Strategy and organisational design in health care


CHAPTER 12 Strategy and organisational design in health care






THEORIES AND CONCEPTS UNDERPINNING CURRENT PRACTICE IN STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ORGANISATIONAL DESIGN


Fundamentally, work is divided between areas, groups and individual employees to enhance the organisation’s ability to achieve its goals in an integrated, efficient and effective manner and to enable it to respond flexibly to a constantly changing and volatile environment. Unfortunately, there is no one best way to structure an organisation, as there are several factors such as external and internal environment, size of organisation, mission and objectives which influence decisions made concerning the design. It is not unusual for organisations in similar circumstances to be structured differently, as the same design is not necessarily the best for all. While keeping in mind the primary function of the organisation, a thorough analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each design should be undertaken in order to assess whether it will be appropriate to the organisation’s overall strategy (McLaughlin 1996).



Primary function of organisations


The development of an organisational design and ways of operating are influenced by the varying nature of each organisation and its primary function. Using these two dimensions, Katz and Kahn (1978, p 145) describe the following four types of organisation:






In the real world, organisations may perform a number of functions and so do not fall easily into one category. However, generally they are driven by one primary function, with others undertaken in a secondary capacity.


Working within a dynamic health care environment, traditional maintenance organisations may find that they need to assume a more productive approach so that they can generate income to boost their funding. For example, some hospitals have developed commercial arrangements with private providers to co-locate private hospitals onsite in order to generate additional income. Other organisations may need to adopt a more political or adaptive stance to maintain their competitiveness (Hosking & Gardner 1996). For example, Baptist Community Services in New South Wales have taken on a research focus in the field of aged and community care by establishing a Clinical Chair in gerontological nursing and a research unit, thus enabling them to undertake research to improve clinical outcomes and clinical effectiveness. This divergence of an organisation from its primary function should be undertaken within the context of the overall organisation strategy and not simply as an ad hoc decision.



Organisational strategy


Organisational strategy defines what an organisation seeks to do and how it plans to do it. While a formal plan may guide overall direction, strategy development is a continuous process, enabling the organisation to respond to changes in its environment as appropriate.


In 1966, an American management writer, Chandler (cited in McLaughlin 1996, p 726), argued that ‘structure follows strategy’. What he meant was that organisational structure was influenced heavily by mission, objectives and goals of an organisation. Strategy will impact on numbers of management layers, levels of authority, communication and decision-making processes.


Whether structure follows strategy has been the source of some debate (Viljoen & Dann 2003, p 334). Mintzberg (1994) argues that strategy formation can be ‘emergent’ in that it arises from within the structure; this is more of a participative or ‘committing’ process than the traditional top-down approach. Mintzberg (1994, p 108) states that strategies:



Thus it would appear that structure may follow strategy in some contexts and precede it in others (Heracleous 2003, p 17, Viljoen & Dann 2003), and that strategy and structure are quite interdependent (Mintzberg et al 2003).


Organisational structure is not the only factor impacting on strategic success. In fact some writers maintain that it is the least important feature (Hubbard 2004, p 253). See Chapter 8, for a discussion of other factions which are associated with successful change processes and implementation of organisational strategy.



FACTORS INFLUENCING ORGANISATIONAL STRATEGY AND DESIGN


To be successful, health care organisations must be able to deal effectively and creatively with their increasingly uncertain operational scenario. Organisational strategy and design are key elements in the adaptive capacity of organisations and, indeed, their survival in highly competitive environments. The ability to anticipate and respond to significant shifts within the environment is critical to the success of the organisation.


A variety of factors affecting the development of organisational strategy are summarised in Figure 12.1. (See also Chapter 4, particularly the section on ‘forces driving change within Australian health care’.)




Environmental factors


A key element of organisational strategy is a thorough analysis of the environment within which the organisation is operating. It is critical that this analysis includes the major features of the organisation’s external environment as well as the important attributes of its internal environment. This allows the establishment of appropriate assumptions on which to build the strategic plan. This section provides a brief overview of major concepts that underpin the assessment of an organisation’s environment. Given the range and diversity of health care organisations, it is important to appreciate that not all the factors discussed below will be of equal importance to all organisations and there will, no doubt, be other factors that have pre-eminent importance for individual organisations at particular times. Nevertheless, it is hoped that the following discussion provides a useful set of concepts and principles that can be applied effectively to enhance the processes of strategic planning and organisational design within different organisations.



The external environment


The aim of an external environmental analysis is to identify and understand the external elements that can indirectly and/or directly affect the organisation’s strategy together with a determination of likely impact on the organisation and the successful achievement of its goals. This analysis is often described in terms of opportunities and threats.


