© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
Sandra Schüssler and Christa Lohrmann (eds.)Dementia in Nursing Homes10.1007/978-3-319-49832-4_66. Inclusion and Support of Family Members in Nursing Homes
(1)
Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Abstract
The involvement of family members in nursing homes is vital for the well-being of people with dementia residing in nursing homes. They can contribute to maintaining a sense of personhood, assist with care, and are advocates for people with dementia. Despite this wide acknowledgement of the importance of family participation in nursing homes, barriers to the implementation of participatory family care have been identified. This chapter describes common dilemmas in care practice in establishing collaboration and partnership between staff and family in nursing homes. Important barriers relate to attitude and role conflict, communication, and the organization. Furthermore, promising interventions (such as the Partner in Caregiving program) and new care models aimed at small-scale, homelike care environments are presented in building partnerships.
Keywords
Family caregivingDementia6.1 Family Involvement in Nursing Homes
Family caregivers are of great importance in nursing homes, especially for people with dementia. Nowadays, person-centered models of care are prominent in dementia care and emphasize strengthening residents’ autonomy and overall well-being (Verbeek et al. 2009). Older people should be enabled to continue their lifestyle as before admission to a nursing home. Program design should ensure that residents are known as people. Family caregivers play an important role to establish this, for example, by providing the historical background for residents, make care decisions, provide personal and social care, and are advocates for people with dementia (Port et al. 2005). Family members aim to maintain a sense of personhood for people with dementia residing in nursing homes, as it is important for family that their loved one is treated as an individual (Sandberg et al. 2001; Bramble et al. 2009). Literature shows that family caregivers remain involved in the lives of their loved ones following admission into nursing homes (Gaugler 2005). This evidence is important to battle against the myth that families abandon their relatives in nursing homes (Rowles et al. 1996). The decision to admit people with dementia into a nursing home is very emotional for family caregivers and triggers feelings of guilt and loss and most relatives want to stay actively involved in the care process (Tornatore and Grant 2004). Family caregivers feel continuing the responsibility for care often after admission, although they are relieved from their round-the-clock care at home (Ross et al. 2001).
Family involvement in long-term care is a multidimensional construct and consists of aspects such as visiting, advocacy, monitoring, and providing socio-emotional, instrumental, and personal care (Gaugler 2005). Looking at more quantitative aspects of family involvement, previous studies have investigated the visiting frequency, duration, and type of care tasks family members conduct. A European study showed that family caregivers visited overall approximately 3–4 times a week, with an average duration of over 100 min (Bleijlevens et al. 2015). There were, however, large differences between countries. In northern countries such as Estonia, Finland, and Sweden, visits were less frequent (around 2 times a week), while in other countries such as Spain, visits were more frequent, up to 5 or 6 days a week (Bleijlevens et al. 2015). Other studies suggest that on average, family caregivers visit and/or provide care between 4 and 9 h per week (Gaugler et al. 2004; Port et al. 2005). Tasks that family caregivers conduct include a wide range of personal, instrumental, and socio-emotional tasks, such as grooming, clipping fingernails, doing laundry, shop for the resident, writing letters, maintaining the apartment, and dealing with family guilt feelings (Gaugler 2005). Furthermore, family members felt responsible for new dimensions of assistance not originally engaged in the community, such as promoting family understanding of nursing home policies, initiating actions to ensure good staff/family relations (Gaugler 2005) as well as supervision and monitoring of quality of care (Moss et al. 1993; Max et al. 1995), representing and maintaining residents’ continuity and connectivity with other family members and friends (Bern-Klug and Thompson 2008). However, a considerable amount of role ambiguity can be apparent, as staff felt that a particular task was the responsibility of the nursing home, whereas families felt that certain care tasks remained their responsibility (Gaugler 2005). Family members themselves stress the importance that preserving the identity of their relative could only be accomplished through collaborative efforts with staff (Gaugler 2005). They often perceive effective involvement as being a teaching resource to nursing staff, so that staff members would deliver sensitive, person-centered individualized care to the person with dementia living in the nursing home.
The building of a partnership between families and staff is increasingly advocated as a means to ensure high-quality care in nursing homes (Penning and Keating 2000). To enhance the feeling of belonging and dignity for people with dementia, a collaboration between family and nursing home staff should be established. For realizing person-centered care and continuation of own lifestyle for people with dementia living in a nursing home, family should be seen as partners in the care for residents instead of visitors (Holmgren et al. 2013). Goals should include family members of people with dementia in nursing homes as this is important to support residents and also to support family members. Previous research indicates that when nursing staff members become more involved with family caregivers and keep open lines of communication, family caregivers’ satisfaction increases, which improves their feeling of confidence that their loved one is well being cared for (Volicer et al. 2008; Piechniczek-Buczek et al. 2007). Family-perceived involvement was significantly and positively correlated with satisfaction and impressions of the facility (Irving 2015). Elements considered as most important by family members were the feeling that residents were well cared for, having trust in the staff of the nursing home and being informed about changes in the residents’ care plan.
