Reflective skills




Introduction



Life-long learning is seen as crucial to enable you to demonstrate you are taking responsibility for your own learning throughout your career and, as a professional, you are required to articulate this through your personal professional profile (PPP). However, as the NMC acknowledges, life-long learning is more than just keeping yourself up to date. It expects you to take an enquiring approach to your practice, at both the pre-qualifying level of activity, and at the post-qualifying level, through the Post-registration Education and Practice (PREP) standards (NMC, 2008). You can download a copy of the PREP handbook (NMC, 2008) from the NMC website. One of the four key areas of support identified by PREP is to help you to ‘think and reflect for yourself’ (NMC, 2008, p. 2). Guidance on how to develop your own profile can be seen in Chapter 15.

Currently, the process of learning to think and reflect for yourself begins early in your pre-qualifying programme. You can then build on your ability to learn from the range of situations and experiences you find yourself in, up to and beyond the point of registration and throughout your career. Reflection, therefore, plays a vital role in preparing you for your professional life and for the life-long learning that is expected of you. Reflection helps you keep abreast of change as the normal expectation of professional practice. However, despite the ever-increasing body of evidence to suggest that reflective skills are crucial to the provision of holistic nursing care (Gustafsson et al., 2007), reflection is not as universal an activity as we think (Conway, 1998; Mantzoukas and Jasper, 2004).

This chapter sets out to explore what is meant by the term ‘reflection’ and the skills involved in undertaking it. It will also examine ways in which you can develop further the skills of reflection to help you in the study process and to gain more from the experiences you are exposed to, personally and professionally.


What is reflection?






B9780702031427000123/fx2.jpg is missing Jot down what you understand by the term ‘reflection‘.
The early work of Dewey (1933), an American educationalist, philosopher and psychologist, laid the foundation for our current concept of reflection. Dewey believed that reflection was central to human learning and professional development. More recently, a number of theorists have further developed the concept of reflection (e.g. Brookfield, 1995; Freire, 1996; Habermas, 1974; Mezirow, 1991; Schon, 1983) and helped advance our understanding of how to learn through reflection and facilitate others to learn. If you are interested in finding out more about the contribution of these different theorists, then Redmond (2004) gives a succinct overview of the literature in her first chapter.


So, how can we define reflection?


Reflection is concerned with learning by thinking, by weighing up all the aspects of the situation and making a conscious and informed decision about what to do. On a personal level, it means taking active control over what you do and how you do it. On the surface, this may seem a fairly straightforward concept; however, there is an increasing body of evidence to suggest that it is not quite as straightforward as it seems (Burns and Bulman, 2000; Moon, 1999; Taylor, 2006).


Reflection in a personal sense


We can relate reflection first to our personal lives. It is often said that we learn from the mistakes we make. Life can be seen as a series of hurdles: each time we meet new experiences, we try to fit them into our already existing understanding to make sense of them. However, not everyone does learn from their experiences. Some people are particularly self-aware and sensitive to their own response in certain circumstances, whereas others never seem to learn from their experiences and continue to make the same mistakes over and over again. Alternatively, you can learn to forget the experience – the experience can be too painful to explore or your feelings can be too strong to dissect. So, when you meet a similar situation in the future, it is easy to make the same mistakes over again. The learning has been one of forgetting.

There are two important issues here. First, feelings are an extremely important aspect of the learning process and the way you feel can dictate whether you learn from a particular experience or not. Feelings of anxiety or uncomfortable feelings can be a barrier to learning. Second, it is crucial that you do not learn to forget too many experiences. If this happens, making mistakes repeatedly may be extremely problematic for you, especially when there may be the opportunity of making life easier for yourself by responding in a different way (see the box below).



Often when you ‘reflect’ you acknowledge that something happened. You describe it to yourself, perhaps over and over again. Perhaps then you share it with someone else and this helps you see it in a different light. However, your ‘reflections’ often stop there. You do not allow yourself the opportunity of making sense of the situation for another time. Rather, you seem to recall it numerous times to ‘get it off your chest’.

Merely thinking about what you did is not in itself true reflection, certainly not at a level that requires you to make sense of it and change what you do the next time.


