Foundations of health research

1


Foundations of health research




Introduction


Health research is a systematic and principled way of obtaining evidence (data, information) for solving health care problems and investigating health issues. Research is systematic in that researchers follow a sequential process (see Ch. 3) and principled in that research is generally carried out according to explicit rules. These rules or principles constitute the method. The term ‘method’ derives from the Greek word ‘methodoi’, meaning a ‘way of travelling’ or ‘the path which we follow’. It is the application of appropriate methods which guarantee the validity of the evidence and the truth of knowledge. In health research, ‘method’ refers to a set of rules which specify:



Strictly speaking, the terms ‘method’ and ‘methodology’ have different meanings. Method refers to the rules of evidence followed for collecting data in a project. Methodology refers to the critical discussion, comparison and application of methods. The present chapter is concerned with methodology. Later chapters in this book are concerned with specific methods used in health research.


The primary aim of this chapter is to examine the philosophical foundations of scientific research methods. Emphasis is placed on method as a means of conducting applied research and producing the best possible evidence for solving health problems.


The general aims of this chapter are to:




Knowledge and methods


Two concepts drawn from philosophy are relevant to our discussion: ontology and epistemology.


Ontology refers to the question of what exists in the world, what is ‘real’. Different knowledge systems take diverse positions on what constitutes reality. In contrast to the natural sciences, various traditional interpretations hold different views on what constitutes the reality. For example, the notion of life force or qi/chi, a central concept in traditional Chinese medicine, is absent in contemporary Western medicine. Of historical interest, is the classical Greek belief in humors that was once central to Western medicine. The balance of humors was thought to determine mental and physical wellbeing; however humors are no longer seen as ‘real’ in Western medicine.


Epistemology is a field of philosophy concerned with the nature, source and legitimacy of knowledge. In the domain of health research we are interested in knowledge as applicable to:



Before we begin discussion of scientific knowledge and research it is useful, as a means of contrast, to look at some other epistemological approaches.



Tradition


Western health care is one of many approaches; it is erroneous to believe that it is always the best option for preventing, treating and managing diseases. The World Health Organization (WHO 2010) defines traditional medicine as ‘the knowledge, skills and practices based on the theories, beliefs and experiences indigenous to different cultures, used in the maintenance of health and …treatment of physical and mental illness’.


There are hundreds of different medical traditions. They are based on distinct ontological and epistemological positions, ranging from shamanism to empirically oriented components of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). The beginnings of TCM can be traced back thousands of years, well before the introduction of Western medicine. The principles of TCM were, in part, based on the experiences of practitioners, successfully treating diseases using natural methods such as acupuncture and herbal remedies. This practical knowledge was combined with Chinese philosophy to formulate holistic theories of physiology, pathology and treatment (Lu et al 2004). These theories emphasize the close relationship between the human body as a system integrated with the natural and social environment. The prevention or treatment of disease is contingent on the re-establishment of a dynamic balance between the energy flows within the body, the mind and the environment.



Reasoning


Reasoning is commonly used to arrive at true knowledge. It is assumed that, if the rules of logic are applied correctly, then the conclusions are guaranteed to be valid. As an example, let us look at the following syllogism:



Logic guarantees that the conclusion (3) is true, provided that the syllogism is in a valid form and the premises (1) and (2) are true. Clearly, the limitation of formal (that is, ‘content-independent’) reasoning is that it works in practice only if we have means for establishing the factual truth of the premises. In the above example, conclusion (3) might be empirically false, given that the premise (1) is factually false.


The origin of modern science originates from ‘natural’ philosophy. Reasoning and logic are very much a part of science. However, we require reliable evidence to support conclusions based on logic and mathematical operations.



The scientific method


Science and the scientific method evolved over a period of thousands of years (Fara 2009). Great civilizations, such as Babylonia, China and India, devised written languages and symbols for numbers, to permanently record observations and speculations about the world. This was an essential step in the development of formal science. Disciplines such as astronomy, mathematics and medicine were further developed by Greek and Roman philosophers and physicians. For example, the Roman physician Galen worked as a surgeon treating injured gladiators and used experimental methods to test hypotheses about physiology and anatomy. Much of the classical knowledge was lost during the dark ages, but an important fraction was preserved and expanded upon by Muslim and Christian scholars (Fara 2009).


The beginnings of modern Western science are generally traced to the beginning of the 16th century, a time in which Europe experienced profound social changes and a resurgence of great artists, thinkers and philosophers. Gradually, scholars’ interests shifted from theology and armchair speculation to systematically describing, explaining and attempting to control natural phenomena. These changed circumstances enabled philosophers such as Descartes and Francis Bacon to challenge tenets of medieval thinking, and scientists such as Galileo, Newton and Harvey to propose new ways of conducting research and building knowledge.


The following points represent the essential characteristics of the early scientific world view:


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Apr 12, 2017 | Posted by in MEDICAL ASSISSTANT | Comments Off on Foundations of health research

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access