Clinical Reasoning Process: Cornerstone of Effective Occupational Therapy Practice

Fig. 5.1
Integrative clinical reasoning (CR) process framework. (From the Australian Occupational Therapy Journal; Carrier et al. 2012)
Table 5.1
External and internal factors influencing the evolving clinical reasoning process. (Adapted from Carrier et al. 2012)
External factors
Description
Client
 
Availability (emotional, cognitive, physical)
Includes personality, openness to intervention, personal (e.g., level of education, learning style and speed), and functional characteristics (e.g., functional profile, type of disabilities, prognosis)
Functional characteristics interact closely with the task (e.g., determine the objective)
Previous knowledge
Task knowledge and habits
Environment
 
Client’s physical and social environment
Physical and social obstacles and facilitators
Availability of tools
Tool(s) available or not when intervening
Occupational therapist’s practice context
Includes physical location of the intervention, organizational factors (e.g., underlying values, implicit and explicit rules), work organization, and social environment (colleagues)
Influence of the practice context is modulated by the OT’s personality
Task
 
Content
Type, complexity, and quantity of tasks (e.g., number of pieces of equipment involved)
Objective
Determined by the client’s particular characteristics and environment (e.g., familiarize versus teach how to do it)
Interaction of Factors
 
Client–environment interaction
Degree of correspondence between the client and his/her social and physical environment
Task–environment interaction
Degree of correspondence between the task, equipment used, and place where it is done
Degree of difficulty/safety
Difficulty experienced by the client and risk to the client’s safety when performing the task during assessment and intervention
Result of the strategy
Success or failure of the intervention strategy
The result may be anticipated (prior to using the strategy) or evaluated from the client’s reactions (after using the strategy)
Internal factors
Description
Knowledge and experiences (professional and personal)
Includes: Knowledge about (1) assessments, interventions, and equipment; (2) client’s availability with respect to intervention
Experiences regarding clients’ reactions and characteristics, assessments, interventions, and equipment
Acquisition of new knowledge and experiences sustains the development of the intervention plans that are available to the OT
Personal habits
Usual way of intervening in this type of clinical situation (corresponds to the profile–plan match)
Preparation
Degree of preparation for intervening; the need to prepare depends on the OT’s knowledge and experiences
Availability (emotional, cognitive, physical)
Includes personality, degree of cognitive and physical fatigue, and openness to reactions from the client and his/her social environment. These reactions indicate the results of the strategy used
View of occupational therapy
A two-way, interactive and dynamic process modulated in terms of intensity
OT occupational therapist
Table 5.2
The eight stages of the clinical reasoning process. (Adapted from Carrier et al. 2012)
Stages
Description of occupational therapists’ cognitive actions
Phase 1—Development of the intervention plan
1.
Gathering information
Collect information about external factors related to the client, the environment, the task, and their mutual interaction
   
 Determined by the knowledge occupational therapists have of their client and his/her situation; less knowledge = more detailed information gathering
 May be limited by organizational elements of the practice context, such as the lack of information in medical records and referrals
2.
Picturing the clinical situation
Develop a picture of the clinical situation
   
 May be more or less complete, depending on the comprehensiveness of the information obtained in stage 1, with potential later effects on the choice of interventions
3.
Matching to the generic profile (a)
and the intervention plan (b)
(a) Link the picture of the clinical situation to the generic profile that fits best from the occupational therapist’s own bank of profiles
 Bank content depends on the occupational therapist’s experience
 May be possible to estimate the level of complexity of the clinical situation, which is related to external factors collected during stage 1
   
(b) Match the generic profile to a particular sequence of therapeutic actions (or intervention plan)
 Influenced by emotional availability and specifically personality
 Matching is the usual way to intervene in a particular situation (personal habits)
 Intervention plans available depend on experience and knowledge
 If knowledge of client is insufficient and client s availability is unknown, a “general” intervention plan, which includes varied strategies involving a wider range of methods, is used
Phase 2—Finalization of the choice of intervention plan
4.
Assessing the plan
Go back to the picture of the clinical situation and assess the plan in regard to:
 Occupational therapist’s own availability and readiness to intervene
 Availability of the tool being considered (e.g., equipment)
 Anticipated efficacy of the plan (results obtained)
 State of their therapeutic relationship with the client (i.e., emotional link between therapist and client and, if applicable, the client’s social environment)
5.
Choosing to use (or not use) the plan
Choose to use the plan, or to postpone or end the intervention
 Clients are consulted about the plan to get their agreement. The action of consulting is influenced by the way therapy is viewed and the physical location of the intervention, e.g., the client’s home (element of the practice context)

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 21, 2017 | Posted by in GENERAL | Comments Off on Clinical Reasoning Process: Cornerstone of Effective Occupational Therapy Practice

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access