16: Abdominal and Genitourinary Procedures

Section Sixteen Abdominal and Genitourinary Procedures





PROCEDURE 95 Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage



Jean A. Proehl, RN, MN, CEN, CCRN, FAEN


Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) is also known as belly tap, peri dial, peri lavage, and peritoneal lavage.






PATIENT PREPARATION




1. Insert an indwelling urinary catheter (Procedure 104) to decompress the bladder and to prevent bladder perforation when the catheter is introduced. If a catheter cannot be inserted for some reason, the open technique should be used (Nagy, 2004).


2. Insert a gastric tube (Procedure 98) to decompress the stomach and to prevent stomach perforation during catheter insertion.


3. If possible, complete any abdominal radiographs before the procedure, because air may enter the abdomen and confuse any future abdominal films.


4. Place the patient in the supine position.


5. * Shave the abdomen or clip the hair and cleanse it with antiseptic solution. The usual site for catheter insertion is midline, one third of the distance between the umbilicus and the symphysis pubis. The umbilical or supraumbilical areas may also be used.



PROCEDURAL STEPS




1. *Drape the abdomen with sterile towels.


2. *Infiltrate the insertion site with lidocaine. In general, lidocaine with epinephrine is used to help control bleeding at the site. Absolute hemostasis at the site is essential to help prevent false-positive results.


3. *Insert the catheter into the peritoneal space via open or Seldinger (closed) technique.


a. Open technique (ACS, 2004). Incise through the abdominal skin and the subcutaneous tissue to the fascia. Elevate the wound edges with clamps and incise the fascia down to the peritoneum. Nick the peritoneum and insert the catheter into the peritoneal cavity. Advance the catheter caudally into the pelvis.

b. Seldinger (closed) technique (ACS, 2004). Elevate the skin on both sides of the intended needle insertion site with fingers or forceps and insert an 18-G needle attached to a syringe into the abdomen. Remove the syringe and thread the guidewire through the needle until resistance is met or only 3 cm of wire is exposed. Remove the needle while leaving the wire in place. Incise the skin adjacent to the wire and thread the lavage catheter over the wire and into the abdomen. Remove the wire while leaving the catheter in place.

4. * For core rewarming or cooling, insert two catheters; one is used to infuse constantly and the other is used to drain the solution. This is more time efficient than infusing and draining via the same catheter.


5. If the lavage is for diagnostic purposes, attach a 20-ml syringe and aspirate. If 10 ml or more of gross blood is obtained the test is considered positive (ACS, 2004; Marx & Isenhour, 2006; Nagy, 2004).


6. Attach the primed IV tubing to the catheter (Figure 95-1). The IV tubing should not contain a backcheck valve because this prevents the fluid from being siphoned out of the abdomen. If the tubing is vented, the fluid may leak from the vent, or a water seal may form and prevent fluid return. Cystoscopy tubing allows much faster infusion and drainage. To connect the catheter to the cytoscopy tubing, push the end of the connecting tubing into the sleeve of the cystoscopy tubing. Tying a suture around the distal end of the sleeve of the cystoscopy tubing tightens the connection (optional).


7. Infuse 1 L of sterile warmed normal saline solution or lactated Ringer’s solution. Room temperature solutions may cause or worsen hypothermia. Stopping the infusion before the drip chamber is dry facilitates siphoning of the fluid. Monitor urinary catheter and chest-tube drainage for evidence of lavage fluid because this may assist with a diagnosis of diaphragm or bladder rupture.


8. If the patient’s condition allows, leave the fluid in the peritoneal space for 5 to 10 minutes. Palpate the abdomen or gently rock the patient from side to side to help distribute the fluid throughout the peritoneal cavity.


9. Lower the IV bag to the floor and allow the fluid to siphon out of the abdomen. If the fluid does not return, make sure the appropriate tubing has been used. If necessary, cut off a backcheck valve or vent and drain the fluid into a basin. Then try repositioning the patient. The physician may reposition the catheter or insert another catheter to facilitate drainage. Additional fluid may also be instilled to encourage fluid return. Adequate fluid return is 30% or more of the infused volume (ACS, 2004). Any fluid left in the abdomen is absorbed through the peritoneum and should be added to the patient’s parenteral fluid intake.


