30. Elder Maltreatment

CHAPTER 30. Elder Maltreatment

Forensic Biomarkers

Catherine Pearsall




Background


Elder maltreatment is one of the most underdiagnosed and underreported problems in society, and as such it presents as an integral challenge for the forensic nurse. Although there has been some attention and research directed toward elder maltreatment in recent years, relatively little is known about its characteristics, causes, or consequences or about effective means of management and prevention. Little information is available regarding the true extent of elder abuse, in large part because surveillance is limited and the problem remains hidden (National Center on Elder Abuse, 2005). Victims are often reluctant to reveal abuse due to shame, self-blame, denial, fear of reprisal, or a desire for privacy (Hirsch, Strattan, & Loewy, 1999). Discussion of elder abuse first appeared in the literature in the 1960s (Lachs & Pillemer,1995). Researchers have attempted to determine the prevalence and clinical scope of this phenomenon since that time.


Elder Maltreatment Statistics


The National Center on Elder Abuse (2005) has reported that, annually, between 1 million and 2 million Americans aged 65 and older have been the victims of abuse or mistreatment by someone on whom they depend for their care or protection. The frequency estimates vary between 2% to 10% and are based on diverse sampling, methodologies, and case definitions. In domestic settings, data suggest that only one in fourteen incidents, excluding self-neglect cases, are brought to the attention of authorities. It is further estimated that for every case of elder maltreatment reported to authorities, approximately five more go unreported (National Center on Elder Abuse, 2005). This problem will most likely increase in magnitude, as the elderly population increases (Bonnie & Wallace, 2003).

According to the Department of Health and Human Services, the population identified as persons 65 years or older numbered 37.3 million in 2006, an increase of 10% since 1996. This represents 12.4% of the total population of the United States and equals approximately one in every eight Americans (Administration on Aging, 2008). The United States Census Bureau population statistics project that by the year 2050, this population will number approximately 80 million. The highest percentage of population growth is projected to be for those 85 and older as it is estimated that this population will more than triple from the 5.4 million in 2008 to 19 million in 2050 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2008). Unfortunately, those 85 years or more suffer abuse and neglect two to three times their proportion of the total elder population (National Center on Elder Abuse, 1998). Life expectancy of people born in the United States has been rising throughout the past century, and as the population ages, so does the incidence of age-related diseases and disabilities (Bonnie & Wallace, 2003). The risks of experiencing abuse and mistreatment increase as individuals age and become frail (Lachs, Williams, O’Brien, Pillemer, & Charlson, 1998); as such, forensic nurses should anticipate an increase in the number of cases of elder maltreatment.


The first ever National Elder Abuse Incidence Study (NEAIS) reported that based on a national estimate, 449,924 elderly persons aged 60 and over, experienced abuse and/or neglect in domestic settings in 1996 (National Center on Elder Abuse, 1998). Of this total, 70,942 (16%) were reported to and substantiated by adult protective services (APS); however, the remaining 378,982 (84%) were not reported to APS. The estimated number rises to 551,011 elderly individuals, ages 60 and over, when self-neglect is added to the equation. Of this total, 115,110 (21%) were reported and substantiated by APS, and the remaining 435,901 (79%) were not reported to APS. These results confirmed the “tip of the iceberg” theory of elder abuse. According to this theory, official reporting agencies such as APS are alerted to the most visible cases of abuse and neglect. However, large numbers of incidents remain unidentified and unreported. In the NEAIS, community sentinels were solicited for information on their professional encounters with elderly clients and contacts (National Center on Elder Abuse, 1998). Case information was obtained from local adult protective service agencies as well as from specifically trained groups of individuals known as “sentinels” who were drawn from agencies such as law enforcement agencies, senior citizen programs, banking institutions, hospitals, and clinics that serve the elderly. The “sentinel” approach has been employed in three federally sponsored child abuse surveys. The assumption that underlies this approach is that reported cases reveal the proverbial tip of the iceberg and that many community cases are never reported. Yet even this estimate is considered to be low, as many abused elderly are homebound and isolated and not seen in settings such as banks, senior centers, hospitals, or police stations where sentinels would identify them (Wolf, 2000).