6.2 Dilemmas in Care Practice
Realizing a partnership in every day care practice can be challenging, as both family caregivers and staff experience barriers. When people with dementia move into a nursing home, they and their family have to adjust and follow nursing home rules and routines (Bauer and Nay 2003). Family members often feel guilty over the decision to place their loved one into a nursing home. During the transition, they express a high need for information about the transition and would like to be recognized as an expert in knowing the loved one (Afram et al. 2015; Abrahamson et al. 2009; Chen et al. 2007; Givens et al. 2012). Staff members discover that the new resident brings family members who both expect continued involvement in care and need information and attention (Hertzberg et al. 2001). Staff-family relationships evolve in a social and physical environment that is familiar to staff, but is foreign to family members, who find themselves in a strange place with new roles to play and complex rules to interpret (Utley-Smith et al. 2009). Establishing and maintaining an effective staff-family relationship can be challenging for both parties. Four main barriers can be identified that hinder collaboration between staff and family: attitude and role conflict, communication, knowledge, and organization.
6.2.1 Attitude and Role Conflict
Although nursing staff recognizes the importance of family members as a helpful resource in getting to know the resident and providing care, they often prefer completing their tasks without their help (Wilson et al. 2009). In this way, the nursing homes’ routines and rules are assured. Furthermore, nursing staff may also perceive working and interacting with family members as difficult and challenging (Haesler et al. 2010). They expect family to fit in their work routines, which may cause friction (Bauer and Nay 2003). In order to achieve person-centered care through better collaboration with family caregivers, nursing staff need to recognize that family participation is of major importance and can add value. Moreover, the translation of this perception into clinical practice seems challenging but crucial in the establishment of a good relationship (Bauer and Nay 2003; Haesler et al. 2010).
From the opinion of staff, family members sometimes hold distorted expectations toward the care nursing homes should provide, and these expectations are often conflicting with those of staff (Holmgren et al. 2013). For example, staff and family may have dissimilar thoughts about how care should be provided and the available amount of time for personal attention for their loved one (Haesler et al. 2010; Majerovitz et al. 2009; Utley-Smith et al. 2009). These family members can be described as demanding, challenging or selfish, as they fail to realize that finite resources in a nursing home must be allocated fairly among residents and relatives.
An important factor contributing is the difference in role perception. Nursing staff often regard themselves as the experts in care for people with dementia as they have the professional skills. Family caregivers may feel marginalized by nursing staff, who traditionally perceive the nursing home arena as their professional territory (Holmgren et al. 2013). It was found that nursing staff characterize a good relationship with family members by the readiness of family caregivers to rely on the expert role of staff and to relinquish the responsibility of care (Kellett 2000). Families are expected to value staff’s caring efforts. This may cause tension, as at the same time family caregivers envision a certain role for themselves within the nursing home. The sense of losing the caregiver role for family members when relocating a loved one into a nursing home may cause difficulties with staff, especially since most family has provided care at home for a long time. There appears to be a barrier between the preferred role family wants to fulfill and the role they actually fulfill. Disagreement on responsibilities between formal and family caregivers can either cause gaps in patient care or duplication of tasks (Haesler et al. 2007; Ward-Griffin and McKeever 2000) and leads to a general feeling of dissatisfaction in the resident’s care. On the other hand, conflict could also be caused by nursing staff trying to meet family’s expectations and not succeeding in this (Utley-Smith et al. 2009). Therefore it is extremely important for both formal and family caregivers to determine role division and responsibilities from the onset of placement and to appreciate and see each other as equals in the care for nursing home residents (Corazzini et al. 2015; Haesler et al. 2007)
6.2.2 Communication
Good communication between family caregivers and nursing staff is vital for a partnership in care. It can increase satisfaction and family involvement and reduce complaints (Majerovitz et al. 2009). Sharing personal interests, work, and hobbies between nursing staff and family contributed to a trustful relationship (Haesler et al. 2007). Having a trustful relationship between family caregivers and staff can encourage family to visit and remain involved in the care for residents with dementia. Furthermore, emotional support to residents and family can encourage communication between staff and family (Majerovitz et al. 2009). It is important that communication focuses on the psychological and social needs of the resident and family members, as well as the focus on medical treatment.
Perspectives of family and staff may differ. Families would like to receive better orientation to the nursing home along with guidance and information during the placement procedure. Furthermore, families value clear, complete, and timely information on the resident’s condition and treatment. Finally, mutual respect and approaching family in a sensitive manner are highly appreciated by families (Majerovitz et al. 2009). Utley-Smith et al. (2009) highlight several benefits of promoting integration of the family, such as improved information exchange, increased trust, mutual understanding of expectations and goals, decreased dissonance in family-staff relationships, and ultimately improved care results for residents. Family members would potentially have more current information, hold more realistic care expectations, be engaged in productive dialogue with staff members, and have fewer formal complaints when connections are increased and exchange of information would be improved.
Nursing home staff, on the other hand, also value good communication with family caregivers because in many cases the family knows what the resident wants and needs and also expects (Majerovitz et al. 2009). For staff members, improved connections and communication could also be beneficial. Staff may gain valuable family input into care planning, feel appreciated and have more positive encounters with the family, have less time taken away from clinical work, and experience fewer state and regulatory interventions (Utley-Smith et al. 2009). However, family members feel (partly) responsible for the care of the resident and thus want to maintain a level of control over the care. Staff members, on the other hand, experience role conflict in their attempt to manage the often incompatible expectations of employers and family members (Abrahamson et al. 2009). Furthermore, nursing staff feel that family members complain quickly but seldom offer praise for their work and that family does not always recognize their intimate knowledge of the resident (Majerovitz et al. 2009).