45. Testifying as a Forensic Nurse

CHAPTER 45. Testifying as a Forensic Nurse

Cari Caruso




Part I. Criminal cases


Testifying in court can be very exciting. The anticipation of sitting before a judge and jury, being questioned by attorneys, can also produce considerable anxiety and stress, especially if it is a new experience. For a nurse who has never been in court, the local district attorney (DA) can usually arrange for the observation of a trial. Generally, this involves calling the DA’s office and introducing oneself as a forensic nurse examiner and explaining that it would be beneficial to see some court proceedings. The DA will usually be receptive to the request because if there is a chance that, in the future, the nurse may have a case that goes to trial, the DA would like to be assured that the nurse has some prior knowledge of how the court system works. Such an observation will also afford the nurse an opportunity to see the way the courtroom is set up, where witnesses will be seated, and where the jury, prosecutor, and the defense attorneys will be located. Forensic nurses should arrange to attend courtroom observations during a trial that has pertinent elements of their practice specialty. If that is not possible, any criminal proceeding will provide insight to the justice system. The day of the visit, the DA will ask the judge for permission to admit an observer for the proceedings; typically, the judge will give approval if it can be ascertained that the observer has no connections with the case. Typically, trials are open to the public but on occasion, depending on the kind of case being tried, the courtroom may be closed to the public.

Normally, for a trial, a testifying witness may not be allowed in the courtroom to hear anyone else’s testimony (Federal Rules of Evidence, 2000). Sometimes defense witnesses may listen to prosecution witnesses to prepare for rebuttal. Witnesses should expect to be seated on the hard benches in the hallway or other adjacent area or anteroom. Although pleasantries may be exchanged with others, it is inappropriate for a witness to speak to anyone about the case. There may be jurors, family members, or other witnesses in the area. It is a good idea for the nurse witness to bring a neutral kind of book or other activity to pass the time. If your phone or handheld computer has games, they will help pass the time until it is time for the nurse to testify.

If the nurse has conducted the forensic examination in the case being tried, she or he will be built in to the prosecution’s case so the dealings will be done with the prosecutor or the deputy district attorney. The DA will attempt to schedule a witness as close as possible to the anticipated time that the nurse will go on the stand. However, it is likely that the estimate of the time for testimony will go awry, and the nurse should always expect that there may be waiting involved. Many times circumstances prevent the nurse from even testifying that day, and she or he must come back the next day or another time when testimony continues.

Witnesses who may be anxious or have had little experience with public speaking should keep in mind certain techniques that may help them to appear relaxed and comfortable while on the witness stand. It is recommended that a witness analyze her or his own demeanor to pinpoint some basic areas for improvement. For example, an individual who has a tendency to fidget while sitting may make a conscious effort to control this behavior. A witness who appears at ease will likely have optimal impact with the jury. Soft, timid voices may convey a lack of confidence and possibly detract from credibility. Additionally, it complicates proceedings if the court needs to request the witness to speak up or to repeat testimony. Practicing is an effective way to improve performance during testimony. For example, merely relating a story or event in front of friends or family members and requesting their critique may be valuable. It may be helpful for a witness to ask someone to record such sessions so that she or he can study the effectiveness of delivery, presence, and style. Was the event related accurately? Was the speech enunciated and distinct, or was there mumbling, stuttering, hesitation, or stumbling over certain words? Was the pace of speaking too slow or too fast? Remember that a court reporter must be able to understand the words and enter the testimony into the record. Was eye contact maintained with the audience? Were there meaningless phrases, such as “you know” or “um”? Did the speaker maintain the audience’s attention throughout the presentation? Some guidelines that may help the witness to convey a positive impression are outlined in Box 45-1.

Box 45-1







• Dress professionally. A professional appearance shows the jury that nurses take themselves and the proceedings seriously.


• Remember to breathe. When under stress, people tend to take shallow breaths. When getting tense, take a few deep breaths. Take normal breaths before speaking so that your voice will stay at a good level.


• Walk into the courtroom with authority. Before arriving at the witness box, turn to the clerk, who will ask you to raise your right hand and recite, “Do you swear to tell the truth .…” Say, “I do” in a clear and audible tone. Then sit in the witness box. It may be good to start by smiling and saying, “Good morning” to the judge and jury.


• Sit up straight and look attentive. Do not fidget.


• Speak clearly and audibly.


• Make eye contact with those speaking, especially when replying to a question.


• Exude confidence.

Even though a witness may have limited experience in the forensic nursing field, he or she will typically have considerable experience as a nurse. These skills will serve the expert well during the testifying process, in which the major task is to educate the jury. Medical and nursing professionals employ their body of knowledge and clinical information to explain certain dynamics to a body of the public that must make sense of it in order to come to a reasonable conclusion. The lay public has little knowledge of medical terminology or physiology, so everything that is stated on the witness stand must be simplified and put into lay terms that can be readily understood. Nothing should be taken for granted in this arena. When most sexual assault nurses speak about the external genitalia, they mean parts anterior to the hymen. However, the layperson may think that the reference is to the pubic area. The terms external and internal should be explained. Technical terms can be used if they have been thoroughly defined. Things that may seem second nature to a nurse may not have the same meaning to the jury, so it essential for the witness to assume the role of a teacher to ensure that the listeners adequately understand the information.

It may be strange, to a novice, that before the courtroom session begins, the prosecutor and defense attorney may be making plans for a golf game or amiably chatting about a recent sports event. They may not be rivals outside the court milieu; however, each has a job to do and they must maintain their professional facade during the proceedings.


Role of the Forensic Nurse Examiner


Forensic nurse examiners who have conducted forensic examinations in that jurisdiction are called by the prosecution to testify because they have provided an important service that contributed to a particular body of evidence. They are more or less incorporated into the prosecution case. It is, however, extremely important to understand that they do not work for the prosecutor and must remain independently objective and not feel responsible to tell anything but the truth. Whether the individual functions as a sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE), a death investigator, or any type of forensic nurse, he or she may have collected and evaluated information that will contribute to a larger body of information.

The forensic nurse is an educator and interpreter of the type of work we do and its protocols, standards, and procedures. By the time of the trial, the district attorney has determined that the case has merit and viability because of evidence of one kind or another. The forensic nurse should have an opinion about whether findings from the forensic examination could be consistent with the history provided by the patient, remembering that the history is only the patient’s version of the events, as told to us, and be honest enough to acknowledge that the findings could be equally consistent with something else, such as consensual sexual contact, a nonspecific finding, or a medical condition. The SANE cannot substantiate force or determine consent versus nonconsent, so the nurse must maintain total neutrality. The forensic nurse can never cross over into the providence of the jury by stating that a sexual assault occurred. Only the jury can make that determination. The forensic nurse examiner has been given a particular history, regarding an event, but has no idea whether that history is accurate. This is why the forensic nurse’s objectivity is paramount. The nurse should be unbiased and truthful to establish her or his credibility.

The SANE’s testimony will not usually be the single hinge on which the verdict decision rests. It will be a supporting part, in a large body of evidence, but not necessarily the only consideration. Each witness is a cog in the wheel. The role of the forensic nurse examiner is to tell the unbiased truth. The nurse was not present at the scene and did not witness the event firsthand; therefore, the intention of the nurse is to relay her or his findings in the documentation and photography, to ensure that each is a fair and accurate representation of the examination, and to reflect this in the testimony without editorializing. Although the forensic nurse does not want a guilty person to go free or a person who is not guilty to go to prison, the nurse should not even entertain the idea that she or he can be the judge or jury of any case. The nurse examiner should not be tempted have a stake in the case. To appear to be siding with one party or another will expose the nurse to be biased and taint the testimony, so the nurse should avoid disparaging comments on the witness stand about the defendant or the patient. The nurse may be competent at identifying findings and injuries, but the nurse cannot verify causation. The nurse may have opinions, but it is inappropriate for the forensic nurse examiner to declare that a sexual assault occurred, and the nurse could be disqualified for such a statement. Determining whether a sexual assault occurred is not the role of the testifying nurse. The forensic nurse should attempt to impress the court with professionalism, objectivity, and knowledgeable explanations of her or his exam findings. The nurse’s unbiased testimony, in combination with the other testimony offered in trial, will provide the clear information jurors need to reach a satisfactory decision. Testimony should be based in current literature and the training and experience of the examiner, because a peer, in the role of an opposing expert, may be challenging the nurse’s explanations.