10. Obtain laboratory specimens from the IV bag when the fluid return is finished. Visual inspection of the fluid is not accurate. Commonly ordered tests include red blood cell (RBC) count, white blood cell (WBC) count, and Gram’s stain. The fluid is placed in the same specimen tubes that would be used if the tests were being performed on blood. Some laboratories also accept the fluid in the IV bag or syringes. Recommended diagnostic tests and positive findings vary from source to source but commonly include the following (ACS, 2004; Marx & Isenhour, 2006):





11. *Remove the catheter and suture the wound. If a laparotomy is indicated, the wound should not be sutured, and a sterile dressing should be applied. If the findings are equivocal, the catheter may be left in place, the wound sutured, and the lavage repeated 2 to 3 hours later.


12. Place a thin layer of an antibiotic ointment and a dry sterile dressing over the wound.








PROCEDURE 96 Paracentesis



June F. Stacey, RN, BSN, CEN







PROCEDURAL STEPS




1. Cleanse the abdomen with antiseptic solution.


2. * Drape the abdomen with the sterile drapes or towels.


3. *Infiltrate the insertion site with lidocaine.


4. * Make an incision midline 2 cm below the umbilicus. In a patient with midline scarring, the incision can be made in either lower quadrant medial to the anterior superior iliac crest and 4 to 5 cm cephalad (Marx, 2004).


5. *Attach a 10-ml syringe to the catheter. The needle or IV catheter is inserted slowly in 5-mm increments through the abdominal wall until peritoneal fluid is aspirated. Avoid continuous aspiration during insertion as this may pull the bowel toward the needle. Remove the inner trocar or stylet.


6. Fluid may be drained by gravity drainage, by aspiration with 60-ml syringe, or by vacuum drainage.






7. Collect laboratory specimens in sterile containers. Commonly ordered laboratory tests include a differential cell count, albumin assay, and cultures (Marx, 2004).


8. When the needle is withdrawn, apply antibiotic ointment and dressing as per institutional dressing protocol.


9. Monitor the patient during and after the procedure. Watch for and report bleeding, fluid leakage, or scrotal edema. Check vital signs often to detect hypotensive complications early. Vital signs are recommended every half hour for 2 hours after the procedure, then hourly for 2 hours, then every 4 hours for 24 hours.






PROCEDURE 97 Intraabdominal Pressure Monitoring



Lucinda W. Rossoll, RN, MSN, CCRN, CEN


Intraabdominal pressure (IAP) can be measured directly with an intraperitoneal catheter or indirectly via a gastric balloon or urinary bladder pressure measurement (the gold standard). The bladder acts as a pressure reservoir, a compliant structure that reflects pressure changes. There is a significant correlation between bladder pressure and abdominal pressure. Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is defined as a condition in which end-organ dysfunction or damage results from untreated intraabdominal hypertension (IAH) (Cheatham, 2006). IAH occurs when the contents of the abdomen expand secondary to increased organ volume, tumor, blood, fluid, or a change in abdominal wall compliance. This leads to decreased venous return, decreased cardiac output, and dysfunction of the organs contained in the abdominal cavity. When IAP pressure is greater than 15 mm Hg, renal dysfunction can occur. IAH is defined as sustained or repeated IAP of 12 mm Hg or greater or an abdominal perfusion pressure (APP) that is 60 mm Hg or less (Cheatham, 2006). APP is a calculated by subtracting the IAP from the mean arterial pressure (MAP). Normal IAP is less than 5 mm Hg. IAP is categorized by severity according pressure (Wolfe & Gallagher, 2006):








PROCEDURAL STEPS




1. Prepare the pressure monitoring system as follows (Figure 97-1):









2. Level the air side of the stopcock (air-fluid interface) to the top of the symphysis pubis.


3. Turn on the monitor and select either the 30- or the 60-mm Hg scale.


4. Connect transducer to the monitor and zero balance the transducer. Zero balancing the system to the atmospheric pressure negates the effects of the atmospheric pressure. To prevent erroneous pressure readings, zero the system before and after the pressure system is attached to the patient, with any significant change in the waveform and the values, whenever the system is disconnected, and at the beginning of each shift. To zero, turn the four-way stopcock off to the patient and open to the transducer and to air (air-fluid interface). Zero the monitor according to the manufacturer’s directions. Once the monitor is zeroed, flush the open stopcock port and replace the dead-ender cap. Turn the stopcock on to the patient and on to the transducer.