Reflection in a professional sense


It is over 20 years since reflection and reflective practice were first introduced to nursing and midwifery in the UK, with the introduction of Project 2000 (UKCC, 1986) and the move into higher education nationally. Reflective learning has now become an essential element in both pre- and post-registration education programmes globally (Greenwood, 1998; Kember, 2001; Taylor, 2006). The belief is that reflection helps you as a nurse or midwife to learn from your practice. It helps you to make sense of how you and others deal with the complex situations you find yourselves in and it helps you to bridge the gap between the theory you learn in the classroom and your professional practice.

Prior to the introduction of reflective practice, much of the learning in practice and in the education institutions focused on rather traditional teaching styles and all assessments were written in the formal, third person academic style, with the student presenting a rather objective view of how care should be managed. The focus was more on teaching rather than learning. However, Schon (1987) believed that this rather objective, theory-driven approach to learning was inappropriate for education programmes preparing students for a professional career. He recommended that universities re-focus their activity on facilitating students, through reflective methods, to identify and address problematic issues in a more individual way (Mantzoukas, 2007; Schon (1983) and Schon (1987)). He recognized that, in dealing with human behaviour, problems in professional practice are not straightforward. They do not follow a recipe-type approach to decision making. Instead, situations in professional practice are ‘messy’, uncertain, complex, individual and sometimes conflicting. Rather than ‘teach’ theory and expect professionals to bridge the gap between the theory taught to their individual situations, Schon believed that reflective methods would enable them to analyse their unique situation and empower them to confront and address each situation in an individual and holistic way (Mantzoukas, 2007).

As a student of midwifery or nursing, you can use reflective methods to help you to deal with uncertainties and to find new solutions to dilemmas for each individual you care for. Individualized care is now a well-established way of thinking about care. The lists of textbook problems in clinical practice and, even more, the recipe-book solutions to these problems are becoming things of the past. Also, as an adult learner you will bring with you to the learning experience your own individual ways of making sense of the situations. By learning from each situation, you can build up your own portfolio of learning and be able to tailor solutions to meet the individual needs of the patients in your care.

Taylor (2006) argues that reflection encourages students to think critically. From a process of exploration, often triggered by a sense of the unexpected, reflection encourages you to make sense of an experience and learn from it to help you in the future. As already mentioned, feelings are a crucial element in terms of how they influence your learning from the experience.



B9780702031427000123/fx3.jpg is missing The most important aspect of reflection is learning from the experience.

To enable you to make the most of your learning, many theorists have described their own process to guide you. Before we consider different guides or ‘frameworks’ to help you look critically at your practice, it is worthwhile considering the relationship between reflection and expert practice.

If you look around you, you can certainly identify a number of practitioners who would fit the title of expert. But what exactly do we mean by the term ‘expert’? Those ‘expert’ practitioners whom you have identified will have a number of different attributes, yet you have identified them all as ‘experts’. Conway (1996) suggests that expertise is not definitive and in her own study she identified four different types of ‘expert’ as illustrated below.

FOUR DISTINCT TYPES OF ‘EXPERT’ IDENTIFIED BY CONWAY (CONWAY, 1996, WITH PERMISSION)




Technologist


Characterized by wide range of knowledge, including anticipatory knowledge, diagnosis knowledge, ‘know-how’ knowledge and monitoring knowledge both of junior doctors and patients’ conditions. Teaching by these experts was mainly didactic: images were used, as was in-depth questioning and a translator function was demonstrated. Issues arose in relation to the authority that expert nurses had vis-à-vis doctors.


Traditionalist


Characterized by the need for ‘survival’. These experts were preoccupied with ‘getting the work done’ and managing care with scarce resources. For them, care had a medical focus and the experts operated as overseers and doctors’ assistants. Management and doctors were perceived as all powerful. They did not value their own practice and saw themselves as powerless in terms of influence. They saw education as an optional extra and not as central to practice development. Value was attached to ‘doing’ and not to ‘reflecting’. They showed that ‘papering over the cracks’ was what nursing was about and this others also learned to do. This dispossessed others.


Specialist


Characterized by prescribing treatment regimes, recommending medication and extending their roles. There were subdivisions within this group that reflected the traditionalists, technologists and humanistic existentialists. They had developed knowledge in terms of assessment, diagnosing, quality of life and transformative ability. Doctor–nurse relationships varied.