A forensic nurse examiner may be called as a prosecution witness or a defense witness. However, most often the nurse will appear as part of the prosecution’s case if she or he has conducted the examination. As mentioned before, the SANE is “built in” to the prosecution’s case simply by the fact that she or he has conducted the forensic examination. That, however, does not mean that she or he must say only things that will benefit the prosecution. In essence, the forensic nurse examiner is testifying about the condition of the patient, the evidence that was collected, and the facts that the findings reveal. The opposition will often attempt to discredit the forensic nurse examiner and raise questions about the nurse’s credentials, making it appear that the nurse is biased for the prosecution. However, that is the job of the opposing side in our adversarial system, and the nurse should not take it personally. Despite a sound education and outstanding credentials, the opposing attorney may bring the credibility of forensic nurses into question because the nurse’s honest testimony will more than likely be damaging to one side or the other. It also could be beneficial to one or both sides. Some forensic nurse examiners/SANEs act as consultants for defense counsel. That shows definitive objectivity.



Curriculum Vitae


A curriculum vitae (CV) is an organized summary of employment and educational history. It functions like an extended résumé. It also may help to validate the credibility of the nurse witness. It should include the nurse’s legal name and contact information along with details regarding academic achievements, organizational affiliations, professional presentations, publications, and relevant work experiences.

There are many ways to design a CV, and some nurses choose to have a professional assist them in developing an exemplary record for use in the legal arena. It should be constructed to serve as a formal document that illustrates the education, training, and experience that contribute to the nurse’s expertise. It should always be kept current and completely truthful.

The forensic nurse examiner will be asked to furnish a CV to the prosecutor. It should include any classes, seminars, and conferences attended that may demonstrate expertise, including dates and the names of the speakers. This will illustrate specific study topics along with venerable lecturers who taught them.

Many nurses prepare both a comprehensive and an abbreviated CV. The shorter version would contain the elements from the full CV that are most important for the court to hear. It is advisable for the nurse to look over the brief form before going into the courtroom to ensure that all pertinent information can be relayed without hesitation, because it is easy to overlook elements of education and experience when sitting in the witness chair. Credentials should be listed first, followed by a work history, specialized training, other achievements, and publications. Pay special attention to true credentials, certifications, designations, and certificates of completion. If there are numerous training sessions or conferences, the nurse may report, “I have attended all required annual training sessions at my employing institution and certain specific scientific assemblies for six consecutive years.” Copies of the CV should be readily available upon request.

The CV will not be read in court, so what is said in the court regarding the nurse’s qualifications may bear weight on whether the court will accept the nurse as an expert. The forensic nurse examiner should not allow her or his credentials to be stipulated. It is important for the jury to hear about the forensic nurse examiner’s qualifications. Most likely, the prosecutor will have shared the CV with defense counsel to ensure the counsel’s awareness of the individual’s qualifications to serve as an expert. However, the CV may also be used to attempt to disqualify an expert who is perceived to be a powerful tool against the opposition. The CV could also damage the nurse’s credibility if the listings are not entirely truthful. Be sure to check the accuracy of the CV and that the corresponding dates correlate to the correct activities.