Understanding the changes that are taking place outside a health care organisation requires consideration of at least two key areas:




The impact, or potential impact, that they can exert on health care organisations can conceptually differentiate these. The general environment encompasses trends occurring in the community as a whole, and can be considered as having a more indirect — albeit important — impact on health care organisations. On the other hand, the health care environment takes in trends affecting health care more specifically and thus can be thought of as affecting health care organisations more directly. Clearly, in the dynamic environments in which organisations operate, a good understanding of both dimensions of an organisation’s external environment is essential to effective strategic planning.


Both the general and health care environments are complex, multifaceted entities. To facilitate the analysis of these environments it is helpful to group the trends into a number of key areas. One model that describes key environmental trends influencing organisations is the STEP (social, technological, economic and political) model as described by Piggot (2000). This is a useful model that can be applied equally well to the analysis of the external and internal environment regardless of organisational size or setting/location. Table 12.1 presents a checklist of factors that can be usefully considered during a STEP analysis.


Table 12.1 The STEP model for analysing key environmental trends influencing organizations



















SOCIAL






TECHNOLOGICAL



ECONOMIC





POLITICAL






Source: Adapted from Piggot CS 2000 Business planning for health care management (2nd ed). Buckingham Press, Philadelphia


An example of a partial environmental analysis for the development of a new clinical service is presented in Case Study 12.1.




The internal environment


Directing attention to the external environment emphasises the importance of adapting to change, ‘fitting’ the organisation to the broader context and understanding the ‘rules of success’ that are written outside organisations (Ginter et al 2002, p 139). However, these elements are only part of an effective strategic planning process. What is also needed is an understanding of the organisation’s capacity, resources and capabilities and how these contribute to the development of organisational strengths and/or weaknesses.


The internal environment encompasses all of the factors working within an organisation that can influence its operational effectiveness and/or efficiency and/or its competitive advantage. Organisations have certain strengths that enhance their ability to carry out their tasks. Conversely, they also have certain weaknesses that can limit their capacity to function optimally. Thus a thorough understanding of an organisation’s internal environment is essential to the development of effective organisational strategy and structure. Just as the external environment of an organisation is a complex, multifaceted entity, so too is the internal environment. One model that can be used to facilitate analysis of an organisation’s internal environment is the SSIFT (synergy, staff, information, financial, technical/physical) model adapted from Piggot (2000) and Ginter et al (1998). Table 2 presents a checklist of factors that can usefully be considered during a SSIFT analysis.


Table 12.2 Analysis of an organisation’s internal environment























SYNERGY



STAFF






INFORMATION





FINANCIAL






TECHNICAL/PHYSICAL



Source: Derived from Ginter PM, Swayne LM, Duncan WJ 1998 Strategic management of health care organisations (3rd ed). Blackwell Business, Malden, MA; and Piggot CS 2000 Business planning for health care management (2nd ed). Buckingham Press, Philadelphia



Stakeholder analysis


As part of the environmental analysis (internal and external), it is useful to analyse the influence of various stakeholders associated with the organisation in some way. These are people and groups who have an interest in the organisation, its outcomes and success or who are affected in some way by its activities. These individuals or groups have varying levels of power and influence on the organisation’s activities and overall direction. (For more information see Chapter 4 Organisational change and adaptation in health care.)


Ginter et al (2002) also emphasise the importance of analysing competitors and how organisations establish their competitive advantage through the value that they create for their patients and stakeholders. Their adaptation of Porter’s Value Chain (Ginter et al 2002, p 141) combines evaluation of the usual support activities (culture, structure and resources), with evaluation of service delivery, including aspects of marketing. People working in private-for-profit health organisations may also wish to consider additional frameworks such as Porter’s Value Chain, Porter’s Five Competitive Forces, Porter’s Diamond Model, or a framework for analysing competition at an international level (see Porter 1998). These well-known models are discussed in most contemporary strategic management books; for example, Hubbard (2004), Viljoen and Dann (2003), Hitt et al (2005), Ginter et al (2002). Hubbard (2004) has even extended Porter’s five forces to an eight forces model.


New means of evaluating strategic performance are also discussed more fully in the general strategy books. These extend beyond the traditional economic and financial measures to include social/community and environmental factors, other stakeholders such as customers and staff, the level of learning and innovation; for example, Triple Bottom Line and Balanced Scorecard (Kaplan & Norton 1996) (see also Hubbard 2004).


For a detailed discussion of specific measures of organisational performance in the health sector, see Part Five Improving organisational performance.



