Use of Effective Case Management Plans
Mary Jane McKendry
Teresa M. Treiger
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Upon completion of this chapter, the reader will be able to:
List the components of a case management care plan.
Define important terms and concepts related to developing a successful case management care plan.
Identify critical multidisciplinary and cross-functional relationships essential for successful execution of a case management care plan.
Describe how to identify appropriate, measurable, and achievable case management plan goals and outcomes.
IMPORTANT TERMS AND CONCEPTS
Accountable Care Organization (ACO)
Advocacy
Algorithm
Assessment
Care Plan
Care Transitions
Clinical Pathway
CMAG Guidelines
Development
Evaluation
Evidence-Based Criteria and/or Guidelines
Evidence-Based Decision Support Criteria
Facilitation
Goal (Measurable)
Implementation
Interdisciplinary
Intervention
Medication Reconciliation
Outcome
Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH)
Patient Empowerment
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA or ACA)
Planning
Performance Standards
Problem Identification
Problem Statement
Protocol
Quality Standards
Resource Consumption
Risk Stratification
Self-management
SMART Goals
Transition Planning
Utilization Management
Variance
Introduction
A. Today, in the health care environment, there is an increasing focus on quality and quality-of-care outcomes coupled with an even more intense focus on effectiveness and efficiency of the care received.
In 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was signed into law. Commonly referred to as the Affordable Care Act (ACA), it positions consumers as partners on their health care team.
PPACA put many comprehensive health insurance reforms in place. These were aimed at addressing fragmented care delivery as well as more accessible and affordable preventive care.
The Commission for Case Manager Certification (CCMC) notes that the ACA identified the means to heal an otherwise fragmented health care system through implementation of the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) and Accountable Care Organization (ACO). Both of these types of organizations rely on care coordination as a central pillar of their success (2015).
Professional care coordination and case management are needed as these activities evolve to fundamental roles driving successful outcomes.
B. As case management roles transform in response to health care changes, many case managers find that some of the traditional goals of case management (CM) seem incongruent with expanding responsibilities.
Patient empowerment, patent-determined goals, patient-agreed-upon care plans, and quality outcomes have always been goals of case management; however, their importance is now front and center. Case managers may feel conflicted as they focus on patient-centered care, quality services, and safety while at the same time attempting to reduce costs and control resource utilization.
The latest Role and Function Study, which captures current knowledge, skills, and activities of case managers, found that “case managers reported an increase in prominence of quality measurement and evaluation functions, likely because of new care models based on value rather than volume. Value-based payment models require quality measures to quantify and reward efficient, effective care delivery” (CCMC, 2014).
C. In reality, case managers are trying to meet the goals of different customers at the same time while ensuring that patient involvement and empowerment leads to supported patient self-management.
Case managers recognize that reducing variation, duplication, and fragmentation of care are all priorities, which must be balanced against keeping care patient-centered.
It is imperative that case managers support patient access to appropriate services and resources in order to maintain optimal level of wellness; on the other hand, utilization and costs must be addressed and controlled. Helping patients access appropriate resources at the right time results in cost savings and appropriate utilization of resources.
The PPACA drives home these points with the inclusion of various care coordination initiatives highlighting
Use of integrated care approaches to improve quality and reduce health care costs
Establishing quality performance standards for participating providers
Increased demand for professionals with experience coordinating health care services for patients to help them meet goals including those associated with new models of health care delivery
D. Care coordination makes it possible to achieve balance in both the patient-centered and system-centered goals of case management. Recognizing this begins with acknowledging the complexity of a case manager’s job and understanding there is a need for tools (e.g., road maps, reports) to support the successful resolution of identified patient needs (e.g., barriers to care, health education).
E. Consider that a case manager must understand the current health care environment and be aware of ongoing transformation at multiple levels (e.g., individual, organizational). Case managers not only need clinical skills and knowledge but also must master business skills and knowledge.
System-centered goals may address data gathering and analysis, reducing clinical variation, meeting expectations for time frames, and addressing available resources.
Patient-centered goals may address accessing appropriate care in a timely manner, providing education and tools to ensure patient empowerment, and encouraging patient self-management (Pearson, Mattke, Shaw, Ridgely, & Wiseman, 2007).
F. Today, the consumers of case management services demand collaborative, well-defined, and managed plans of care.
Care plans must effectively and efficiently address achievable outcomes and appropriate resource utilization/allocation, which ensure access to quality health care products and services.
Using collaborative approaches for care planning, a case manager creates a road map in order to meet the goals and responsibilities of his or her job, the needs of the patient, and the needs of other case management customers (e.g., employers, health plans, health care facilities).
Generally, a road map supports case management with outcomes and evaluative reports developed for use at the individual, department, and program level.
Reports may vary in scope and content and include a range of available information.
High-level executive summary reports
Department performance trends
Individualized patient-specific progress reports
Through the use of outcome reports, users are able to determine if, how, and where progress has been made. They also identify where improvement opportunities may exist, especially in meeting care and organizational or case management program goals.
