Concept of Death |
Behavior |
Communication Issues |
Infancy |
No known concept Death viewed as separation |
May be clingy or irritable |
Related to infant’s perception of separation anxiety Need comfort from persons important to them |
Early Childhood (1-4 Years) |
Does not have comprehension of death Aware that someone is missing Aware of other people being “sad” |
Altered sleep patterns Irritable Clingy |
Similar to infants as related to separation anxiety Needs reassurance |
Middle Childhood (5-10 years of age) |
Knows the word death or dead, but has little understanding of the meaning Sees death as temporary or reversible May feel ambivalent about absent person May develop “magical thinking,” viewing themselves as the cause |
Withdrawal Regression Irritable May feel confused or guilty Concerned about whether the person who has died has food, clothing, and so forth Uses imaginative play Anticipates return Has imaginary conversations with the dead |
Children may parrot what they have heard others say They may be very curious and ask uninhibited or frank questions Bereaved siblings may feel that their thoughts or actions caused the death Therapeutic play is often an effective intervention to address feelings and anxieties May still have fears related to separation and need family to be close They need the opportunity to express concerns, fears, and curiosity |
Early Adolescence (11-14 years) |
Begins to understand death as irreversible Sees death as natural May begin to realize they or others might die Associates death with fear, violence, or destruction May be uncomfortable expressing feelings May have anxiety related to mutilation fears |
Asks specific questions about death and death-related rituals, such as funerals, burials Curious about how the body feels after death Needs burial and closure rituals if a pet dies May use play to cope with feelings Often denies death May “act out” at school or with family |
Needs to express fears about potential loss of a parent A dying child may try to “protect” family by withdrawing May choose favorite nurse as confidante May seem outwardly uncaring, although inwardly upset Siblings of ill, dying, or dead sibling may need more specific information about cause of illness or death Bereaved or dying children may have feelings of guilt related to blaming themselves for causing the illness or death |
Middle and Late Adolescence (ages 15-21 years) |
Accepts finality of death Over time, develops mature understanding of death Has fears that he or she may die May have “morbid curiosity” related to gruesome or violent death Becomes concerned about practical matters associated with death Denies own mortality by risk-taking behaviors Incorporates cultural rituals and attitudes to death and is interested in exploring issues related to afterlife |
May feel or express sadness, loneliness, or anger May have reckless demeanor or tough, uncaring attitude Tries to act adultlike, but may develop regressive behavior Often wants to touch the body after death May use rituals to decrease anxiety Often develops regressive behavior with staff or family May use creative outlets such as writing, music, or art Peer support may seem more important than family May be very concerned about body image Ill child may want to be involved with funeral planning and “putting their affairs in order” |
Needs questions answered openly and in a nonjudgmental manner, especially when related to morbid curiosity Needs more detailed explanations of illness and potential causes of death Requires discussion about reckless behavior and consequences Wants opportunity to voice fears and concerns Dying adolescents have the need to discuss value of life and concerns related to dying, but may find it difficult to initiate these conversations Siblings of ill or dying child may act sad or depressed, or may seem oblivious to situation and become angry if their plans or activities are disrupted; often want to be at school or with friends and not at home or the hospital, yet have difficulty in voicing concerns |
Sources: AACN & COH (2012); Brown-Hellsten, Hockenberry-Eaton, Lamb et al. (2000); Ethier (2009); Fochtman (2002). |