Standard 6. Evaluation



Standard 6. Evaluation


Janet Y. Harris MSN, RN, CNAA-BC

Kim W. Hoover PhD, RN



Standard 6. Evaluation. The registered nurse evaluates progress toward attainment of outcomes.


Definition and Explanation of the Standard

The evaluation component rounds out the Standards of Practice and the six elements of nursing process: assessment, diagnosis, outcomes identification, planning, implementation, and evaluation. Evaluation, the component of interest in this chapter, is defined as “the process of determining the progress toward attainment of expected outcomes, including the effectiveness of care” (ANA, 2010, p. 65). Evaluation is accomplished through direct observation; through interviews with the healthcare consumer, family, and/caregiver; and through reviews of record documentation including progress notes, flow sheets, and results and reports from other departments. In Standard 3, Outcomes Identification, the registered nurse (RN) identifies expected outcomes for a plan individualized to the healthcare consumer or situation. Nurses must create a collective system of accountability by evaluating outcomes through constant evaluation and re-evaluation and adjustment in collaboration with others. Those outcomes may be related to the standards of care, the process of care, or the outcomes of care. Benner, Sutphen, Leonard, and Day (2010) tell us that nurses must ask the right questions, find the right information to answer those questions, and make the best decision on the basis of that information through clinical reasoning. Without the ability to appropriately
evaluate, the RN is simply following orders and can potentially cause a breakdown in the entire system of care.

Practice imperatives were established as early as 2001, when the Institute of Medicine (IOM) published Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. This book called for safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, efficient, and equitable care. The RN and the advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) are critical to the evaluation of those patient outcomes.

The RN provides a systematic, criterion-based evaluation of outcomes prescribed by the plan of care and within the specified time frame. The RN conducts the evaluation in partnership with the healthcare consumer and his or her family or caregivers. The RN also collaborates with other healthcare providers involved with the plan of care to evaluate whether nursing interventions are appropriate and affecting outcomes. During the evaluation, the nurse assesses whether the patient’s outcomes have been achieved. The outcomes are met, partially met, or not met at all, and conclusions are drawn about the status of the problem to see if problems are resolved, revised, or continue. The nurse determines if the original diagnoses were correct, if they need to be revised, or if the priorities need to be revisited to meet changing demands. This ongoing assessment determines how well the plan of care is working, if the interventions are effective, if new data are necessary to make the correct evaluation, and if the plan of care needs to be modified. The evaluation depends on all other phases of the nursing process.

The graduate-level prepared specialty nurse and the APRN are expected to evaluate systems more broadly to “determine the effect of the plan on healthcare consumers, families, groups, communities, and institutions” (ANA, 2010, p. 46). Therefore, the advanced practice nurse must evaluate the accuracy of the diagnoses and outcomes demonstrated. Synthesis for those advanced nurses includes a focus on population that includes families, communities, organizations, and systems. Results at this advanced level often focus on policy, process, or protocol revision to affect the larger population of patients or consumers.


Application of the Standard in Practice


Education

Education program standards, outlined by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and the National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission (NLNAC), require that graduate and undergraduate curricula incorporate patient safety and quality improvement content, ranging from
using evaluation data to improving patient care while assisting in the design and implementation of new models of care delivery and subsequent evaluation. Criteria listed for nursing practice necessitate an increased level of accountability for APRNs (AACN, 2010a, 2010b, 2011). The National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) competencies include analyzing data, forming an evidence-based action plan, initiating the plan, and evaluating the outcomes of care (NONPF, 2006).

Including a strong component of evaluation in curriculum development, evaluation of students’ achievement of learning goals, and evaluation of students by their peers will be aided by evidence-based practice information. This information that can be accessed electronically through reliable sources, such as the Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN, 2011), which was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI, 2011); and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI, 2011). A number of tools, such as case studies, standardized patient scenarios, clinical simulation, course content, and electronic health record systems, are available to assist educators teach sound evaluation methods that result in quality improvement. Educators are obligated not only to teach evaluation skills, but also to use them in practice. The use of process improvement tools, including root cause analysis (RCA), models appropriate evaluation standards.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 1, 2016 | Posted by in NURSING | Comments Off on Standard 6. Evaluation

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access