The injured child

2. The injured child


Contents



Consent and confidentiality11


Non-accidental injury13


Communication14


Analgesia15


Injuries to children15


Children and sports injuries17


This book deals with minor injuries to patients of every age. While it can not offer comprehensive coverage of paediatric minor injuries, the commonest presentations will be covered in the appropriate chapters. In this chapter, certain topics which are more general but which underpin the management of the injured child will be discussed.


Consent and confidentiality


We may describe as a child any person who has not yet completed the process of bodily growth and sexual maturation. There is also the more complex issue that young people may be fully grown but not yet ready for the adult world. These matters do not arise so much in the first decade of life, but they become significant for most of the second one. Paediatrics deals with both of these decades. It therefore contains at least two patient groups which are as different from each other as either is from the adult (see Box 2.1 for generally accepted terminology for the stages of childhood).

Box 2.1







• Prenatal: conception – birth


• Infancy: birth – 2 years


• Childhood:




a) Toddler 2–3 years


b) Early childhood 3–5 years


c) Later childhood 6–10 years


• Adolescence:




a) Prepubescence 10–12 years


b) Postpubescence 12–20 years (with gender variations)

A variety of standards is applied, not always uniformly throughout the UK, to matters as diverse as when a young person may consent to sex, marry, accept criminal liability, buy cigarettes and alcohol, vote, drive a car and give or withhold consent to medical treatment. Usually, although this is not the case with medical consent, the law settles these questions with a line in the sand. Age is the determining factor. This ignores the fact that children have a wide range of normal development patterns, but it makes social policy manageable. There can also be conflict between the law and belief systems, usually but not invariably religions, which play a large role in directing the lives of many young people.

Young people have full human rights long before they have the maturity to use them. The boundary between the parents’ caring role and the child’s legitimate impulse towards independence can be difficult to define at any particular time. These matters occasionally intrude into healthcare. Consent to medical treatment and confidentiality are the subjects which cause difficulty. Minor injury is not a field where problems of this kind arise very often but it does happen from time to time. You must have a sense of how our multicultural society in general, and the law in particular, approach these matters. The child’s immaturity imposes on you a greater burden, not a lesser one, to protect his or her rights; but you must also ensure that your patient has been properly treated. While your first obligation is always to the patient, the best solution to any problem is one which is acceptable to the whole family.

The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989; ratified in the UK in 1991) states that a child who understands the issues has the right to consent to his or her treatment. In England, Wales and Scotland, a child who is under 16 years of age may consent to medical treatment if a doctor is satisfied that he or she understands that decision in the sense of the term ‘informed consent’ (Box 2.2). A child who has this understanding is sometimes said to be ‘Gillick competent’ (Box 2.3). English law, not operative in Scotland, allows a competent child to consent to treatment but may not allow the child to refuse it: the courts or, on occasion, the parents can over-rule refusal. In Scotland, the court can do this but the parents cannot: the child in Scotland has more power to refuse treatment if the conditions for an informed consent are met (Box 2.4).



Box 2.4







• England & Wales: The Family Law Reform Act 1969


• Northern Ireland: Age of Majority Act 1969


• Scotland: Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991

Morton & Phillips (1996) offer an interpretation of consent from the viewpoint of senior doctors working in A&E in England, which is summarised here.

When a parent or a carer brings a child to A&E for treatment, the consent of the adult to the child’s treatment is implicit if the treatment has been explained. If the child needs an anaesthetic, written consent should be obtained. (In general, written consent should be sought for procedures which carry significant risk, or which are invasive or intimate.) If a child of 12 years or older comes to A&E alone for treatment, every effort should be made to contact a responsible adult to obtain consent. If no adult is available and the child is competent, then minor treatment, not including X-rays or the giving of medicines, might be performed. At the other extreme, in a dire emergency, life-saving measures can be undertaken without consent if the child is alone. The situation should be documented and continuing efforts made to locate the parents. The parents should be informed in writing of the action taken.

Medical treatment is sometimes imposed on young children against their stated desire if treatment is in the child’s long-term interest and the refusal is deemed to be, perhaps, the result of stress. Consent is obtained from the parents. You should remain aware of the child’s rights, give an appropriate level of explanation, and minimise the potential for the treatment to add to the trauma of the original injury. A children’s A&E department has options such as sedation and theatre treatment for dealing with these problems. Refer at the outset if there is any doubt.

If a child is competent to consent, he or she has the right to patient confidentiality. This right can be over-ruled in certain situations: notifiable disease, child protection issues, road traffic accident, terrorist event, a threat to the safety of others or a court order. These stipulations also apply to adults.


Non-accidental injury


Another issue which arises from the relationship of children with their carers is the vulnerability of children to abuse from those who are supposed to be nurturing them. We all share the responsibility to report, usually to police or social services, the suspicion that a child is being abused, but as a practitioner treating injured children you are certain at some time to meet a child who has been deliberately injured. It is likely that when you do the problem will not be disclosed during the consultation. You must therefore know the signs by which the physical abuse of children may be recognised, and you must know how to deal with the situation when you meet it. Non-accidental injury (NAI) is the term used to describe this form of abuse.

The other forms of abuse which are recognised are sexual abuse, emotional abuse and deprivation, and neglect. There are a number of indicators that can assist in assessing whether child abuse is occurring.




1. Certain external factors are recognised as predisposing to child abuse (which includes NAI):




○ poverty


○ a single parent, especially if young and isolated


○ a stepfather living in the house


○ a parent who has suffered abuse, has mental health problems or is of low intelligence


○ a parent who has unreasonable expectations of a child and is angered by failure


○ an unwanted or difficult pregnancy


○ postnatal depression, or any other problem which causes difficulty with parent–child bonding


○ a child who is difficult or disabled


○ a previous history of abuse of the child or a sibling.


2. Certain aspects of the child’s appearance are indicators of possible abuse:




○ failure to thrive, looking malnourished, not meeting milestones in speech development


○ dirty, not properly dressed for the weather (although this can be misleading and should be interpreted in context)


○ neglected physical disorders; severe nappy rash or ‘cradle cap’


○ a child who does not interact normally, especially with the parents: ‘frozen watchfulness’ is the precocious, subdued demeanour of a child who expects violence


○ a child with disturbed, hyperactive behaviour.

Great care has to be taken in the interpretation of predisposing factors. They are ambiguous.




3. The following signs should raise concern about the specific possibility of a NAI:




○ a delay bringing the child to hospital, especially if the injury is of a severity which calls for immediate treatment


○ the injury does not seem consistent with the story; concern should be greater if the injury is consistent with known patterns of deliberate harm (see below)


○ the parent (or carer) is aggressive, uninterested or evasive when asked questions


○ the story of how the accident happened changes.

Oct 8, 2016 | Posted by in NURSING | Comments Off on The injured child

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access