Humanistic existentialist


Characterized by a dynamic and strong nursing focus to care. Patients were truly viewed holistically and a humanistic philosophy was used in practice. They were passionate about nursing practice. A devolved hierarchy using primary nursing was operational. Humanistic existentialist experts were risk takers. They had supportive managers, good resources and were educationally well developed. They exerted considerable power and influence and saw themselves as creating the culture in their areas. Self-awareness and reflective abilities typified this group. They were also very aware of the influence that they had on other nurses.


Interestingly, each group believed they were reflective although, in reality, this was not the case. Reflective ability was the hallmark of only one of the four types (the humanistic existentialists), with far less development in the other three groups. Their ways of thinking were different and the way they approached their practice was different, with those with minimal reflective abilities giving care that was limited in focus and illness orientated. In contrast, reflective practitioners gave responsive care, full of warmth and based on the needs of the individual. The different ‘world views’ are therefore important, as they influence the ‘natural’ skills individuals bring to situations, with some having more advanced critical reflective skills than others.

As Conway (1996) acknowledges, reflection in a professional sense for some, is not easy. However, as our understanding of reflective learning develops, Burns and Bulman (2000) acknowledged that, 5 years on, and through support and guidance, there was a more positive recognition by student nurses of the value of reflection and their development as curious and challenging practitioners.

More recently, however, a study (by Mantzoukas and Jasper, 2004) of sixteen nurses in four medical wards in England found that although the nurses used and acknowledged the power of reflection for developing practice, its use was devalued by those perceived as being in more ‘powerful’ roles; for example, doctors and managers. It was the ward culture that invalidated it as ‘normal’ for knowledge development and practice provision, forcing its use as a covert activity rather than an accepted and formal learning tool.

Whether you are a nurse or midwife at the beginning of your career, or returning after a break, it is important that you understand how to reflect and identify tools that will help you in the process. Using your clinical mentors or peers to support you, learning from your experience and not by any practice imposed upon you by others or by rituals or routine, will be crucial to deliver the high standards of professional practice set for us by the NMC (2005). While reflection is now accepted as a learning tool in the academic and research world, this study demonstrates that in fact there are still some barriers to its implementation in practice.


Learning from our mistakes


You will have met practitioners who have been in practice some years and have developed their practice, kept themselves up-to-date and become expert practitioners. However, you might also have had the misfortune to work with other practitioners who have been in practice for a number of years but have simply repeated their experience over time and have not learned from it.

With the drive towards more flexible career pathways and greater career opportunities from healthcare assistant to consultant, coupled with the NHS modernization agenda advocating new ways of working and better vocational training opportunities for the wider workforce (Department of Health (1999) and Department of Health (2000a)), the boundaries between professional work and non-professional carers have become blurred. Over 15 years ago, Dewar (1992) found that first-level nurses could not differentiate easily between their own work and that of healthcare assistants, and, with the introduction of assistant practitioners, the boundaries are likely to be less clear now. You may be quite clear in your own mind what the differences are but, if challenged, could you put them into words? Perhaps the development of reflective skills will enable the profession, as a whole, to articulate the value of the professional carer. In turn, this may allow you to distinguish between you, the professional, and your assistant, and encourage you to articulate this difference in practice.



B9780702031427000123/fx3.jpg is missing Reflection consists of:


• Thinking about an experience


• Exploring that experience in terms of feelings and significant features


• Processing the significant features and identifying learning


• Effects on future practice


Types of reflection


As the concept of reflection has developed in relation to professional practice, a number of different types of reflection have been identified in relation to reflecting before, during or after an event.

In addition to the different types of reflection, there are different levels of reflecting. These levels are of particular importance clinically, especially when you engage in a group discussion of an incident that happened in your work. They are also important when developing your skills of reflection for academia. These are considered in more detail in Chapter 14.

Learning from practice is very important in any programme of professional development, whether pre- or post-registration. After all, the whole purpose of learning is to gain insight from our practice and to develop standards of care. Otherwise, learning and study become sterile activities.