Subpoena


When the forensic nurse receives a subpoena, she or he should note certain details right away, such as the date of the trial. In many jurisdictions, the subpoena comes shortly before the trial or preliminary hearing. Subpoenas usually list the name of the defendant and not the name of the victim. If the work was primarily with the victim, the nurse may not know the name of the defendant. Look for the contact number of the witness coordinator’s officer and make contact promptly. The witness coordinator may be the source of communication regarding the trial appearance and continuations. The nurse should state that she or he is the forensic nurse who conducted the evidentiary examination and has received a subpoena. The nurse will be asked to provide the case number, which may be found in a prominent site on the subpoena along with the name of the prosecuting attorney. The witness coordinator will confirm who the prosecutor will be and verify the identity of the victim. Ordinarily the coordinator will establish the nurse’s availability for testifying within a certain time span and will ask whether the nurse will be on vacation or unavailable at certain times. The nurse should confirm the name and number of the prosecutor and make contact as soon as the chart and other materials from the case have been located. The prosecutor may only have the forensic exam report and might not be aware that the file contains consents, nurse’s notes, medication records, photographs, and other documents related to the patient. Make sure the prosecutor has a copy of all documents related to the case.

Generally a subpoena includes two checkboxes that refer to the courtroom appearance: (1) be in court, and (2) be on call. The nurse should request to be placed, “on call.” If, “be in court,” has been checked, the nurse should contact the DA and the witness coordinator and request be switched to “on call.” This way, the witness will not have to be in court until needed and will avoid hours of waiting in the hall. The prosecutor will provide an estimated time for the nurse’s appearance.

A subpoena may be issued for the preliminary hearing. Most of the time, the forensic nurse will not be expected to appear at a preliminary hearing; however, there are exceptions, so make sure you communicate with the DA. The preliminary hearing determines whether there was probable cause for the suspect’s arrest and if there is enough evidence for an indictment. There is no jury at this time. If an indictment is filed, then the matter goes to trial.

A pretrial conference may be held between the preliminary hearing and the trial. A subpoena may be received for that, too. A pretrial conference is used to review evidentiary issues before trial, but again, the forensic nurse may not be required to be present.

When the forensic nurse receives a subpoena for the actual trial, he or she should contact the prosecutor and the witness coordinator, keeping in mind that trials may be continued and continued and continued. Maintain ongoing and consistent communication so there is no ambiguity about what is happening. It is possible that, somewhere along the line, the defendant will plead and there will be no trial at all. When this occurs, the information should be filed with nurse’s other case records for subsequent reference.

Again, the on-call trial date status should be verified. The first day of the trial as listed on the subpoena will not necessarily be for testimony but the beginning of procedures. The first steps will be for motions and for jury selection. This may take a day or more, so the nurse’s testimony will most likely not be on that day but days later. Once the jury has been selected, the DA will have a better idea when the nurse will appear.


There is always a chance that the presence of the forensic nurse examiner may not be required. Photos and documentation will have been entered into evidence, and perhaps no further explanations or a court appearance will be necessary.

Potential witnesses should bring their subpoena to court on the prescribed day of appearance (it may even grant parking privileges in a restricted area or at no cost). Even after the trial is over, the witness should maintain the subpoena and file it with the chart. It is a useful document for recording the outcome of the case, including the details of sentencing.


Fact Witness versus Expert Witness


Different types of witnesses may testify in a trial. The two types that most often involve the nurse are fact witness and expert witness. In either case, it is most important for the nurse to be nonbiased, objective, and scientific. The forensic nurse must be a witness, not an advocate. The role of a fact witness, as defined by Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1998), is “To see or know by personal presence; to have direct cognizance of.” These witnesses have firsthand knowledge of a particular event. That role may apply to nurses who are testifying regarding the observations and direct contact with the patient. A fact witness may testify to things that she or he heard, seen, touched, tasted, or smelled and may give an opinion related to those things perceived by his or her senses.




a witness having special knowledge of the subject about which he is about to testify; that knowledge must generally be such as is not normally possessed by the average person. This expertise may derive from either study and education or from experience and observation. An expert witness must be qualified by the court to testify as such … but the court must be satisfied that the testimony presented is of a kind which in fact requires special knowledge, skill or experience.