G. This chapter provides an overview of case management plan design, reviews tools available to assist in evidence-based case management plan development, and discusses strategies for developing comprehensive, high-quality, multidisciplinary, patient-centered plans of care.
Descriptions of Key Terms
A. Accountable Care Organization (ACO)—Groups of doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers who come together voluntarily to give coordinated high-quality care to their Medicare patients. The goal of coordinated care is to ensure that patients, especially the chronically ill, get the right care at the right time while avoiding unnecessary duplication of services and preventing medical errors (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS], 2015).
B. Algorithm—A systematic process consisting of an ordered sequence of steps, each step depending on the outcome of the previous one; in clinical management a protocol (MediLexicon.com, 2015) that guides step-by-step assessments and interventions. Algorithms are generally most useful for high-risk groups as they are known for their specificity (very specific) and generally do not allow for provider/patient flexibility. Often utilized to manage a specific process, control care practices, or address an individual problem. Algorithms may incorporate research methodology to measure cause and effect (Wojner, 2001).
C. Care coordination—The deliberative organization of patient care activities between two or more participants (including the patient) involved in a patient’s care to facilitate the appropriate delivery of health care services. Organizing care involves the marshalling of personnel and other resources needed to carry out all required patient activities and is often managed by the exchange of information among participants responsible for different aspects of care (McDonald et al., 2014).
D. Case management care plan—A comprehensive plan that includes a statement of problems/needs determined upon assessment, strategies to address the problems/needs, and measurable goals to demonstrate resolution based upon the problem/need, the time frame, the resources available, and the desires/motivation of the client (Case Management Society of America [CMSA], 2010).
E. Clinical pathway—A structured, interdisciplinary care management plan designed to support the implementation of specific clinical guidelines and protocols. Clinical pathways are computational maps or algorithms and are one of the primary tools used to manage health care quality by focusing on the standardization of care processes. Pathways are used to guide the various health care team members on the usual treatment patterns related to common diagnoses, conditions, and/or procedures.
Clinical pathways are designed to support clinical management, clinical and nonclinical resource management, clinical audit, and financial management.
Clinical pathways are a “process map” utilized to promote quality care and decrease costs by standardizing treatment methods within
clinical processes, while at the same time endeavoring to improve the continuity and coordination of care across different disciplines and ensure successful transitions of care.
Clinical pathways are known by many synonyms including care pathways, integrated care paths, multidisciplinary pathways of care, care maps, critical pathways, collaborative pathways, or care paths (Open Clinical, 2015).
F. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs)—Systematically developed statements designed to assist practitioner and patient decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances (Institute of Medicine, 2011).
Guidelines commonly apply to a general health condition. To be defensible, guideline development must be able to demonstrate
A development process that is open, documented, and reproducible
That the resultant product can be of use to both clinicians and patients
That the concept of appropriateness of services is well reflected in the guideline
That the guideline relates specifically to clearly defined clinical issues (Mulrow & Lohr, 2001)
G. Evidence-based medicine—The definition of evidence-based medicine (EBM) provided in 1996 by Sackett, Rosenburg, Gray, Haynes, and Richardson continues to be relied upon today. EBM is the “integration of the best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values to make clinical decisions.” The evidence being referred to is “patient centered, clinically relevant research found in the medical literature on diagnostic tests, treatment techniques, preventive programs, and prognostic markers” (Steves & Hootman, 2004). EBM injects contemporary research findings into day-to-day clinical practice and patient care.
H. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA or ACA)—A U.S. Federal Statute signed into law on March 23, 2010. Together with the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act amendment, it represents the most significant regulatory overhaul of the US health care system since the passage of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965. Enacted to increase the quality and affordability of health insurance, lower the uninsured rate by expanding public and private insurance coverage, and reduce the costs of health care for individuals and the government (CMS, 2015).
I. Protocol—Guidelines designed to address specific therapeutic interventions for a given clinical problem. Protocols are less specific than algorithms and do allow for minimal provider flexibility via treatment options. They are multifaceted and therefore can be used to drive practice for more than one discipline. Like algorithms, they may and most often do incorporate research methodology to measure cause and effect. Guidelines are based on examination of current evidence within the paradigm of evidence-based medicine and usually include consensus statements on best practices in health care (Institute of Medicine, 2011; Wojner, 2001).
J. Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Criteria—Impartial, evidence-based tools used as a lexicon to evaluate the decisions about the appropriateness and quality of care that support integrated care
management and utilization management (UM) approaches to evaluate patient care and services (Mitus, 2008).
management and utilization management (UM) approaches to evaluate patient care and services (Mitus, 2008).
Applicability to CMSA’S Standards of Practice
A. The Case Management Society of America (CMSA) describes in its standards of practice for case management that case management practice extends across all health care settings, including payer, provider, government, employer, community, and clinic or doctor’s office, and that case managers use a variety of tools to ensure effective practice and delivery of safe and quality patient care (CMSA, 2010).
B. This chapter describes various plans, pathways, and protocols, which support the case management roles, functions, and activities described in the CMSA standards including the case management process.