Elder Maltreatment Definition Controversy


The greatest impediment to epidemiological research in elder abuse is the differing definitions of elder abuse and maltreatment itself (Lachs & Pillemer, 1995). Definitions and legal terms vary from state to state. Many states, for example, include self-neglect in their statutes and reporting statistics when describing the elderly who are living alone in the community and are unable to provide for themselves that which is necessary for physical or mental well-being. Some argue that these individuals should not be included in epidemiological studies of abuse of elderly persons; however, they account for a substantial proportion of the APS caseload (Lachs & Pillemer, 1995). Researchers have used various definitions of elder abuse and maltreatment. Many estimates of the frequency of elder abuse involve prevalence studies, and they are difficult to compare because of the differences in definitions, sample characteristics, and methodologies used (Kleinschmidt, 1997). Even the age of an “elder” is in question, as some researchers identify age 60 and above as elderly, whereas others include only those individuals over the age of 65.

Literature indicates that the prevalence and perception of elder abuse, and thus how one defines abuse, may differ by ethnic and cultural group. Limited inquiry has been made into this research arena, which further influences statistical analysis (Wieland, 2000). Wieland listed two reasons for this knowledge gap: most studies include predominately or exclusively white samples, and ethnic group identity has not typically been viewed as a variable in elder abuse research. The United States is a multicultural society, so definitions for what constitutes elder mistreatment may differ drastically among various cultural groups.

One of the foremost challenges confronting forensic nurses is the need to develop an objective definition of what characterizes elder maltreatment.


Categories of Elder Maltreatment


Kleinschmidt reviewed 21 studies and identified four general types or categories of elder abuse identified in the literature: physical, emotional, financial, and neglect. Some researchers included sexual abuse in the physical abuse category, whereas others expanded the category list and included a separate category for sexual abuse. In addition, some researchers added yet another separate category for self-neglect (Kleinschmidt, 1997).


Physical abuse


Physical violence or abuse is an act that is carried out with the intent of causing physical pain or injury such as hitting, grabbing, slapping, pushing, or other bodily injury and that may result in sprains, bruises, abrasions, skeletal fractures, burns, and other wounds (Lachs & Pillemer, 1995). Some researchers also include sexual abuse within their definitions of physical abuse (Kleinschmidt, 1997).


Psychological/emotional abuse


Psychological or emotional abuse is commonly listed as a category of mistreatment (Lachs & Pillemer, 1995). This includes verbal or nonverbal insults, humiliation, or infantilization (Kleinschmidt, 1997) and is often defined as an act carried out with the intention of causing emotional pain or injury. Psychological abuse often accompanies physical abuse (Lachs & Pillemer, 1995).


Financial abuse


Material exploitation or the misappropriation of money or property is the third category identified in the literature. This would include the theft of social security or pension checks, coercion in financial matters, and threats to enforce the signing or changing of legal documents such as wills or deeds (Lachs & Pillemer, 1995). Some researchers restrict this definition to only illegal or improper use of only specific government benefits, and often this form of elder mistreatment is not addressed in studies on elder abuse (Kleinschmidt, 1997). It is estimated that only 1 in 25 cases of financial exploitation is reported, which suggests that annually there may be as many as 5 million financial abuse victims (National Center on Elder Abuse, 2005).


Neglect


Neglect is often defined as the failure of a designated caregiver to meet the needs of an elder who depends on that individual’s care. Neglect may be further divided into intentional neglect, where there is a deliberate failure in caregiving responsibilities with the intent to harm or punish an elder, or unintentional, which may be the result of ignorance or incapability to provide care (Lachs & Pillemer, 1995). Intent is a difficult concept to prove. This presents a problem in the literature, as intent-based definitions may technically not exist because intent may not be proved (Kleinschmidt, 1997). Some researchers consider abandonment a form of neglect (Kleinschmidt, 1997). Much of the controversy that surrounds the conceptual definition of elder abuse focuses on the issue of neglect. Cases of neglect raise difficult questions regarding who the responsible caregiver is, what the specific responsibilities are to the neglected individual, and whether this neglect was intentional or unintentional (Lachs & Pillemer, 1995).


Self-neglect


The area of self-neglect is occasionally discussed in elder abuse research as a category of elder abuse. This is often defined as an act being conducted by an elder that threatens that individual’s health or safety as in an individual who has difficulty performing activities of daily living and refuses assistance despite resulting problems (Kleinschmidt, 1997).


Sexual abuse


Sexual abuse is defined as nonconsensual intimate contact. Elderly are at particular risk for sexual maltreatment as they may be too weak to resist assaults or they may be unable to recognize or report the abuse because of cognitive deficiencies (Kleinschmidt, 1997).


Other


The National Aging Resource Center on Elder Abuse (NARCEA) has suggested that states use a separate category called “all other types.” This would include violation of rights, medical abuse, and abandonment (Kleinschmidt, 1997).

An argument exists that in our attempt to subdivide elder abuse into categories to assign blame, we are ignoring the needs of the victims themselves and that emphasis and resources should be directed to improving functions and quality of life. In response to this argument, many researchers choose to avoid the terms abuse and neglect and instead refer to the problem as the mistreatment of the elderly or the inadequate care of the elderly, which includes both the acts of omission and commission (Lachs & Pillemer, 1995).


Cause of Elder Abuse and Maltreatment


No one explanation for the cause of elder abuse exists. Abuse is a complex problem that is rooted in multiple factors. Fulmer, Guadagno, Bitondo, Dyer, and Connolly identified five theories worthy of further exploration:




• The situational theory adopts the belief that increasing caregiver overburden and demands creates the environment for mistreatment.


• The exchange theory speaks to the long-term dynamics between an elder and the perpetrator.


• The social learning theory espouses that mistreatment is a learned behavior and is influenced by environment.


• Political economic theory concentrates on the challenges of role changes as one ages.


• The psychopathology of the caregiver theory explores the caregiver’s mental health status and how that places an elder at risk for maltreatment.

Unfortunately, few studies have tested these theories (Fulmer et al., 2004).

Despite the popular image of elder abuse occurring in a setting of a dependent victim and an overstressed caregiver, there is accumulating evidence that it is neither caregiver stress levels nor the dependence level of the victim that are the core factors leading to elder abuse. It is now felt that stress may be a contributing factor in abuse cases, but this does not explain the phenomenon. Recent studies on the relationships between caregiver stress, Alzheimer’s disease, and elder abuse suggest that it is the long-term or preabuse nature of the relationships that is the important factor in predicting instances of maltreatment. The mental status of the perpetrator (which includes emotional, psychiatric, and substance abuse problems), the dependency of the perpetrator on the victim, and the lack of outside-the-home external support for the victim continue to emerge as elder abuse risk factors (Wolf, 2000).

Anetzberger discussed the complexity of elder abuse and the results of prior studies, which suggest that the etiology of elder abuse is multifaceted and that caregiver stress and burden is not the only dominant risk factor. She stressed that the reality of elder abuse demands the development of new explanatory and intervention models (Anetzberger, 2000). A number of sociodemographic factors have been identified as possible contributors to elder abuse. Levine (2003) listed the following factors: intrafamily stressors (including separation, divorce, and financial strain), ageism, increased life expectancy, and medical advances that have prolonged years lived with chronic disease.

Elders are abused in homes, hospitals, nursing homes, and in other institutions. Prevalence or incidence data on elder abuse in institutional settings are lacking despite the vast existing literature on issues of quality of care. A survey conducted in one U.S. state reported that 36% of nursing and support staff reported had witnessed at least one incident of physical abuse by another staff member during the prior year, and 10% admitted to having committed at least one act of physical abuse themselves (Wolf, 2000). A cross-sectional retrospective chart review of new in- and outpatients conducted by a Montreal General Hospital Division of Geriatric Psychiatry in one calendar year studied the prevalence and correlates of four types of elder abuse and neglect in a geriatric psychiatry service (Vida, Monks, & Des Rosiers, 2002) Although this study was limited by a clinically derived and a relatively small sample size of 126 patients, it was reported that elder abuse and neglect was suspected or confirmed in 16% of patients studied. Living with nonspouse family, friends, or other persons in a non-supervised setting, along with a history of family disruptions by widowhood, divorce, or separation were significantly correlated with abuse, whereas statistically nonsignificant yet potentially important identifiers included female gender, alcohol abuse, and low functional status.

Most elder abuse and neglect takes place in the home and is inflicted by family, household members, and paid caregivers (Smith, 2002). Elders are most at risk from family members. The perpetrator is a family member in two thirds of known cases of abuse and neglect, and these family members were identified as adult children or spouses (National Center on Elder Abuse, 1998).