Fact witnesses only testify to what they saw, collected, and observed. Expert witnesses deliver this type of testimony as well, but they may also contribute opinions and provide additional information regarding their area of expertise. They may not, however, make any statements or declarations that are within the providence of the jury. The experienced forensic nurse examiner will likely appear as an expert witness.



Frye rule


Forensic nurses should become familiar with the term Kelly-Frye, also called the Frye Rule, from United States v. Frye (1923). This case established, in the rules of evidence, that the results of scientific tests or procedures are admissible as evidence only when the tests or procedures have gained general acceptance in the particular field to which they belong. It clarified that an expert witness with knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may offer an opinion in his or her area of expertise that is relevant to the case and will assist the court with its understanding of the matter at hand.


Daubert test


Another important term is the Daubert test. Under Daubert ( Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 1993) and Kumho ( Kumho Tire Company v. Patrick Carmichael, 1999), which establishes the important legal principle that the opinion of experts must be based on reliable methodology or analysis and not subjective belief or unsupported speculation. Furthermore, the reliability of expert testimony is deemed to be as important as the relevance of the expert testimony. The Daubert decision caused much controversy because the scientific world had grown in leaps and bounds and some felt that the Frye rule was too weak, that because a proclaimed expert had made studies and observations and had come to a conclusion, even if it had gained acceptance in that field, if it was not supported by standardized scientific methodology and stringent controls, it could be challenged. All evidence can be challenged in court, but the Daubert decision made the criteria more rigorous. States have chosen to opt for either the Frye rule or Daubert test as their criteria, and other states have chosen methods of their own.

In 1993, the U.S. Supreme Court replaced the Frye test with the Daubert test ( Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals). The Court clarified this decision in 1999 in Kumho Tire Company, Ltd. v. Patrick Carmichael. The Daubert test is now the standard for the admissibility of opinion testimony in federal courts. The criteria applied under Daubert and subsequent cases, as decided by lower federal courts, include the following:



The specific factors explicated by the Daubert Court are (1) whether the expert’s technique or theory can be or has been tested—that is, whether the expert’s theory can be challenged in some objective sense, or whether it is instead simply a subjective, conclusory approach that cannot reasonably be assessed for reliability; (2) whether the technique or theory has been subject to peer review and publication; (3) the known or potential rate of error of the technique or theory when applied; (4) the existence and maintenance of standards and controls; and (5) whether the technique or theory has been generally accepted in the scientific community.

Still, the reliability of some issues thought to be valid under Daubert is wavering as a result of continuing controversies over techniques and new innovations in technology.


Hearsay rule


Hearsay is a statement other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted (Federal Rules of Evidence, 2000). This means that the nurse may not testify to something that someone else told her or him. In other words, if the victim or suspect tells the nurse something during an interview or examination, it is considered hearsay.

There are many exceptions to the hearsay rule. For the most part, the exceptions are related to “trustworthiness” and “necessity.” The Federal Rules of Evidence and the individual state evidence codes all have similar statutes, so it is advisable for the nurse to research the rules of hearsay exceptions for that state.

According to the California Evidence Code Section 1200:






(a) “Hearsay evidence” is evidence of a statement that was made other than by a witness while testifying at the hearing and that is offered to prove the truth of the matter stated.


(b) Except as provided by law, hearsay evidence is inadmissible.


(c) This section shall be known and may be cited as the hearsay rule.

Whether or not the rules of evidence in a state allow the nurse an exception to the hearsay rule, it is still up to the court and the judge to decide if those statements will be admissible.


