long-term therapy with drugs—either a class IC agent (flecainide or propafenone) or a class III agent (amiodarone, dronedarone, sotalol, dofetilide).


There are two alternatives to cardioversion: (1) RF ablation of the dysrhythmia focus and (2) control of ventricular rate with drugs. As with atrial fibrillation, ventricular rate is controlled with drugs that suppress AV conduction: verapamil, diltiazem, or a beta blocker.


Like atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter poses a risk of stroke, which can be reduced by treatment with warfarin.




Ventricular dysrhythmias


In contrast to atrial dysrhythmias, which are generally benign, ventricular dysrhythmias can cause significant disruption of cardiac pumping. Accordingly, the usual objective is to abolish the dysrhythmia. Cardioversion is often the treatment of choice. When antidysrhythmic drugs are indicated, agents in class I or class III are usually employed.





Ventricular fibrillation.

Ventricular fibrillation is a life-threatening emergency that requires immediate treatment. This dysrhythmia results from the asynchronous discharge of multiple ventricular ectopic foci. Because many different foci are firing, and because each focus initiates contraction in its immediate vicinity, localized twitching takes place all over the ventricles, making coordinated ventricular contraction impossible. As a result, the pumping action of the heart stops. In the absence of blood flow, the patient becomes unconscious and cyanotic. If heartbeat is not restored rapidly, death soon follows. Electrical countershock (defibrillation) is applied to eliminate fibrillation and restore cardiac function. If necessary, IV lidocaine can be used to enhance the effects of defibrillation. Procainamide may also be helpful. Amiodarone can be used for long-term suppression. As an alternative, an ICD may be employed.






Principles of antidysrhythmic drug therapy




Balancing risks and benefits

Therapy with antidysrhythmic drugs is based on a simple but important concept: Treat only if there is a clear benefit—and then only if the benefit outweighs the risks. As a rule, this means that intervention is needed only when the dysrhythmia interferes with ventricular pumping.


Treatment offers two potential benefits: reduction of symptoms and reduction of mortality. Symptoms that can be reduced include palpitations, angina, dyspnea, and faintness. For most antidysrhythmic drugs, there is little or no evidence of reduced mortality. In fact, mortality may actually increase.


Antidysrhythmic therapy carries considerable risk. Because of their prodysrhythmic actions, antidysrhythmic drugs can exacerbate existing dysrhythmias and generate new ones. Examples abound: toxic doses of digoxin can generate a wide variety of dysrhythmias; drugs that prolong the QT interval can cause torsades de pointes; many drugs can cause ventricular ectopic beats; several drugs (quinidine, flecainide, propafenone) can cause atrial flutter; and one drug—flecainide—can produce incessant ventricular tachycardia. Because of their prodysrhythmic actions, antidysrhythmic drugs can increase mortality. Other adverse effects include heart failure and third-degree AV block (caused by calcium channel blockers and beta blockers), as well as many noncardiac effects, including severe diarrhea (quinidine), a lupus-like syndrome (procainamide), and pulmonary toxicity (amiodarone).



Properties of the dysrhythmia to be considered






Long-term treatment: drug selection and evaluation

Selecting a drug for long-term therapy is largely empiric. There are many drugs that might be employed, and we usually can’t predict which one is going to work. Hence, finding an effective drug is done by trial and error.


Drug selection can be aided with electrophysiologic testing. In these tests, a dysrhythmia is generated artificially by programmed electrical stimulation of the heart. If a candidate drug is able to suppress the electrophysiologically induced dysrhythmia, it may also work against the real thing.


Holter monitoring can be used to evaluate treatment. A Holter monitor is a portable ECG device that is worn by the patient around-the-clock. If Holter monitoring indicates that dysrhythmias are still occurring with the present drug, a different drug should be tried.




Pharmacology of the antidysrhythmic drugs


As discussed above, the antidysrhythmic drugs fall into four main groups—classes I, II, III, and IV—plus a fifth group that includes adenosine and digoxin. The pharmacology of these drugs is presented below, and summarized in Table 49–2.



TABLE 49–2 


Properties of Antidysrhythmic Drugs




























































































































Drug Usual Route Effects on the ECG Major Antidysrhythmic Applications
Class IA
Quinidine PO Widens QRS, prolongs QT Broad spectrum: used for long-term suppression of ventricular and supraventricular dysrhythmias
Procainamide PO Widens QRS, prolongs QT Broad spectrum: similar to quinidine, but toxicity makes it less desirable for long-term use
Disopyramide PO Widens QRS, prolongs QT Ventricular dysrhythmias
Class IB
Lidocaine IV No significant change Ventricular dysrhythmias
Mexiletine PO No significant change Ventricular dysrhythmias
Phenytoin PO No significant change Digoxin-induced ventricular dysrhythmias
Class IC
Flecainide PO Widens QRS, prolongs PR Maintenance therapy of supraventricular dysrhythmias
Propafenone PO Widens QRS, prolongs PR Maintenance therapy of supraventricular dysrhythmias
Class II
Propranolol PO Prolongs PR, bradycardia Dysrhythmias caused by excessive sympathetic activity; control of ventricular rate in patients with supraventricular tachydysrhythmias
Acebutolol PO Prolongs PR, bradycardia Premature ventricular beats
Esmolol IV Prolongs PR, bradycardia Control of ventricular rate in patients with supraventricular tachydysrhythmias
Class III
Amiodarone PO Prolongs QT and PR, widens QRS Life-threatening ventricular dysrhythmias, atrial fibrillation*
Dronedarone PO Prolongs QT and PR, widens QRS Atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation
Sotalol IV Prolongs QT and PR, bradycardia Life-threatening ventricular dysrhythmias, atrial fibrillation/flutter
Dofetilide PO Prolongs QT Highly symptomatic atrial dysrhythmias
Ibutilide IV Prolongs QT Atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation
Class IV
Verapamil PO Prolongs PR, bradycardia Control of ventricular rate in patients with supraventricular tachydysrhythmias
Diltiazem IV Prolongs PR, bradycardia Same as verapamil
Others
Adenosine IV Prolongs PR Termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia
Digoxin PO Prolongs PR, depresses ST Control of ventricular rate in patients with supraventricular tachydysrhythmias
< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 24, 2016 | Posted by in NURSING | Comments Off on Antidysrhythmic drugs

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access