5. Clamp the drainage bag tubing distal to the sampling port.


6. Cleanse the port with alcohol.


7. Insert the 18-G needle into the sampling port of the drainage tubing or insert the 18-gauge IV catheter and thread the catheter into the port.


8. Instill 50 ml of sterile normal saline into the urinary catheter through the sampling port.


9. Briefly release the clamp to allow fluid from the bladder to fill the tubing and remove air from the system.


10. Run a strip of the waveform and read the mean IAP at end-expiration.


11. Document the reading and patient position (flat or supine).


12. Remove the needle and unclamp the drainage system. If an IV catheter is used, it may be left in place.






PROCEDURE 98 Insertion of Orogastric and Nasogastric Tubes



Lucinda W. Rossoll, RN, MSN, CCRN, CEN


Orogastric and nasogastric tubes are also known as Levin, Lavacuator, Salem sump, Ewald, enteric, or feeding tubes.


NOTE: This procedure does not address the insertion of small-bore feeding tubes. Different procedures are required for insertion and verification of placement with these tubes.




CONTRAINDICATIONS AND CAUTIONS




1. In the presence of head trauma, maxillofacial injury, or anterior fossa skull fracture, there is the potential for inadvertent penetration of the brain via the cribriform plate or ethmoid bone if the tube is inserted nasally. In these instances, the orogastric route is used.


2. Caution should be used when inserting the tube in a patient with a potential cervical spine injury; the patient’s head should be manually immobilized for this procedure.


3. If the patient has esophageal varices, there is a risk of inadvertent esophageal rupture and hemorrhage as a result of tube placement.


4. The smallest possible tube appropriate to the intervention or task should be used, because smaller tubes place less stress on the esophageal sphincter.


5. Do not irrigate a Salem sump tube through the blue air vent.


6. If tetracaine is used for intranasal anesthesia, the dose should not exceed 20 mg (Clinical Pharmacology On-Line, 2006).


7. Spray medications used for posterior pharyngeal anesthesia should not exceed 2 seconds of application time. Systemic absorption of benzocaine can have serious adverse effects, including death (FDA, 2006).


8. The traditional method of instilling air while auscultating over the epigastrium is not reliable as the sound produced cannot distinguish between placement in the bronchus, pleural space, or gastrointestinal tract (Cirgin Ellett, 2004). Metheny and Titler (2001) report that there is little scientific evidence to support the use of this method and that the literature contains numerous reports of its ineffectiveness.



EQUIPMENT






PATIENT PREPARATION






PROCEDURAL STEPS




1. Nasogastric placement







2. Orogastric placement





3. Verify the tube position. Use the 60-ml syringe to aspirate gastric contents, and assess the appearance of the aspirate. Gastric contents may be cloudy, grassy green, straw, tan, brown, clear, or off-white (Metheny & Titler, 2001). Test the pH of the aspirate. Gastric pH usually has an acidic range of 1 to 5 (Metheny & Titler, 2001). If either of these findings is not consistent with gastric placement, an additional method of verification is recommended. Additional methods include:


a. Detection of ETCO2 using a capnometer or a colormetric ETCO2 detector. A colormetric detector is as accurate as capnography for detecting carbon dioxide when a gastric tube is placed (Burnes, 2006). The absence of ETCO2 verifies that the tube is not in the respiratory tract; however, it does not verifiy where in the gastrointestinal tract the tube terminates. This method may be used during tube insertion or after tube insertion.




NOTE: The traditional method of instilling air while auscultating over the epigastrium is not reliable because the sound produced cannot differentiate between placement in the bronchus, pleural space, or gastrointestinal tract (Cirgin Ellett, 2004; Metheny & Titler, 2001).


4. Center and secure the tube in place with adhesive tape or with a gastric tube holder. Do not tape the tube to the forehead because this places undue pressure on the nares, resulting in tissue ulceration.









REFERENCES




PROCEDURE 99 Gastric Lavage for Gastrointestinal Bleeding



Joni Hentzen Daniels, MSN, RN, CEN, CCRN


In a gastrointestinal (GI) emergency, the primary clinical concern should be hemodynamic stability. The overall mortality of GI bleeding is approximately 10% and has not changed significantly since the 1960s (Henneman, 2006).




CONTRAINDICATIONS AND CAUTIONS




1. In the presence of GI hemorrhage, irrigation can knock the clot off a bleeding vessel and cause further bleeding, resulting in shock.


2. If the patient has a gag reflex but is obtunded or if the patient does not have a gag reflex, there is risk of aspiration if vomiting occurs during lavage. Endotracheal intubation should be considered in order to protect the airway.


3. Airway protection by an endotracheal tube is not absolute. Assurance of gastric placement of the lavage tube is necessary before instilling anything in a patient who is confused, obtunded, sedated, or resisting the procedure (see Procedure 98).


4. Patients with symptoms suggestive of a perforated viscus (e.g., severe pain, abdominal ridgidity) should have a radiograph to exclude the presence of free air. If perforation is present, lavage should not be performed.


5. Controversy exists regarding the use of iced or room-temperature solution. Some authors believe that iced solution causes a local vasoconstriction, resulting in decreased bleeding and in clot formation. Others maintain that cold temperatures stimulate hydrochloric acid production, thereby adding to gastric irritation. Iced solutions may cause hypothermia and prolong bleeding times; room-temperature solutions have been shown effective in clearing the stomach and promoting hemostasis (Maltz, 2003).


6. The traditional method of instilling air while auscultating over the epigastrium to verify tube placement is not reliable as the sound produced cannot distinguish between placement in the bronchus, pleural space or gastrointestional tract (Cirgin Ellett, 2004). Metheny and Titler (2001) report that there is little scientific evidence to support the use of this method and that the literature contains numerous reports of its ineffectiveness. See Procedure 98 for additional information about verifying tube placement.









PROCEDURE 100 Gastric Lavage for Removal of Toxic Substances



Robin A. Scott, RN, ND, Jean A. Proehl, RN, MN, CEN, CCRN, FAEN


Gastric lavage for removal of toxic substances is also known as gastric decontamination, orogastric lavage, gastric emptying, and stomach pumping.



INDICATION


To assist in the removal of toxic substances or poisons from the stomach, thereby decreasing drug availability and absorption in the body. The effectiveness of gastric lavage is time dependent and is most effective when the procedure is completed within 60 minutes of ingestion (Heard, 2005). Gastric lavage should not routinely be used in managing poisoned patients; instead, gastric lavage should be consider for use in patients who have ingested a potentially life-threatening amount of poison (AACT & EAPCCT, 2000). Lavage can remove drugs either in whole or fragments; however, the amount of drug recovered from the stomach can vary widely (Bartlett & Muller, 2003). Contact your Poison Control Center using the national access number, 1-800-222-1222, for current recommendations regarding the treatment of specific ingestions.



CONTRAINDICATIONS AND CAUTIONS




1. Clinical studies cannot confirm the benefits of gastric lavage as a stand-alone treatment for poisoned patients. The amount of ingested substance that is retrieved using gastric lavage is on average very low, approximately 30% (Bartlett & Muller, 2003).


2. If a patient is unable to protect the airway, then gastric lavage should not be performed unless the patient is intubated (Heard, 2005).


3. Lavage is contraindicated for patients who have ingested a corrosive material or sharp objects (AACT & EAPCCT, 2000).


4. Lavage is contraindicated in patients who have ingested a substance that may cause seizures or abrupt central nervous system depression unless the patient is intubated (Heard, 2005).


5. Gastric lavage may propel stomach contents into the small intestine, which increases the chance of drug absorption (AACT & EAPCCT, 2000).


6. Patients at risk for gastrointestinal bleeding or perforation secondary to pathology, recent surgery, or other medical history should not undergo gastric lavage (AACT & EAPCCT, 2000).


7. Airway protection by an endotracheal tube is not absolute. Careful assessment of gastric placement of the lavage tube is necessary before instilling fluid, especially in a patient who is confused, obtunded, sedated, or resisting the procedure.


8. The gastric lavage procedure is complete when pill fragments are no longer seen in the lavage fluid; however, there is no clearly defined endpoint for the procedure in cases where pill fragments are not seen in the lavage fluid (Heard, 2005).


9. The traditional method of instilling air while auscultating over the epigastrium to confirm tube placement is not reliable as the sound produced cannot distinguish between placement in the bronchus, pleural space or gastrointestional tract (Cirgin Ellett, 2004). Metheny and Titler (2001) report that there is little scientific evidence to support the use of this method and that the literature contains numerous reports of its ineffectiveness. See Procedure 98 for additional information about verifying tube placement.



Nov 8, 2016 | Posted by in NURSING | Comments Off on 16: Abdominal and Genitourinary Procedures

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access