Uniform Rules of Evidence Hearsay Exception, Rule 803(6)


Records in any form are admissible in evidence, if they are the following:




• Records of act or event


• Made at or near the time of the event


• By or from a person with knowledge


• Kept in the course of regularly conducted business activity

One exception is a deathbed confession. It is presumed that people do not lie when they are about to die. According to the California Evidence Code:



1243. Evidence of a statement made by a dying person respecting the cause and circumstances of his death is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the statement was made upon his personal knowledge and under a sense of immediately impending death.

Another exception refers to spontaneous utterances.



California Evidence Code:

1240. Evidence of a statement is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the statement:


(a) Purports to narrate, describe, or explain an act, condition, or event perceived by the declarant; and


(b) Was made spontaneously while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by such perception.


Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 803, Section 4


Yet another exception refers to purposes of medical history:



(4) Statements for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment. Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment and describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations, or the inception or general character of the cause or external source thereof insofar as reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment.

The following rule, in the California Evidence Code, states that it only applies to victims under the age of 12, describing any act or attempted act of abuse or neglect:



1226. Evidence of a statement by a minor child is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if offered against the plaintiff in an action brought under Section 376 of the Code of Civil Procedure for injury to such minor child.

1228. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for the purpose of establishing the elements of the crime in order to admit as evidence the confession of a person accused of violating Section 261, 264.1, 285, 286, 288, 288a, 289, or 647a of the Penal Code, a court, in its discretion, may determine that a statement of the complaining witness is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if it finds all of the following:


(a) The statement was made by a minor child under the age of 12, and the contents of the statement were included in a written report of a law enforcement official or an employee of a county welfare department.


(b) The statement describes the minor child as a victim of sexual abuse.


(c) The statement was made prior to the defendant’s confession.

The court shall view with caution the testimony of a person recounting hearsay where there is evidence of personal bias or prejudice.


(d) There are no circumstances, such as significant inconsistencies between the confession and the statement concerning material facts establishing any element of the crime or the identification of the defendant, that would render the statement unreliable.


(e) The minor child is found to be unavailable pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 240 or refuses to testify.


(f) The confession was memorialized in a trustworthy fashion by a law enforcement official.

If the prosecution intends to offer a statement of the complaining witness pursuant to this section, the prosecution shall serve a written notice upon the defendant at least 10 days prior to the hearing or trial at which the prosecution intends to offer the statement.

If the statement is offered during trial, the court’s determination shall be made out of the presence of the jury. If the statement is found to be admissible pursuant to this section, it shall be admitted out of the presence of the jury and solely for the purpose of determining the admissibility of the confession of the defendant.

1360. (a) In a criminal prosecution where the victim is a minor, a statement made by the victim when under the age of 12 describing any act of child abuse or neglect performed with or on the child by another, or describing any attempted act of child abuse or neglect with or on the child by another, is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if all of the following apply:


(1) The statement is not otherwise admissible by statute or court rule.


(2) The court finds, in a hearing conducted outside the presence of the jury, that the time, content, and circumstances of the statement provide sufficient indicia of reliability.


(3) The child either:




(A) Testifies at the proceedings.


(B) Is unavailable as a witness, in which case the statement may be admitted only if there is evidence of the child abuse or neglect that corroborates the statement made by the child.


(b) A statement may not be admitted under this section unless the proponent of the statement makes known to the adverse party the intention to offer the statement and the particulars of the statement sufficiently in advance of the proceedings in order to provide the adverse party with a fair opportunity to prepare to meet the statement.


(c) For purposes of this section, “child abuse” means an act proscribed by Section 273a, 273d, or 288.5 of the Penal Code, or any of the acts described in Section 11165.1 of the Penal Code, and “child neglect” means any of the acts described in Section 11165.2 of the Penal Code.

