5: Psychosocial and ethical care

Section 5 Psychosocial and ethical care




5.1 Professional and practice issues



Philosophy


Nursing philosophies are in a constant state of development, debate and reformation. Nursing philosophy, therefore, is not prescriptive and does not seek to provide steadfast rules to be adhered to; rather, it serves as a platform for professional development and reflection, and as a method of finding meaning in the nursing profession (Sellman 2010). Good patient care is:



‘Clinical wisdom’ can be applied to everyday nursing practice by drawing from past experiences to make sound judgements and decisions on current situations. It further implies a moral commitment to one’s actions; that one has a personal conviction to the ideals and philosophies that shape one’s nursing practice. Past experiences and compounded practical knowledge that constitute clinical wisdom also support nurses’ abilities to determine which courses of action are advantageous to individual patients (Haggerty and Grace 2008).


When caring for patients, it is important to balance the use of procedural guidelines and standards of care with the provision of individualized care and a reliance on personal moral values (Haggerty and Grace 2008). Key points about philosophy and nursing are:



Ensure a high standard of professional care by:




Professional code of ethics


The International Council of Nurses’ (ICN) Code of Ethics for Nurses (International Council of Nurses 2005) framework states that nurses have an ethical obligation ‘to promote health, to prevent illness, to restore health and to alleviate suffering’ (p. 1). This obligation must be carried out with due regard for human rights and personal dignity, regardless of creed, colour, gender or any other defining personal or social characteristic. These same ethical principles are outlined for nurses and midwives in The Code: Standards of conduct, performance and ethics for nurses and midwives (Nursing and Midwifery Council 2008).


Nurses’ relationships with their colleagues, patients and patients’ families should be guided by the following four principles of ethical conduct:



1. Nurses and people:








2. Nurses and practice:








3. Nurses and the profession:







Principles/processes


The provision of medical treatment to children should follow the four principles approach to care – respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice (Baines 2008). The principles are closely linked to key concepts such as accountability, advocacy, consent and safeguarding children.





Respecting the child’s dignity


Dignity is emerging as a central aspect of biomedical ethics and the philosophy of medicine (Lundqvist and Nilstun 2007). Valuing our own and others’ dignity demands recognition of unconditional human worth that is intrinsic to an individual’s unique identity, experiences, preferences and needs. External factors, such as injury, loss or negative opinions of others, can cause emotional changes in an individual which result in a weakened self-image and diminished level of self-respect. Children and young people who are seriously ill or injured and who have to rely on others for their care are more vulnerable to devaluing their worth as individuals.




Ethical and legal issues


A child’s ability to consent to medical treatment depends on the child’s understanding and developmental stage:



image Very young children who lack the intellectual capacity to comprehend treatment options and their consequences are deemed incompetent and are thus unable to give consent for their own treatment (Parekh 2006).


image In the UK, there is no definitive legal age at which incompetent children at once become competent. For children approaching middle childhood, competence to consent is usually determined by the child’s doctor, who also considers contextual factors, such as the severity and nature of the treatment options (Parekh 2006).


image In the UK, children under 16 years of age cannot give consent to their own medical treatment unless they have been deemed Gillick competent. Children in middle/late childhood and early adolescence are ordinarily considered Gillick competent, otherwise known as Fraser competent.


image In the Gillick case, the judges held that ‘parental rights were recognised by the law only as long as they were needed for the protection of the child and such rights yielded to the child’s right to make his own decisions when he reached a sufficient understanding and intelligence to be capable of making up his own mind’, (Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority (1985) 3 All ER 402 1985).


image Gillick-competent children can comprehend information about medical treatments, weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each, and arrive at an informed decision about their care.


image For treatment decisions that are unlikely to have such grave consequences, therefore, a young person under 16 can consent to treatment provided he or she is competent to understand the nature, purpose and possible consequences of the treatment proposed.




Legal position


Although 16–18-year-olds have the right to consent to medical treatment in the absence of parental consent, subsequent cases have retreated from this position, particularly where they have involved treatment refusal by the young person. Gillick competence is contextually dependent; for example, a child’s ability to give informed consent to a major surgical procedure may be unreliable even at the Gillick-competent stage if their decision-making process appears to be largely motivated by an emotional response (Parekh 2006). Regardless of a child’s developmental stage, a court maintains the right to give consent to a child’s medical treatment in cases where the following two conditions are present:



Gillick-competent adolescents can consent to their own medical treatment in the absence of parental consent; however, in cases where Gillick-competent minors refuse consent, their refusal can be overridden by parental consent until the child reaches 18 years of age (Vasey 2009).


Thus if a child refuses consent to their own medical treatment and it is in their best interest, parental consent in favour of the treatment overrides the child’s refusal (Parekh 2006).


The ethical justification for allowing courts and/or parents to commit a child to medical treatment despite his or her refusal to give consent stems from the belief that in many cases, a child’s refusal is a consequence of their developmental immaturity, especially in cases where lifesaving treatment is refused.


Similarly when parents may be asked to make decisions on behalf of a very young or severely developmentally disabled child, parental authority is never justified when parents make decisions that are clearly in conflict with the best interests of the child. In these instances, the treatment outcome will be decided by the courts under the advice of the physician (Baines 2008).





Strategies of care




Key characteristics of FCC




image The family must be viewed as the constant in the child’s life:








image Parents’/primary carer’s preferences for participation may vary considerably so daily negotiation is essential:












image Families from different cultures have unique social, cultural and linguistic needs and different understandings of FCC:







image Hospital system and policies need to be flexible and responsive to families needs:










Play in hospital


Play is an integral aspect of childhood, child development and a basic need of all children. The first 5 years of a child’s life is a period of rapid development in physical, mental and social skills such as walking, talking, understanding and imitating. One of the most important ways in which a child learns to develop these skills is through play. It is an activity that assists in the normal development, as children learn physical, mental and social skills through play. It is a universal activity in all cultures so child’s freedom to play must be preserved in hospital.






Integrated care pathways (ICPs)


Over the last two decades, ICPs have become increasing popular for healthcare systems in Europe and worldwide. Integrated care pathways are documented policies and guidelines for delivering integrated care. ICPs have been adopted for variety of health conditions and patient populations. Although integrated care contributes to improved clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction, more empirical evidence is needed to demonstrate clinical efficacy (Allen et al 2009, Doocey and Reddy 2010).







5.2 Psychosocial Issues



Attachment and loss


The concept of attachment is one way of describing the closeness-seeking and care-eliciting behaviours of children to their main carer. John Bowlby (Bowlby et al 1956, Bowlby 1952, 1980) was an eminent psychiatrist who developed a theory to explain the process of attachment and separation. Bowlby defined attachment as need for the infant/child to stay in close proximity to the primary care-giver usually the mother and to be comforted by her presence, sound and touch. Attachment theory is based on the following, that:










Jun 15, 2016 | Posted by in NURSING | Comments Off on 5: Psychosocial and ethical care

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access