6 Broad skills for mental health nursing
Communication skills in mental health settings
The first premise made in this section, as inferred above, is that there is something special about the skill of communication as used by effective nurses (Crawford et al 2006). This skill may sometimes be quite different from those used in non-work or social situations. This specialness is rooted in the nurse’s ‘intention’ (Heron 2001) which originates in what the nurse is trying to achieve as part of care management.
Consider a community psychiatric nurse (CPN) calling at a service user’s home for the first time to make an initial contact and assessment. The CPN will have a range of clear intentions. Some of these intentions will be clearly planned and obvious to an observer. Others may be reactive to the immediate situation, more subtle, not so easily detected and may even be such an integrated part of the nurse’s professional personality that they are not aware of performing them until asked to reflect on what they are doing. For example, the skilled CPN is able to often process through a sufficiently comprehensive assessment of a service user, almost as if an everyday conversation is taking place (Bonham 2004). There is no sense of a ‘cross-examination’ or intrusive questioning. Areas of the service user’s experience are examined and assessed with the minimum discomfort for the service user. At the same time, the nurse may sometimes be experiencing, at a deeper level, feelings or emotions which in a social context may be difficult (Bonham 2004). The experienced effective nurse develops the ability to manage these tensions by, for example, clinical supervision. Ask one of your mentors to give you illustrations of this.
During interactions with service users, the CPN intends to:
Create a climate of trust and approachability.
Enable conversation to occur as naturally as possible.
Keep the focus of the conversation with the service user.
Explore issues being experienced by the service user.
Listen intently to the language and delivery used by the service user.
Support, validate and reassure the service user as appropriate.
Do the above with any significant others who may be involved.
Include any coworker (for example, you as a student).
Limit questions that are asked to those which have a clear purpose.
Encourage questions to be asked by the service user.
Involve the service user in any plan of treatment.
Be aware of timing, in terms of the needs of the service user, and other professional caseload demands.
Clarify any issues which are unclear to the CPN, the service user or any other involved party, before finishing the visit.
Leave the service user at least no more distressed, or anxious, than when the visit started, and possibly less so – if at all possible.
Summarise any action or plan arising as a result of the visit.
Confirm that the service user understands any action or plan.
Confirm that the service user understands what is happening next, in terms of any input from the CPN or any other care professional who may be involved.
Finish the visit at an appropriate point, and in a congruently positive way, if at all possible.
The CPNs you work with may have more intentions, or a few less, than in the examples below, but you will see that the below sequence suggests a thoughtful, deliberate, intentional and strategic approach. This is very different from social interaction with friends, family, neighbours and so on, which is often more spontaneous, less considered and less goal or outcome orientated. The effective mental health nurse will therefore be constantly ‘at work’ within clinical areas. Some of this work may appear to be ordinary everyday conversation (Burnard 2003).
Consider though … this is not a social relationship. One person is a service user and one person is a professional receiving a salary. This is a professional being friendly, not a professional being a friend (Murray et al 1997, Jackson & Stevenson 1998). Just like the CPN above, the mental health nurse, in this quite different clinical environment, has a range of clear intentions which could be as follows:
• Be approachable (if you don’t have this, how can you be effective?).
• Use social connectors such as a cup of tea, a newspaper, TV programmes, sport, plans for the day, and so on.
• Be aware of time constraints such as shift changes and meal times.
• Be aware of personal limitations – tiredness, other service users arranged to be seen during the shift, care plans to update, liaison with other professionals.
• Assess. How is the service user at this moment? Different from earlier today, yesterday, last week? If so, in what way?
• Edit. What is going to be added to the care plan as a result of this assessment?
• Be aware of anything that needs to be communicated to other colleagues – the service user is becoming increasingly agitated, the service user is more settled, etc.
• Create, sustain or finish a professional relationship.
• Maintain continuity – in terms of being clear to the service user that you will be back on duty tomorrow/next week/not at all.
If the above range of intentions is examined more closely, they can be separated into identifiable skills. Most of these can be found in the body of literature on therapeutic interventions, communication skills, counselling and so on. This confirms the existence of a robust evidence base for the skills and attributes. These can be considered and discussed in the classroom, then practised in placement. As confidence and proficiency increase (this is a slow process for most people, by the way), the skills can be combined and blended into each other. They will become less conscious and more a part of your natural professional personality (Benner 1984).
Intention as separate communication skills and attributes ‘Clusters’
Approachable
This is where it all starts (Bonham 2004). As a professional mental health nurse you are, in effect, being paid to be approachable. Other mental health professionals can use unapproachability to maintain distance between themselves and service users. It is a primary function of the mental health nurse to close that distance, professionally and skilfully. Not all service users wish to engage with mental health professionals, or even be friendly. If you are not sure what the individual components of approachability are, think about the colleagues you have met on placement. If you are just starting your career as a nurse, think of people you know who have this quality. What is it that seems to give them approachability? You’ll find that the answer to this often lies in what they do, as much as in what they say. (Also consider – do you want to be approachable all the time?)