A cohort of 2812 community-dwelling adults over the age of 65 from the New Haven Established Population for Epidemiologic Studies in the Elderly were studied to determine the risk factors and prevalence of APS utilization by older adults in an 11-year longitudinal study (Lachs, Williams, O’Brien, Hurst, & Horwitz, 1996). Referral to the state ombudsman on aging for protective services was the main outcome measure. The prevalence of APS use was 6.4% over the 11-year period. Self-neglect was the main indicator for referral, accounting for 73% of the cases. Elder mistreatment, poverty, minority status, functional disability, and worsening cognitive impairment were found to be risk factors for reported elder abuse.

A case-controlled study conducted in Baylor College of Medicine Geriatrics Clinic in Texas sought to describe the characteristics of abused or neglected patients and to compare the prevalence of depression and dementia in those referred because of neglect with that of those referred for other reasons (Dyer, Pavlik, Murphy, & Hyman, 2000). This institution provides interdisciplinary geriatric assessment and intervention to older people in Harris County. Forty-seven elders in this survey were referred to the clinic because of neglect, whereas 97 were referred for other reasons. A total of 45 cases of abuse or neglect were identified of which 37 (82%) were diagnosed with self-neglect and 7 experienced multiple types of abuse and neglect (2 cases of caregiver neglect with self-neglect, 2 cases of abuse with self-neglect, 2 cases of caregiver neglect and abuse, and 1 case of all three forms of abuse and neglect). A statistically significant higher prevalence of depression (62% versus 12%) and dementia (51% versus 30%) was reported in victims of self-neglect compared to patients referred for other reasons, which suggests that geriatric clinicians should assess for neglect or abuse in their depressed or demented elder patients (Dyer et al., 2000).

One study investigated community characteristics associated with elder abuse by analyzing county level data, which included county-level population adjusted numbers of abused elderly, abused children, children in poverty, high school dropouts, physicians and other healthcare providers, hospital beds, social workers, and caseworkers in the Department of Human Services; subjects from 99 counties in Iowa between 1984 and 1993 were studied to identify the relationship between elder abuse rates and county demographics (Jogerst, Dawson, Hartz, Ely, & Schweitzer, 2000). The study concluded that county demographics such as population density, children in poverty, and reported child abuse were the community characteristics associated with an increased rate of elder abuse. Reported incidence of child abuse was identified as having the strongest correlation.

There is a dire need to further explore and empirically test existing theories and to create tested theoretical models that can be utilized in clinical practice.


Elder Abuse Detection


Elder abuse is difficult to detect, as some elderly experience social isolation. However, even the most isolated elderly individuals may come in contact with the healthcare system at some point in time. Elderly patients visit their primary care providers an average of five times per year, yet primary care providers constitute only a small percentage of the cases reported to APS (Harrell, Toronjo, McLaughlin, Pavlik, Hyman, & Bitondo Dyer, 2002). For a dependent elder, the primary care provider may be the only opportunity for abuse detection, yet, unfortunately, many primary care providers attribute the medical findings that may, in fact, signal abuse to aging or an underlying disease (Hirsch et al., 1999). An analysis of the state of Michigan’s records of reported cases of suspected adult abuse for the years 1989–1993 revealed that physicians reported an average of only 2% of all reports of suspected elder abuse and that physician reporting rates were highest in small counties with low physician-to-population ratios (Rosenblatt, Cho, & Durance, 1996). It was suggested that increasing physician awareness of the problem of elder abuse could increase the number of cases screened for potential abuse and, as such, increase the number of elder abuse reports to responsible agencies (Rosenblatt et al., 1996).

Few studies have specifically examined the barriers to elder abuse detection and reporting by primary care providers. Krueger and Patterson surveyed family physicians to determine their perceptions of barriers and strategies in the effective detection and appropriate management of abused elders. A lack of knowledge about the prevalence and definition of elder abuse, denial of abuse, resistance to intervention, lack of protocols, and lack of guidelines regarding confidentiality were identified as important barriers to detection (Krueger & Patterson, 1997).


Forensic biomarkers


Healthcare or legal professionals are often not witnesses to elder abuse. Therefore, the legal system relies on other reporters and evidence to identify the existence of abuse. Most extreme and heinous cases of mistreatment can be easily identified as abuse, for example, gunshot wounds, knife wounds, bite marks, and rope burns. The majority of cases, however, are not as clear cut because they may mimic or be mistaken for physiological and psychological changes that occur with age (Dyer, Connolly, & McFeeley, 2003), as elders respond differently from younger individuals in their response to injury (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2001). In addition, elders recover at a slower rate from even minor injuries because of the age effect on the body’s ability to respond to injury and the disruption of physiological balance (Brown, Streubert, & Burgess, 2004). A research gap exists in the literature, as there is a paucity of primary research data regarding forensic markers of elder abuse (Dyer et al., 2003). The use of forensic markers may help evaluate elder abuse (Pearsall, 2005). Forensic markers include abrasions, lacerations, bruising, fractures, restraints, decutiti, weight loss, dehydration, burns, cognitive and mental health problems, hygiene issues, burns, and sexual abuse (Bonnie & Wallace, 2003). A discussion regarding potential forensic markers in each of the categories of elder abuse follows (Pearsall, 2005).


Physical abuse


Numerous forensic markers have been identified through research that may signal the occurrence of elder physical abuse and maltreatment. These may include bruises, abrasions, lacerations, and fractures.

Blunt force trauma with associated rupture of small blood vessels under the skin without breaking the skin, results in the superficial discoloration of the skin commonly known as a bruise (Dyer et al., 2003) or a contusion (Brown, Streubert, & Burgess 2004). Blood escapes into the surrounding tissues and can track through fascial planes, resulting in bruising apart from the site of injury. Generally, with age, the blood vessels become easier to rupture (Dix, 2000). A bruise can become noticeable hours or days after an initial trauma. Eyelids, neck, and scrotum are very susceptible to enduring a bruise. In the elderly, bruises occur more frequently and resolve more slowly than in a younger person and can last for months rather then weeks (Dyer et al., 2003). Elder skin is fragile because with age it becomes thin, loose, and transparent with a decreased vascularity and atrophy. In addition, elders bruise under less force than do younger individuals (Brown et al., 2004). There is currently no way to determine exactly the amount of force needed to produce a bruise (Dix, 2000).


A classic study that was inspired by a case of child abuse looked at the question of the aging of a bruise (Langlois & Gresham, 1991). The goal was to determine whether it was possible to establish the age of a bruise by its appearance. Photographs were obtained of bruises using high-definition color film from three sources: patients presenting to the emergency department, inpatients, and staff. Only bruises where case and age were known were used. Photographs were obtained in sequence from the time of appearance to resolution whenever possible. These were then assessed for the presence of particular colors, and data were collected. A total of 369 photographs were obtained from 89 subjects with an age range of 10 to 100 years spanning a five-month period of time. The main colors that were noted were blue, red, yellow, and purple/black. Frequency of occurrence of each color was determined within each time interval for the two age groups and for the two age groups combined. Red was found to be commonly present in all age groups, whereas purple/black was less commonly seen. Yellow was found not to be present in bruises within the first two time intervals (0 to 6 hours and 7 to 18 hours), whereas it was observed with increasing frequency in the 157- to 288-hour time frame. The appearance of a yellow coloration was found to be highly significant, as a yellow bruise was very likely to be more than 18 hours old. Elders (individuals over the age of 65), showed a slower development of yellow color. Bilirubin, which is the result of hemoglobin metabolism, has been attributed to the yellow coloration in a bruise. Red, blue, and purple/black appeared anytime from within one hour of bruising to resolution of up to 21 days (Langlois & Gresham, 1991). The issue of whether a bruise on an elderly victim can be accurately aged by appearance remains controversial. This issue is currently under investigation. An accurate description of observed bruising should include the location, shape, and color of the bruise using appropriate terminology (Brown et al., 2004).

Bruises alone do not necessarily indicate abuse; however, they do necessitate further assessment. The size, shape, and appearance of all bruises, patterns of injury, injuries in unusual locations, and burns must be carefully and thoroughly documented including as much objective information as possible. Photographs of the injuries are helpful, and any suspicious injuries require further investigation (Humphries Lynch, 1997).

The pattern of bruising may suggest the cause of the injury, as a bruise can possess the shape of knuckles or fingers and parallel discoloration marks can demonstrate injury from a linear cylindrical object (Dyer et al., 2003). Brown et al. stressed the importance of a comprehensive assessment of the entire body of an elderly assault victim for bruising. The neck, arms, and legs may manifest fingertip bruising from restraint. The face, breast, chest, abdomen, and extremities may manifest bruises from punches and may resemble the shape of a fist with a central clear area, which is created when the punch trauma forces capillary blood away from the targeted location (Brown et al., 2004).

One study sought to develop a scoring system for bruise patterns as a tool for identifying abuse in children (Dunstan, Guildea, Kontos, Kemp, & Sibert, 2002). The aim was to determine whether abused and nonabused children differed in the extent and pattern of bruising and whether existing differences were sufficient to develop a score to assist in the diagnosis. The total length of bruising in 12 areas of the body (anterior chest and abdomen, back, buttocks, left and right arms, left and right face, left and right ears, other areas of the head, and neck) was determined in 133 physically abused and 189 control children ages 1 to 14. Abuse cases were identified via a child protection database, whereas the bruising patterns of control children were obtained from presentation to an ambulatory outpatient consultation for reasons other than abuse. Bruises were measured, and details of bruises were recorded together with the maximum dimension of each bruise and whether or not each bruise had a specific shape. Differences were noted between cases and controls in the total length of bruises. A scoring system was developed using logistic regression analysis using total duration of bruising. The authors concluded that a scoring system can provide a measure that discriminates between abused and nonabused children. However, it is noted that this score should not replace the complex analysis of abuse that includes a thorough history and physical examination (Dunstan et al., 2002). A review of the literature did not produce similar data regarding elder maltreatment.

Falls are the most common cause of injury in an adult and are often associated with bruising (Dyer et al., 2003). Falls have numerous causes such as decreased vision, accidents, and chronic medical conditions and are not always preventable. However, abusive or neglectful caregivers can accredit intentional bruises to an accidental fall. Falls alone are not indicative of elder abuse, as 30% of community-dwelling elderly and 50% of nursing home residents fall, and most elders who experience falls will have one to three falls annually (Dyer et al., 2003). However, complaints associated with a history of a fall require further questioning, assessment, and awareness on the part of the healthcare professional in terms of the potential for elder maltreatment.

Abrasions are exposed skin caused by friction, whereas lacerations are noted to be tears of the skin resulting from blunt trauma (Dix, 2000). Skin thickness, elasticity, and tensile strength decreases with age, and abrasions can result even from minor trauma. Abrasions may occur if an elder victim is pulled or dragged across a surface (Brown et al., 2004). Abrasions are vital for diagnostic purposes, because they retain the pattern of the causative agent better than any other form of injury, making careful documentation essential in identification of the mode of injury. Skin tears are a common form of lacerations in the elderly and can present on the forearms and occasionally on the lower extremities when the epidermis separates from the underlying connective tissue resulting in a skin flap (Dyer et al., 2003). The forensic nurse must be aware that an elder’s skin will often tear, causing a laceration if the victim is punched, pulled, or restrained (Pearsall, 2005).

Fractures are often the by-product of trauma and include a severing, splintering, or compression of the bone. The hip and distal wrist are the most common sites of fracture. Bones become thinner and less dense with age, exposing the elder to an increased risk for fractures. In addition, conditions such as osteoporosis, chronic steroid use, cancer, osteomalacia, Paget’s disease, poor nutrition, alcoholism, and age-related sex hormone deficiencies debilitate the bone and escalate the risk for fracture. In addition, elders heal at a much slower rate, and little or no data are available on the fracture resolution rate in the elderly population. Forensic nurses must conduct a detailed history and a comprehensive examination, as well as a complete assessment of medical records, to determine if a fracture should raise the suspicion of an abusive situation. Fractures of the the head, spine, and trunk are more indicative of abuse injuries than are fractures of the limbs, sprains, or musculoskeletal injuries. However, extremity fractures may occur in the struggle of an attacker to restrain an extremity during an attack, and arm fractures may be the result of an attempt to break a fall or by raising the arms as a means of protection against an attacker’s assault. Rib and thoracic cage fractures may occur when force is exerted to the chest wall when a victim is forced to the ground and sustains blows from the perpetrator’s arms, legs, or by other means of assault (Brown et al., 2004). In addition, fractures that exhibit a rotational component and spiral fractures of large bones absent of history of gross injury may also be indicators of abuse (Dyer et al., 2003).