Organisational mission and objectives




Another essential element of organisational strategy is the development, review and/or redefinition of the organisation’s mission, vision and strategic objectives. A mission statement is a broad expression of an organisation’s distinctive purpose or raison d’être and how it achieves this purpose. They are designed to be quite stable but this does not mean that they cannot be altered to reflect significant, relevant changes in the organisation’s environment.


The mission statement is often accompanied by a vision statement, or statement of strategic intent, that describes more broadly what/where the organisation wants to be when the purpose is being accomplished; that is, ‘Where do we want to go?’ ‘What do we want to be?’. The vision statement is usually short, specific to the organisation, and designed to motivate staff towards the achievement of a desired but realistic future state (Hitt et al 2005, p 386, Hubbard 2004, p 69). Vision and mission statements are often combined. Where they are not combined, the mission statement usually focuses on what the organisation is doing to achieve the vision; that is, it operationalises the vision (Hubbard 2004, p 69).


Many organisations also include a statement of the core values that underpin decision-making within the organisation, such as teamwork, continuous improvement and individualised patient care. Finally, strategic objectives are the tangible outcomes or targets to be achieved. This section provides a brief overview of key concepts that contribute to an understanding of organisational mission (incorporating vision) and strategic objectives.



Purpose of mission statements


Mission statements have become progressively more important in the administration of modern health care organisations. The principal reason for this is the complex and dynamic environment in which health care organisations find themselves operating. Changing mandates, reduced budgets and increased accountability are likely to provide continuing challenges in both the for-profit and not-for-profit health care sectors. Responding effectively to these challenges requires, among other things, the re-examination of organisational strategy. The development of a meaningful mission statement is a strategic exercise that is considered by academics and administrators alike as critical to the success of health care organisations (Bart 2000).


An effective mission statement can be said to fulfil three main purposes:





Despite some ongoing debate about the pragmatic or ‘real’ value of mission statements and their influence on organisational processes, there is now a substantial body of supportive literature and a number of studies have demonstrated a relationship between mission statements and organisational performance (Ginter et al 2002). For example, Bart (1997) found that the inclusion of particular content items in mission statements had a greater influence on employee behaviour than when they were not included; for example, ‘purpose’, ‘general corporate goals’, ‘self-concept’, ‘desired public image’, ‘values’, ‘concern for customers’ and ‘concern for employees’.


If they are to be of strategic value, mission statements must be well formulated and effective in the way that they link the organisation’s activities and values with its desired future.



Key features of a mission statement


While there are many ways of writing a mission statement, several key features have been identified as generally applicable to the mission statement of any organisation (Ginter et al 2002). However, mission statements do not need to include all of these. An overall summary of the features is presented in Table 12.3.


Table 12.3 Key features of a mission statement































CUSTOMERS AND MARKETS
The particular kinds of patients or clients for whom services will be provided; for example, children of all ages.
PRINCIPAL SERVICES
The special services that will be provided; for example, comprehensive diagnostic and treatment services for adult patients, high quality supportive care for frail elderly clients.
GEOGRAPHIC AREA
The particular geographical area where the organisation will operate; for example, a defined scope of activity, such as rural facilities/services.
ORGANISATIONAL PHILOSOPHY/VALUES
Key philosophical beliefs and/or values of the organisation; for example, a commitment to holistic caring, enhancing quality of life for clients.
ORGANISATIONAL GOALS
Key goals that the organisation is working towards; for example to promote optimal health and wellbeing, to enhance quality of life for clients and their families.
ORGANISATIONAL SELF-CONCEPT
The distinct way that an organisation ‘sees’ itself; for example, a private, not-for-profit integrated health service, a caring community/family, partnership of high-quality health care providers.
PUBLIC IMAGE
The way that the organisation wishes to be perceived by the community in which it operates; for example, high-quality, cost-effective services, delivery of services in a manner that values and respects the personal dignity and uniqueness of all who are served.

Source: Derived from Ginter PM, Swayne LM, Duncan WJ 2002 Strategic management of health care organisations (4th ed). Blackwell Business, Malden, MA, pp 183–4


It might be useful at this point to consider some examples of mission statements (Box 12.1). Note that although the elements summarised in Table 12.3 are exhibited to a greater or lesser degree in the examples provided in Box 12.1, each mission statement attempts to capture the uniqueness of the respective organisation in terms of its reason for being. In this way these statements provide useful guidelines to staff and customers as to what the organisation should be doing.


Apr 15, 2017 | Posted by in MEDICAL ASSISSTANT | Comments Off on Strategy and organisational design in health care

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access