The process of reflection


A large number of papers related to reflective practice were published during the 1990s (Hannigan, 2001) and the proliferation of papers has continued. Despite a lack of empirical evidence, reflection is seen as ‘the best tool that nursing has to date for advancing its practice’ (Mantzoukas and Jasper, 2004, p. 926). As a tool, therefore, different theorists have developed their own models of structured reflection to help you to follow a process to allow you to articulate your clinical decision making and learn from your experience (Boud et al., 1985; Gibbs, 1988; Johns, 2006; Rolfe et al., 2001). Jasper (2006) presents a comprehensive overview of a range of published frameworks for reflection as well as a comparison of their presentation and key questions/cues.


Reflective frameworks


One of the most popular frameworks to help you gain the most from your reflective learning is the one developed by Gibbs who uses Kolb’s experiential learning cycle as a basis to help you to gain new insights into learning from your experience. Gibbs’ (1988) framework is presented in Figure 12.1.


Gibbs’ model helps learners work through different aspects of the learning situation and allows to break it down into different parts to make sense of it and gain new insights into how things might be done differently in the future.

The post-qualifying student case study below offers you a way of approaching learning through reflection, using Gibbs’ tool.




Jenny is a newly qualified Emergency Nurse Practitioner (ENP) who works in an emergency department.


Description


I attended a patient who had a cut to his dominant hand from a clean kitchen knife. Having examined him, I knew he needed referral. I bleeped the ‘on call’ plastics registrar and tried to make my referral over the telephone. He kept asking me questions I wasn’t ready for and he became angry. In the end he told me to speak to one of my medical colleagues to make the referral. Reluctantly I did ask my colleague, who was very supportive.


Feelings/reactions


I felt mortified that I had let the patient down as well as myself. I was really anxious about making the referral and felt stupid when I couldn’t seem to answer any of his straightforward questions. I have spent 6 months studying and passing exams and know I can do this role, but was so nervous about the referral. I also felt angry with the plastics registrar because I felt he undermined me.


Evaluation


The only good thing I could find was that the patient eventually received the correct treatment and that my medical colleague in the emergency department was very supportive and agreed with my clinical findings and diagnosis. The less positive aspects of the experience were that I was unprepared for the questions that I knew would be asked. I also thought I left a poor impression by making a mess of the referral. I also felt I slowed up the process for the patient who could have been transferred to the ward an hour previously.


Analysis


If I analyse the situation objectively I really wasn’t prepared for making the referral. I knew the questions that I would be asked. We have covered this on my Emergency Nurse Practitioner (ENP) course and I didn’t take the time to write down what I needed to say or to collect all the information I required. I also felt a bit under confident and perhaps intimidated by the plastics registrar and had a feeling of doom about the whole situation which turned out to be a self-fulfilling prophecy! When I think back over the situation and put myself in the place of the plastics registrar, it must have been very frustrating to speak to someone who was clearly nervous, didn’t have the right information and sounded under confident.


Conclusions (general)


My lack of confidence didn’t engender confidence in the person I was referring to. I recognize that I should not have let my emotions get in the way of the referral and also that I took the whole episode very personally when in fact it was my behaviour rather than me as a person which was the problem. I didn’t need to get so upset, because it didn’t help anyone, least of all the patient.



Personal action plans


My action plan as a result of this incident is to practise making referrals to my colleagues in the team, gathering all the information needed to gain confidence and experience. I will try to rehearse the conversation in my head beforehand and ask myself what the other person would want to know. I will also practise being more succinct, stating my intention in the first sentence and being prepared for the questions, giving time for them to be asked.

You can see from this example of an experienced nurse taking over a new role that she has used Gibbs’ (1988) framework to help her to analyse her situation and try to make sense of it. This abridged extract from her portfolio does show some good insight into her feelings and how she has planned to prepare for a similar situation in the future.



B9780702031427000123/fx1.jpg is missing Think about your own practice and how Gibbs’ model might help you to analyse and help you learn from a situation you have been in.