The hearsay rules may vary from state to state and even from trial to trial, so the court decides whether the nurse may quote a patient’s statement during testimony. A patient’s statement may be on a form or document that has been entered into evidence. That may stand, or a part of the document could be construed as hearsay. For example, if a SANE has documented an injury on a reporting form that indicates a purple bruise to the left arm, this is permissible because the nurse examiner witnessed, firsthand, the injury and its characteristics. If the nurse examiner states that the victim told her the injury was sustained by the suspect punching her, there may be an objection, citing hearsay. Even though the form may say, “Purple bruise to left arm. Patient states, ‘He punched me,’” the fact that the victim told the nurse how it happened may be considered hearsay. On the witness stand, the nurse will be able to state that there was a bruise to the patient’s left arm but may not be allowed to say, “The patient said, ‘He punched me.’” The nurse should be prepared to comply with whatever the ruling is. The jury will be able to examine documents so they may be able to see those entries during deliberation.

There is a phrase that states: “You can’t unring a bell.” It refers to something said in court that may be stricken from the record, but the jurors have already heard it. It may be spoken unintentionally or intentionally. The jurors will be instructed to disregard the statement, but once the bell is rung, can it be unrung? Let’s use the preceding example: If the prosecutor asks the nurse what injury she or he observed on the patient’s left arm, suppose the nurse answers, “A purple bruise where the defendant punched her.” The defense may then object and ask that the statement be stricken from the record, citing hearsay. If the objection is sustained, the court will ask the nurse to only answer to what she observed. The prosecutor will ask the question again, and the nurse’s answer should be, “A purple bruise.” However, the jury may not easily forget the nurse’s prior statement that the defendant caused the injury—that is, the bell that cannot be unrung. In this case, the nurse may not have known that such a statement would be stricken due to hearsay, but in some cases litigators may use this as a tactic in their strategy. In other cases, the nurse’s statement would be appropriate; it depends on what the court will accept in terms of hearsay.


Preparation for Trial


Preparation for trial should be done reasonably close to the actual time of trial. If preparation is done too early, the nurse may forget the details and even may confuse one case for another.

The first step is to obtain the documentation that was prepared at the time of the nurse’s encounter with the patient. Then have any photographs that relate to the case copied onto a disc. If the nurse has received a separate subpoena for records and photographs, these items should be prepared and delivered in response to the subpoena. These records may also be supplied to the DA in a manner that is customary in the local region. The forensic nurse may want to make some notes about the case but should remember that everything recorded, even brief notes, may be discoverable, meaning that it may be submitted as evidence to the court. That is not to say that the nurse should not make notes, only that he or she should be prepared to hand them over to the court. Notes should be written with the mindset that they are not for the writer’s eyes only.

The forensic nurse should study all documentation thoroughly, almost memorizing it. Although records may be accessed in courtrooms, it is preferred that witnesses know all of the details before testifying. The focus should be on significant information, and the witness should be able to retrieve it promptly if a question about it arises during the testimony. Certain questions will surely be asked in nearly every case, such as questions regarding when the examination was conducted, what evidence was collected, and what injuries were observed.

The nurse should not make notes on the actual documents to be submitted. For example, if an error is noted on the sexual assault documentation form, do not write “Uh-oh, problem” in the margin. In fact, no unofficial commentary should ever be written anywhere on a document. If the defense happens to ask to see a copy of the document or, even worse, a notation has been made on the document that will be duplicated for evidence, the nurse witness would have supplied great ammunition for the testimony to be attacked by the opposition. Although forensic nurses do not have a bias toward one party or the other, they must be aware of their role in the process. If an error has been made in documentation, the nurse should bring it to the DA’s attention as soon as possible. Errors can be addressed in a manner that avoids accusing someone of being deceptive, misleading, or untruthful. Once the DA knows that an error was made, she or he can rehabilitate the issue. For instance, if something was improperly labeled (right versus left arm, for example), the DA will have that information and will not be surprised if it comes up later. It may or may not be addressed in court, depending on how significant it is. The exchange could go like this:




Q: Ms. C., on diagram A you drew an injury to Ms. J.’s left arm; is this correct?


A: Yes.

Nov 8, 2016 | Posted by in NURSING | Comments Off on 45. Testifying as a Forensic Nurse

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access