Moral Development

Universal moral standards condemn actions such as lying, cheating, and murder.
Conventional moral standards belong to a particular culture, religion, or other self-identified group, and condemn actions ranging from consumption of certain foods to sexual mores.
Piaget identified changes in children’s moral reasoning from learning right and wrong, to considering intent, and then understanding the principles behind rules.
Kohlberg identified levels of moral reasoning in children and adults that increase in complexity.
Gilligan distinguished between Kohlberg’s morality of justice, which assumes the reasoner is an autonomous thinker, and an ethic of caring, which is based on relationships between the reasoner and the situation.
TERMS
Conventional moral standards
Moral development
Moral growth
Moral philosophers
Moral development refers to the emergence in children of universal moral standards that lead to the condemnation of such behaviors as lying, cheating, robbing, murdering, raping, and the like. Conventional moral standards, by contrast, refers to the ideas that a particular group, religion, or culture believe in but cannot demand that everybody else agree with them. For example, in India violations of food taboos are regarded as seriously as crimes against a person. Members of Western cultures may not accept this belief, but members of both cultures agree in condemning murder. Culture, with its powerful influence on conventional moral standards, is a recurrent theme in any analysis of moral development.
As we begin our analysis of children’s moral progress, keep in mind that moral behavior is a complex mixture of cognition (thinking about what to do), emotion (feelings about what to do or what was done), and behavior (what is actually done).

Piaget studied moral reasoning in children. Young children (from birth to about 2 or 3 years of age) begin to learn about right and wrong from their parents. During these early years, modeling is especially effective. Lacking cognitive sophistication, young children who have good relationships with their parents usually are impressed by what they see their parents doing.
The next phase of moral growth (about 2 to 6 years of age) reflects children’s growing cognitive maturity and their developing ability to decide what is right or wrong. As they approach school age, they begin to understand intent as another factor in doing wrong—for example, dropping and breaking a dish “on purpose” versus “by accident.”
As children move into middle childhood (about 6 to 12 years of age), they interact with their siblings in their family lives, with their schoolmates in classroom experiences, and with their friends in games and other social activities. Here they again encounter the reality of rules—but rules not established by parental edict. Consequently, they learn about making and following regulations as well as deriving insights into the children who don’t. School-aged children who are concrete thinkers tend to cling to absolute rules of right and wrong, whereas older school-aged children (10 to 13 years of age) begin to appreciate the principle behind the rules. For example, think about children of different ages playing a baseball game. A 9-year-old may declare that allowing the 5-year-old to stay at bat until he or she hits the ball is “unfair” and “breaking the rules,” whereas the 13-year-old pitcher looks at the discrepancy in skill between the 5- and 9-year-olds, and handicaps the younger player in an effort to “level the playing field” among players.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

