Improve Quality and Safety

Chapter 7 Improve Quality and Safety



Clinical governance is an umbrella term given to all the systems that need to be in place to improve clinical quality. Currently there are many systems in the NHS which ensure that we measure and improve quality. One could argue the NHS is being audited to death at the moment, but it is necessary in the current financial climate to ensure that we are being as efficient and as effective as we can within available resources. However, you are responsible for a team of nurses, not a team of auditors. Do take care to ensure that the measurement of quality does not interfere with the delivery of quality patient care.


Quality indicators are not the only way of measuring quality. Patient surveys, comments, complaints and incidents also give us a good deal of information about where to target resources to improve our service. This chapter explains the process of quality monitoring and improvement as well as the practical tasks of dealing with complaints and incidents.



Quality indicators


In the current climate, it seems that we are being overrun with quality indicators, which have a tendency to increase quality in one area but with the unfortunate side effect of reducing quality in another, leading to the identification of another quality indicator that has to be met and so on. An example of this is the 4-hour waiting target in A&E, which led to increased pressure on beds and the subsequent mixing of male and female patients which in turn led to problems with privacy and dignity. This in turn, has led to a number of further quality indicators for single sex wards and various other initiatives for increasing privacy and dignity. Another example is the changing of ward layouts to single rooms and 4–6-bed bays to meet hygiene, privacy and dignity indicators, resulting in the reduced ability of nurses to adequately observe and supervise and thereby contributing to an increased number of falls. Quality indicators have therefore been introduced to reduce the number of falls, including initiatives such as hourly rounding. And so it goes on …


Sometimes, we can be so taken with the need to meet quality indicators that we allow them to override our common sense and clinical priorities. Remember that, first and foremost, you are a clinician and the patients’ needs are your priority. This is particularly pertinent at times when you have to choose between meeting a quality indicator and ensuring that patients get appropriate individualised care. An example would be the choice between getting a patient discharged by 12 noon or taking the time to ensure they understand their discharge medication. To be able to make an appropriate choice, you should have some idea of what the most important quality indicators are, where they come from and why they are so important.





Nursing quality indicators


There are various other quality initiatives in nursing, which include the following:



The above list is just a small sample of the plethora of quality initiatives being implemented across England at the time of writing this book. In 2010, they were all incorporated under one framework called ‘Energise for Excellence’ (E4E) (see Box 7.1). Many are simply ways of trying to save money but without reducing quality. QIPP, for example, was specifically tailored to meet the £20 billion savings required by the government to be made by 2015.



It is important to ‘keep an eye’ as to what is going on and where the various quality indicators come from. You also need to be fully aware of the penalty that comes with the non-completion of each quality indicator. There may be times when you have to choose one quality indicator over another in terms of reaching the standard, particularly when staffing shortages become acute.



Identify mistakes and risks


There will always be an element of risk within health care because things are always changing and no change comes without risk. Managing risk is therefore a continuous process. Standards, policies and procedures are continually being updated to reduce the risk of things going wrong but inevitably no system or human being is perfect and mistakes will continue to be made. We currently have a National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) originally set up by the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) in 2003, which gathers data from all health care organisations in England and Wales (Northern Ireland and Scotland operate more local systems of reporting and data collection). The NRLS distributes the learning from these data via patient safety alerts, guidelines and policies. We also have a system of dealing with complaints that ensures they are investigated locally, recurring themes are identified and improvements made accordingly.


As the ward manager, you should be familiar with the systems for dealing with complaints and incidents. This will ensure that you do not get weighed down with bureaucracy, are able to support your staff and the patients and relatives involved, and focus on making improvements to care as a direct result.



Be open and say sorry


Generally, all patients want is an apology, an explanation of what went wrong and reassurance that mistakes will not recur, yet nearly half of all the complaints upheld by the Health Service Ombudsman in 2010 were because an apology was not given. ‘When things do go wrong, an apology can be a powerful remedy; simple to deliver and costing nothing’ (Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman 2010).


Saying sorry is not an admission of liability (NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) 2009); in fact, there have been various studies from hospitals in Australia, Singapore and the USA that have shown a marked reduction in the number of claims since policies were introduced that promote the concept of saying sorry when things go wrong (NPSA 2009). Do ensure that your team are all aware of this. Most organisations now have guidelines for staff on how to communicate with patients and their families when a mistake has been made, particularly when any harm has been caused. One recommendation for ensuring a good apology is to refer to the three Rs recommended by Armstrong (2010):




Support your staff


Working in health care is a vocation and we are all dedicated professionals. To give care to others every day sometimes under very difficult circumstances and then be the subject of a complaint or an incident investigation can be soul-destroying. It needs to be handled very sensitively. All health care professionals are naturally going to feel upset and perhaps even angry. They may feel that they have given so much yet all they get in return is a written complaint or a demand for a statement about areas of care that may have been missed. Try to remember that these are not formal disciplinary or performance management procedures. They are informal and designed to help us learn and improve our services. Formal, signed witness statements are not required for either complaint or incident investigations.


If a particular individual is involved, then it would be better for you to investigate and handle the complaint or incident personally rather than delegating to another member of staff. Individuals who are the subject of a complaint or incident investigation need to feel that they are fully supported by their manager. You must ensure that you:



At all times, ensure that such individuals are kept involved and informed. They should see the final complaint response letter or incident report before it is sent back to the appropriate manager. It would be unfair not to let them see this and to have the chance to correct any inaccuracies. Do also reassure all staff that they will not be personally identified in any incident report.


Don’t feel that you have to handle a difficult complaint or incident by yourself. The complaints manager is usually very experienced in most types of complaint and will be able to advise. The risk manager will also be able to help with any incident investigation. If you feel you need more professional support then contact your director of nursing who, in many organisations, also has executive responsibility for clinical governance and quality. They usually have a lot of experience in handling complex complaints and incidents.



Know when to stop an incident or complaint investigation





Investigate complaints appropriately


The main aim of the NHS complaints procedures across the UK is to achieve ‘local resolution’. This means that complainants should have their verbal or written complaint dealt with locally by the organisation which was treating them. If not satisfied with the written response, the complainant can take it to a second, more formal, stage. There are different procedures for the second stage depending on where in the UK the problem arose. It usually involves either asking for an ‘independent review’ or going straight to the Health Service Ombudsman.


This section focuses only on ‘local resolution’ because it is this part of the complaints process which involves the ward manager. It consists of either a verbal response to a verbal complaint, or a written response to a verbal or written complaint. It may also consist of a meeting with the complainant followed by a letter.




Written complaints


All written complaints should be addressed to the chief executive or complaints manager. If you receive one directly you must forward it immediately to the complaints department. They will send an acknowledgement to the complainant and sort out various aspects such as permission to access the patient’s notes for investigation. Once you have received a written complaint from the complaints department with a request to respond, the following four steps are recommended:






Maintain confidentiality


The complaints department will have informed the complainant that their records may be used and will have given them the option of refusing to allow this.


The Data Protection Act 1998 requires all processing of data to be ‘fair and lawful’ and all ‘personal data to be protected against unauthorised or unlawful processing and against accidental loss, destruction or damage’. This means that while the investigator has the documents in their possession but is not using them directly, they should be kept in a locked drawer/filing cabinet and the office should be locked at all times when no one is there. The medical records should never be taken home under any circumstances.


As a health care professional, the investigator should follow their own professional code of confidentiality and the Caldicott principles (Box 7.2). You should also ensure they are aware of the appropriate NHS Code of Confidentiality which emphasises that patient information must remain confidential and seen only by those with direct involvement (Department of Health 2003, NHS Scotland 2008, NHS Wales 2005).


Jun 15, 2016 | Posted by in NURSING | Comments Off on Improve Quality and Safety

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access