Detection tools
Description
Neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI)
A questionnaire on 12 neuropsychiatric symptoms that can either be administered by interview (NPI-NH) or by filling in a score sheet (NPI-Q)
Behavioral symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease (Behave-AD)
Clinical rating scale on six behavioral symptoms, administered by interview
Resident assessment instrument (RAI)
A structural assessment on various domains of nursing home care, used for care planning
Cohen-Mansfield agitation inventory (CMAI)
A questionnaire containing 29 items on agitated behavior that can be scored on a 7-point Likert scale
5.2.3 Analysis
The analysis of challenging behavior starts with a clear description of behavior. For clarity in discussing the behavior among coworkers and other disciplines, it is important to differentiate between observations and interpretations. Interpretations are often personal and colored by our own judgment, experience, and knowledge of a situation. Observations, in contrast, are straightforward and allow others to make their own interpretations of the behavior. Although this seems obvious, it is often hard to give a description that is free of judgment or interpretation. Often, behavior is described as “anxious” or “angry,” while the actual observation is “rapid breathing” or “raising her voice.” It is helpful to use the mnemonic: “I see ….[observation] and therefore I think …[interpretation]. For example, “I see mrs. X pacing up and down the corridor and asking bystanders passers-by in a high pitched voice ‘where am I? Help me!’, therefore I think she is anxious and disoriented.” A clear description of the behavior also contains information about the place, time, duration, and environment during the behavior. All this information facilitates the analysis of the behavior.
After having made a clear description of the behavior, it is time to start the analysis. There are several explanatory models for behavior, which overlap and do not exclude one another. When analyzing behavior, it is helpful to keep the explanatory models in mind.
5.2.3.1 Unmet Needs
When dementia progresses, communication becomes increasingly difficult. The ability to translate thoughts and needs to meaningful language deteriorates, for example, because of word finding problems. Also, people may have difficulty to translate their feelings and bodily sensations (e.g., hunger or pain) into concrete needs. The unmet needs model (Cohen-Mansfield et al. 2015) states that because of these communication problems and because of a decreased ability to be self-supporting in fulfilling one’s own needs, many needs of people with dementia are unmet. Challenging behavior subsequently arises as an outcome of frustration, as a means of fulfilling needs or as a means of communicating needs.
The unmet needs that lead to the challenging behavior may have various causes. In the unmet needs model, needs are categorized as “environmental,” “current condition,” and “lifelong habits and personality.” Environmental needs can refer to physical or psychosocial environment. The physical environment may create an unmet need for a person who wants to wander around, when there is no space to do so. The psychosocial environment can be the interaction with other people, for example, caregivers may create an unmet need when a person with dementia wants to be independent and autonomous while all tasks are taken over by nursing staff. The current physical or mental condition of a person with dementia may create an unmet need, for example, pain that arises when he or she is unable to communicate pain. Lastly, lifelong habits and personality may not attune with the current way that one’s life is arranged, which can result in an unmet need (Cohen-Mansfield et al. 2015).
When a person exhibits challenging behavior, it is therefore very important to make an objective description and to analyze which needs this person may have and which of those needs may be unmet. Together with disciplines like a physician, dietician, and/or occupational therapist, nursing staff can examine physical needs such as the possibility of a person being hungry, in pain, or sitting uncomfortably. The psychologist may help with analyzing psychological and psychosocial needs. It can be helpful to use the Camberwell Assessment of Needs for the Elderly (CANE) to structure the process of analyzing unmet needs (Cohen-Mansfield et al. 2015).
5.2.3.2 Progressively Lowered Stress Threshold
The progressively lowered stress threshold (PLST) model (Hall and Buckwalter 1987; Smith et al. 2004) starts with the assumption that every person had a threshold for the amount of stress he can cope with before he becomes upset. This threshold is more or less stable once it is set in adulthood, although it can be temporarily lowered by circumstances such as feeling ill or going through a major life event. The basic principle of the PLST model is that due to brain damage, the stress threshold of people with dementia lowers during the disease. Also because of brain damage, people with dementia experience stimulants that are not particularly distressing for healthy people as stressors (e.g., the noise of a television or people walking by), and due to cognitive impairment, many stressful situations arise (e.g., not knowing where you are or not recognizing family or friends). Because of these disadvantages, the chance of a person with dementia to cross the stress threshold and become upset is heightened. The third disadvantage a person with dementia has to deal with is that he or she is often unable to recognize the feeling of crossing the threshold and/or is unable to independently undertake action to lower the stress. The behavior that follows is a result of coping with stress, for example, by shouting out or becoming agitated.
The model helps caregivers in analyzing behavior and adapting the environment so that it becomes less stressful. It also explains the pattern of behavior that is often seen in residential settings. Often, in the afternoon or the early evening, challenging behavior is most apparent. The PLST model might explain this phenomenon, because stressors accumulate during the day while the stress threshold decreases during the day because of the lowered amount of energy most people with dementia have. When a clear behavioral pattern is recognizable throughout the day, it is thus helpful to analyze the amount of stressors and the possibility of adapting the environment and the daily activity plans.
5.2.3.3 Model of Functional Analysis
With functional analysis, factors that cause behavior or that cause behavior to continue are analyzed (Moniz et al. 2012). Usually, the ABC approach is used in which A stands for “antecedent,” B for “behavior,” and C for “consequences.” Antecedents of behavior can be found by observing the situation before the challenging behavior starts. For example, you can observe a person sitting quietly in a chair while nurses are passing by (“A”). In “B,” the behavior is described objectively and detailed, for example, “Mr. Smith begins to move in his chair and makes a clicking sound with is tongue. After 2 min, he stands up and calls out ‘help help’ to the nurses.” Finally, the consequences following the behavior are described. Often, immediate and prolonged consequences are described, for the immediate consequences can cause behavior to continue while prolonged consequences are often the reason for consulting a physician or psychologist. An immediate consequence could be that a nurse speaks with Mr. Smith, calms him down, and helps him back into his chair. A prolonged consequence could be that nurses become frustrated, avoid or ignore Mr. Smith. Preferably, the interventions that are drawn up after making a functional analysis aim at the antecedent, for this might prevent the behavior from happening. However, this is not always possible, for example, when encountering a specific fellow resident is an antecedent. Also, an antecedent might also be a consequence, for example, when calling out of one resident (A) leads to another resident shouting back (C) which triggers (A) agitation (B) in the first resident. If, for whatever reason, treating the antecedent is not possible, treatment will focus on diminishing the consequences that cause the behavior to continue.
5.2.3.4 Combining Several Views: The Biopsychosocial Model
The models that are described above do not exclude each other and can be used together when analyzing challenging behavior. The models overlap in that they are based on the principle that challenging behavior is a symptom that something is upsetting the person with dementia. Because the reason why a person with dementia becomes upset can lie on different levels and on different areas of expertise, multidisciplinary collaboration is crucial for the analysis and treatment of challenging behavior. It is important to combine the analysis of biological factors, psychological factors, and social factors into one biopsychosocial model in which all aspects of the behavior are joined together (Cohen-Mansfield 2000; Zwijsen et al. 2016).
Biological Factors
The physician does a thorough physical examination, medication review, psychiatric examination, and when appropriate further tests: blood testing, cultures, X-ray, etc. Physical problems (infections, pain, constipation), side effects of medication, delirium, and depression are all known to be associated with challenging behavior. These factors should be ruled out as attributing factor or be treated appropriately.
Psychological Factors
The psychologist makes a functional analysis of the behavior to determine what causes the behavior and what causes the behavior to continue. It is possible that the behavior is caused by psychological issues like a mood disorder or a personality disorder. To analyze these causes, the psychologist might do a neuropsychological assessment, an assessment of personality, a hetero anamnestic interview, or an assessment of mood or anxiety issues.
Social Factors
Assessing the social factors contributing to the behavior is also part of a functional analysis. For this, a psychologist or a nurse might observe the person with dementia in different situations and on different locations. In the observation, there is specific attention for the physical environment, the interaction between residents and between nursing staff and resident, and the amount of stimuli present (both auditory, visual, smell and touch).
After the physician, the psychologist, and the nurse make their analysis, they discuss their findings to draw up a hypothesis about the cause of the challenging behavior.
5.3 Treatment
The analysis of the challenging behavior ends with a hypothesis about the cause of the behavior and/or about the factors that lead to the continuation of the behavior. This hypothesis is the starting point for the treatment plan. The first step of the treatment plan is to establish a treatment goal and to measure the current situation for evaluation purposes. The goal attainment scale can be helpful in clarifying the expected outcome of the treatment (Bouwens et al. 2008) (Table 5.2).
Table 5.2
Using a goal attainment scale (GAS)
The GAS can be used in making treatment goals individual while also standardizing the outcome measures of the treatment. When using GAS, at least three treatment goals are established and prioritized. For each goal, the expected outcome is set. After that, possible other outcomes are noted down from “much less than expected” up onto “much better than expected”.
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channelFull access? Get Clinical TreeGet Clinical Tree app for offline access |