Suitably engaging eye contact (Egan 2002).
A friendly or open demeanour (Bonham 2004).
Professionally available body language.
Manipulation of the environment, such as an open office door, or the deliberate positioning of oneself within the service user group rather than the professional group.
Choice of clothing that suggests equality rather than superiority or striking difference, together with clarity of boundaries, i.e. the clarity has to be meaningful for the service user.
Honest
In professional situations it is essential, for the safety and care of service users and your own professional credibility, that you are more considered and careful about what you say and how you say it. This pre-editing of your natural spontaneity can sometimes feel like avoidance or professional economy with the truth. The mental health nurse will often be in the situation of knowing more about certain issues than the service user. Often information is withheld from the service user as it is deemed to be ‘… in their best interests’ (Nursing and Midwifery Council 2008). This view needs very careful consideration and must be the result of a multiprofessional consensus whenever realistically possible. Reflect with other students and your mentors on how to best manage these situations.
Encouraging clarity
Your friend: I hate this kind of situation.
A service user: I hate this kind of situation.
You: What do you mean, you hate it?
In the first example no effort is made to explore the nature of the word ‘hate’, the nature of the situation and the reasons for this view. In the second example the nurse has a strategy or intention to clarify. It may not be achieved immediately, during the next exchange, but the nurse is making a professional effort to tentatively (Bonham 2004) find out more, as part of a longer term assessing or monitoring, perhaps. It is important to note here that the above phrase ‘What do you mean, you hate it?’ can have many different impacts depending on how the words are delivered by the nurse. Try rehearsing some of these with another student and experiment with tone of voice, eye contact and general demeanour, to see the effect on the other person.
Consistent
Both nurses in the examples above will be assessing, planning, implementing and evaluating the care they give (Norman & Ryrie 2009) as part of a consensus team approach. Even the CPN, who is more autonomous in terms of needing to make decisions about the care given, has to refer back to a team for support. That team will continue to give consistent, planned and agreed care. The original direction of this care may have come from the early meetings between the service user and the CPN. The team supports the carrying through of this care. So, to be consistent, the nurse must be empathic (Rogers 1951) to service users and colleagues, assertive with both, an effective listener to what is said and what is not said by both, sensitive to cultures and environments, a lateral thinker (de Bono 2009) and be open-minded to the ideas of others.
Transparent
Some other terms that can be linked to this are honesty, congruence, genuineness and authenticity (Rogers 1951). Like many of the attributes discussed in this section, transparency is not just something that is used in your interactions with service users. Some examples of transparent practice are the following:
• Fully including service users in all aspects of the management of their care, even the unpleasant or difficult ones, such as restricting their movements or unwanted adjustments to medication.
• Giving service users access to information written about them.
Optimistic
Your work as a mental health nurse means that you are a professional optimist (Bonham 2004). In your personal life you may be pathologically pessimistic. In your professional life there is always hope for the service user you are working with. Looking at the caring role of the nurse at a very basic and pragmatic level, if you cannot visualise any hope for the service user you are working with then perhaps it is in the service user’s best interests to minimise therapeutic contact with them. This might mean asking a colleague to take over the care of the person, referral to a more suitable care agency, arranging clinical supervision to reflect with another how hope might be found or a team consensus may be to no longer engage with that person. An example of this is the person who continually self-harms despite, and regardless of, a range of therapeutic interventions by different concerned professionals. There may come a point when the input starts to become counterproductive. It may be more caring to withdraw support in a planned way, to try to foster independence, rather than dependence. This is in line with contemporary ‘recovery’ approaches (Repper & Perkins 2003) (see Ch. 3).
Ordinary
This is sometimes seen as a rather strange attribute for a mental health nurse – the ability to be ordinary or to possess ordinariness. It could be argued that this is a re-presentation of Rogers’ core condition of congruence (or genuineness, honesty, authenticity). It is not. Ordinariness is a separate entity. To a large extent, within healthcare literature, clear references to ordinariness are few. The term is used in passing as the focus of the text is foregrounding something else. Occasionally it features in its own right as an attribute that some nurses have (Burnard 2003, Bonham 2004), and that is appreciated by service users. This does not just apply to mental health settings. Oblique reference to ordinariness can be found across the complete spectrum of health care (Dunniece & Slevin 2000, Blomqvist & Edberg 2002, Giske & Artinian 2007, Hopkins & Niemic 2007). To paraphrase these ideas, the nurse who has this therapeutic attribute can use their ordinariness to consolidate any stage of the therapeutic relationship. It can manifest itself in the following ways: