Storytelling



Storytelling


Margaret P. Moss



The art and science of storytelling is presented in this chapter as a mechanism that can be used in alternative or complementary therapy. Its historical roots in orality (also known as oralism) are defined and explicated through examples from primary oral cultures. These are cultures that do not have a written language system (Sampson, 1980). In direct contrast, taking the art form into the future, digital storytelling is explored. Storytelling is then connected to its use as an alternative method in which to affect the path of one’s health in terms of education, prevention, and intervention. Finally, concrete recommendations for health professionals close out the chapter.




SCIENTIFIC BASIS

Storytelling “is one of the world’s most powerful tools for achieving astonishing results” in almost any industry (Guber, 2007, p. 55). Through an implicit contract between the storyteller and the listener (Guber, 2007), time is always a necessary ingredient. The storyteller must take the time to fully tell a story through all of its parts, using the necessary gestures, processes, and aesthetics. A story, as a sequence of events with discernible relations between those events and culminating in some conclusion, is a cognitive package (Bergner, 2007) that can be given to the listener. The listener must make time available to be present within the story to hear the message and absorb it. Successful transmission will allow the listener to repeat the story to others in some form. Repetition, of course, leads to stronger transmission on both sides.

Effective storytellers understand their listener(s) and what they already know, what they care about, and what they want to hear (Guber, 2007). The great storyteller will guide the story through essential elements based on the listener’s understanding that the story is larger than the teller (Guber, 2007).



Language and Healing Beyond Health Literacy

“One of the few universals is that humans in all known cultures use language and tell stories” (Ramirez-Esparza & Pennebaker, 2006, p. 216). Storytelling without language is not possible. “Language embodies cultural reality” (Kramsch, 1998, p. 3). Language itself and healing may have a connection not yet fully explored or understood, beyond health literacy bounds. Most of the literature involving language and health surround the idea of health literacy, which has been defined as, “the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic health information and services needed to make appropriate health decisions” (Nielsen-Bohlman, Panzer, & Kindig, 2004, p. 4). Although evidence points to greater understanding of health services and all that entails when spoken in the receiver’s primary language (Koh et al., 2012), language as a healing tool and force are offered for consideration in this section.

In many indigenous cultures, for example, medicine and religion lines blur (Moss, 2000). Healing prayers are taken as a means toward optimum health whether in the physical, mental, spiritual, or emotional domain (Moss, 2000). These prayers are likely conducted in the traditional language. A recent study from South Africa offers that, “language creates an image of the unknown to which people attach meaning” (Lourens, 2013, abstract). There is comfort in hearing one’s own language. It takes away a struggle and the required energy needed to accept either information or prayer, presumably then, allowing more energy to be used for healing.

Whereas indigenous examples of language use in prayer and healing may be specifically seen as other examples, the dominant cultures also use language in healing and prayer beyond their use as delivery of information only. We see this in the change in tone, speed, earnestness, and length of delivery that exceeds any aesthetic needed to merely deliver information. This can be from a mother to a sick child, a prayer group to a member, or other cultural convention or relationship.


American Indian Exemplar

The Zuni Indians of New Mexico use storytelling through all parts of their lives. It is used casually and formally. It is used in secular and sacred telling. The teller can be a priest, a kiva group, a grandmother, or another person. A kiva is a “medicine (i.e., priestly) society” to which men are initiated as youths and remain to carry out the work of the kiva (Moss, 2000). The purpose of the dances they perform can be solely to heal listeners from sickness. Through word of mouth, the news may spread that a Rain Dance is called. Unlike what Hollywood portrays, this dance calls listeners to one of the small plazas (flat dirt squares) in the village where they can receive needed healing prayers.


Time is part of the contract. The listener arrives at a loosely determined time and waits. The dancers and lead teller arrive some time later. The teller knows why the listeners are there: the contract is intact. There is respectful listening and targeted telling. The telling is in the form of prayer, song, and dance. The team is in full regalia, with masks and dress from centuries of performances. A formula is employed in the telling. It can take hours. The teller(s), the process, and the aesthetics all come together in dance, silence, and singing to heal the listener.


Jul 14, 2016 | Posted by in NURSING | Comments Off on Storytelling

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access