Introduction: Pain Assessment
The International Association for the Study of Pain (
IASP, 2017) defines pain as a combined sensory, emotional, and cognitive phenomenon: “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience that we primarily associate with tissue damage or describe in terms of such damage, or both.” Pain is a personal, subjective experience influenced by cultural beliefs and other psychological variables (
IASP, 2017). Pain is the most common symptom that brings patients to see a provider, and it is often the first sign of an ongoing pathologic process. Depending on the individual circumstances, the same physical lesion or disease state can produce different levels of pain and need for pain relief.
Pain medicine has been shaped largely by the biopsychosocial model, first identified by Gordon Waddell in 1987. The biopsychosocial model established that clinicians need to understand pain from the biomedical perspective as well as the impact of the patient’s perception and their social context. Pain includes three distinct components: a sensory-discriminatory component, a motivational-affective component, and a cognitive-evaluative component. This framework requires that you have an
understanding of the characteristics of the pain, the psychological responses to pain, how and why the pain has changed this person’s life, and the implications for recovery (
Azari, Zevin, & Potter, 2007).
Pain management has more recently been shaped by patient- and family-centered care. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality produced a guide of evidence-based strategies through its Patient and Family Advisory Council that promotes patient- and family-centered care and includes the domain of pain management. Evaluation of the patients’ perspective of a need for help with pain-centered care and healthcare providers’ focus on pain management revealed major gaps in care. Patients focused on pain assessment, explanation of therapies, and adjunct therapies. Healthcare providers focused on aspects such as medication administration, or reduction in call light usage. Based on their evaluation, the council created a bundle of strategies that may guide development of a personalized plan of care for pain management. These strategies include a redesigned pain management assessment, a menu of pain control, and comfort options (
Bookout, Staffileno, & Budzinsky, 2016).
For everyday clinical practice, it is necessary to have outcome measures that are practical and comprehensive enough to be easily used for all patients. Your initial assessment must establish if the pain is acute or chronic and the adverse effects it has created for the patient including physiologic, emotional, and psychological aspects. Your assessment must be systematic, comprehensive, and include evaluation of all the following: (1) type, (2) frequency, (3) location, (4) intensity, (5) modifying factors, (6) effects of treatments, (7) functional impact, and (8) psychosocial impact on the patient. There are multiple instruments available to assess pain. A comprehensive approach to the measurement of pain will include a combination of instruments such as verbal rating scales, numeric rating scales (NRSs), behavioral observation scales, and physiologic responses (
Fink, 2000;
Gomella & Haist, 2007;
Melzack & Katz, 2001;
Turk et al., 2003).
One example of a comprehensive approach is based on the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (
Turk et al., 2003) recommendations. The IMMPACT recommended six core outcome domains: pain, physical functioning, emotional functioning, patient ratings of improvement and satisfaction with treatment, other symptoms and adverse events during treatment, and patient’s disposition and characteristics data (
Table 3-1;
Turk et al., 2003).
Based on the IMMPACT recommendations, the Norwegian Pain Society created a 4-page, 31-item screening questionnaire that covers the IMMPACT-recommended outcome domains. The questionnaire includes questions on coping and catastrophizing, health-related quality of life, economic impact of the pain condition, social security status, and any ongoing litigation or compensation process (
Turk et al., 2003).