Accreditation of nursing programs



Accreditation of nursing programs


Marsha Howell Adams, DSN, RN, CNE


Accreditation is an ongoing, voluntary process that is pursued by nursing programs to assure quality of those programs. Through the accreditation process, nursing programs are held accountable for establishing appropriate program outcomes and designing effective evaluation systems for measuring those outcomes. This process promotes continuous quality improvement as nursing programs strive to meet those educational outcomes. The National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission (NLNAC) and the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) serve as the two accrediting organizations for nursing education. Each has been approved by the U.S. Department of Education (USDOE) and is dedicated to maintaining quality nursing programs.


Accreditation and regulation are two distinct, independent entities. Regulation is governed by state boards of nursing. The state boards of nursing develop rules and regulations designated to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. In keeping with this mission, nursing programs must comply with the state boards of nursing’s administrative code and submit an annual report addressing compliance. While a nursing program can lose its accreditation status and remain operational, state boards of nursing have the legal authority to close nursing programs that do not comply with the criteria as stated in the administrative code (Spector, 2010).


This chapter will provide a general overview of the accreditation process with regional and programmatic accrediting agencies for nursing programs. NLNAC and CCNE will be the two accrediting agencies addressed for the purposes of this discussion. This chapter will provide insight into the nursing program accreditation process, preparing the self-study report, the value of a consultant, and the actual on-site visit. The decision-making process and follow-up by nursing programs will also be described based on each accrediting agency’s processes.




Overview of the accreditation process


Accreditation is “a process of external quality review created and used by higher education to scrutinize colleges, universities, and programs for quality assurance and quality improvement” (Eaton, 2009, p. 1). It is a means for assuring quality to stakeholders such as students, families, and the general public by colleges, universities, and programs. Accreditation and quality go hand in hand and can play a significant role in accessibility of funding in both the public and the private sectors, potential employment by college graduates, and transferring program and course credit among colleges and universities. In an effort to hold accrediting organizations accountable, these organizations apply for recognition by the USDOE and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) as a means of external review. Accrediting organizations seek USDOE recognition to become eligible for federal funding. CHEA recognition affords the accrediting organization a standing of quality among the higher education community. According to CHEA, there are four types of accrediting organizations: regional (accredits 2- and 4-year public and private institutions), national faith-related (accredits nonprofit, degree-granting, religious- or doctrine-based institutions), national career-related (accredits single-purpose, for-profit, career-based institutions), and programmatic (accredits specific programs and professions) (Eaton, 2009; USDOE, n.d.).


Institutions that house nursing as a discipline may be regionally accredited. Regional accrediting agencies such as the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS), the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools (NCA), and the New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC) accredit 2- and 4-year institutions and are responsible for setting standards and monitoring compliance with those standards by the college or university as a whole. Programmatic accrediting agencies are discipline specific and accredit programs, professions, and schools such as nursing, law, and engineering. The programmatic agencies for nursing programs are NLNAC and CCNE (CHEA, 2010; NLNAC, 2008; Van Ort & Butlin, 2010). In addition to these two entities, there are advanced practice nursing accrediting bodies such as the Council on Accreditation of Nurse Anesthesia Educational Programs and the American College of Nurse-Midwives, Division of Accreditation.


The accreditation model practiced by most accrediting organizations is a combination of a self-study and a site visit by a team of peer evaluators. The self-study is a document addressing the systematic and thorough examination of a program’s components in relation to its stated mission created by the program. It is based on the standards and criteria developed by the accrediting organization. The self-study is reviewed by peer evaluators composed of faculty and administrators within the stated profession. A site visit is conducted to verify, clarify, and amplify the self-study content by a team of peer evaluators. The peer evaluators submit a report to the accrediting organization addressing compliance of standards based on information obtained through the self-study and site visit. The accrediting organization’s decision-making body composed of elected commissioners makes the final decision whether the program is accredited, reaccredited, or denied accreditation. The accrediting organization publishes a list of all accredited institutions and programs on its website.


The focus of the accreditation process is very similar among accrediting organizations. The basic components addressed include:




Programmatic accrediting agencies for nursing programs


The NLNAC (2008) and the CCNE (2009a) serve as the two accrediting bodies for nursing programs in the United States. Each of these bodies is recognized by the USDOE as a national accrediting agency. This distinct recognition is granted to accrediting agencies who meet specific standards for assuring quality in nursing programs eligible for federal funding and other resources. The NLNAC is recognized as an accrediting body for all types of nursing programs, including practical, diploma, associate, baccalaureate, master’s and postmaster’s certificate, and clinical doctorate programs. The CCNE is recognized to accredit baccalaureate and higher-degree programs in nursing such as the master’s of science in nursing (MSN) and the doctorate in nursing practice (DNP). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) programs are accredited by regional accreditation agencies. In addition to USDOE recognition, both NLNAC and CCNE are recognized by the CHEA (NLNAC, 2008; CCNE, 2009b).



