Cancer

Chapter 3
Cancer


Tanya Urquhart‐Kelly


Aim


The aim of this chapter is to introduce the reader to the basic principles that are associated with cancer; understanding these principles can help the reader provide care that is evidence‐based, compassionate and competent.



Introduction


In the United Kingdom, more than 350 000 patients are diagnosed annually with cancer (Cancer Research United Kingdom [CRUK], 2016a). Of these, childhood cancer accounts for only 0.5%, indicating that cancer is relatively rare in children. Approximately 1750 children are diagnosed with cancer per annum in the UK, that is 31 children every week (CRUK, 2016b). Around 1 in 500 children in Great Britain will develop some form of cancer by 14 years of age (CRUK, 2016b).


Despite its rarity, cancer remains the most common single cause of death in the 1–14‐year age group, accounting for 20% of all deaths (Smith & Phillips, 2012). There have, however, been significant improvements in cancer treatments over the last 50 years meaning that more children than ever are being cured (Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group [CCLG], 2016). Continuing research informs improved treatments with reduced side effects. Given the poor prognosis, treatments in the early 1960s and 1970s were designed to obtain ‘cure at any cost’. Refinement of treatment through clinical trials, has not only improved cure rates to over 82%, compared to less than 30% in the 1960s, but also reduced the associated burden of morbidity and mortality from treatment side effects.


Biology of cancer


Childhood cancers differ from adult cancers as they are histologically very diverse (Stiller, 2004), whereas most adult cancers are carcinomas. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia is the most common form of childhood cancer, accounting for approximately 25–30% of new cases annually (Vora, 2016). This is followed by tumours of the central nervous system (CNS) and lymphomas. Fig. 3.1 shows the incidence rates for childhood cancer.

Pie chart of incidence rates for childhood cancer with different shaded sectors representing percentages of Leukaemia (31%), Lymphomas (10%), Bone tumours (4%), Neuroblastoma (6%), etc.

Figure 3.1 Incidence rates for childhood cancer.


Pathogenesis of cancers


Cells reproduce to grow in number or replace those that die off naturally. The process by which a cell reproduces is known as mitosis. Mitosis involves the DNA in the nucleus of a cell condensing and packing itself into the 23 pairs of identical chromosomes. These then self‐replicate at which point the cell splits into two leaving each daughter cell with 23 chromosomes, which duplicate to create identical pairs. Mitosis is controlled by a number of master regulatory genes which tell cells to either continue to divide or stop.


Genes


All cancers arise when a cell is genetically altered and unable to control its own growth and proliferation. Over the last decade there have been significant advances made in understanding the molecular genetics of several childhood cancers (Pritchard‐Jones, 1996). There are three known major classes of cancer genes: (1) Oncogenes – mutated forms of normal cellular genes that have become cancer causing. They increase the speed of cell division (proliferation), block differentiation and act in a dominant manner, i.e., mutation in only one of the pair of genes is sufficient for pathogenicity; (2) Tumour suppressor genes – whose function is to inhibit cell division, survival and associated properties of cancer cells (e.g., p53, see next section); (3) Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) processing genes – whose normal function is to regulate DNA replication and when mutated, allow rapid accumulation of mutations in other cancer‐causing genes. Chronological mutation of all three of these cancer genes may be involved in the development and progression of a single cancer.


p53


The most important tumour suppressor gene in human cells is p53, which expresses a protein that controls cell division and survival. The protein is mutated or inactivated in about 60% of cancer cases; it is found in increased amounts in a wide variety of transformed cells.


Aetiology of cancers


Genetic predisposition


Inherited variants in p53 cause a familial cancer syndrome called Li‐Fraumeni syndrome; in these families, the affected relatives develop a diverse set of malignancies including leukaemia, breast carcinomas, sarcomas (bone tumours), and brain tumours at unusually early ages.


There are other known genetic predispositions for some cancers, for example, children with Down syndrome are known to have a higher risk of developing leukaemia (Siegel, Naishadham & Jemal, 2013). However, some solid tumours occur less frequently than expected in Down syndrome, specifically there is a complete absence of neuroblastoma and Wilms tumour (nephroblastoma) (Satgé, Sasco & Lacour, 2003). It is therefore likely that there are genes on chromosome 21 that increase the risk of some cancers while others have an opposite effect. Furthermore, children who have hereditary retinoblastoma (RBS) (a rare tumour of the eye) have an increased risk of developing osteosarcoma. This is a classic example of a cancer resulting from an inherited genetic abnormality. It is not unusual for families to contain more than one affected member and in more than one generation. In most familial cases, both eyes are affected, indeed heritable RBS is usually defined as any case with bilateral tumours or a family history (Stiller, 2004a).


