Definitions
Infection control is the application of standard principles to prevent health-care associated infections (HCAI) and is essential in the reduction of HCAI. Asepsis is described as the state of being free from living pathogenic organisms1 and aseptic technique as the effort taken to keep a patient as free from micro-organisms as possible.2 The incidence of HCAI in the United Kingdom is estimated to be 9%;3 statistics specific to the ambulance service are not readily available.
Aseptic technique is used to minimise the risk of infection when managing wounds, or when carrying out invasive procedures such as intravenous cannulation. Asepsis in the out-of-hospital environment is classed as medical asepsis and aims to reduce the number and spread of organisms during patient contact with the ambulance service; this differs from surgical asepsis, which is undertaken in operating theatres.
The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) divides the standard principles into three broad categories:4
- Hand hygiene
- Use of personal protective equipment (PPE)
- Safe use and disposal of sharps
- Education of patients, their carers, and healthcare personnel.
Indications for infection control
Patients have a right to clean and safe treatment wherever and whenever they are treated by the National Health Service (NHS).5 Around 320,000 healthcare-associated infections occur every year (almost 3 million during the decade from 1993). These infections add an average of 11 days of hospitalisation for each person infected and cost the NHS an estimated £1 billion annually. Around a third of these infections could probably have been prevented.6 The application of evidence-based infection prevention and control into every day practice is believed to be important in reducing preventable infections and could reduce the human and financial costs.7 Health-care professionals should routinely apply the principles of infection control to the management of every patient/client.
Hand hygiene
Several studies have demonstrated a clear link between handwashing and a reduction in infection8-11 and, although these studies are hospital based, it is useful and reasonable to extrapolate the findings and apply them to the community setting. Expert opinion is consistent in asserting that effective handwashing reduces the number of pathogens carried on the hands and that this will logically decrease the incidence of preventable HCAI.12-14
Currently there is no compelling evidence to favour the general use of antimicrobial handwashing agents over soap, or one antimicrobial agent over another.4 The acceptability of any preparation used in the community setting will need to be based upon ease of use and their dermatological effect; in most cases this will be determined by the employing Trust.
The latest recommendations from NICE4 state that hands that are visibly soiled or potentially grossly contaminated with dirt or organic material must be washed with liquid soap and water. Hands must be decontaminated, preferably with an alcohol-based hand rub unless hands are visibly soiled, between caring for different patients or between different care activities for the same patient.
There is little high level evidence to support any given handwashing technique in terms of duration of washing and hand drying. Current guidelines are based on expert opinion that suggest that the time taken to decontaminate the hands, the exposure of all aspects of the hands and wrists to the decontaminant, the use of vigorous rubbing, thorough rinsing (in the case of handwashing), and drying are all key factors in the process of effective hand hygiene.12,15
Recommendations4
Areas that are commonly missed in handwashing are shown in Figure 12.1.
The handwashing technique that remains in vogue within the health service was first described by Ayliffe, Babb and Quoraishi in 197816 and is still the procedure recommended by the Ambulance Service Association (Figure 12.2).17
Personal protective equipment
Most expert opinion regarding the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) has been based on studies in the hospital environment; however, it is safe to extrapolate the general findings and apply them to the community setting. This section discusses gloves, aprons, visors/eye protection, and face masks. The purpose of PPE is to protect both patients and staff, and to reduce the risk of transmission of microorganisms.18,19 The decision to use PPE and the level of PPE is based upon an assessment of the anticipated risk of transmission of micro-organisms to the patient, and the risk of exposure to body fluid during patient management.
The guidelines in Figure 12.3 may be helpful in determining the level of PPE required.
Gloves
The use of gloves as a primary defence against infection has become common practice for health professionals in the hospital and community settings. There is expert agreement that gloves play a role in protecting the hands from contamination, and reducing the risk of transmission of micro-organisms to both patient and practitioner,20–22 but they should not be worn unnecessarily as prolonged and indiscriminate use may cause skin sensitivity and adverse reactions.23 The guidance given above should be used to decide when it is appropriate to wear gloves.