C. According to CMSA, the resource and resource utilization practice standard explains that case managers should incorporate factors related to quality, safety, access to care, and cost-effectiveness in assessing, monitoring, and evaluating resources for the client’s care (CMSA, 2010).
D. CMSA standards of practice for case management also state that case management plans should address anticipated resources needed by the client, but case managers must be cognizant of the benefits (health insurance plan) available to provide for these resources (CMSA, 2010).
E. Alternate funding sources serve as added means to secure the resources a client needs.
F. CMSA recommends that resources allocation and consumption should be based on the client’s needs as documented in the case management plan of care, evidence-based practice guidelines, care goals, and effective and efficient use of health care and financial resources (CMSA, 2010).
G. This chapter addresses case management practice, which requires knowledge of and proficiency in the following practice standards: Assessment, Problem/Opportunity Identification, Planning, Monitoring, Outcomes, and Facilitation/Coordination and Collaboration.
Case Management Care Planning and Plans of Care
A. Historically, case management was considered a social worker function due to early efforts of settlement houses of the late 1800s and early 1900s. Residents and volunteers of early settlement houses helped create and foster new organizations and social welfare programs, some of which continue to the present time. Settlements were action oriented where programs and services were added as neighborhood needs were discovered. For example, social workers assisted people in the settlements in addressing poverty and health issues in an effort to enhance their quality of life.
B. In the late 1980s, case management care planning became more aligned as a nursing responsibility due to legislative and regulatory requirements. Conceptualizing case management as either social work or nursing is inaccurate; doing so does not effectively capture the spirit of the intervention, nor is it inclusive of an interdisciplinary care team approach.
C. Case managers understand that care planning must include all members of the health care team, especially the patient. Because planning is an
essential part of the case manager’s work, it has been highlighted as a component of the case management process and identified as a practice standard.
essential part of the case manager’s work, it has been highlighted as a component of the case management process and identified as a practice standard.
Case Management Process
Development of the case management plan
Establish goals of the case management intervention and prioritize client needs by helping to determine types of services and resources required to meet identified needs (CMSA, 2010)
Case Management Practice Standard of Planning
Identifies immediate, short-term, long-term, and ongoing needs.
Develops appropriate and necessary case management strategies and goals to address those needs (CMSA, 2010).
The case manager and client are best served when the fundamental components of appropriate case management care planning, as documented in CMSA’s Standards of Practice, are applied.
D. Case management care plans are tools to define practice and as guides for patient care activities (Tahan, 2002). Plans should be patient-specific, action-oriented, and time-defined.
The end result of case management care planning is a patientcentered, patient-agreed-upon plan of care that has realistic, achievable goals and focuses on patient self-management and safe, quality outcomes.
Use of SMART methodology to determine or develop goals is an efficient approach.
Goals should be
Specific
Measurable
Attainable
Realistic/Reasonable
Time period specific (Doran, 1981)
One of the most significant responsibilities for a case manager is the development of a case management plan.
E. Tahan (2002) identified a number of characteristics of a case management plans that are helpful for case managers to be aware of and consider when developing and implement case management plans for their patients (Box 21-1).
F. An effective case management plan is a specific document (or electronic equivalent) that delineates
Individual care needs (e.g., diagnostic, therapeutic, social)
Actions required and responsible party (e.g., case manager, patient, caregiver, care team member)
Short- and long-term goals with completion and/or progress time frames for attainment
Anticipated outcomes (e.g., knowledge gained, self-management skill, adherence)
G. The uses of a case management plan include
Cost-effectiveness and reduction in lengths of stay
Improved quality of care and customer satisfaction
Better allocation of resources and coordination of services that result in eliminating redundancy, fragmentation, and duplication of care activities
Clearly defined plans of care and delineation of responsibilities
Improved communication systems among the various disciplines
BOX 21-1 Characteristics of Case Management Plans of Care
Each plan addresses a specific diagnosis, surgical procedure, or a phase in the care needed.
The plans represent a time line of patient care activities based on the clinical service. This could be minutes or hours in the emergency department; days in the acute care setting; weeks in the neonatal intensive care unit; months in long-term care facilities; or visit-by-visit in ambulatory or home care settings.
The plans include well-defined milestones or trigger points that aid in expediting care and indicate an impending change in care activities (i.e., switching from intravenous to oral antibiotics when temperature is within normal range for 24 hours).
The length of each plan depends on a predetermined length of stay based on the diagnosis/procedure and reimbursement rules, guidelines, and mechanisms.
The plans clearly delineate the responsibilities of the various health care team members as they relate to each particular department.
The plans identify the outcome indicators or quality measures used to evaluate the appropriateness and effectiveness of care.
Each plan may include a specific variance tracking section to evaluate any delays in care activities/processes/outcomes.
The plans may be used as one strategy to ensure compliance with the standards of care of regulatory and accreditation agencies.
The plans are interdisciplinary in nature, a mechanism that reinforces a seamless approach to the delivery of care.Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree