Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
Types of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Technique | Advantages/Disadvantages |
---|---|
Bone marrow harvest | |
Peripheral blood stem cells | |
Cord blood | Plentiful and relatively easy to harvest by obstetricians trained in the procedure Excellent source to increase pool of unrelated donors May be associated with less graft-versus-host disease Currently limited to individuals weighing less than 50–70 kg. With ex vivo expansion techniques may become more widespread |
Indications for and Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Disease-free survival at 5 years after HSCT varies substantially, depending on the age of the recipient, the underlying disease, disease status at the time of transplantation, the type of HSCT procedure, and the extent of prior treatment. Depending on these factors, disease-free survival can range from 10% to 75% (Baron & Storb, 2007; Brunstein, Baker, & Wagner, 2007; Chantry et al., 2006; Koreth et al., 2007; Nademanee & Forman, 2006; Tabbara et al., 2002; Yakoub-Agha et al., 2006).
OVERVIEW OF THE PROCESS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING CARE
Pretransplant Evaluation of the Recipient and Donor
The pretransplant evaluation of the recipient includes physical and psychosocial evaluation, an evaluation of the adequacy of insurance coverage, and family support and education about the transplant process to permit informed consent for the procedure. Evaluation before final selection of a donor includes confirmatory high-resolution tissue typing, an assessment of viral serology, and an evaluation of overall health. The components of the evaluation of recipient and donor are summarized in the box on page 144.
Selection of a donor for HSCT is based on the type and stage of the underlying disease, donor and recipient age, and comorbidities, together with HLA- and mixed leukocyte culture (MLC)-matched donor. MLC is performed to observe for interaction between the potential donor’s cells and recipient cells. Low reactivity indicates greater compatibility. A related donor is usually a sibling (siblings have the greatest chance of matching on both HLA and on other minor and as yet unrecognized antigens). If more than one donor is HLA identical to the patient, donor selection is based on sex, ABO compatibility, negative viral titers, younger donor age, and donor nulliparity because all these factors are associated with an improved outcome of HSCT (Confer & Miller, 2007). Into the future, there is a potential role for non-HLA genetics in donor selection, based on the insights into the immunobiology of HSCT complications provided by genotyping for non-HLA genes (Dickinson, 2007).
Mismatch in ABO blood group between patient and donor does not preclude successful HSCT. Depending on the direction of the incompatibility (major versus minor incompatibility), the hematopoietic stem cell product may have to be depleted of RBCs to prevent a hemolytic reaction caused by ABO antibodies still circulating in the patient’s bloodstream. After engraftment and approximately 100 days after transplantation, the recipient of an ABO-mismatched transplant will seroconvert to the ABO type of the donor.
Pretransplant Evaluation of Recipient and Donor
EVALUATION OF THE HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENT
• History of current illness, including presenting signs and symptoms; previous therapies; initial diagnosis; pathology and staging; complications; relapses or progressions; current disease status; transfusion history
• Medical history, including major illnesses, chronic illnesses, recurring illnesses, surgical history, childhood illnesses, and infectious disease exposure. For women, the medical history should also include menarche, onset of menopause or date of last menstrual period, pregnancies, and outcomes.
• Current laboratory studies, including liver function tests, renal function, and complete blood cell count (CBC)
• Infectious disease serologies, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B and C, cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma virus (HTLV)-1, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), toxoplasma titer, and ABO and Rh typing
• Human leukocyte antigen typing and deoxyribonucleic acid procurement for future engraftment studies (allogeneic transplant recipients)
• Multiple gated acquisition (MUGA) scan
• Pulmonary function tests, including single-breath diffusing capacity
• 24-Hour urine for creatinine clearance
• Computed tomography (CT) of chest and sinuses periodically for surveillance and if there are symptoms or a history of repeated infections
• Disease restaging, including radiographic studies (computed tomography (CT), nuclear medicine studies), bone marrow aspirate and biopsy, cytogenetics, molecular diagnostics, and measures of minimal residual disease
• Dental evaluation, including full-mouth x-rays and cleaning
• Sperm/fertilized embryo banking
• Autologous stem cell backup if undergoing unrelated or mismatched transplantation
• Informed consent for treatment, transfusion support, clinical trials
• Nutritional evaluation, if appropriate
• Consultations with radiation therapy, infectious disease, pulmonary, cardiology, or renal services, if clinically indicated
EVALUATION OF THE HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL DONOR
• History and physical examination, noting history of serious or chronic illnesses, history of hematological problems including bleeding tendencies, cancer history and transfusion history, current medications, allergies, and pregnancy history for females.
• The presence of any risk factors for HIV or viral hepatitis infection are noted
• Physical examination for any abnormalities and an assessment of the adequacy of peripheral veins
• CBC with differential, chemistries, liver and renal function tests, coagulation studies, ABO and Rh typing; pregnancy test
• Confirmatory HLA typing, deoxyribonucleic acid procurement for future engraftment studies (allogeneic donors only)
• Infectious disease serologies, including VDRL, HIV, hepatitis B and C, CMV, HSV, HTLV-1, EBV, toxoplasma titer
Stem Cell Harvesting, Mobilization, and Collection
Hematopoietic stem cells may also be collected from the peripheral blood. However, because stem cells are not abundant in the peripheral blood, chemotherapy (for autologous transplant recipients who are providing their own stem cells for subsequent administration) or colony-stimulating factors (for healthy donors providing an allogeneic stem cell transplant product) (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF] or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF]) must be given before collection to drive progenitor cells into the peripheral circulation. This process is termed mobilization or priming. The chemotherapy that patients undergoing an autologous stem cell transplant receive for stem cell mobilization is also useful for tumor reduction. For both related and unrelated donors, colony-stimulating factors (CSF) alone are used to increase the number of stem cells in the peripheral blood. Protocols vary, but G-CSF or GM-CSF is given by a subcutaneous injection daily. Stem cell collections begin after 4 or 5 days of CSF injections.
Conditioning Therapy/Preparative Regimen
The rationale for selecting the agents that are included in the preparative regimen is based on the hypothesis that increasing the total dose or dose rate will kill more tumor cells, resulting in improved response and survival rates. Typically, drugs with different (i.e., nonoverlapping) nonhematologic dose-limiting toxicities are combined in maximal doses. Alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, busulfan, thiotepa, cisplatin, melphalan, carmustine), etoposide, cytarabine, and sometimes total-body irradiation are used to destroy the bone marrow and eradicate disease. The regimen is administered over 2 to 8 days. The individual drugs that may be used in combination as part of the transplant conditioning regimen may have several adverse effects (see table on page 146). The patient is then allowed 1 or 2 rest days to clear the chemotherapy from the system before the infusion of stem cells. Bone marrow aplasia occurs within days after the conditioning regimen is completed.
A reduced intensity conditioning regimen followed by allogeneic HSCT is a newer approach that may provide a treatment option for older patients and those who have undergone a prior autologous transplant or have comorbidities, such as lung, kidney, or liver disease and cannot tolerate the toxicities of a high-dose conditioning regimen. The rationale for reduced intensity conditioning regimens is that the immune-mediated graft-versus-tumor effect provided by the new immune system, rather than primarily the conditioning regimen itself, is responsible for control of the disease. Reduced intensity regimens under investigation include fludarabine, single-dose total-body irradiation (≤500 cGy), cyclophosphamide, melphalan, busulfan, and a combination of potent immunosuppressive medications. Data to support the potential efficacy of a reduced intensity regimen exist for patients with Hodgkin disease, multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (Giralt, 2005). These reduced intensity regimens are not without risk, and patients undergoing transplant after a reduced intensity conditioning regimen still experience many of the expected complications of a conventional, fully myeloablative allogeneic transplantation. The problems encountered in the early posttransplantation period, such as infection, bleeding, and regimen-related toxicities, may be reduced after nonmyeloablative transplantation, but the risk of GVHD and the long-term risks of infection continue to be important. The role of strategies such as posttransplant immunotherapy and posttransplant maintenance therapy with agents such as rituximab or imatinib in improving the outcomes for patients who have received a reduced intensity allogeneic HSCT are the subject of continuing study.
Stem Cell Infusion
The infusion of stem cells is a relatively simple procedure, much like a blood transfusion. The cells are infused through a central venous catheter over 30 to 90 minutes, depending on the total volume of the product. In allogeneic HSCT, the stem cells are usually infused immediately after they are collected. Autologous stem cells are cryopreserved with dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and must be thawed in a warm normal saline solution bath at the bedside immediately before reinfusion. Premedication with acetaminophen, hydrocortisone, and diphenhydramine is usually recommended, and patients may also receive prehydration to maintain renal perfusion. Vital signs and pulse oximetry are monitored closely before, during, and at intervals after stem cell infusion. An infusion pump should not be used to administer stem cells; normal saline solution is used to prime and flush the tubing.
Therapeutic Agent | Side Effects |
---|---|
Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) | Mucositis, diarrhea, cardiotoxicity, fever, chills and hypersensitivity during infusion (reaction may worsen with each subsequent dose) |
Busulfan | Interstitial pulmonary fibrosis, hepatic dysfunction, including veno-occlusive disease, acute cholecystitis, generalized seizures, mucositis, skin (hyperpigmentation, desquamation, acral erythema), nausea and vomiting |
Carmustine (BCNU) | Hepatic, pulmonary, central nervous system, cardiac effects (arrhythmias and hypotension), nausea and vomiting |
Carboplatinum | Nausea and vomiting, nephrotoxicity, liver function abnormalities including veno-occlusive disease, ototoxicity |
Cisplatinum | Nausea and vomiting, neurotoxicity (peripheral neuropathy, ataxia, visual disturbances), ototoxicity, renal |
Cyclophosphamide | Cardiac effects (cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, hemorrhagic cardiac necrosis, pericardial effusion, electrocardiographic abnormalities), interstitial pulmonary fibrosis, hemorrhagic cystitis, elevation in liver enzymes, nausea and vomiting, metabolic (syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion) |
Cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) | Cerebellar toxicity, encephalopathy, seizures, conjunctivitis, skin (rash, acral erythema), nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, renal insufficiency, liver function abnormalities, pancreatitis, noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, fever, arthralgias |
Etoposide | Hypersensitivity reactions, hypotension, liver function abnormalities and chemical hepatitis, renal dysfunction, nausea and vomiting, metabolic (metabolic acidosis), mucositis, stomatitis, painful skin rash on the palms, soles, and periorbital area |
Fludarabine | Mucositis, diarrhea, pulmonary fibrosis, pneumonitis, hypersensitivity reaction during infusion |
Ifosfamide | Hemorrhagic cystitis |
Melphalan | Acute hypersensitivity, renal, mucositis, nausea and vomiting, hepatic toxicity including veno-occlusive disease |
Thiotepa | Hyperpigmentation, acute erythroderma, dry desquamation, liver function abnormalities, including veno-occlusive disease, mucositis, esophagitis, dysuria, hypersensitivity reaction during infusion |
Total body irradiation | Nausea, vomiting diarrhea, parotitis, xerostomia, stomatitis, erythema, pneumonitis, veno-occlusive disease |
Data from Chan, 2000; Gupta-Burt & Okunieff, 1998; McAdams & Burgunder, 2004; Petros & Gilbert, 1998; Rees, Beale, & Judson, 1998; and Solimando, 1998.
Early Complications of Stem Cell Transplantation
After stem cell infusion, the hematopoietic stem cells migrate to the bone marrow spaces, where they are attracted by chemotactic factors. Engraftment occurs when the transplanted progenitor cells begin to grow and manufacture new hematopoietic cells in the bone marrow. After the stem cell infusion but before complete hematopoietic cell engraftment, patients have severe pancytopenia, and the resulting complications may include infection and bleeding. Patients are also at risk for mucositis, skin toxicities, and veno-occlusive disease of the liver. Examples of early and late complications arising from autologous and allogenic stem cell transplantation can be found in the box on page 147. Nonhematologic adverse effects vary depending on the agents used for the conditioning regimen. The nonhematologic adverse effects that are associated with the agents that typically comprise stem cell transplant conditioning regimens are outlined in the table on left.
Infection.
Infection is the most common posttransplantation complication owing to mucositis, the presence of central venous access devices, and severe neutropenia. In allogeneic HSCT recipients, the use of immunosuppressants compounds the infection risk. Pathogens may be bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa, including herpes simplex and herpes zoster viruses, cytomegalovirus, Candida species, Aspergillus species, and Pneumocystis carinii. Infections caused by bacteria and other organisms that commonly occur after HSCT at each phase of the posttransplant period are listed in the box on left. Until their blood counts begin to recover, patients typically receive prophylaxis for viruses and fungi. If febrile neutropenia develops, empirical treatment with broad-spectrum antimicrobials is initiated. Screening for cytomegalovirus reactivation and for invasive aspergillosis may also be conducted during periods of greatest risk (neutropenic transplant recipients, graft versus host disease flare, intensive immunosuppressive treatment) or when infection is suspected.
Infections After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Early and Late Complications of Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
Veno-Occlusive Disease of the Liver.
Clinical manifestations of VOD usually begin during the first 2 weeks after transplantation and are characterized by hyperbilirubinemia, rapid weight gain, ascites, right upper quadrant pain, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and jaundice. Treatment is supportive and focuses on maintaining intravascular volume and renal perfusion while minimizing fluid accumulation (Saria & Gosselin-Acomb, 2007). Options for preventing VOD in patients who are at highest risk for development of this complication include anticoagulation with heparin, antithrombin III concentrates, defibrotide, prostaglandin E, and ursodeoxycholic acid (Actigall) (Ho et al, 2004, 2007; Imran et al, 2006; Tay et al, 2007; Wadleigh et al, 2004).