The familial aggregation of childhood cancer is widely studied. Often a familial link for childhood cancer will only come to light following the diagnosis of a second sibling. Table 3.1 lists examples of congenital factors associated with childhood cancer, which give rise to an increased risk of childhood cancer.


Table 3.1 Examples of congenital factors associated with childhood cancer








































Factor Associated childhood cancer
Chromosomal abnormality
Down syndrome (trisomy 21) Acute leukaemia
13q syndrome Retinoblastoma
Genetic syndrome
Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome Wilms tumour
Inherited immunodeficiency
Fanconi anaemia AML, hepatoma
Familial neoplastic syndromes
Li‐Fraumeni syndrome Soft tissue carcinoma and adrenocortical carcinoma
Familial retinoblastoma Retinoblastoma and osteosarcoma
Neurofibromatosis type 1 Astrocytoma, ALL and rhabdomyosarcoma

Environmental factors


Despite numerous literature reviews of environmental or exogenous exposures, there is little evidence of these being firmly established as risk factors for childhood cancer (Stiller, 2004b). They include: neonatal administration of vitamin K, parental use of medications and drugs, proximity to electromagnetic fields, parental employment and exposure to potential mutagens (Vora, 2016).


Ionising radiation (IR)


IR has been implicated in the induction of leukaemia (Vora, 2016). Research also shows that cells can detect and respond epigenetically, altering gene expression after low doses of IR (Jones et al., 2010). More than 67 years ago, a correlation between antenatal obstetric diagnostic X‐rays and cancer in the offspring were discovered (Stewart et al., 1958). At that time it was thought that 5% of all childhood cancers were as a result of in utero irradiation. However, this number has reduced and is attributable to significantly lower numbers of women being exposed to irradiation in pregnancy.


Viruses


There is an association with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) and both paediatric Hodgkin and Burkitt lymphomas (Paola & Preciado, 2013). International variations in the incidence of childhood lymphoma are therefore apparent (Stiller, 2004a).


Hormones


The hormone diethylstilboestrol (DES) is the only established trans‐placental carcinogen; it was administered to pregnant women threatening abortion >40 years ago (Giusti et al., 1995). This drug is no longer used and thus DES‐related clear‐cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina or cervix in young women should cease.


Signs and symptoms


There are no early warning signs or screening tests for cancer in children. Presenting symptoms vary widely depending on the type and site of the cancer, i.e., abdomen, bone, brain, kidney and blood. Commonly seen symptoms in leukaemia and lymphoma include:



  • Tiredness, breathlessness and pale skin (due to anaemia and reduction in red blood cells)
  • Chronic fatigue
  • Tiny red spots on the skin (petechiae)
  • Abnormal bleeding of the gums and epistaxis
  • Bone pain and muscle aches
  • Abdominal pain due to enlarged spleen and/or liver
  • Swollen lymph glands in the groin, neck and under the arms
  • Weight loss.

Solid tumours may present with a mass of increasing size (more evident with weight loss), pain, malaise and abnormalities of the central nervous system (particularly headaches, early morning vomiting, altered eye appearances and disturbed vision). All of which should be viewed as early warning signs. It is common for these generic symptoms to be attributed to other common childhood diseases. See Fig. 3.2 for the possible signs and symptoms of solid and CNS tumours.

Silhouette of a human with labels possible signs and symptoms of solid tumours (weight loss, weakness, etc.; left) and CNS tumours (headaches, cognitive decline, altered gait, etc.; right).

Figure 3.2 Possible signs and symptoms of solid and CNS tumours.


Staging cancers


The stage of a cancer is often used to describe its size and whether it is found in only one part of the body (localised disease) or if it has spread beyond its original site (metastatic disease).


Although cancer ‘staging’ is not applied in acute leukaemia, the presenting clinical features, leukaemia cytogenetics and early response to treatment are powerful predictors of cure. Combinations of these are used for risk stratification purposes to determine the intensity of treatment a particular patient should receive. Table 3.2 lists the current UK risk stratification approach.


Table 3.2 UK risk stratification to the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL)
















Risk Definition
Standard <10 yrs of age
WCC < 50 × 109/L
Intermediate >10 yrs of age
WCC > 50 × 109/L
High Any patient with a cytogenetic abnormality.
Failure to remit at Day 29.

Historically, it was evidenced that the prognosis for acute leukaemia was worse for boys than girls. However, this is no longer evident from contemporary studies (Vora, 2016). Patients who show slow clearance of blast cells from their blood or bone marrow following induction therapy are associated with a higher risk of relapse than those who do not. Today, minimal residual disease monitoring (MRD) is a more sophisticated and sensitive measure that identifies patients who will or will not relapse.