Psychological/emotional abuse


Most physical abuse is accompanied by a psychological component, or psychological abuse may occur alone and may be difficult to recognize unless examples of verbal threats, insults, or humiliation are observed (Humphries Lynch, 1997). Subtle signs such as depression, change in behavior, fear, anxiety, or withdrawal, under careful assessment, may reveal that the elder is experiencing intimidation and maltreatment from the perpetrator (Wieland, 2000). Assessment or psychological maltreatment presents as a challenge, because the forensic nurse needs to search for concealed indicators in the dynamics presented by the elder and the caregiver (Pearsall, 2005). The importance of early identification is key because a forensic nurse can intervene early when signs of psychological abuse are subtle. In doing so, it may be possible to not only halt the abusive psychological behavior but also prevent the escalation to physical mistreatment (Humphries Lynch, 1997).


Financial abuse


The inappropriate use of an elderly individual’s resources for personal gain is termed financial exploitation. This category includes credit card and telemarketing fraud, predatory lending, and theft or extortion, and it is accompanied by psychological abuse. These activities are often targeted at vulnerable elders who have cognitive impairment and are thus more vulnerable to trusting caregivers, relatives, and acquaintances. Financial exploitation is often unrecognized despite the devastating emotional and financial losses experienced by the elder. Up to one half of all categories of elder maltreatment in the United States is attributed to financial abuse. In the United States, an annual conservative estimate of elder maltreatment in individuals 65 years old and over is 3% to 4%. When financial abuse is included as an option in calculation of those figures, the prevalence rate may be closer to 12% (Tueth, 2000).

Financial abuse can present in three common situations (Tueth, 2000):




• Caregiver, relative, or acquaintance abuse is often viewed as the most prevalent, egregious, and predatory. This may occur when perpetrators find themselves in an opportune situation where they are caring for a disabled elder or when a perpetrator actively searches for vulnerable elders with the intent of financial exploitation.


• Door-to-door scam operations where a perpetrator identifies him or herself as a skilled worker, repairman, and the like and bills for services that are not provided, double-bills, or otherwise falsely collects funds.


• Business professionals, either professional or imposters, such as investment and insurance agents who target vulnerable elders in schemes (Tueth, 2000).

Financial abuse can be devastating to the victim and is often traced to family members, trusted friends, and caregivers. It is likely to occur with the tacit acknowledgment and consent of the elder person. The manifestations of financial abuse generally are not immediately evident and discoverable (Bonnie & Wallace, 2003).

Potential clinical indicators of financial abuse include observable changes in behavior related to the abuser and the elder, excessive interest in an elder’s personal assets, demonstration of excessive control, controlling phone use, unusual degree of fear exhibited by the elder, unexplained bank account withdrawals, and credit card activities (Tueth, 2000). A coercion to change a will or transfer assets abruptly and without forethought may also be a warning sign (Wieland, 2000).


Neglect


Dehydration is a potential forensic biomarker for neglect. Dehydration is caused by intentional fluid withholding or if inadequate water intake persists for a long period of time. A lack of staff or family support may also lead to dehydration. Decreased fluid intake or excessive water loss can cause an inadequate level of body fluid, which results in dehydration. The elderly are much more prone to dehydration. Often elderly have decreased body fluid reserves, impaired thirst drives, and the central nervous system fluid regulation may be compromised. Medical illness is the most common cause of dehydration; however, indicators of dehydration can be used as forensic markers for abuse or neglect when fluid withholding or neglect of care is identified during a comprehensive examination (Dyer et al., 2003).

Malnutrition is often used as a forensic marker for neglect. Malnutrition refers to an inadequate health status resulting from a diminished intake of necessary nutrients. An age-related decrease in smell and taste may contribute to a decrease in appetite. In addition, illness, poor dentition, mental status changes, malabsorption syndromes, cancer, and other disorders can lead to malnutrition. Potential adverse effects of pharmacological agents, such as mental impairment and appetite suppression, can also contribute to malnutrition. The loss of 40% of body weight can cause death. The most frequent cause of malnutrition due to neglect in the institutional setting is often attributed to an inadequate staffing to assist individuals who require eating assistance. In addition, improper feeding techniques may contribute to choking, aspiration, pneumonia, or death (Dyer et al., 2003).

Use and abuse of medications may be forensic markers for abuse and neglect, as abusive or neglectful caregivers may withhold required medications, consume the prescriptions themselves, or overdose an elder (Dyer et al., 2003). Careful assessment of medication and treatment regimens, prescription renewal history, as well as appropriate laboratory medication levels may be helpful in ensuring that therapeutic medication levels are maintained (Pearsall, 2005).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 8, 2016 | Posted by in NURSING | Comments Off on 30. Elder Maltreatment

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access