NLNAC




Accrediting organization

In 1996 the National League for Nursing (NLN) approved the creation of the NLNAC as an independent entity within the organization; in 1997, with sole authority and accountability, the NLNAC began implementing the accreditation role and responsibilities. The NLNAC’s mission is to support nursing education, nursing practice, and the public through accreditation. The commission defines accreditation as “a voluntary, self-regulatory process by which non-governmental associations recognize educational institutions or programs that have been found to meet or exceed standards and criteria for educational quality” (NLNAC, 2008, p. 1).


NLNAC is governed by a 15-member Board of Commissioners composed of individuals representing nursing education (9 commissioners), service (3 commissioners), and the public sector (3 commissioners). The executive director (ED) reports directly to the Board of Commissioners. The remaining organization structure is composed of professional and administrative staff, program evaluators, and support staff. The ED or NLNAC commissioners chair delivers a formal report to NLN, the parent organization, during an NLN Board of Governors meeting annually. While NLN is the parent organization, NLNAC is a wholly owned subsidiary of NLN whose accrediting processes, finances, and administration are separate and independent of NLN to meet compliance requirements of the USDOE. The NLNAC Board of Commissioners is responsible for setting policy and making decisions related to accreditation, policy, finances, and administration (NLNAC, 2008).


Program evaluators (peer reviewers) participate as site visitors, evaluation review panel members, and appeal panel members. These individuals must meet certain criteria related to educational preparation, nursing education expertise, and professional service in addition to attending program evaluator professional development (every 4 years) in order to serve as a program evaluator. Program evaluators are expected to maintain confidentiality regarding nursing programs visited and recommendations made as a result of the self-study and site visit. They also must be from an NLNAC-accredited nursing program. NLNAC provides a detailed accreditation manual that can be downloaded easily by nursing programs (www.nlnac.org/manuals/Manual2008.htm).



NLNAC standards and criteria

There are six designated NLNAC (2008) accreditation standards, including mission and administrative capacity, faculty and staff, students, curriculum, resources, and outcomes. These standards are applicable for all types of nursing programs. The standards and criteria are reviewed every 5 years. Table 29-1 identifies the standards that are defined as “agreed-upon rules for measurement of quantity, extent, value, and quality” (NLNAC, 2008, p. 12). Each standard has specific criteria based on the type of nursing program being evaluated. For example, there are specific criteria (elements that must be addressed in the evaluation of a standard) for the clinical doctorate, master’s and postmaster’s certificate, baccalaureate, associate, diploma, and practical nursing programs. Distance education is also addressed as a criterion in each of the standards. To aid with preparation of the self-study document, NLNAC provides focus questions for each standard and criteria that facilitate adequately addressing each standard. It is an expectation that all standards will be in compliance for the nursing program to receive initial or continued accreditation. Nursing programs are expected to provide a summary of program strengths, areas in need of development, and an action plan based on the standards and criteria. NLNAC offers self-study forums for nursing programs beginning the accreditation or reaccreditation process. The focus of the forums is an overview of the accreditation process and writing a self-study. Each forum addresses in detail a specific standard that may have been identified as an area needing further nursing program development. For example, Standard 6: Outcomes was identified as an area needing development for fall 2009 and spring 2010, followed by Standard 2: Faculty and Staff (NLNAC, 2010).



TABLE 29-1


Comparison of NLNAC and CCNE Accreditation Standards






























































NLNAC Accreditation Standards (NLNAC, 2008) CCNE Accreditation Standards (CCNE, 2009a)
Standard 1 Standard I
Mission and Administrative Capacity Program Quality: Mission and Governance
The nursing education unit’s mission reflects the governing organization’s core values and is congruent with its strategic goals and objectives. The governing organization and program have administrative capacity resulting in effective delivery of the nursing program and achievement of identified outcomes. The mission, goals, and expected aggregate student and faculty outcomes are congruent with those of the parent institution, reflect professional nursing standards and guidelines, and consider the needs and expectations of the community of interest. Policies of the parent institution and nursing program clearly support the program’s mission, goals, and expected outcomes. The faculty and students of the program are involved in the governance of the program and in the ongoing efforts to improve program quality.
Standard 2 Standard II
Faculty and Staff Program Quality: Institutional Commitment and Resources
Qualified faculty and staff provide leadership and support necessary to attain the goals and outcomes of the nursing education unit. The parent institution demonstrates ongoing commitment and support for the nursing program. The institution makes available resources to enable the program to achieve its mission, goals, and expected aggregate student and faculty outcomes. The faculty, as a resource of the program, enables the achievement of the mission, goals, and expected aggregate student outcomes.
Standard 3 Standard III
Students Program Quality: Curriculum and Teaching–Learning Practices
Student policies, development and services support the goals and outcomes of the nursing education unit.
Standard 4 Standard IV
Curriculum Program Effectiveness: Aggregate Student and Faculty Outcomes
The curriculum prepares students to achieve the outcomes of the nursing education unit, including safe practice in contemporary health care environments. The program is effective in fulfilling its mission, goals, and expected aggregate student and faculty outcomes. Actual aggregate student outcomes are consistent with the mission, goals, and expected student outcomes. Actual alumni satisfaction data and the accomplishments of graduates of the program attest to the effectiveness of the program. Actual aggregate faculty outcomes are consistent with the mission, goals, and expected faculty outcomes. Data on program effectiveness are used to foster ongoing program improvement.
Standard 5  
Resources  
Fiscal, physical, and learning resources promote the achievement of the goals and outcomes of the nursing education unit.  
Standard 6  
Outcomes  
Evaluation of student learning demonstrates that graduates have achieved identified competencies consistent with the institutional mission and professional standards and that the outcomes of the nursing education unit have been achieved.  


image



NLNAC accreditation process

NLNAC follows the accreditation model discussed earlier in the chapter. A four-step process is used that includes a self-study report, an on-site visit, a review by the evaluation panel, and a final decision by the Board of Commissioners. The on-site visit is performed by site visitors composed of professional peers. The team of site visitors looks for congruence between the self-study and the actual functioning of the program. The site visitors make a recommendation to the accreditation status of the nursing program. This report is submitted to NLNAC; a copy is then sent to the nursing program administrator, who has 2 weeks to review the report and clarify any errors noted in it on a response form. The final draft of the report is sent to the site visitors and the nursing program administrator. Next, the report is reviewed by the evaluation review panel, whose role is to validate the site visit team’s report and determine that there is strong evidence to support the standards and criteria. This panel is appointed by the NLNAC Board of Commissioners and one of the commissioners serves as a member of the panel. The nursing program administrator may attend the evaluation review panel meeting in person or by conference call. The administrator is in the role of observer only, but may address the panel after deliberations are completed. A recommendation from the panel is made to the Board of Commissioners, which has the sole authority for determining accreditation status of nursing program applicants.



Initial accreditation and continuing accreditation

Nursing programs seeking initial accreditation must comply with certain policies and procedures. The chief executive officer of the college or university initiates the process and authorizes the NLNAC to begin the accreditation process. NLNAC assigns the nursing program a mentor to facilitate the self-assessment process. The nursing program applies for candidacy status by submitting state board of nursing approval documentation, specific fees, and information related to faculty, curriculum, and resources. Once candidacy status is established, the nursing program has 2 years to complete the accreditation process. The nursing program must be in compliance with all standards and criteria to receive initial accreditation or risk accreditation being denied. Initial accreditation nursing programs are reviewed in 5 years (NLNAC, 2008).


Nursing programs seeking continuing accreditation must be in compliance with all standards and criteria to receive accreditation for 8 years. If a nursing program is found to be noncompliant in one or two standards, the next review is scheduled in 2 years for all types of programs except the practical nurse program, which is reviewed in 18 months. This review can be a follow-up report or a follow-up report with a follow-up site visit. For nursing programs that are noncompliant in three or more standards, the next review, consisting of a site visit with self-study report, is in 2 years for all program types except practical nursing program, which is reviewed in 18 months.


Nursing programs facing possible denial or withdrawal have the opportunity to appeal the decision. Nursing programs have 30 days to begin the appeal process after receiving notification of the adverse accreditation decision. An appeal panel is charged with reviewing all pertinent materials, including any documentation relevant to the adverse accreditation decision and information presented at an appeal hearing where oral presentations are made by two representatives of the nursing program, including the nursing administrator. The final appeal decision is made by the appeal panel. A final decision can be affirmation of the adverse accreditation decision, continuing accreditation with an on-site visit in 8 years, or initial accreditation with an on-site visit in 5 years. All NLNAC accreditation decisions are made available to the USDOE, state boards of nursing, and the public. The NLNAC website (www.nlnac.org) provides extensive information to guide nursing programs in every aspect of the accreditation process.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Feb 12, 2017 | Posted by in NURSING | Comments Off on Accreditation of nursing programs

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access