Staging occurs following the cancer diagnosis and can be helpful in giving an indication of the prognosis. Staging can be decided on following other investigations such as blood tests and imaging. Knowing the particular type and stage of a cancer helps in decision making regarding the most appropriate treatment. Thus it is common that childhood neoplasms are classified according to histology rather than the primary site.


The standard classification scheme is the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD‐O) (WHO, 2013), which has been used for nearly 35 years, principally in tumour or cancer registries, for coding the site (topography) and the histology (morphology) of the neoplasm, usually obtained from a pathology report.


The ICD‐O comprises 12 major groups: leukaemias, lymphomas, brain and spinal tumours, sympathetic nervous system tumours, retinoblastoma, kidney tumours, liver tumours, bone tumours, soft tissue sarcomas, gonadal and germ cell tumours, epithelial tumours and other unspecified malignant neoplasms.


Central nervous system tumour staging


Astrocytic tumours, medulloblastoma and ependymoma account for about 80% of all paediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumours. Extent of disease is an important prognostic factor in determining the intensity of therapy and predicting the outcome for many CNS malignancies, including medulloblastoma, other embryonal CNS tumours (pineoblastoma, primitive neuroectodermal tumour, atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumour), and ependymomas (Louis et al., 2007). Extent of disease is classified according to the M stage. In the absence of visible disease beyond the primary on imaging (MRI brain and spine) and of malignant cells in the cerebrospinal fluid, M0 applies. M1 codes positive tumour cells in the cerebrospinal fluid, M2 visible metastases in brain, M3 visible metastases in spine, and M4 metastases outside the CNS (Harisiadis & Chang, 1977).


Some pathologists also grade the tumours, but practice varies widely around the world, with the majority not grading tumours at all. The codes in Table 3.3 for histologic grading and differentiation may be added as a 6th digit to the classification code.


Table 3.3 Tumour grades




























Code Grade Description
1 I Well differentiated/Differentiated, NOS
2 II Moderately differentiated/Moderately well differentiated/Intermediate differentiation
3 III Poorly differentiated
4 IV Undifferentiated/Anaplastic
9 NA Grade or differentiation not determined, not stated or not applicable

Differentiation describes how much or how little a tumour resembles the normal tissue from which it arose. If a code is not used, the following adverbs may be used by pathologists: ‘well’, ‘moderately’, and ‘poorly’ to indicate degrees of differentiation. These approximate to grades I, II, and III. ‘Undifferentiated’ and ‘anaplastic’ usually correspond to grade IV.


Treatment of cancer


Treatments for childhood cancer vary widely and are specific to the site, stage and type of cancer. A combination of treatment modalities is often used, namely chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. A multidisciplinary approach to treatments is also paramount. This includes consultant medical staff, junior doctors, neurosurgeons, sonographers and radiologists, nursing staff, specialist oncology outreach nurses, oncology pharmacist, psychology, CLIC Sargent social workers, occupational therapist, clinical oncologist, laboratory staff, oncology surgeon, physiotherapist, speech and language therapist, hospital play specialists (HPS), and housekeepers. Additionally, the laboratory, medical and radiology teams inform diagnosis and treatment whilst the HPS, psychologists, nursing staff and CLIC Sargent workers prepare the child and family for coping with the physical and emotional burden of treatment. There are newer treatment modalities including targeted therapies, which are mentioned later in this chapter.


Treatment can be complex and is delivered with the goal of cure, improving survival while minimizing toxicity and preserving quality of life (Wills‐Alcoser & Rodgers, 2003). Adjuvant therapies are known to enhance these factors. Surgical intervention combined with chemotherapy is known to increase and improve the survival in children with solid tumours such as Wilms and osteosarcoma. Likewise low‐dose radiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma who show an inadequate response to first‐line chemotherapy (EuroNet, 2013).


Treatment for childhood cancers in the UK involves the use of multicentre trials and following guidelines refined and informed from previous trials. The main body in the UK responsible for clinical trials is the National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI, 2016) Children’s Cancer & Leukaemia Clinical Studies Group (NCRI CCL CSG, 2015). The treatment is delivered by a network of primary treatment centres (PTCs). A professional organisation, the Children’s Cancer & Leukaemia Group (CCLG), constituted by members representing all disciplines involved in the care of children with cancer based in, or linked to, PTCs across the UK and Ireland, is responsible for guidelines and advocacy (CCLG, 2017).

Mar 27, 2019 | Posted by in NURSING | Comments Off on Cancer

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access