Structured reflection


A rather more detailed framework is the one described by Johns (2006). With a more comprehensive set of cues to guide your reflection than the stages offered by Gibbs (1988), Johns’ framework makes it a very popular framework for those of you at the beginning of your reflective practice. Its detailed questions or cues help you begin to understand your practice in relation to the fundamental ways of knowing identified by Carper (1978). Johns’ framework is continually being developed and is now in its 15th edition (Johns, 2006) since its inception in 1992. As with any tool, it can be used to help you either think or write reflectively. The written approach is considered in Table 12.1.
































































TABLE 12.1 Johns’ model of structured reflection (from Johns, 2006)
REFLECTIVE CUE MSR MAP
1. Bring the mind home
2. Focus on a description of an experience that seems significant in some way Aesthetics
3. What particular issues seem significant to pay attention to? Aesthetics
4. How were others feeling and why did they feel that way? Aesthetics
5. How was I feeling and why did I feel that way? Personal
6. What was I trying to achieve and did I respond effectively? Aesthetics
7. What were the consequences of my action on the patient, others and myself? Aesthetics
8. What factors influence the way I was/am feeling, thinking and responding to this situation? Personal (personal, organizational professional, cultural)
9. What knowledge did or might have informed me? Empirics
10. To what extent did I act for the best and in tune with my values? Ethics
11. How does this situation connect with previous experiences? Personal/reflexivity
12. Given the situation again, how might I respond differently? Reflexivity
13. What would be the consequences of responding in new ways for the patient, others and myself? Reflexivity
14. What factors might constrain me from responding in new ways? Personal
15. How do I now feel about this experience? Personal
16. Am I able to support myself and others better as a consequence? Reflexivity
17. What insights have I gained? (framing perspectives) Reflexivity
18. Am I more able to realize desirable practice? (Being available template)
19. What have I learnt through reflecting?

Johns begins by asking you to ‘bring the mind home’ (2006, p. 37). Here he is asking you to find your own space and focus your thoughts and feelings on a particular situation before writing a description of that experience. To reflect purposefully, it is important that you focus on a particular learning point in the situation to prevent your mind being distracted by so many different aspects that ‘we [may] find ourselves scattered everywhere, in all directions, leaving nobody at home.’ (Rinpoche, 1992, p. 59) He advocates meditation to bring the mind home and help create a still point within yourself to purposefully reflect (Johns, 2006, p. 37). The storytelling aspect of reflection acts as a trigger to help you tease out the issues that are important to you and with a view to learning and perhaps changing your practice, but it is only a small part of the whole process.

In Table 12.1, Johns has used Carper’s (1978) four ways of knowing to help you to reflect on your clinical reasoning and action by mapping his questions and cues against these four ways of knowing. However as you can see from Table 12.1, he uses the aesthetic response as the core, influenced by ethical, empirical and the personal. These ways of knowing are as follows:


■ Empirical knowledge: theoretical, scientific, accessible through the senses.


■ Aesthetic knowledge: artistic and creative aspects of the situation – what is most pleasing? Knowing what to do with the moment, instantly without conscious deliberation. Producing creative and deeply moving interactions with others.


■ Personal knowledge: your personal experience, which influences the situation and also how you can manage your own concerns so they do not interfere with seeing the patients.


In addition to Carper’s four ways of knowing, Johns constructed a fifth way of knowing, which he named ‘reflexivity’ and which helps you look back to make sense of ‘the unfolding pattern’ (Johns, 2006, p. 57) of events in the present situation, with a view towards the future. Johns suggests that there is a need for reflection to be guided, so the cues help you to stay as true to the meaning of the situation as you can. In this way, Johns encourages you to move away from the purely theoretical knowledge that you bring to each situation and explore other types of knowledge that help you make sense of the situation. This, of course, can be as relevant to your clinical practice as it is to your study. All aspects of knowing are important and contribute to the whole of knowing. Learning to articulate each aspect allows you to communicate and develop that knowledge to refine your understanding for practice.

It may be helpful to consider Johns’ (2006) framework to guide your thoughts through a particular problem in your practice.



B9780702031427000123/fx2.jpg is missing Take an example from your recent practice experience and follow the cues and questions Johns poses in his model (Table 12.1). This might be an example where you congratulate yourself on how well the situation turned out or it may be something that you felt unhappy about in the way you or others acted. Whatever the situation, the cues that Johns’ model gives you should help you understand more fully what happened and how you might approach a similar situation in the future.

Using a guided approach, getting in touch with your feelings and responses to problems, you can learn to reflect critically and gain from your experiences. As Conway (1996) illustrated, some individuals find this easier than others. If it is not within your ‘make-up’ or doesn’t suit your own philosophical perspective then, like any new skill, it needs practice and development, guidance and support.

Jun 18, 2016 | Posted by in MIDWIFERY | Comments Off on Reflective skills

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access